2,236
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Meaning-making in virtual learning environment enabled educational innovations: a 13-year longitudinal case study

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 168-182 | Received 23 Nov 2021, Accepted 19 May 2022, Published online: 29 May 2022

References

  • Aguinis, H., & Solarino, A. M. (2019). Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants. Strategic Management Journal, 40(8), 1291–1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3015
  • Ashrafi, A., Zareravasan, A., Rabiee Savoji, S., & Amani, M. (2020). Exploring factors influencing students’ continuance intention to use the learning management system (LMS): a multi-perspective framework. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1734028
  • Baptista, J. (2009). Institutionalisation as a process of interplay between technology and its organisational context of use. Journal of Information Technology, 24(4), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2009.15
  • Barari, N., RezaeiZadeh, M., Khorasani, A., & Alami, F. (2020). Designing and validating educational standards for E-teaching in virtual learning environments (VLEs), based on revised bloom’s taxonomy. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1739078
  • Barman, L., Josephsson, S., Silén, C., & Bolander-Laksov, K. (2016). How education policy is made meaningful – a narrative exploration of how teachers show autonomy in the development of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(6), 1111–1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1144571
  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Anchor Books.
  • Blundell, C., Lee, K.-T., & Nykvist, S. (2020). Moving beyond enhancing pedagogies with digital technologies: Frames of reference, habits of mind and transformative learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1726235
  • Browne, T., Jenkins, M., & Walker, R. (2006). A longitudinal perspective regarding the use of VLEs by higher education institutions in the United Kingdom. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820600852795
  • Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2019). The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526485656
  • Chan, R. Y., Bista, K., & Allen, R. M. (2021). Online teaching and learning in higher education during COVID-19 - international perspectives and experiences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003125921
  • Colyvas, J. (2007). From divergent meanings to common practices: The early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford university. Research Policy, 36(4), 456–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.019
  • Combe, I. A., & Carrington, D. J. (2015). Leaders’ sensemaking under crises: Emerging cognitive consensus over time within management teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.02.002
  • Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. Cambridge, MA.
  • Dodgson, M., Ash, S., Andrews, J., & Phillips, N. (2021). Managing technology-enabled innovation in a professional services firm: A cooperative case study. Academy of Management Discoveries, https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2020.0217
  • Duesbery, L., & Twyman, T. (2020). How are descriptive and inferential statistics different? In 100 questions (and answers) about action research (pp. 94). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544305455
  • Flavin, M. (2020). Re-imagining technology enhanced learning. Springer Nature, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55785-0
  • Furberg, A. (2010). Scientific Inquiry in Web-Based Learning Environments: Exploring Technological, Epistemic and Institutional Aspects of Students’ Meaning Making [PhD Thesis, University of Oslo]. Norway.
  • Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120604
  • Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine.
  • Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of worldmaking. Hackett Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350928558
  • Green, W., Anderson, V., Tait, K., & Tran, L. T. (2020). Precarity, fear and hope: Reflecting and imagining in higher education during a global pandemic. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(7), 1309–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1826029
  • Greener, S. L. (2020). COVID-19: A stimulus to 2020 vision. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), 656–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1821434
  • Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Meyer, R. E. (2017). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526415066
  • Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews Are enough?. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  • Haack, P., Schilke, O., & Zucker, L. (2021). Legitimacy revisited: Disentangling propriety, validity, and consensus. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 749–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12615
  • Hadjithoma, C., & Karagiorgi, Y. (2009). The use of ICT in primary schools within emerging communities of implementation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.010
  • Heise, D. R. (1979). Understanding events: Affect and the construction of social action. Cambridge University Press.
  • Hinings, C. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (2008). Organizational institutionalism and sociology: A reflection. In The sage Handbook of organizational institutionalism. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n20
  • Hirsch, P. M. (1986). From ambushes to golden parachutes: Corporate takeovers as an instance of cultural framing and institutional integration. American Journal of Sociology, 91(4), 800–837. https://doi.org/10.1086/228351
  • Hsu, P. L., Maccari, E. A., Mazieri, M. R., & Storópoli, J. E. (2018). A bibliometric review of institutional theory on higher education institutions. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies, 10(3), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2018.v10i3.384
  • Huang, J., Matthews, K. E., & Lodge, J. M. (2021). ‘The university doesn’t care about the impact it is having on US’: Academic experiences of the institutionalisation of blended learning. Higher Education Research & Development, https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1915965
  • Kligyte, G., & Barrie, S. (2014). Collegiality: Leading US into fantasy – the paradoxical resilience of collegiality in academic leadership. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.864613
  • Lanford, M., Corwin, Z. B., Maruco, T., & Ochsner, A. (2019). Institutional barriers to innovation: Lessons from a digital intervention for underrepresented students applying to college. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1576558
  • Li, N., Wang, Q., Liu, J., & Marsick, V. (2022). Improving interdisciplinary online course design through action learning: A Chinese case study. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 19(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2021.2002681
  • Li, N., Zhang, X., & Limniou, M. (2021). A country’s national culture affects virtual learning environment adoption in higher education: A systematic review (2001–2020). Interactive Learning Environments, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1967408
  • Luan, S., Reb, J., & Gigerenzer, G. (2019). Ecological rationality: Fast-and-frugal heuristics for managerial decision making under uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1735–1759. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0172
  • Marsan, J., Carillo, K. D., & Negoita, B. (2020). Entrepreneurial actions and the legitimation of free/open source software services. Journal of Information Technology, 35(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396219886879
  • McGrath, C., Roxå, T., & Bolander Laksov, K. (2019). Change in a culture of collegiality and consensus-seeking: A double-edged sword. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(5), 1001–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1603203
  • Miles, M. B., Eckholm, M., & Vandenburghe, R. (1987). School improvement: Exploring the process of institutionalization. ACCO.
  • Natividad, G., Spector, J. M., & Evangelopoulos, N. (2018). An analysis of two decades of educational technology publications. In R. Huang, Kinshuk, M. Jemni, N.-S. Chen, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Lecture Notes in educational technology. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0137-7
  • Nworie, J. (2015). Institutionalization of teaching and learning gains in higher education. Educational Technology, 55(5), 21–28.
  • Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D. C., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., Bozkurt, A., Crawford, S., Czerniewicz, L., Gibson, R., Linder, K., Mason, J., & Mondelli, V. (2021). 2021 EDUCAUSE horizon report, teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE.
  • Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n11
  • Raviola, E., & Norbäck, M. (2013). Bringing technology and meaning into institutional work: Making news at an Italian business newspaper. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1171–1194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613492077
  • Rienties, B., Bas, G., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2016). Why some teachers easily learn to use a new virtual learning environment: A technology acceptance perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.881394
  • Rogers. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). The Free Press.
  • Sargent, C. S. (2015). Evidence of reflective thinking across the curriculum: College experience versus individual courses. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(3), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.973375
  • Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.172.0136
  • Sinclair, J., & Aho, A.-M. (2018). Experts on super innovators: Understanding staff adoption of learning management systems. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1342609
  • Slager, R., Gond, J. P., & Moon, J. (2012). Standardization as institutional work: The regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organization Studies, 33(5-6), 763–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443628
  • Staudt Willet, K. B., & Carpenter, J. P. (2020). Teachers on reddit? Exploring contributions and interactions in four teaching-related subreddits. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(2), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1722978
  • Teo, T., & Huang, F. (2019). Investigating the influence of individually espoused cultural values on teachers’ intentions to use educational technologies in Chinese universities. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(5-6), 813–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1489856
  • Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 175–190). SAGE.
  • Twiner, A., Littleton, K., Whitelock, D., & Coffin, C. (2021). Combining sociocultural discourse analysis and multimodal analysis to explore teachers’ and pupils’ meaning making. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100520
  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Hargrave, T. J. (2004). Social, technical, and institutional change: A literature review and synthesis. In M. S. Poole, & A. H. de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation. Oxford Universty Press.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Wei, Q. (2021). Do urban carbon reduction practices under China’s institutional arrangement go beyond “low-hanging fruits”? empirical evidence from guangzhou. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(6), 978–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1796606
  • Wilson, M. L. (2021). The impact of technology integration courses on preservice teacher attitudes and beliefs: A meta-analysis of teacher education research from 2007–2017. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1950085
  • Xi, Y. (2021). Noteworthy conduct and independent character: The way of HeXie education. Qinghua University Press.
  • Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (Sixth edition. ed.). SAGE.