To be, or not to be, that is not the question: external researchers in emancipatory action research

References

• Anderson, G. L., and K. Herr. 1999. “The New Paradigm Wars: Is There Room for Rigorous Practitioner Knowledge in Schools and Universities? ” Educational Researcher 28 (5): 12–21. 40 doi:10.3102/0013189X028005012.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, H., P. Mirvis, E. Neilsen, and W. Pasmore. 2008. “Action Research at Work: Creating the Future following the Path from Lewin.” In The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, 2nd ed., edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 77–93. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. London, UK: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 2005. “Staying Critical.” Educational Action Research 13 (3): 347–358. doi:10.1080/09650790500200316.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlström, L., and B. Lemma. 2008. “Critical Perspectives on Teacher Education in Neoliberal Times: Experiences from Ethiopia and Namibia.” Southern African Review44 of Education 14 (1–2): 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Forsman, L., G. Karlberg-Granlund, M. Pörn, P. Salo, and J. Aspfors. 2014. “From Transmission to site-based Professional Development: On the Art of Combining Research with Facilitation.” In Lost in Practice: Transforming Nordic Educational Action Research, edited by K. Rönnerman and P. Salo, 113–132. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Forssten Seiser, A. 2020. “Exploring Enhanced Pedagogical Leadership: An Action Research Study Involving Swedish Principals.” Educational Action Research 28 (5): 791–806. doi:10.1080/09650792.2019.1656661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsen, B. 1996. “Action Research, Democratic Dialogue and the Issue of “Critical Mass” in Change.” Qualitative Inquiry 2 (1): 90–103. doi:10.1177/107780049600200113.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsen, B. 2001. “Theory and Practice: The Mediating Discourse.” In Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry & Practice, edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 17–26. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsen, B., A. Hansson, and T. U. Qvale. 2008. “Action Research and the Challenge of Scope.” In The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, 2nd ed., edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 64–77. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 2005. “Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and the Public Sphere.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research,3rd ed., edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 559–604. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. 2006. “Participatory Action Research and the Public Sphere.” Educational Action Research 14 (4): 459–476. doi:10.1080/09650790600975593.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. 2014. “Reflections on How the Theory of Practice Architectures Is Being Used in the Nordic Context.” In Lost in Practice: Transforming Nordic Educational Action Research, edited by K. Rönnerman and P. Salo, 205–217. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Langelotz, L., and K. Rönnerman. 2014. “The Practice of Peer Group Mentoring: Traces of Global Changes and Regional Traditions.” In Lost in Practice: Transforming Nordic Educational Action Research, edited by K. Rönnerman and P. Salo, 75–93. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lendahl Rosendahl, B., and K. Rönnerman. 2006. “Facilitating School Improvement: The Problematic Relationship between Researchers and Practitioners.” Journal of In-Service Education 32 (4): 497–509. doi:10.1080/13674580601024457.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J. 1997. Action Research: Principles and Practice. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Noffke, S. E. 1997. “Professional, Personal and Political Dimensions of Action Research.” Review of Research in Education 22: 305–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noffke, S. E. 2009. “Revisiting the Professional, Personal and Political of Action Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research, edited by S. E. Noffke and B. Somekh, 6–23. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnerman, K., P. Salo, and E. M. Furu. 2008. “Action Research in Nordic Countries: A Way to See Possibilities.” In Nurturing Praxis: Action Research in Partnerships between School and University in a Nordic Light, edited by K. Rönnerman, E. M. Furu, and P. Salo, 21–37. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Salo, P., and K. Rönnerman. 2014. “The Nordic Tradition of Educational Action Research: In the Light of Practice Architectures.” In Lost in Practice: Transforming Nordic Educational Action Research, edited by K. Rönnerman and P. Salo, 53–71. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B., and K. Zeichner. 2009. “Action Research for Educational Reform: Remodeling Action Research Theories and Practices in Local Contexts.” Educational Action Research 17 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1080/09650790802667402.
   Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. 1990. Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. London, ON: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wennergren, A-C. 2014. “The Power of risk-taking in Professional Learning.” In Lost in Practice: Transforming Nordic Educational Action Research, edited by K. Rönnerman and P. Salo, 133–151. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., D. Fyn, L. Langelotz, J. Lönngren, L. McCorquodale, and J. Nehez. 2014. “Our Way(s) to Action Research: Doctoral Students’ International and Interdisciplinary Collective Memory Work.” Action Research 12 (3): 293–314. doi:10.1177/1476750314534452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuber-Skerritt, O. 1992. Action Research in Higher Education: Examples and Reflections. London, UK: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar