Debunking Mental Health Misperceptions in Short-Form Social Media Videos: An Experimental Test of Scientific Credibility Cues

References

• Achterberg, P., de Koster, W., & van der Waal, J. (2017). A science confidence gap: Education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014. Public Understanding of Science, 26(6), 704–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515617367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M., Bruflat, R., Fucilla, R., Kramer, M., McKellips, S., Ryan, D. J., & Spiegelhoff, M. (2000). Testing the persuasiveness of evidence: Combining narrative and statistical forms. Communication Research Reports, 17(4), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090009388781
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, F. (2019). Suicide on Instagram–content analysis of a German suicide-related hashtag. The Crisis, 40(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000529
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Barta, K., & Andalibi, N. (2021). Constructing authenticity on TikTok: Social norms and social support on the “Fun” platform. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479574
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basch, C. H., Donelle, L., Fera, J., & Jaime, C. (2022). Deconstructing TikTok videos on mental health: Cross-sectional, descriptive content analysis. JMIR Formative Research, 6(5), e38340. https://doi.org/10.2196/38340
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhargava, P., MacDonald, K., Newton, C., Lin, H., & Pennycook, G. (2023). How effective are TikTok misinformation debunking videos? Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-114
   Google Scholar
• Blades, C. A., Stritzke, W. G., Page, A. C., & Brown, J. D. (2018). The benefits and risks of asking research participants about suicide: A meta-analysis of the impact of exposure to suicide-related content. Clinical Psychology Review, 64, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, L., Conway-Moore, K., Aguiar, A., Önal, F., Rutter, H., Helleve, A., Nwosu, E., Falcone, J., Savona, N., Boyland, E., & Knai, C. (2023). Associations between social media, adolescent mental health, and diet: A systematic review. Obesity Reviews, 24(S2), Article e13631. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13631.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, L., & Vraga, E. (2021). The Swiss cheese model for mitigating online misinformation. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 77(3), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2021.1912170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothby, C., Murray, D., Waggy, A. P., Tsou, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2021). Credibility of scientific information on social media: Variation by platform, genre and presence of formal credibility cues. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(3), 845–863. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00151
   Google Scholar
• Borah, P., Kim, S., Xiao, X., & Lee, D. K. L. (2022). Correcting misinformation using theory-driven messages: HPV vaccine misperceptions, information seeking, and the moderating role of reflection. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 30(3), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2021.1912046
   Google Scholar
• CDC. (2021). Youth risk behavior surveillance data summary & trends report: 2011-2021. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/YRBS_Data-Summary-Trends_Report2023_508.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, W. (2022). BeReal is Gen Z’s new favorite social media app. Here’s how it works. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2022/04/16/1092814566/bereal-app-gen-z-download
   Google Scholar
• Dazzi, T., Gribble, R., Wessely, S., & Fear, N. T. (2014). Does asking about suicide and related behaviours induce suicidal ideation? What is the evidence? Psychological Medicine, 44(16), 3361–3363. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714001299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, B. D., Ewell, P. J., Brauer, M., & Hallam, J. S. (2023). Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA. PLOS One, 18(3), Article e0279720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, E., Gell, S., Heiss, R., & Karsay, K. (2023). Social media influencers and adolescents’ health: A scoping review of the research field. Social Science & Medicine, 340, Article 116387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, K. S., & Spyridakis, J. H. (2009). Effect of contact information on the credibility of online health information. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 52(2), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2009.2017992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gesser-Edelsburg, A., Diamant, A., Hijazi, R., Mesch, G. S., & Angelillo, I. F. (2018). Correcting misinformation by health organizations during measles outbreaks: A controlled experiment. PLOS One, 13(12), Article e0209505. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillory, J. J., & Geraci, L. (2013). Correcting erroneous inferences in memory: The role of source credibility. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(4), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, A. (2001). Mann-Whitney test is not just a test of medians: Differences in spread can be important. BMJ, 323(7309), 391–393. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7309.391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiss, R., Nanz, A., Knupfer, H., Engel, E., & Matthes, J. (2023). Peer correction of misinformation on social media: (In)civility, success experience, and relationship consequences. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231209946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiss, R., & Rudolph, L. (2022). Patients as health influencers: Motivations and consequences of following cancer patients on Instagram. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(6), 806–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2045358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., & Crow, D. A. (2017). How can we use the ‘science of stories’ to produce persuasive scientific stories? Palgrave Communications, 3(1), Article 53. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0047-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2017). Educating for democracy in a partisan age: Confronting the challenges of motivated reasoning and misinformation. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216679817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, B., Tyson, A., & Funk, C. (2022). Americans’ trust in scientists, other groups declines. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2022/02/15/americans-trust-in-scientists-other-groups-declines/
   Google Scholar
• Knoll, J., Matthes, J., & Heiss, R. (2020). The social media political participation model: A goal systems theory perspective. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 26(1), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517750366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, L., Robinson, J., & Abberbock, T. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mataira, P. J., Morelli, P. T., Matsuoka, J. K., & Uehara McDonald, S. (2014). Shifting the paradigm: New directions for non-profits and funders in an era of diminishing resources. Social Business, 4(3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1362/204440814X14103454934212
   Google Scholar
• Matsa, K. E. (2022). More Americans are getting news on TikTok, bucking the trend on other social media sites. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/10/21/more-americans-are-getting-news-on-tiktok-bucking-the-trend-on-other-social-media-sites/
   Google Scholar
• McCashin, D., & Murphy, C. M. (2022). Using TikTok for public and youth mental health–A systematic review and content analysis. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045221106608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morbia, R. (2021, November 16). TikTok teaching? U of T researchers study the social media platform’s use in academia. University of Toronto News. https://www.utoronto.ca/news/tiktok-teaching-u-t-researchers-study-social-media-platform-s-use-academia
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, J., Fagan, K., Dreyfuss, E., & Donovan, J. (2022). TikTok, the war on Ukraine, and 10 features that make the app vulnerable to misinformation. The Media Manipulation Casebook. https://mediamanipulation.org/research/tiktok-war-ukraine-and-10-features-make-app-vulnerable-misinformation
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, N. J., Nason, G., Manecksha, R. P., & O’Kelly, F. (2022). The unintentional spread of misinformation on ‘TikTok’: A paediatric urological perspective. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 18(3), 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquetto, I. V., Jahani, E., Atreja, S., & Baum, M. (2022). Social debunking of misinformation on WhatsApp: The case for strong and in-group ties. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512964
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PlushCare. (2022). How accurate is mental health advice on TikTok? https://plushcare.com/blog/tiktok-mental-health/
   Google Scholar
• Polihronis, C., Cloutier, P., Kaur, J., Skinner, R., & Cappelli, M. (2022). What’s the harm in asking? A systematic review and meta-analysis on the risks of asking about suicide-related behaviors and self-harm with quality appraisal. Archives of Suicide Research, 26(2), 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2020.1793857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorius, C., McCashin, D., & Coyle, D. (2022). Mental health professionals as influencers on TikTok and Instagram: What role do they play in mental health literacy and help-seeking? Internet Interventions, 30, 100591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2022.100591
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Putnam, A. L., & Phelps, R. J. (2017). The citation effect: In-text citations moderately increase belief in trivia claims. Acta Psychologica, 179, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer, E., & Mitchell, A. (2021). News use across social media platforms in 2020. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2021/01/12/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-in-2020/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. N., & Seitz, H. H. (2019). Correcting misinformation about neuroscience via social media. Science Communication, 41(6), 790–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019890073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, E., Wicks, R., & Leshner, G. (2012). Experimental methodology in journalism and mass communication research. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699011430066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., Meier, A., & Beyens, I. (2022). Social media use and its impact on adolescent mental health: An umbrella review of the evidence. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogels, E. A., Gelles-Watnick, R., & Massarat, N. (2022). Teens, social media and technology 2022. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/08/10/teens-social-media-and-technology-2022/
   Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017). Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media. Science Communication, 39(5), 621–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017731776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2018). I do not believe you: How providing a source corrects health misperceptions across social media platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1337–1353. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1313883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2022). Correcting what’s true: Testing competing claims about health misinformation on social media. American Behavioral Scientist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221118252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., Sojung, C. K., Cook, J., & Bode, L. (2020). Testing the effectiveness of correction placement and type on instagram. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(4), 632–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/194016122091908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrontis, D., Makrides, A., Christofi, M., & Thrassou, A. (2021). Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 617–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, N., Brooks, J. J., Saucier, C. J., & Suresh, S. (2021). Evaluating the impact of attempts to correct health misinformation on social media: A meta-analysis. Health Communication, 36(13), 1776–1784. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1794553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Walther, J. B., Pingree, S., & Hawkins, R. P. (2008). Health information, credibility, homophily, and influence via the Internet: Web sites versus discussion groups. Health Communication, 23(4), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230802229738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Margolin, D., & Niederdeppe, J. (2020). Testing strategies to increase source credibility through strategic message design in the context of vaccination and vaccine hesitancy. Health Communication, 36(11), 1354–1367. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1751400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar