Meaning-making in an intergenerational project: a dialogic narrative analysis of young children’s interactions with older adults

References

• Age UK. 2018. All the Lonely People: Loneliness in Later Life. Accessed March 16 2021. https://www.ageuk.org.uk/globalassets/age-uk/documents/reports-andpublications/reports-and-briefings/loneliness/loneliness-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. [Edited by Michael Holquest]. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. (C. Emmerson, Trans.). Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., and G. Kress. 2008. “Writing in Multimodal Texts: A Social Semiotic Account of Designs for Learning.” Written Communication 25 (2): 166–195. doi:10.1177/0741088307313177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boivin, N. 2021. “Co-participatory Multimodal Intergenerational Storytelling: Preschool Children’s Relationship with Modality Creating Elder Inclusion.” Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 0 (0): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Association [BERA]. 2018. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research, 4th edition. Accessed 25 August 2021. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, S. 2020. “Stronger Together? Intergenerational Connection and Covid-19.” Quality in Aging and Older Adults 21 (4): 253–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Aging Better. 2020. Doddery but dear? Examining age-related stereotypes. Accessed August 31 2021. https://www.ageing-better.org.uk/publications/doddery-dear-examining-age-related-stereotypes.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. 2009. “The Heteroglossic World of Pre-Schoolers’ Pretend Play.” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 10 (4): 331–342.
   Google Scholar
• Cortellesi, G., and M. Kernan. 2016. “Together Old and Young: How Informal Contact Between Young Children and Older People Lead to Intergenerational Solidarity.” Studia Paedagogica 21 (2): 101–116.
   Google Scholar
• De Vocht, L. 2015. “Reconceptualising Teacher-Child Dialogue in Early Years Education as a Moral Answerability.” International Journal of Early Childhood 47 (2): 317–330.
   Google Scholar
• Drury, L., D. Abrams, and H. Swift. 2017. Making intergenerational connections – an evidence review. Accessed 16 March 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318223654_Making_intergenerational_connections_What_are_they_why_do_they_matter_and_how_to_make_more_of_them.
   Google Scholar
• Fair, C., and E. Delaplane. 2015. ““It is Good to Spend Time with Older Adults. You Can Teach Them, They Can Teach You”: Second Grade Students Reflect on Intergenerational Service Learning.” Early Childhood Educational Journal 43 (1): 19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flewitt, R., S. Price, and T. Korkiakangas. 2019. “Multimodality: Methodological Explorations.” Qualitative Research 19 (1): 3–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Heydon, R. 2007. “Making Meaning Together: Multi-Modal Literacy Learning Opportunities in an Intergenerational Art Programme.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 39 (1): 35–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydon, R., L. McKee, and S. O’Neill. 2018. “Singing Our Song: The Affordances of Singing in an Intergenerational, Multimodal Literacy Programme.” Literacy 52 (3): 128–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, B., and G. Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., and L. Christensen. 2012. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Approaches. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Khanum, R., and E. Theodotou. 2019. “A Comparative Study of Multimodal Approaches to Learning: to Support Children’s Learning in the Early Years.” Research in Teacher Education 9 (2): 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurban, F., and J. Tobin. 2009. “They Don’t Like Us: Reflections of Turkish Children in a German Preschool.” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 10 (1): 24–34.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, H., M. Bamberg, J. Creswell, D. Frost, R. Josselson, and C. Suárez-Orozco. 2018. “Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report.” American Psychologist 73 (1): 26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Makaton Charity. 2021. What is Makaton? Accessed 30 May 2021. https://makaton.org/TMC/About_Makaton/What_is_Makaton.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K., and L. Unsworth. 2017. “Multimodal Literacy.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, edited by G. Noblit , pp 1–45, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. 2005. “Quality and Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research in Counseling Psychology.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 52: 250–260. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherji, P., and D. Albon. 2015. Research Methods in Early Childhood. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pascal, C., T. Bertram, C. Cullinane, and E. Holt-White. 2020. Covid-19 and social mobility impact brief 4: Early Years. Accessed 16 March 2021. https://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Early-Years-Impact-Brief.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. 2008. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, R. 2015. “Children’s Violently Themed Play and Adult Imaginaries of Childhood: a Bakhtinian Analysis.” International Journal of Early Childhood 47 (2): 235–250.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M. 2020. Baby shark becomes You Tube’s most-watched video of all time, BBC News. Accessed 25 August 2021. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-54783116.
   Google Scholar
• Shirkhani, F., A. Jamali-Nesari, and N. Feilinezhad. 2015. “Bakhtinian Dialogic Concept in Language Learning Process.” Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences 205: 510–515.
   Google Scholar
• Springate, I., M. Atkinson, and K. Martin. 2008. Intergenerational practice – a review of the literature. Accessed 16 March 2021. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/LIG01/LIG01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Volsoninov, V. 1986. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. 1953. “Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena - A Study of the First Not-Me Possession1.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 34: 89–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington, M., and B. van Oers. 2017. “Children’s Social Literacies: Meaning Making and the Emergence of Graphical Signs and Texts in Pretence.” Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 17 (2): 147–175. doi:10.1177/1468798415618534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yelland, N., L. Lee, M. O’Rouke, and C. Harrison. 2008. Rethinking Learning in Early Childhood Education. Maidenhead: Open University press.
   Google Scholar