The effectiveness of ICT-enhanced teaching mode using activity theory on raising class interaction and satisfaction in an engineering course

References

• Anthony, A. B. (2011). Activity theory as a framework for investigating district-classroom system interactions and their influences on technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(4), 335–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782594
   Google Scholar
• Arrosagaray, M., Gonzalez-Peiteado, M., Pino-Juste, M., & Rodriguez-Lopez, B. (2019). A comparative study of Spanish adult students’ attitudes to ICT in classroom, blended and distance language learning modes. Computers & Education, 134(JUN), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.016
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Researcher in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bosman, L., Duvalcouetil, N., Mayer, B., & Mcnamara, P. (2019). Using online discussions to develop the entrepreneurial mindset in environmental engineering undergraduates: A case study. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 9(3), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v9i3.9491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman, L., Roy, S., Mcdonald, W., & Ababei, C. (2020). Using online discussions to connect theory and practice in core engineering undergraduate courses. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(3), 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, M. B., Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A., Sedano, C. I., Hauge, J. B., Hu, J., & Rauterberg, M. (2015). An activity theory-based model for serious games analysis and conceptual design. Computers & Education, 87(Sep.), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.023
   Google Scholar
• Cebrian, G., Palau, R., & Mogas, J. (2020). The smart classroom as a means to the development of ESD methodologies. Sustainability, 12(7), 3010(1–18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, Y. L., & Jang, H. (2019). Teaching writing to elementary school students: An activity theory perspective. Irish Educational Studies, 38(4), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2019.1645720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engestrom, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Gutierrez, M., Gimenez, G., & Calero, J. (2020). Is the use of ICT in education leading to higher student outcomes? Analysis from the Spanish autonomous communities. Computers & Education, 157, 103969(1–15). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, V., & Gomez, J. (2017). Applying active methodologies for teaching software engineering in computer engineering. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 12(4), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2017.2778358
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Valcarcel, A., Basilotta, V., & Lopez, C. (2014). ICT in collaborative learning in the classrooms of primary and secondary education. Comunicar, 21(42), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Valcarcel, A., Tejedor, F., & Tejedor, F. (2017). Student perception of the value of ICT’s in their learning strategies and their relation to performance. Education Xx1, 20(2), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.13447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, A., Stav, Y., & Yamin, N. (2016). Increasing motivation of engineering students: Combining “real world” examples in a basic electric circuits course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 2460–2469. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Aharon-Gero/publication/311558798_Increasing_motivation_of_engineering_students_Combining_real_world_examples_in_a_basic_electric_circuits_course/links/584c691508aeb989251f7713/Increasing-motivation-of-engineering-students-Combining-real-world-examples-in-a-basic-electric-circuits-course.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y. C. (2021). An action research in critical thinking concept designed curriculum based on collaborative learning for engineering ethics course. Sustainability, 13(5), 2621(1–23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L. S., Su, J. Y., & Pao, T. L. (2019). A context aware smart classroom architecture for smart campuses. Applied Sciences, 9(9), 1837(1–34). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091837.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. (2014). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments - a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0004-5
   Google Scholar
• Iria, E.-A., Carlos, A.-H., Mar, P.-S., Abelardo, P., Raquel, M., Crespo-García, D. L., & Carlos, D.-K. (2015). A methodology for improving active learning engineering courses with a large number of students and teachers through feedback gathering and iterative refinement. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9288-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, V. (2017). The use of activity theory as a methodology for developing creativity within the art and design classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37(3), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwet, M. (2017). Operation phakisa education: Why a secret? Mass surveillance, inequality, and race in South Africa's emerging national e-education system. First Monday, 22(12), 3672408(1–31). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i12.8054
   Google Scholar
• Kwet, M., & Prinsloo, P. (2020). The ‘smart’ classroom: A new frontier in the age of the smart university. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1734922
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, C., Cranmer, S., & Mcnicol, S. (2018). Developing digital pedagogy through learning design: An activity theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1131–1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. H., Yang, H. H., & Macleod, J. (2018). Preferences toward the constructivist smart classroom learning environment: Examining pre-service teachers’ connectedness. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(3), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1474232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. T. (2019). Impacts of a flipped classroom with a smart learning diagnosis system on students’ learning performance, perception, and problem-solving ability in a software engineering course. Computers in Human Behavior, 95(JUN), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.036
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. T., & Lin, Y. C. (2017). In D. René, & C. Aubin (Eds.), Mobile learning: Students’ perspectives, applications and challenges (Chapter 5). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lui, M., & Slotta, J. D. (2014). Immersive simulations for smart classrooms: Exploring evolutionary con applying mobile technology to the support learning and diagnosis approach in a flipped classroom concepts in secondary science. Technology Pedagogy & Education, 23(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.838452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marianna, V., Olga, M., Alexander, S., Mira, R., & Eduard, M. (2017). Systematic review and results of the experiment of a flipped learning model for the courses of descriptive geometry, engineering and computer graphics, computer geometry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 13(8), 4831–4845. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00967a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, M., Ochoa, S. F., Bastarrica, M. C., & Gutierrez, F. J. (2017). Enhancing the student learning experience in software engineering project courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 61(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2017.2742989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwan, A., & Sweeney, T. (2019). Using activity theory to analyse contradictions in English teachers’ technology integration. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0418-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, C., Goni, J., & Sotomayor, T. (2021). Embracing the social turn: Epistemic change in engineering students enrolled in an anthro-design course. International Journal of Technology and Education, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09699-x
   Google Scholar
• Noel, R., Riquelme, F., Lean, R. M., Merino, E., & Munoz, R. (2018). Exploring collaborative writing of user stories with multimodal learning analytics: A case study on a software engineering course. IEEE Access, 6, 67783–67798. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2876801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbuanya, T. C., & Efuwape, B. M. (2018). Technology-aided learning environment: An investigation into electrical/electronics students’ instructional preferences, attitude and approaches to learning. South African Journal of Education, 38(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38ns2a1535.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, E., Barba, P., & Corrin, L. (2021). Enabling adaptive, personalised and context-aware interaction in a smart learning environment: Piloting the icollab system. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, F. (2020). Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10239-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radosavljevic, V., Radosavljevic, S., & Jelic, G. (2019). Ambient intelligence-based smart classroom model. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(2), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1652836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tissenbaum, M., & Slotta, J. D. (2019). Developing a smart classroom infrastructure to support real-time student collaboration and inquiry: A 4-year design study. Instructional Science, 47(4), 423–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09486-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turhan, C., Akman, I., & Hacaloglu, T. (2019). Online collaborative tool usage for review meetings in software engineering courses. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(2), 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1651742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valiente, D., Payá, L., Fernández de Ávila, S., Ferrer, J. C., & Reinoso, O. (2019). Analysing students’ achievement in the learning of electronics supported by ICT resources. Electronics, 8(3), 264(1–15). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8030264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. J. S., Yang, L. Z., & Chen, T. L. C. (2020). The effectiveness of ICT-enhanced learning on raising intercultural competencies and class interaction in a hospitality course. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1815223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S., Veen, B. V., & Rau, M. A. (2020). How drawing prompts can increase cognitive engagement in an active learning engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(4), 723–742. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, T. T., & Wu, Y. T. (2020). Applying project-based learning and scamper teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100631(1–10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, S. (2020). A conceptual model for integrating affordances of mobile technologies into task-based language teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1711132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. F., Yu, H. J., Gong, C. H., & Chen, N. S. (2017). Students’ perceptions and behaviour in technology-rich classroom and multi-media classroom. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00636a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, X. L., Kim, H. S., Lai, W. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Cognitive regulations in ICT-supported flipped classroom interactions: An activity theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, T. X. P., & Mickleborough, N. C. (2015). Promoting collaborative problem-solving skills in a course on engineering grand challenges. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 52(2), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.866591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2010). A conceptual framework based on activity theory for mobile CSCL. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 211–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00580.x
   Google Scholar