Normative and behavioural economics: a historical and methodological review

References

• Afriat, S. N. 1967. “The Construction of Utility Functions from Expenditure Data.” International Economic Review 8 (1): 67–77. doi:10.2307/2525382.
   Google Scholar
• Afriat, S. N. 1973. “On a System of Inequalities in Demand Analysis: An Extension of the Classical Method.” International Economic Review 14 (2): 460–472. doi:10.2307/2525934.
   Google Scholar
• Allais, M. 1953. “Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’Ecole Americaine.” Econometrica 21 (4): 503–546. doi:10.2307/1907921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apesteguia, J., and M. A. Ballester. 2015. “A Measure of Rationality and Welfare.” Journal of Political Economy 123 (6): 1278–1310. doi:10.1086/683838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arneson, R. J. 1990. “Liberalism, Distributive Subjectivism, and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (2): 158–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. 1959. “Rational Choice Functions and Orderings.” Economica 26 (102): 121–127. doi:10.2307/2550390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baujard, A. 2010. “Collective Interest versus Individual Interest in Bentham’s Felicific calculus. Questioning Welfarism and Fairness.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17 (4): 607–634. doi:10.1080/09672567.2010.483067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benartzi, S., and R. H. Thaler. 2002. “How Much is Investor Autonomy Worth?” The Journal of Finance 57 (4): 1593–1616. doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, D. J., M. A. Fontana, and M. S. Kimball. 2020. “Reconsidering Risk Aversion.” Working Paper 28007. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. 1780. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, N. 2003. “Normative Behavioral Economics.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 32 (4): 411–427. doi:10.1016/S1053-5357(03)00049-0.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, N., and G. Gigerenzer. 2010. “As-If Behavioral Economics: Neoclassical Economics in Disguise?” History of Economic Ideas 18 (1): 133–165.
   Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D. 2009. “Behavioral Welfare Economics.” Journal of the European Economic Association 7 (2–3): 267–319. doi:10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D. 2016. “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: A Unified Approach to Behavioral Welfare Economics.” Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 7 (1): 12–68. doi:10.1017/bca.2016.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D. 2021. “In Defense of Behavioral Welfare Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 28 (4): 385–400. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2021.1988133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D., and A. Rangel. 2007. “Toward Choice-Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics.” American Economic Review 97 (2): 464–470. doi:10.1257/aer.97.2.464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D., and A. Rangel. 2008. “Choice-Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics.” In The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics, edited by A. Caplin and A. Schotter, 155–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D., and A. Rangel. 2009. “Beyond Revealed Preference: Choice-Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (1): 51–104. doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beshears, J., J. J. Choi, D. Laibson, and B. C. Madrian. 2008. “How Are Preferences Revealed?” Journal of Public Economics 92 (8–9): 1787–1794. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.04.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt, V., M. Ogaki, and Y. Yaguchi. 2015. “Normative Behavioural Economics Based on Unconditional Love and Moral Virtue.” Japanese Economic Review 66 (2): 226–246. doi:10.1111/jere.12067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt, H., J. L. Pinto, and P. P. Wakker. 2001. “Making Descriptive Use of Prospect Theory to Improve the Prescriptive Use of Expected Utility.” Management Science 47 (11): 1498–1514. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.11.1498.10248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossert, W., P. K. Pattanaik, and Y. Xu. 2003. “Similarity of Options and the Measurement of Diversity.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (4): 405–421. doi:10.1177/0951692803154004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botti, S., and S. S. Iyengar. 2006. “The Dark Side of Choice: When Choice Impairs Social Welfare.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 25 (1): 24–38. doi:10.1509/jppm.25.1.24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breig, Z., and P. Feldman. 2023. “Revealing Risky Mistakes Through Revisions.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. 1964. “What Should Economists Do?” Southern Economic Journal 30 (3): 213–222. doi:10.2307/1055931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. 1987. “The Constitution of Economic Policy.” The American Economic Review 77 (3): 243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, Colin, Samuel Issacharoff, George Loewenstein, Ted O’Donoghue, and Matthew Rabin. 2003. “Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for “Asymmetric Paternalism.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151 (3): 1211–1254. doi:10.2307/3312889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernev, Alexander, Ulf Böckenholt, and Joseph Goodman. 2015. “Choice Overload: A Conceptual Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 25 (2): 333–358. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, P. S., and S. Ghosal. 2011. “Behavioral Decisions and Policy.” CESifo Economic Studies 57 (4): 560–580. doi:10.1093/cesifo/ifr015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, P. S., and S. Ghosal. 2012. “Decisions with Endogenous Frames.” Social Choice and Welfare 38 (4): 585–600. doi:10.1007/s00355-011-0623-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danchev, S. 2016. “Was Bentham a Primitive Rational Choice Theory Predecessor?” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (2): 297–322. doi:10.1080/09672567.2014.916728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DellaVigna, S. 2009. “Psychology and Economics: Evidence From the Field.” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (2): 315–372. doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhami, S. S. 2016. The Foundations of Behavioral Economic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, P., and D. Kahneman. 2008. “Interpretations of Utility and Their Implications for the Valuation of Health.” The Economic Journal 118 (525): 215–234. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02110.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dold, M. F., and M. J. Rizzo. 2021. “The Limits of Opportunity-Only: Context-Dependence and Agency in Behavioral Welfare Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 28 (4): 364–373. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2021.1988132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dold, M. F., and C. Schubert. 2018. “Toward a Behavioral Foundation of Normative Economics.” Review of Behavioral Economics 5 (3–4): 221–241. doi:10.1561/105.00000097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dold, M. F., and A. Stanton. 2021. “I Choose for Myself, Therefore I Am: The Contours of Existentialist Welfare Economics.” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 14 (1): 1–29. doi:10.23941/ejpe.v14i1.470.
   Google Scholar
• Dziewulski, P. 2020. “Just-Noticeable Difference as a Behavioural Foundation of the Critical Cost-Efficiency Index.” Journal of Economic Theory 188: 105071. doi:10.1016/j.jet.2020.105071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgeworth, F. Y. 1881. Mathematical Psychics. London: C. Kegan Paul & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 1998. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 2000. Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 2016. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, B. 1995. “On the Relationship between True Preference and Actual Choice.” Social Choice and Welfare 12 (4): 353–361. doi:10.1007/BF00186279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleurbaey, M., and P. Hammond. 2004. “Interpersonally Comparable Utility.” In Handbook of Utility Theory: Volume 2 Extensions, edited by S. Barbera, P. Hammond, and C. Seidlr, 1179–1285. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L., and D. Kahneman. 1993. “Duration Neglect in Retrospective Evaluations of Affective Episodes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (1): 45–55. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier, D. 1986. Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. 1992. “Laundering Preferences.” In Foundations of Social Choice Theory (reprinted ed., edited by J. Elster and A. Hylland, 75–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grüne-Yanoff, Till. 2012. “Old Wine in New Casks: Libertarian Paternalism Still Violates Liberal Principles.” Social Choice and Welfare 38 (4): 635–645. doi:10.1007/s00355-011-0636-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüne-Yanoff, Till. 2022. “What Preferences for Behavioral Welfare Economics?” Journal of Economic Methodology 29 (2): 153–165. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2022.2061721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. 2015. Inside the Nudge Unit: How Small Changes Can Make a Big Difference. London: Allen.
   Google Scholar
• Hands, D. 2013. “Foundations of Contemporary Revealed Preference Theory.” Erkenntnis 78 (5): 1081–1108. doi:10.1007/s10670-012-9395-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hands, D. W. 2010. “Economics, Psychology and the History of Consumer Choice Theory.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (4): 633–648. doi:10.1093/cje/bep045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hands, D. W. 2014. “Normative Ecological Rationality: Normative Rationality in the Fast-and-Frugal-Heuristics Research Program.” Journal of Economic Methodology 21 (4): 396–410. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2014.965907.
   Google Scholar
• Harsanyi, J. C. 1977. “Rule Utilitarianism and Decision Theory.” Erkenntnis 11 (1): 25–53. doi:10.1007/BF00169843.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. M. 2012. Preference, Value, Choice, and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. M. 2016. “On the Econ Within.” Journal of Economic Methodology 23 (1): 26–32. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2015.1070525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hédoin, Cyril. 2015. “From Utilitarianism to Paternalism: When Behavioral Economics Meets Moral Philosophy.” Revue de Philosophie Économique 16 (2): 73–106. doi:10.3917/rpec.162.0073.
   Google Scholar
• Hédoin, Cyril. 2017. “Normative Economics and Paternalism: The Problem with the Preference-Satisfaction Account of Welfare.” Constitutional Political Economy 28 (3): 286–310. doi:10.1007/s10602-016-9227-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heukelom, F. 2014. Behavioral Economics: A History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R., and R. G. D. Allen. 1934. “A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value. Part I.” Economica 1 (1): 52–76. doi:10.2307/2548574.
   Google Scholar
• Houthakker, H. S. 1950. “Revealed Preference and the Utility Function.” Economica 17 (66): 159–174. doi:10.2307/2549382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtman, M., and J. Maks. 1985. “Determining All Maximal Data Subsets Consistent with Revealed Preference.” International Economic Review 19: 89–104.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J. M. C. 2005. “Is More Choice Always Desirable? Evidence and Arguments from Leks, Food Selection, and Environmental Enrichment.” Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 80 (1): 73–92. doi:10.1017/s1464793104006554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante, G., G. Lecouteux, and R. Sugden. 2016. “Preference Purification and the Inner Rational Agent: A Critique of the Conventional Wisdom of Behavioural Welfare Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 23 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2015.1070527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. S., and M. R. Lepper. 2000. “When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (6): 995–1006. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jevons, W. 1871. The Theory of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jullien, D. 2016. “All Frames Created Equal Are Not Identical: On the Structure of Kahneman and Tversky’s Framing Effects.” OEconomia 6 (6–2): 265–291. doi:10.4000/oeconomia.2364.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 1994. “New Challenges to the Rationality Assumption.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 150 (1): 18–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 1999. “Objective Happiness.” In Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, edited by D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz, 3–25. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2000. “Experienced Utility and Objective Happiness: A Moment-Based Approach.” In (Eds.), Choices, Values, and Frames, edited by D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, 673–692. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2018. “Why Nobel Prize Winner Daniel Kahneman Gave Up On Happiness (Interview).” Accessed August 1, 2020. https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-why-nobel-prize-winner-daniel-kahneman-gave-up-on-happiness-1.6528513
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., B. L. Fredrickson, C. A. Schreiber, and D. A. Redelmeier. 1993. “When More Pain is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End.” Psychological Science 4 (6): 401–405. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00589.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. B. Krueger. 2006. “Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (1): 3–24. doi:10.1257/089533006776526030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., A. B. Krueger, D. A. Schkade, N. Schwarz, and A. A. Stone. 2004. “A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 306 (5702): 1776–1780. doi:10.1126/science.1103572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and J. Snell. 1990. “Predicting Utility.” In Insights in Decision Making: A Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn, edited by R. M. Hogarth, 295–310. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and J. S. Snell. 1992. “Predicting a Changing Taste: Do People Know What They Will Like?” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 5 (3): 187–200. doi:10.1002/bdm.3960050304.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and R. Sugden. 2005. “Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 32 (1): 161–181. doi:10.1007/s10640-005-6032-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and R. H. Thaler. 2006. “Anomalies: Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (1): 221–234. doi:10.1257/089533006776526076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and C. Varey. 1991. “Notes on the Psychology of Utility.” In Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being, edited by J. Elster and J. E. Roemer, 127–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., P. P. Wakker, and R. Sarin. 1997. “Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2): 375–406. doi:10.1162/003355397555235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, Y.-F., and K. V. Velupillai. 2015. “Behavioural Economics: Classical and Modern.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (2): 236–271. doi:10.1080/09672567.2013.792366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, N., G. Loewenstein, and J. McCafferty. 2004. “The Economics of Meaning.” Nordic Journal of Political Economy 30: 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Kőszegi, Botond, and Matthew Rabin. 2007. “Mistakes in Choice-Based Welfare Analysis.” American Economic Review 97 (2): 477–481. doi:10.1257/aer.97.2.477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köszegi, B., and M. Rabin. 2008. “Revealed Mistakes and Revealed Preferences.” In The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics, edited by A. Caplin and A. Schotter, 193–209. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lecouteux, G. 2015. “In Search of Lost Nudges.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (3): 397–408. doi:10.1007/s13164-015-0265-0.
   Google Scholar
• Lecouteux, G. 2016. “From Homo economicus to Homo psychologicus: The Paretian Foundations of Behavioural Paternalism.” Œconomia. History, Methodology, Philosophy 6 (2): 175–200.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. 1999. “Because It is There: The Challenge of Mountaineering … for Utility Theory.” Kyklos 52 (3): 315–343. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.1999.tb00221.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G., and E. Haisley. 2008. “The Economist as Therapist: Methodological Ramifications of “Light” Paternalism.” In The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics, edited by A. Caplin and A. Schotter, 210–245. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G., and P. A. Ubel. 2008. “Hedonic Adaptation and the Role of Decision and Experience Utility in Public Policy.” Journal of Public Economics 92 (8–9): 1795–1810. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCrimmon, K. R., and S. Larsson. 1979. “Utility Theory: Axioms versus ‘Paradoxes.” In Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox: Contemporary Discussions of the Decisions under Uncertainty with Allais’ Rejoinder, edited by M. Allais and O. Hagen, 333–409. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• MaCrimmon, K. R. 1968. “Descriptive and Normative Implications of the Decision-Theory Postulates.” In (Eds.), Risk and Uncertainty: Proceedings of a Conference Held by the International Economic Association, edited by K. Borch and J. Mossin, 3–32. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Madrian, B. C., and D. F. Shea. 2001. “The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (4): 1149–1187. doi:10.1162/003355301753265543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, P., and M. Mariotti. 2014. “Welfare Economics and Bounded Rationality: The Case for Model-Based Approaches.” Journal of Economic Methodology 21 (4): 343–360. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2014.965909.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. 1978. “Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice.” The Bell Journal of Economics 9 (2): 587–608. doi:10.2307/3003600.
   Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell, A. 1977. “The Recoverability of Consumers’ Preferences from Market Demand Behavior.” Econometrica 45 (6): 1409–1430. doi:10.2307/1912308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell, A. 1978. “On Revealed Preference Analysis.” The Review of Economic Studies 45 (1): 121–131. doi:10.2307/2297089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell, A., M. D. Whinston, and J. R. Green. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McQuillin, B., and R. Sugden. 2012. “Reconciling Normative and Behavioural Economics: The Problems to Be Solved.” Social Choice and Welfare 38 (4): 553–567. doi:10.1007/s00355-011-0627-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. 1859. On Liberty. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, G. 2005. “Libertarian Paternalism is an Oxymoron.” Northwestern University Law Review 99 (3): 1245–1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrouchev, I. 2019. “Normative Economics Without the Concept of Preference.” OEconomia 9 (9-1): 135–147. doi:10.4000/oeconomia.4578.
   Google Scholar
• Mitrouchev, I. 2023. From Decision Utility to Experienced Utility: Back and Forth. 2023 iRisk Working Paper 4. IESEG Working Paper Series 2023-iRisk-04, IÉSEG School of Management Lille Catholic University 3, rue de la Digue F-59000.
   Google Scholar
• Mitrouchev, I., and V. Buonomo. 2023. “Identity, Ethics and Behavioural Welfare Economics.” Economics and Philosophy. doi:10.1017/S0266267123000123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscati, I. 2018. Measuring Utility: From the Marginal Revolution to Behavioral Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, H. 1974. “Effects of Problem Representation and Feedback on Rational Behavior in Allais and Morlat-Type Problems.” Decision Sciences 5 (2): 225–242. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1974.tb00610.x.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K., and J. Rehbeck. 2022. “When Choices Are Mistakes.” American Economic Review 112 (7): 2237–2268. doi:10.1257/aer.20201550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogaki, M., and S. C. Tanaka. 2017. Behavioral Economics: Toward a New Economics by Integration with Traditional Economics. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pareto, V. 1909. Manuel d’Économie Politique. Paris: V. Giard & E. Brière.
   Google Scholar
• Pattanaik, P. K., and Y. Xu. 1990. “On Ranking Opportunity Sets in Terms of Freedom of Choice.” Recherches économiques de Louvain 56 (3–4): 383–390. doi:10.1017/S0770451800043955.
   Google Scholar
• Pattanaik, P. K., and Y. Xu. 2000. “On Diversity and Freedom of Choice.” Mathematical Social Sciences 40 (2): 123–130. doi:10.1016/S0165-4896(99)00043-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto-Prades, Jose-Luis, and Jose-Maria Abellan-Perpiñan. 2012. “When Normative and Descriptive Diverge: How to Bridge the Difference.” Social Choice and Welfare 38 (4): 569–584. doi:10.1007/s00355-012-0655-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabin, M. 1998. “Psychology and Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1): 11–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebonato, R. 2012. Taking Liberties: A Critical Examination of Libertarian Paternalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Redelmeier, D. A., and D. Kahneman. 1996. “Patients’ Memories of Painful Medical Treatments: Real-Time and Retrospective Evaluations of Two Minimally Invasive Procedures.” Pain 66 (1): 3–8. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(96)02994-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redelmeier, D. A., J. Katz, and D. Kahneman. 2003. “Memories of Colonoscopy: A Randomized Trial.” Pain 104 (1–2): 187–194. doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00003-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisch, L. A., and C. R. Sunstein. 2016. “Do Europeans Like Nudges?” Judgment and Decision Making 11 (4): 310–325. doi:10.1017/S1930297500003740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisch, L. A., C. R. Sunstein, and W. Gwozdz. 2017. “Beyond Carrots and Sticks: Europeans Support Health Nudges.” Food Policy.69: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo, M. J., and D. G. Whitman. 2009. “The Knowledge Problem of New Paternalism.” BYU Law Review 2009 (4): 905–968.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo, M. J., and D. G. Whitman. 2019. Escaping Paternalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, L. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: MacMillan & Co., Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, A., and Y. Salant. 2012. “Eliciting Welfare Preferences from Behavioural Data Sets.” The Review of Economic Studies 79 (1): 375–387. doi:10.1093/restud/rdr024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salant, Y., and A. Rubinstein. 2008. “(A, f): Choice with Frames.” Review of Economic Studies 75 (4): 1287–1296. doi:10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00510.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. 1938. “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer’s Behaviour.” Economica 5 (17): 61–71. doi:10.2307/2548836.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. 1948. “Consumption Theory in Terms of Revealed Preference.” Economica 15 (60): 243–253. doi:10.2307/2549561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, L. J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Scheibehenne, B., R. Greifeneder, and P. M. Todd. 2010. “Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice Overload.” Journal of Consumer Research 37 (3): 409–425. doi:10.1086/651235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, C. A., and D. Kahneman. 2000. “Determinants of the Remembered Utility of Aversive Sounds.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 129 (1): 27–42. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, C. 2015. “Opportunity and Preference Learning.” Economics and Philosophy 31 (2): 275–295. doi:10.1017/S0266267115000139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. (2004) 2016. The Paradox of Choice. Rev. ed. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Scoccia, D. 2019. “Paternalisms and Nudges.” Economics and Philosophy 35 (1): 79–102. doi:10.1017/S0266267118000093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1991. “Welfare, Preference and Freedom.” Journal of Econometrics 50 (1–2): 15–29. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(91)90087-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slesnick, D. T. 1998. “Empirical Approaches to the Measurement of Welfare.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (4): 2108–2165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., and A. Tversky. 1974. “Who Accepts Savage’s Axiom?” Behavioral Science 19 (6): 368–373. doi:10.1002/bs.3830190603.
   Google Scholar
• Slutsky, E. 1915. “Sulla Teoria Del Bilancio Del Consumatore.” Giornale degli Economisti e Rivista di Statistica 51 (Anno 26) (1): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 1759. Theory of Moral Sentiments. London: Printed for A. Millar.
   Google Scholar
• Sudgen, R. 1998. “The Metric of Opportunity.” Economics and Philosophy 14 (2): 307–337. doi:10.1017/S0266267100003874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. 1991. “Rational Choice: A Survey of Contributions from Economics and Philosophy.” The Economic Journal 101 (407): 751–785. doi:10.2307/2233854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. 2003. “Opportunity as a Space for Individuality: Its Value and the Impossibility of Measuring It.” Ethics 113 (4): 783–809. doi:10.1086/373953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. 2004. “The Opportunity Criterion: consumer Sovereignty Without the Assumption of Coherent Preferences.” American Economic Review 94 (4): 1014–1033. doi:10.1257/0002828042002714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. 2007. “The Value of Opportunities over Time When Preferences Are Unstable.” Social Choice and Welfare 29 (4): 665–682. doi:10.1007/s00355-007-0250-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. 2008. “Why Incoherent Preferences Do Not Justify Paternalism.” Constitutional Political Economy 19 (3): 226–248. doi:10.1007/s10602-008-9043-7.
   Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. 2010. “Opportunity as Mutual Advantage.” Economics and Philosophy 26 (1): 47–68. doi:10.1017/S0266267110000052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. 2017a. “Characterising Competitive Equilibrium in Terms of Opportunity.” Social Choice and Welfare 48 (3): 487–503. doi:10.1007/s00355-016-1015-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. 2017b. “Do People Really Want to Be Nudged Towards Healthy Lifestyles?” International Review of Economics 64 (2): 113–123. doi:10.1007/s12232-016-0264-1.
   Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. 2018. The Community of Advantage: A Behavioural Economist’s Defence of the Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. 2021. “A Response to Six Comments on the Community of Advantage.” Journal of Economic Methodology 28 (4): 419–430. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2021.1994634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. 2022. “Debiasing or Regularisation? Two Interpretations of the Concept of ‘True Preference’ in Behavioural Economics.” Theory and Decision 92 (3–4): 765–784. doi:10.1007/s11238-022-09876-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. 2015. “Nudges, Agency, and Abstraction: A Reply to Critics.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (3): 511–529. doi:10.1007/s13164-015-0266-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. 2019. On Freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R., L. A. Reisch, and M. Kaiser. 2019. “Trusting Nudges? Lessons from an International Survey.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (10): 1417–1443. doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1531912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H. 1980. “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1 (1): 39–60. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H. 2018. “From Cashews to Nudges: The Evolution of Behavioral Economics.” American Economic Review 108 (6): 1265–1287. doi:10.1257/aer.108.6.1265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., and S. Benartzi. 2004. “Save More tomorrowTM: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving.” Journal of Political Economy 112 (S1): S164–S187. doi:10.1086/380085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., and C. R. Sunstein. 2003. “Libertarian Paternalism.” American Economic Review 93 (2): 175–179. doi:10.1257/000282803321947001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., and C. R. Sunstein. 2009. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Revised and expanded ed. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thoma, J. 2021. “On the Possibility of an Anti-Paternalist Behavioural Welfare Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 28 (4): 350–363. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2021.1972128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1973. “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability.” Cognitive Psychology 5 (2): 207–232. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 185 (4157): 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 211 (4481): 453–458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hees, M. 2004. “Freedom of Choice and Diversity of Options: some Difficulties.” Social Choice and Welfare 22 (1): 253–266. doi:10.1007/s00355-003-0285-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varey, C. A., and D. Kahneman. 1992. “Experiences Extended Across Time: Evaluation of Moments and Episodes.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 5 (3): 169–185. doi:10.1002/bdm.3960050303.
   Google Scholar
• Varian, H. R. 1990. “Goodness-of-Fit in Optimizing Models.” Journal of Econometrics 46 (1-2): 125–140. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(90)90051-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varian, H. R. (1987) 2014. Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach. 9th ed. New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, B., and D. Hausman. 2010. “To Nudge or Not to Nudge?” Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1): 123–136. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00351.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitman, D. G., and M. J. Rizzo. 2015. “The Problematic Welfare Standards of Behavioral Paternalism.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (3): 409–425. doi:10.1007/s13164-015-0244-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar