86
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Educational Case Report

Improving Academic Writing in a Low-Resource Country: A Systematic Examination of Online Peer-Run Training

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Received 06 Mar 2023, Accepted 09 Feb 2024, Published online: 29 Mar 2024

References

  • Benamer HT, Bakoush O. Arab nations lagging behind other Middle Eastern countries in biomedical research: a comparative study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9(1):26. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-26.
  • Alhamid N, Almounayer N, Alsabbagh B, Atassi B. Case reports and research productivity among Syrian medical students: Review, reality, and suggested solutions. Avicenna J Med. 2015;5(4):101–105. doi:10.4103/2231-0770.165119.
  • Matar H, Almerie Q, Adams C, Essali A. Publications indexed in Medline and Embase originating from the Syrian Arab Republic: A survey. East Mediterr Health J. 2009;15(3):648–652. doi:10.26719/2009.15.3.648.
  • Diab MM, Taftaf RMO, Arabi M. Research productivity in Syria: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of current status. Avicenna J Med. 2011;1(1):4–7. doi:10.4103/2231-0770.83716.
  • Stone-Brown K. Syria: a healthcare system on the brink of collapse. BMJ. 2013;347:f7375. doi:10.1136/BMJ.F7375.
  • Sahloul MZ, Monla-Hassan J, Sankari A, et al. War is the enemy of health. Pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine in war-torn Syria. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(2):147–155. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201510-661PS.
  • Syria “the most dangerous place on earth for healthcare providers” – study | Syria |. The Guardian. 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/15/syria-conflict-study-condemns-weaponisation-of-healthcare.
  • Physicians for Human Rights - Syrias Neighbors Must Let Doctors Practice. 2022. https://phr.org/news/syrias-neighbors-must-let-doctors-practice/.
  • Fouad FM, Sparrow A, Tarakji A, et al. Health workers and the weaponisation of health care in Syria: a preliminary inquiry for The Lancet-American University of Beirut Commission on Syria. Lancet. 2017;390(10111):2516–2526. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30741-9.
  • Hanafi I, Kheder K, Sabouni R, et al. 2024. Factors influencing research productivity among Syrian medical professionals amidst conflict: a case-control study [Internet]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377202026_Factors_Influencing_Research_Productivity_among_Syrian_Medical_Professionals_amidst_Conflict_a_Case-Control_Study.
  • Guha-Sapir D, Rodriguez-Llanes JM, Hicks MH, et al. Civilian deaths from weapons used in the Syrian conflict. BMJ. 2015;351:h4736. doi:10.1136/BMJ.H4736.
  • Diggle E, Welsch W, Sullivan R, et al. The role of public health information in assistance to populations living in opposition and contested areas of Syria, 2012-2014. Confl Health. 2017;11(1):33. doi:10.1186/s13031-017-0134-9.
  • T Al S, Abbas F, Turk T, Alkhatib M, Hanafi I, Alahdab F. Medical research in war-torn Syria: medical students’ perspective. Lancet. 2018;391(10139):2497–2498. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31207-8.
  • Turk T, Al Saadi T, Alkhatib M, et al. Attitudes, barriers, and practices toward research and publication among medical students at the University of Damascus, Syria. Avicenna J Med. 2018;8(1):24–33. doi:10.4103/ajm.AJM_116_17.
  • Hanafi I, Haj Kassem L, Hanafi M, et al. Medical research conduct and publication during higher education in Syria: Attitudes, barriers, practices, and possible solutions. Avicenna J Med. 2022;12(3):127–137. doi:10.1055/S-0042-1755387.
  • Alahdab F, Firwana B, Hasan R, et al. Undergraduate medical students’ perceptions, attitudes, and competencies in evidence-based medicine (EBM), and their understanding of EBM reality in Syria. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5(1):431. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-5-431.
  • Woolliscroft JO. Innovation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Acad Med. 2020;95(8):1140–1142. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003402.
  • Kaul V, Gallo de Moraes A, Khateeb D, et al. Medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Chest [Internet]. 2021;159(5):1949–1960. doi:10.1016/J.CHEST.2020.12.026.
  • Abouzeid M, Elzalabany MK, Nuwayhid I, Jabbour S. Conflict-related health research in Syria, 2011–2019: a scoping review for The Lancet - AUB Commission on Syria. Confl Health. 2021;15(1):92. doi:10.1186/S13031-021-00384-3.
  • Jirge P. Preparing and publishing a scientific manuscript. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2017;10(1):3–9. doi:10.4103/JHRS.JHRS_36_17.
  • Busse CE, Anderson EW, Endale T, et al. Strengthening research capacity: a systematic review of manuscript writing and publishing interventions for researchers in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(2):e008059. doi:10.1136/BMJGH-2021-008059.
  • Fleming-Nouri A, Crocombe D, Sammaraiee Y. Twelve tips on setting up and running a peer-led medical education society. Med Teach. 2016;38(12):1199–1203. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2016.1209471.
  • Allikmets S, Vink JP. The benefits of peer-led teaching in medical education. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016;7:329–330. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S107776.
  • Burgess A, McGregor D, Mellis C. Medical students as peer tutors: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14(1):115. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-115.
  • Abbas F, Sawaf B, Hanafi I, et al. Peers versus professional training of basic life support in Syria: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):142. doi:10.1186/S12909-018-1241-Z/TABLES/6.
  • Sabouni A, Chaar A, Bdaiwi Y, et al. An online academic writing and publishing skills course: Help Syrians find their voice. Avicenna J Med. 2017;7(3):103–109. doi:10.4103/AJM.AJM_204_16.
  • Knobe M, Münker R, Sellei RM, et al. Peer teaching: A randomised controlled trial using student-teachers to teach musculoskeletal ultrasound. Med Educ. 2010;44(2):148–155. doi:10.1111/J.1365-2923.2009.03557.X.
  • Fujiwara T, Nishimura M, Honda R, et al. Comparison of peer-led versus professional-led training in basic life support for medical students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011;2:187–191. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S22948.
  • Alahdab F, Alabed S, Al-Moujahed A, et al. Evidence-based medicine: a persisting desire under fire. Evid Based Med. 2017;22(1):9–11. doi:10.1136/ebmed-2016-110608.
  • Maloney S, Nicklen P, Rivers G, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of blended versus face-to-face delivery of evidence-based medicine to medical students. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(7):e182. doi:10.2196/JMIR.4346.
  • Camargo CP, Tempski PZ, Busnardo FF, Martins M de A, Gemperli R. Online learning and COVID-19: a meta-synthesis analysis. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020;75:e2286. doi:10.6061/CLINICS/2020/E2286.
  • Qazi A, Naseer K, Qazi J, et al. Conventional to online education during COVID-19 pandemic: Do develop and underdeveloped nations cope alike. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020;119:105582. doi:10.1016/J.CHILDYOUTH.2020.105582.
  • Mukhtar K, Javed K, Arooj M, Sethi A. Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(COVID19-S4):S27–S31. doi:10.12669/PJMS.36.COVID19-S4.2785.
  • Phadtare A, Bahmani A, Shah A, Pietrobon R. Scientific writing: A randomized controlled trial comparing standard and on-line instruction. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9(1):27. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-9-27/TABLES/3.
  • Sabouni A, Bdaiwi Y, Janoudi SL, et al. Multiple strategy peer-taught evidence-based medicine course in a poor resource setting. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):82. doi:10.1186/S12909-017-0924-1/TABLES/3.
  • NIH Clinical Center News. 2017. https://www.cc.nih.gov/about/news/newsletter/2017/apr2017/story-april-06-syria.html.
  • Courses in Clinical Research. 2023. https://ocreco.od.nih.gov/courses/ippcr.html.
  • Huisman B, Saab N, van Driel J, van den Broek P. Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assess Eval High Educ [Internet]. 2018;43(6):955–968. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318.
  • Writing in the Sciences | Stanford Online. 2023. https://online.stanford.edu/courses/som-y0010-writing-sciences.
  • Goyal M, Dua A, Kedia AK, Misra DP, Santhanam S, Ravindran V. Usefulness of a workshop on scientific writing and publication in improving the baseline knowledge deficit among postgraduates education. J Roy Coll Phys Edinburgh. 2020;50(3):316–321. doi:10.4997/jrcpe.2020.323.
  • Prat-Sala M, Redford P. Writing essays: Does self-efficacy matter? The relationship between self-efficacy in reading and in writing and undergraduate students’ performance in essay writing. Educ Psychol (Lond). 2012;32(1):9–20. doi:10.1080/01443410.2011.621411.
  • Wortman-Wunder E, Wefes I. Scientific writing workshop improves confidence in critical writing skills among trainees in the biomedical sciences. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2020;21(1):21. 1.5. doi:10.1128/JMBE.V21I1.1843.
  • Hassan B. The relationship of writing apprehension and self-esteem to the writing quality and quantity of EFL university students. Mansoura Faculty of Education Journal. 2001;39:1–36.
  • Fernández E, García AM, Serés E, Bosch F. Students’ satisfaction and perceived impact on knowledge, attitudes and skills after a 2-day course in scientific writing: a prospective longitudinal study in Spain. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2018;8(1):e018657. doi:10.1136/BMJOPEN-2017-018657.
  • Yadav SK, Para S, Singh G, Gupta R, Sarin N, Singh S. Comparison of asynchronous and synchronous methods of online teaching for students of medical laboratory technology course: A cross-sectional analysis. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10(1):232. doi:10.4103/JEHP.JEHP_1022_20.
  • Crome M, Rahman A, Iversen RM, Lührs A-K. Synchronous vs. asynchronous education: Questionnaire-based survey in dental medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic**. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift International. 2021;3(5):206–215. doi:10.3238/dzz-int.2021.0025.
  • Fabriz S, Mendzheritskaya J, Stehle S. Impact of synchronous and asynchronous settings of online teaching and learning in higher education on students’ learning experience during COVID-19. Front Psychol. 2021;12:733554. doi:10.3389/FPSYG.2021.733554/BIBTEX.
  • Kositanurit W, Vivatvakin S, Kaikaew K, et al. Asynchronous online lecture may not be an effective method in teaching cardiovascular physiology during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):162. doi:10.1186/S12909-022-03217-W.
  • Xie H, Liu W, Bhairma J, Shim E. Analysis of synchronous and asynchronous E-learning environments. 2018:2589–4943. doi:10.2991/jimec-18.2018.58.
  • Perveen A. Synchronous and asynchronous e-language learning: A case study of virtual University of Pakistan. Open Praxis. 2016;8(1):21. doi:10.5944/openpraxis.8.1.212.
  • Bdaiwi Y, Rayes D, Sabouni A, et al. Challenges of providing healthcare worker education and training in protracted conflict: A focus on non-government controlled areas in north west Syria. Confl Health. 2020;14(1):42. doi:10.1186/S13031-020-00287-9.
  • Cameron C, Deming SP, Notzon B, Cantor SB, Broglio KR, Pagel W. Scientific writing training for academic physicians of diverse language backgrounds. Acad Med. 2009;84(4):505–510. doi:10.1097/ACM.0B013E31819A7E6D.
  • Rickard CM, McGrail MR, Jones R, et al. Supporting academic publication: evaluation of a writing course combined with writers’ support group. Nurse Educ Today. 2009;29(5):516–521. doi:10.1016/J.NEDT.2008.11.005.
  • Guilford WH. Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Adv Physiol Educ. 2001;25(1–4):167–175. doi:10.1152/ADVANCES.2001.25.3.167.
  • Walker JP, Sampson V. Argument-driven inquiry: Using the laboratory to improve undergraduates’ science writing skills through meaningful science writing, peer-review, and revision. J Chem Educ. 2013;90(10):1269–1274. doi:10.1021/ed300656p.
  • Geithner CA, Pollastro AN. Doing peer review and receiving feedback: Impact on scientific literacy and writing skills. Adv Physiol Educ. 2016;40(1):38–46. doi:10.1152/ADVAN.00071.2015/SUPPL_FILE/APPENDIX_3.PDF.
  • Conte D. Peer Review Improves Undergraduate Science Writing Skills. California: The Berkeley Electronic Press; 2010.
  • Bawa P. Retention in online courses. Internet. 2016;6(1):215824401562177. doi:10.1177/2158244015621777.
  • Tyler-Smith K. Early attrition among first time eLearners: A review of factors that contribute to drop-out, withdrawal and non-completion rates of adult learners undertaking elearning programmes. MERLOT J Online Learning and Teaching. 2006;2(2):73–85.
  • Smith BG, Smith BG. 2010. E-learning technologies: A comparative study of adult learners enrolled on blended and online… [Internet]. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/115478/.
  • Abimbola S. The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(5):e002068. doi:10.1136/BMJGH-2019-002068.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.