Analysis on synergies and trade-offs in green building development: from the perspective of SDG 11

References

• Abu-Hijleh B, Jaheen N. 2019. Energy and economic impact of the New Dubai municipality green building regulations and potential upgrades of the regulations. Energy Strategy Rev. 24:51–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad T, Aibinu AA, André S, Chan APC. 2019. Investigating associations among performance criteria in green building projects. J Clean Prod. 232:1348–1370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alawneh R, Ghazali F, Ali H, Asif M. 2019. A new index for assessing the contribution of energy efficiency in LEED 2009 certified green buildings to achieving UN sustainable development goals in Jordan. Int J Green Energy. 16:490–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alwisy A, BuHamdan S, Gül M. 2018. Criteria-based ranking of green building design factors according to leading rating systems. Energy Build. 178:347–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anantsuksomsri S, Tontisirin N. 2016. A spatial agent-based model of a congestion game: evolutionary game theory in space. Ann Reg Sci. 57:371–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansah MK, Chen X, Yang HX, Lu L, Lam PTI. 2019. A review and outlook for integrated BIM application in green building assessment. Sustain Cities Soc. 48:101576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanda JO, Olukoya OAP. 2019. Green building standards: opportunities for Nigeria. J Clean Prod. 227:366–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azar E, Nikolopoulou C, Papadopoulos S. 2016. Integrating and optimizing metrics of sustainable building performance using human-focused agent-based modeling. Appl Energy. 183:926–937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azari R, Kim YW. 2016. Integration evaluation framework for integrated design teams of green buildings: development and validation. J Manage Eng. 32:04015053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berawi MA, Miraj P, Windrayani R, Berawi ARB. 2019. Stakeholders’ perspectives on green building rating: a case study in Indonesia. Heliyon. 5:e01328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce-Hyrkäs T, Pasanen P, Castro R. 2018. Overview of whole building life-cycle assessment for green building certification and ecodesign through industry surveys and interviews. Procedia CIRP. 69:178−183.
   Google Scholar
• Bulti DT, Assefa T. 2019. Analyzing ecological footprint of residential building construction in Adama City, Ethiopia. Bulti Assefa Environ Syst Res. 8:2.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho JP, Bragança L, Mateus R. 2019. Optimising building sustainability assessment using BIM. Automat Constr. 102:170–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HM, Chen WY. 2019. Potential impact of shifting coal to gas and electricity for building sectors in 28 major northern cities of China. Appl Energy. 236:1049–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China Association of Building Efficiency. 2017. China building energy consumption research report. http://www.cabee.org/. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen C, Pearlmutter D, Schwartz M. 2017. A game theory-based assessment of the implementation of green building in Israel. Build Environ. 125:122–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinge WO, Rickenbacker HJ, Landis AE, Thiel CL, Bilec MM. 2018. Dynamic life cycle assessments of a conventional green building and a net zero energy building: exploration of static, dynamic, attributional, and consequential electricity grid models. Environ Sci Technol. 52:11429−11438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine A, McCollum M. 2019. Understanding social system drivers of green building innovation adoption in emerging market countries: the role of foreign direct investment. Cities. 92:303–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwaikat LN, Ali KN. 2018. Green buildings life cycle cost analysis and life cycle budget development: practical applications. J Build Eng. 18:303–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias EM, Lin CK. 2015. The empirical study of green buildings (residential) implementation: perspective of house developers. Procedia Environ Sci. 28:708–716.
   Google Scholar
• Fang XN, Zhou BB, Tu XY, Ma Q, Wu JG. 2018. “What kind of a science is sustainability science?” An evidence-based reexamination. Sustainability. 10:1478–1493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulconbridge J. 2015. Mobilising sustainable building assessment models: agents, strategies and local effects. Area. 47:116–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferwati MS, Al SM, Shafaghat A, Keyvanfar A. 2019. Qatar Sustainability Assessment System (QSAS)-Neighborhood Development (ND) assessment model: coupling green urban planning and green building design. J Build Eng. 22:171–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freme L, Zuo J, Rameezdeen R. 2018. Improving collaboration among stakeholders in green building projects: role of early contractor involvement. J Legal Affairs Dispute Resolut Eng Constr. 10:04518020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher KS, Zhang F, Orvis R, Rissman J, Liu Q. 2019. Assessing the policy gaps for achieving China’s climate targets in the Paris agreement. Nat Commun. 10:1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo YL, Zhu CL. 2017. Evaluation of green building cost based on life cycle theory. Xi'an, China: Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Material Science, Energy and Environmental Engineering (MSEEE).
   Google Scholar
• Halil FM, Nasir NM, Hassan AA, Shukur AS. 2016. Feasibility study and economic assessment in green building projects. Procedia - Social Behav Sci. 222:56–64.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt E, Oberg A, Coronado C, Andrews C. 2019. Assessing “green” and “resilient” building features using a purposeful systems approach. Sustain Cities Soc. 48:101546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano Y, Ihara T, Gomi K, Fujita T. 2019. Simulation-based evaluation of the effect of green roofs in office building districts on mitigating the urban heat island effect and reducing CO2 emissions. Sustainability. 11:2055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang N, Bai LB, Wang HL, Du Q, Shao L, Li JT. 2018. Social network analysis of factors influencing green building development in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 15:2684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo XS, Yu ATW, Darko A, Wu ZZ. 2019. Critical factors in site planning and design of green buildings: a case of China. J Clean Prod. 222:685–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingrao C, Messineo A, Beltramo R, Yigitcanlar T, Ioppolo G. 2018. How can life cycle thinking support sustainability of buildings? Investigating life cycle assessment applications for energy efficiency and environmental performance. J Clean Prod. 201:556–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2014. Climate change 2014 mitigation of climate change. Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA). 2018. World energy outlook 2018: the gold standard of energy analysis. https://www.iea.org/weo2018/.
   Google Scholar
• Ishak NI, Kamal EM, Yusof NA. 2017. The green manufacturer’s compliance with green criteria throughout the life cycle of building material. SAGE Open. 7:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismaeel WSE. 2019. Drawing the operating mechanisms of green building rating systems. J Clean Prod. 213:599–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SW, Tae SH, Roh SJ, Kim TH. 2015. Green template for life cycle assessment of buildings based on building information modeling: focus on embodied environmental impact. Sustainability. 7:16498–16512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung BCM. 2018. Greening existing buildings [GEB] strategies. Energy Rep. 4:159–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lex SW, Calì D, Rasmussen MK, Bacher P, Bachalarz M, Madsen H. 2019. A cross-disciplinary path to healthy and energy efficient buildings. Technol Forecast Soc. 142:273–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li MQ, Patiño-Echeverri D, Zhang JF. 2019. Policies to promote energy efficiency and air emissions reductions in China’s electric power generation sector during the 11th and 12th five-year plan periods: achievements, remaining challenges, and opportunities. Energy Policy. 125:429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li N, Chen WY. 2019. Energy-water nexus in China’s energy bases: from the Paris agreement to the well below 2 degrees target. Energy. 166:277–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu QH, Liu QY, Liu WN. 2018. Energy-saving reconstruction of buildings in cold winter and hot summer areas with the green ecological concept. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 186:012012.
   Google Scholar
• Liu QL, Wang Q. 2017. How China achieved its 11th five-year plan emissions reduction target A structural decomposition analysis of industrial SO2 and chemical oxygen demand. Sci Total Environ. 574:1104–1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu YJ, Wu ZL, Chang RD, Li YK. 2017. Building Information Modeling (BIM) for green buildings: a critical review and future directions. Automat Constr. 83:134–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madad A, Gharagozlou A, Majedi H, Monavari SM. 2019. A quantitative representation of the urban green building model, focusing on local climatic factors by utilizing monetary valuation. Ecol Econ. 161:61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes MJA, Jones KE, Toledano MB, Milligan B. 2019. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between urban ecosystems and the sustainable development goals. Environ Sci Policy. 93:181–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainali B, Luukkanen J, Silveira S, Kaivo-oja J. 2018. Evaluating synergies and trade-offs among sustainable development goals (SDGs): explorative analyses of development paths in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainability. 10:815–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng Y. 2018. Source tracing and application of regional natural materials in ecological buildings. ASSEHR. 180:285–289.
   Google Scholar
• Micolier A, Taillandier F, Taillandier P, Bos F. 2019. Li-BIM, an agent-based approach to simulate occupant-building interaction from the building-information modelling. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 82:44–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD). 2006. Assessment standard for green building (GB/T 50378-2006). Beijing: China Architectural and Building Press. in Chinese
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD). 2016a. Interim measures for the acceptance and operation management of provincial public building energy consumption monitoring platform. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD). 2016b. The 13th five-year plan for energy saving and emission reduction. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD). 2017a. Reporting specifications of the provincial public building energy consumption monitoring system data. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD). 2017b. Notice on further regulating the management of green building label. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed MAA. 2019. Saving energy through using green rating system for building commissioning. Energy Procedia. 162:369–378.
   Google Scholar
• Mok KY, Shen GQ, Yang R. 2018. Stakeholder complexity in large scale green building projects: a holistic analysis towards a better understanding. ECAM. 25:1454–1474.
   Google Scholar
• Muller MF, Esmanioto F, Huber N, Loures ER, Junior OC. 2019. A systematic literature review of interoperability in the green building information modeling lifecycle. J Clean Prod. 223:397–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Development and reform commission (NDRC) and Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD). 2013. Green building action plan. http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Nerini FF, Tomei J, To LS, Bisaga I, Parikh P, Black M, Borrion A, Spataru C, Broto VC, Anandarajah G, et al. 2018. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the sustainable development goals. Nat Energy. 3:10–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nykamp H. 2017. A transition to green buildings in Norway. Environ Innov Soc Tr. 24:83–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofek S, Akron S, Portnov BA. 2018. Stimulating green construction by influencing the decision-making of main players. Sustain Cities Soc. 40:165–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onuoha IJ, Aliagha GU, Rahman MSA. 2018. Modelling the effects of green building incentives and green building skills on supply factors affecting green commercial property investment. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 90:14–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlar M, Sharafali M, Goh M. 2019. Optimal control and cooperative game theory based analysis of a by-product synergy system. J Clean Prod. 233:731–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsaeifar S, Bozorgi-Amiri A, Naimi-Sadigh A, Sangari MS. 2019. A game theoretical for coordination of pricing, recycling, and green product decisions in the supply chain. J Clean Prod. 226:37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan P, Costa L, Rybski D, Lucht W, Kropp JP. 2017. A systematic study of sustainable development goal (SDG) interactions. Earth’s Future. 5:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan S, Al-Ghamdi SG, Mackey HR. 2019. Greywater recycling in buildings using living walls and green roofs: a review of the applicability and challenges. Sci Total Environ. 652:330–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin CB, Wang JN, Ge CZ, Su JQ. 2019. Simulating the cost-effectiveness of China’s green transition based on emission reduction targets during the 12th five-year plan period. J Clean Prod. 208:19–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin ZF, Li JP, Xu ZY. 2016. Research on the evolution mechanism and countermeasures of green building market based on evolutionary game theory. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronics, Mechanics, Culture and Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Riascos LAM, Palmiere SE. 2015. Energy efficiency and fire prevention integration in green buildings. IEEE Lat Am Trans. 13:2608–2615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh SJ, Tae SH, Suk SJ, Ford G, Shin SW. 2016. Development of a building life cycle carbon emissions assessment program (BEGAS 2.0) for Korea׳s green building index certification system. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 53:954–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setiawan D. 2018. Study of ecological and green architecture theories for a house in South Jakarta. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 195:012088.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma M. 2018. Development of a ‘green building sustainability model’ for green buildings in India. J Clean Prod. 190:538–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha S, Dhakal S. 2019. An assessment of potential synergies and trade-offs between climate mitigation and adaptation policies of Nepal. J Environ Manage. 235:535–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song CJ, Liu QL, Gu S, Wang Q. 2018. The impact of China’s urbanization on economic growth and pollutant emissions: an empirical study based on input-output analysis. J Clean Prod. 198:1289–1301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song LG, Ross G, Cai F, Lauren JE. 2016. China’s new sources of economic growth: vol. 1: reform, resources and climate change. Canberra: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang SW, Jim CY. 2011. Game-theory approach for resident coalitions to allocate green-roof benefits. Environ Plann A: Economy Space. 43:363–377.
   Google Scholar
• Tudiwer D, Hoeckner V, Korjenic A. 2018. Greening Aspang-hygrothermal building simulation for analysis and evaluation of various scenarios related to indoor climate. Bauphysik. 40:120–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulubeyli S, Kazanci O. 2018. Holistic sustainability assessment of green building industry in Turkey. J Clean Prod. 202:197–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2014. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. http://undocs.org/ch/A/RES/70/1.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2017. SDG indicators: global indicator framework for the sustainable development goals and targets of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database/.
   Google Scholar
• Unites Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network (UNSDSN). 2018. SDG index and dashboards report 2018: global responsibilities implementing the goals. http://www.sdgindex.org/overview/.
   Google Scholar
• Varma CRS, Palaniappan S. 2019. Comparision of green building rating schemes used in North America, Europe and Asia. Habitat Int. 89:101989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertal M, Zozulák M, Vašková A, Korjenic A. 2018. Hygrothermal initial condition for simulation process of green building construction. Energy Build. 167:166–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas G, Jha KN, Patel DA. 2019. Development of green building rating system using AHP and fuzzy integrals: a case of India. J Architect Eng. 25:04019004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Feng W, Cai WG, Ren H, Ding C, Zhou N. 2019. Do residential building energy efficiency standards reduce energy consumption in China? – A data-driven method to validate the actual performance of building energy efficiency standards. Energy Policy. 131:82–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• William R, Garg J, Stillwell AS. 2017. A game theory analysis of green infrastructure stormwater management policies. Water Resour Res. 53:8003–8019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer R, Eikemeier S, Preisler A, Berger M. 2016. LIFE cycle habitation - designing green buildings. Energy Procedia. 96:323–332.
   Google Scholar
• Wong JKW, Zhou J. 2015. Enhancing environmental sustainability over building life cycles through green BIM: a review. Automat Constr. 57:156–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu XY, Peng B, Lin BR. 2017. A dynamic life cycle carbon emission assessment on green and non-green buildings in China. Energy Build. 149:272–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuni IY, Shen GQP, Osei-Kyei R. 2019. Scientometric review of global research trends on green buildings in construction journals from 1992 to 2018. Energy Build. 190:69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang XY, Zhang SC, Xu W. 2019. Impact of zero energy buildings on medium-to-long term building energy consumption in China. Energy Policy. 129:574–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang JX, Li H, Olanipekun A, Li B. 2019. A successful delivery process of green buildings: the project owners’ view, motivation and commitment. Renewable Energy. 138:651–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Kang J, Jin H. 2018. A review of green building development in China from the perspective of energy saving. Energies. 11:334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou YH, Wu X. 2004. Seeking changes: the economic development in contemporary China. Beijing: Central Compilation and Translation Press.
   Google Scholar