Effects of student engagement in peer feedback on writing performance in higher education

References

• Alemayehu, L., & Chen, H. L. (2021). Learner and instructor-related challenges for learners’ engagement in MOOCs: A review of 2014–2020 publications in selected SSCI indexed journals 1–23 Publications in selected SSCI indexed journals. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1920430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages*. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, K. H., & Hou, H. T. (2015). Exploring students’ behavioural patterns during online peer assessment from the affective, cognitive, and metacognitive perspectives: A progressive sequential analysis. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.822416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, K. H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students’ writing performance during an online peer assessment activity. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Gai, X. (2021). Peer feedback and teacher feedback: A comparative study of revision effectiveness in writing instruction for EFL learners. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1969541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Y., & Xu, J. (2020). Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippou, K., Kallo, J., & Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2021). Supervising master’s theses in international master’s degree programmes: Roles, responsibilities and models. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1636220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galikyan, I., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students’ engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 43, 100692–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsia, L. H., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). Effects of different online peer-feedback approaches on students’ performance skills, motivation and self-efficacy in a dance course. Computers & Education, 96(C), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Lai, H. M., Hsieh, P. J., Uden, L., & Yang, C. H. (2021). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing university students’ behavioral engagement in flipped classrooms. Computers & Education, 175, 104318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifi, S., & Noroozi, O. (2021). Supporting argumentative essay writing through an online supported peer-review script. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(5), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1961097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., & Biemans, H. J. (2021b). How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1687005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2020). Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2021a). Peer feedback or peer feedforward? Enhancing students’ argumentative peer learning processes and outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 768–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., Guo, X., & Tywoniw, R. (2020). Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Du, J., Zhou, D. Q., & Huang, B. (2021). Exploiting the potential of peer feedback: The combined use of face-to-face feedback and e-feedback in doctoral writing groups. Assessing Writing, 47, 100482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M., Babayi, M., Ashrafi, H., & Biemans, H. J. (2022). Gender differences in students’ argumentative essay writing, peer review performance and uptake in online learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2034887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2016). Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay. The Internet and Higher Education, 31(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., & Hatami, J. (2018). The effects of online peer feedback and epistemic beliefs on students’ argumentation-based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(5), 548–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1431143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., Bayat, A., van Ginkel, S., Biemans, H. J., & Mulder, M. (2020). Students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: Does gender matter? Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1543200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Kirschner, P. A., Biemans, H. J., & Mulder, M. (2018). Promoting argumentation competence: Extending from first- to second-order scaffolding through adaptive fading. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9400-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Clark, R. J. (2018). Accountability in peer assessment: Examining the effects of reviewing grades on peer ratings and peer feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 43(12), 2263–2278. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1320374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. C., & Newby, T. (2006). The role of students’ cognitive engagement in online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2001_3
   Google Scholar
• Schunn, C., Godley, A., & DeMartino, S. (2016). The reliability and validity of peer review of writing in high School AP English classes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, H. F. (2022). Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629601
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P., Hayes, S., Vickers, J., Gozza-Cohen, M., Uzuner, S., Mehta, R., Valchova, A., & Rangan, P. (2010). A re-examination of the community of inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., & Weinberger, A. (2007). Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Instructional Science, 40(2), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9174-5
   Google Scholar
• Tian, L., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System, 91, 102247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uludag, P., & McDonough, K. (2022). Validating a rubric for assessing integrated writing in an EAP context. Assessing Writing, 52, 100609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2021). From plans to actions: A process model for why feedback features influence feedback implementation. Instructional Science, 49(3), 365–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09546-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Yuan, K., & Zhang, L. (2019). Understanding student engagement with peer feedback on master’s theses: A Macau study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, J., & Kim C, M. (2018). The effects of autonomy support on student engagement in peer assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9538-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, Y., Wan, Z. H., & Sun, D. (2022). Online formative peer feedback in Chinese contexts at the tertiary level: A critical review on its design, impacts and influencing factors. Computers & Education, 176, 104341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong, Z., Schunn, C., & Wang, Y. (2021). What makes students contribute more peer feedback? The role of within-course experience with peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1968792
   Google Scholar