Factors impacting community living outcomes among former long-term nursing home residents using the interdependence-Human Activity Assistive Technology (i-HAAT) model

References

• Angell, A. M., Goodman, L., Walker, H. R., McDonald, K. E., Kraus, L. E., Elms, E. H., Frieden, L., Sheth, A. J., & Hammel, J. (2020). “Starting to live a life”: Understanding full participation for people with disabilities after institutionalization. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(4), p74042050301–p740420503011. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.038489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkes, J. (2019). Regression analysis: A practical introduction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arling, G., Kane, R. L., Cooke, V., & Lewis, T. (2010). Targeting residents for transitions from nursing home to community. Health Services Research, 45(3), 691–711. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01105.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. (2017). Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beadle-Brown, J., Mansell, J., & Kozma, A. (2007). Deinstitutionalization in intellectual disabilities. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 20(5), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e32827b14ab
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. L., Brady, E., & Branham, S. M. (2018). Interdependence as a frame for assistive technology research and design. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. (pp. 161–173). The Indiana University Purdue University Incorporated (IUPUI). https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236348
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., & Fyffe, C. (2006). Tensions between institutional closure and deinstitutionalisation: What can be learned from Victoria’s institutional redevelopment? Disability & Society, 21(6), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590600918032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol, M., de Haan, R. J., van den Bos, G. A. M., de Jong, B. A., & de Groot, I. J. M. (1999). The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: The impact on participation and autonomy (IPA). Clinical Rehabilitation, 13(5), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1191/026921599668601325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, S. C., & Chan, A. P. (2007). User satisfaction, community participation and quality of life among Chinese wheelchair users with spinal cord injury: A preliminary study. Occupational Therapy International, 14(3), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.228
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chowdhury, M., & Benson, B. A. (2011). Deinstitutionalization and quality of life of individuals with intellectual disability: A review of the international literature: Deinstitutionalization and quality of life. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 8(4), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2011.00325.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colbert v. Quinn. (2011). 1: 07-cv-04737 (N.D. Ill. 2011). Retrieved October 10, 2019, from https://www.clearinghouse.net/chDocs/public/PB-IL-0006-0009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2014). Assistive technologies: Principles and practice. Mosby Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A. M., Polgar, J. M., & Encarnação, P. (2020). Assistive technologies: Principles and practice. Mosby Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Day, H. Y., Jutai, J., Woolrich, W., & Strong, G. (2001). The stability of impact of assistive devices. Disability & Rehabilitation, 23(9), 400–404.https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280010008906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jonge, D., & Stevens, W. (2016). Capturing the true value of assistive technologies to consumers in routine outcome measurement. Technologies, 4(4), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies4040035
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M. P., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health, 25(10), 1229–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903194015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrer, M., Jutai, J., Scherer, M., & DeRuyter, F. (2003). A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(22), 1243–1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280310001596207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, E. L., Banegas, J. R., Perez-Regadera, A. G., Cabrera, R. H., & Rodriguez-Artalejo, F. (2005). Social network and health-related quality of life in older adults: A population-based study in Spain. Quality of Life Research, 14(2), 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-5329-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, B. E., Carnevale, F. A., & King, G. (2012). “This is my way”: Reimagining disability, in/dependence and interconnectedness of persons and assistive technologies. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(22), 1894–1899. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.670040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesbrecht, E. (2013). Application of the human activity assistive technology model for occupational therapy research. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 60(4), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2017). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hammel, J. (2000). Assistive technology and environmental intervention (AT-EI) impact on the activity and life roles of aging adults with developmental disabilities: Findings and implications for practice. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 18(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/J148v18n01_04
   Google Scholar
• Hammel, J., Lai, J.-S., & Heller, T. (2002). The impact of assistive technology and environmental interventions on function and living situation status with people who are ageing with developmental disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation, 24(1–3), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280110063850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel, J., Magasi, S., Heinemann, A., Whiteneck, G., Bogner, J., & Rodriguez, E. (2008). What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30(19), 1445–1460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701625534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, A., Power, M., & The WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedman, M., Pöder, U., Mamhidir, A., Nilsson, A., Kristofferzon, M., & Häggström, E. (2015). Life memories and the ability to act: The meaning of autonomy and participation for older people when living with chronic illness. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 29(4), 824–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitch, D., Pepin, G., & Stagnitti, K. (2014). The integrating theory, evidence and action (ITEA) method: A procedure for helping practitioners translate theory and research into action. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 77(12), 592–600. https://doi.org/10.4276/030802214X14176260335183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jutai, J., & Southall, K. (2013). Measuring the effectiveness of assistive technology on active aging: Capturing the perspectives of users. Technologies for Active Aging, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8348-0_6
   Google Scholar
• Kilkens, O. J. E., Post, M. W. M., Dallmeijer, A. J., van Asbeck, F. W. A., & van der Woude, L. H. V. (2004). Relationship between manual wheelchair skill performance and participation of persons with spinal cord injuries 1 year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 42(3sup1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2004.08.0093
   Google Scholar
• King, B. M., Rosopa, P. J., & Minium, E. W. (2018). Statistical reasoning in the behavioral sciences (7th ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, T., Neri, M. T., & Miller, K. (2005). Using mixed methods in disability and rehabilitation research. Rehabilitation Nursing, 30(3), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.2005.tb00372.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenker, J. A., Harris, F., Taugher, M., & Smith, R. O. (2013). Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8(5), 373–380. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2012.749429
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenker, J. A., Koester, H. H., & Smith, R. O. (2021). Toward a national system of assistive technology outcomes measurement. Assistive Technology, 33(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2019.1567620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magasi, S. P., Wong, A., Gray, D. B., Hammel, J., Baum, C., Wang, C., & Heinemann, A. W. (2015). Theoretical foundations for the measurement of environmental factors and their impact on participation among people with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 96(4), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, W. L., Snow, A. L., Wilson, N. L., Naik, A. D., & Kunik, M. E. (2013). Conceptualization of a toolkit to evaluate everyday competence in planning transitions from nursing homes to the community. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 14(8), e626.1–.e626.7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkler, M., Hammel, J., Gill, C. J., Magasi, S., Vásquez, V. B., Bristo, M., & Coleman, D. (2008). Community-based participatory research in disability and long-term care policy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 19(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207308315280
   Google Scholar
• Mirza, M., & Hammel, J. (2009). Consumer‐Directed goal planning in the delivery of assistive technology services for people who are ageing with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22(5), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oishi, M. M. K., Mitchell, I. M., & Van der Loos, H. F. M. (Eds.). (2010). Design and use of assistive technology. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7031-2
   Google Scholar
• Pinilla-Roncancio, M. (2015). Disability and poverty: Two related conditions. A review of the literature. Revista de la facultad de medicina, 63(3Sup), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v63n3sup.50132
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. J., Green, A. M., & THE WHOQOL-DIS Group. (2010). Development of the WHOQOL disabilities module. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 571–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravneberg, B., & Söderström, S. (2017). Disability, society and assistive technology. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Rimmerman, A. (2017). Disability and community living policies. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Salkind, N. (2010). Encyclopedia of research design. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288
   Google Scholar
• Salmona, M., Lieber, E., & Kaczynski, D. (2019). Qualitative and mixed methods data analysis using dedoose: A practical approach for research across the social sciences. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schreuer, N. (2009). Accommodation outcomes and the ICF framework. Assistive Technology, 21(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400430903050510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheth, A. J., McDonald, K. E., Fogg, L., Conroy, N. E., Elms, E. H. J., Kraus, L. E., Frieden, L., & Hammel, J. (2019). Satisfaction, safety, and supports: Comparing people with disabilities’ insider experiences about participation in institutional and community living. Disability and Health Journal, 12(4), 712–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stack, E., & McDonald, K. E. (2014). Nothing about us without us: Does action research in developmental disabilities research measure up? Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 11(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, G. W., Lloyd Simpson, J., Gonda, C., Ravesloot, C., & Coble, Z. (2010). Moving from independence to interdependence: A conceptual model for better understanding community participation of centers for independent living consumers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 20(4), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207309350561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1997). WHOQOL: Measuring quality-of-life.
   Google Scholar