‘If we lower our responsiveness, the algorithm likes us less’. A biographical perspective on (losing) control in the platform economy

References

• Barratt, T., C. Goods, and A. Veen. 2020. “‘I’m My Own Boss … ’: Active Intermediation and ‘Entrepreneurial’ Worker Agency in the Australian Gig-Economy.” Environment and Planning A (0): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20914346.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. 1998. Tricks of the Trade. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bessa, I., S. Joyce, D. Neumann, M. Stuart, V. Trappmann, and C. Umney. 2022. A Global Analysis of Worker Protest in Digital Labour Platforms. https://doi.org/10.54394/CTNG4947
   Google Scholar
• Betts, S., A. Griffiths, F. Schütze, and P. Straus. 2008. “Biographical Counselling: An Introduction.” European Studies on Inequalities and Social Cohesion 1 (2): 5–58.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, E. L., P. Kalum-Schou, and M. Waldkirch. 2021. “Pacifying the Algorithm – Anticipatory Compliance in the Face of Algorithmic Management in the Gig Economy.” Organization 28 (1): 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420961531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cant, C. 2019. Riding for Deliveroo. Resistance in the New Economy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassell, C., L. Radcliffe, and F. Malik. 2020. “Participant Reflexivity in Organizational Research Design.” Organizational Research Methods 23 (4): 750–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119842640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, S., and M. A. Scully. 2019. “It’s About Distributing Rather Than Sharing: Using Labor Process Theory to Probe the “Sharing” Economy.” Journal of Business Ethics 159 (4): 943–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04210-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, N. K., and L. Humphreys. 2018. “Mediatization of Social Space and the Case of Uber Drivers.” Media and Communication 6 (2): 29–38. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i2.1316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th ed. London, UK: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, J., U. Sherman, R. Carbery, and A. McDonnell. 2020. “Algorithmic Management and App-Work in the Gig Economy: A Research Agenda for Employment Relations and HRM.” Human Resource Management Journal 30 (1): 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021 December. Improving Working Conditions in Platform Work, 3–5. Brussels, Belgium: European Comission.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, M., and V. Pulignano. 2021. “Connecting at the Edge: Cycles of Commodification and Labour Control within Food Delivery Platform Work in Belgium.” New Technology, Work and Employment . September 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12218.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1971. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goods, C., A. Veen, and T. Barratt. 2019. ““Is Your Gig Any good?” Analysing Job Quality in the Australian Platform-Based Food-Delivery Sector.” Journal of Industrial Relations 61 (4): 502–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185618817069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feelings. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huws, U. 2020. “The Algorithm and the City: Platform Labour and the Urban Environment.” Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation 14 (1): 7–14. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.14.1.0007.
   Google Scholar
• Ilsøe, A., and T. P. Larsen. 2021. “Why Do Labour Platforms Negotiate? Platform Strategies in Tax-Based Welfare States.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 44 (1): 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x211056974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalainen, A., S. Vallas, and S. Poutanen. 2019. “Theorizing Work in the Contemporary Platform Economy. In Digital Work and the Platform Economy, edited by Seppo Poutanen, Anna Kovalainen, and Petri Rouvinen, 31–55. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marà, C., and V. Pulignano. 2022. “Unpaid Labour in Online Freelancing Platforms: Between Marketization Strategies and Self- Employment Regulation.” Sociologia del Lavoro 163 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3280/SL2022-163007.
   Google Scholar
• Marrone, M., and V. Finotto. 2019. “Challenging Goliath. Informal Unionism and Digital Platforms in the Food Delivery Sector. The Case of Riders Union Bologna.” Partecipazione e Conflitto 12 (3): 691–716. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v12i3p691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meijerink, J., and A. Keegan. 2019. “Conceptualizing Human Resource Management in the Gig Economy: Toward a Platform Ecosystem Perspective.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 34 (4): 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-07-2018-0277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesole, A., M. C. Brancati Urzí, E. Fernández-Macías, F. Biagi, and I. González Vázquez. 2018. Platform Workers in Europe: Evidence from the COLLEEM Survey. In JRC Science For Policy Report. https://doi.org/10.2760/742789
   Google Scholar
• Pieter de Groen, W., Z. Kilhoffer, K. Lenaerts, and I. Mandl. 2018. “Employment and Working Conditions of Selected Types of Platform Work.” https://doi.org/10.2806/42948.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., H. Horst, J. Postill, L. Hjorth, T. Lewis, and J. Tacchi, eds. 2016. “Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice.” In Antropologia. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pulignano, V., D. Grimshaw, M. Domecka, and L. Vermeerbergen. forthcoming b. ‘Why Does Unpaid Labor Vary Among Digital Labour Platforms? Exploring Socio-Technical of Worker Autonomy.” Human Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Pulignano, V., and C. Marà. 2021. Working for Nothing in the Platform Economy: Forms and Institutional Contexts of Unpaid Labour. https://www.solidar.org/system/downloads/attachments/000/001/410/original/Thematic_publication_Working_for_Nothing.pdf?1638980551.
   Google Scholar
• Pulignano, V., C. Marà, L. Franke, M. Domecka, A. Bertolini, and M. Graham. 2022. Fairwork Belgium Ratings 2021: Labour Standards in the Platform Economy. Oxford, UK: Fairwork.
   Google Scholar
• Pulignano, V., C. Marà, M. Franke, and K. Muszyński. 2023. “Informal Employment on Domestic Care Platforms: A Study on the Individualisation of Risk and Unpaid Labour in Mature Market Contexts.” Transfer: European Review of Labour & Research 102425892311773. https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589231177353.
   Google Scholar
• Pulignano, V., S. Marino, M. Johnson, M. Domecka, and M.-L. Riemann. forthcoming a. “Digital Tournaments’ the Colonization of Freelancers’ ‘Free’ Time and Unpaid Labour in the Online Platform Economy.” Cambridge Journal of Economics
   Google Scholar
• Pulignano, V., A. Piasna, M. Domecka, K. Muszyński, and L. Vermeerbergen. 2021. Does It Pay to Work? Unpaid Labour in the Platform Economy. Brussels: ETUI: Policy Brief.
   Google Scholar
• Ravenelle, A. J. 2019. ““We’re Not uber:” Control, Autonomy, and Entrepreneurship in the Gig Economy.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 34 (4): 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemann, M.-L. H. 2018. “A Moment of Biographical Analysis Under the Microscope: Reading Felipe’s Autobiographical Narrative.” Contemporary Social Science 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2018.1450990.
   Google Scholar
• Riemann, M.-L. H. 2022. Leaving Spain: A Biographical Study of an Economic Crisis and New Beginnings. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/53765.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblat, A., and L. Stark. 2016. “Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers.” International Journal of Communication 10:3758–3784. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2686227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schor, J. B., W. Attwood-Charles, M. Cansoy, I. Ladegaard, and R. Wengronowitz. 2020. “Dependence and Precarity in the Platform Economy.” Theory and Society 49 (5–6): 833–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, A. N., T. M. Bricka, and J. H. Whitaker. 2019. “Work Design in a Digitized Gig Economy.” Human Resource Management Review January 2018: 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100692.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze, F. 1977. Die Technik des narrativen Interviews in Interaktionsfeldstudien - dargestellt an einem Projekt zur Erforschung von kommunalen Machtstrukturen Arbeitsberichte und Forschungsmaterialien No. 1. Bielefeld, Germany: University of Bielefeld, Department of Sociology.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze, F. 1987. Das narrative Interview in Interaktionsfeldstudien. Erzähltheoretische Grundlagen. Teil I: Merkmale von Alltagserzählungen und was wir mit ihrer Hilfe erkennen können. Hagen, Germany: Studienbrief, Fernuniversität Hagen.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze, F. 1992. “Pressure and Guilt: War Experiences of a Young German Soldier and Their Biographical Implications.” International Sociology 7, 2 (June): 187–208. and 3 (September): 347-367.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze, F. 2008. “Biography Analysis on the Empirical Base of Autobiographical Narratives: How to Analyse Autobiographical Narrative Interviews.” European Studies on Inequalities and Social Cohesion 1/2 (Part I): 153–242. and 3/4 (Part II): 5-77.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze, F. 2014. “Autobiographical Accounts of War Experiences. An Outline for the Analysis of Topically Focused Autobiographical Texts – Using the Example of the “Robert Rasmus” Account in Studs Terkel’s Book, The Good War.” qualitative Sociology Review 10 (1): 224–283. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.10.1.10.
   Google Scholar
• Schütze, F. 2016. Sozialwissenschaftliche Prozessanalyse: Grundlagen der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Berlin, Germany/Toronto, Canada: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A. 2018. “Between Autonomy and Control: Strategies of Arbitrage in the “On-demand” Economy.” New Media and Society 20 (8): 2954–2971. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817738236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, A. 2020. “Dynamic Exploits: Calculative Asymmetries in the On-Demand Economy.” New Technology, Work and Employment 35 (2): 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. 1993. Continual Permutations of Action. New York, USA: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Stringhi, E. 2022. “Addressing Gendered Affordances of the Platform Economy: The Case of UpWork.” Internet Policy Review 11 (1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.14763/2022.1.1634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svašek, M., and M. Domecka. 2012. “The Autobiographical Narrative Interview: A Potential Arena of Emotional Remembering, Performance and Reflection.” In The Interview: An Ethnographic Approach, edited by J. Skinner, 107–126. London, UK & New York, USA: Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003087014-7.
   Google Scholar
• Tassinari, A., and V. Maccarrone. 2020. “Riders on the Storm: Workplace Solidarity Among Gig Economy Couriers in Italy and the UK.” Work, Employment and Society 34 (1): 35–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ticona, J., and A. Mateescu. 2018. “Trusted Strangers: Carework platforms’ Cultural Entrepreneurship in the On-Demand Economy.” New Media and Society 20 (11): 4384–4404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818773727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallas, S., and J. B. Schor. 2020. “What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy.” Annual Review of Sociology 15 (1): 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919.
   Google Scholar
• Veen, A., T. Barratt, and C. Goods. 2019. “Platform-Capital’s ‘App-etite’ for Control: A Labour Process Analysis of Food-Delivery Work in Australia.” Work, Employment and Society 34 (3): 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019836911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldkirch, M., E. Bucher, P. K. Schou, and E. Grünwald. 2021. “Controlled by the Algorithm, Coached by the Crowd–How HRM Activities Take Shape on Digital Work Platforms in the Gig Economy.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 32 (12): 2643–2682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1914129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, A. J. 2021. “Algorithmic Management: Consequences for Work Organisation and Working Conditions.” Seville: European Commission, JRC124874.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, J. 2021. “Workers Inquiry and the Experience of Work: Using Ethnographic Accounts of the Gig Economy.” In Experiencing the New World of Work, edited by J. Aroles, F. X. de Vaujany, and K. Dale, 136–156. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108865814.010.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. J., M. Graham, V. Lehdonvirta, and I. Hjorth. 2019. “Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy.” Work, Employment and Society 33 (1): 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, A. J., and V. Lehdonvirta. 2021. “Platform Precarity: Surviving Algorithmic Insecurity in the Gig Economy.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3795375.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. J., V. Lehdonvirta, and M. Graham. 2018. “Workers of the Internet Unite? Online Freelancer Organisation Among Remote Gig Economy Workers in Six Asian and African Countries.” New Technology, Work and Employment 33 (2): 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar