Humanoid robot as a tutor in a team-based training activity

References

• Ah-Nam, L., & Osman, K. (2017). Developing 21st century skills through a constructivist-constructionist learning environment. K-12 STEM Education, 3(2), 205–216.
   Google Scholar
• Akalin, N., Kristoffersson, A., & Loutfi, A. (2019). The influence of feedback type in robot-assisted training. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3(4), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3040067
   Google Scholar
• Aldebaran documentation. (2018). http://doc.aldebaran.com/2-1/family/robots/index_robots.html
   Google Scholar
• Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., & Ghazisaedy, M. (2014). Employing humanoid robots for teaching English language in Iranian junior high-schools. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 11(03), Article 1450022. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219843614500224
   Google Scholar
• Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., & Ghazisaedy, M. (2015). The impact of social robotics on L2 learners’ anxiety and attitude in English vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(4), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0286-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almerich, G., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., Díaz-García, I., & Cebrián-Cifuentes, S. (2020). 21st-century competences: The relation of ICT competences with higher-order thinking capacities and teamwork competences in university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves-Oliveira, P., Paiva, A., & Hoffman, G. (2019). Guide to build YOLO, a creativity stimulating robot for children. HardwareX, 6, e00074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2019.e00074
   Google Scholar
• Andreasson, R., Alenljung, B., Billing, E., & Lowe, R. (2018). Affective touch in human–robot interaction: Conveying emotion to the nao robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(4), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0446-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assad-Uz-Zaman, M., Rasedul Islam, M., Miah, S., & Rahman, M. H. (2019). NAO robot for cooperative rehabilitation training. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering, 6, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668319862151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddoura, R., & Venture, G. (2013). Social vs. useful HRI: Experiencing the familiar, perceiving the robot as a sociable partner and responding to its ections. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(4), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0207-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranwal, N., Singh, A. K., & Nandi, G. C. (2017). Development of a framework for human–robot interactions with Indian sign language using possibility theory. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9(4), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0412-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belpaeme, T., Vogt, P., Van den Berghe, R., Bergmann, K., Göksun, T., De Haas, M., Kanero J., Kennedy J., Küntay A. C., Oudgenoeg-Paz O., Papadopoulos F., Schodde T., Verhagen J., Wallbridge C. D., Willemsen B., de Wit J., Geçkin V., Hoffmann L., Kopp S., Krahmer E., Mamus E., Montanier J.-M., Oranç C., Pandey, A. K. (2018). Guidelines for designing social robots as second language tutors. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(3), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0467-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuscher, L. M., Fan, J., Sarkar, N., Dietrich, M. S., Newhouse, P. A., Miller, K. F., & Mion, L. C. (2017). Socially assistive robots: Measuring older adults’ perceptions. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 43(12), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20170707-04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, L., Burbach, B. E., Kennedy, C., & Walters, L. (2018). Escape room recruitment event: Description and lessons learned. Journal of Nursing Education, 57(3), 184–187. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20180221-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti, D., Di Nuovo, S., Buono, S., & Di Nuovo, A. (2017). Robots in education and care of children with developmental disabilities: A study on acceptance by experienced and future professionals. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0359-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang, T. H. H., & Tapus, A. (2015). Stress game: The role of motivational robotic assistance in reducing user’s task stress. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0256-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Giudice, M., Scutto, V., Ballestra, L. V., & Pironti, M. (2022). Humanoid robot adoption and labour productivity: A perspective on ambidextrous product innovation routines. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(6), 1098–1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1897643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggins, R. (2019). Innovation and problem-solving teaching case: The breakout Box–A desktop escape room. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 19(4), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.33423/jop.v19i4.2294
   Google Scholar
• Escape room Franchise. (2019). https://www.buyescapegames.com/escape-room-listings/
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, R., Kozlowski, S. W., Shapiro, M. J., & Salas, E. (2008). Toward a definition of teamwork in emergency medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 1104–1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00250.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, G., Spaulding, S., Westlund, J. K., Lee, J. J., Plummer, L., Martinez, M., Das, M., & Breazeal, C. (2016). Affective personalization of a social robot tutor for children’s second language skills. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (Vol. 30, pp. 3951–3957).
   Google Scholar
• Hedgecock, J., Standen, P. J., Beer, C., Brown, D., & Stewart, D. S. (2014). Evaluating the role of a humanoid robot to support learning in children with profound and multiple disabilities. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 8(3), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAT-02-2014-0006
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. O., Cuijpers, R. H., Juola, J. F., Torta, E., Simonov, M., Frisiello, A., & Beck, C. (2014). Socially assistive robots: A comprehensive approach to extending independent living. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0217-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. O., Cuijpers, R. H., Pollmann, K., & van de Ven, A. A. (2016). Exploring the entertainment value of playing games with a humanoid robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(2), 247–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0331-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A., Bull, S., & Castellano, G. (2018). I know that now, i’m going to learn this next” promoting self-regulated learning with a robotic tutor. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(4), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0430-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human–Computer Interaction, 19(1-2), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Kwon, T., & Kim, K. (2018). Can human–robot interaction promote the same depth of social information processing as human–human interaction? International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0428-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucirkova, N. (2019). Children’s agency by design: Design parameters for personalization in story-making apps. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 21, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Kutzin, J. M. (2019). Escape the room: Innovative approaches to interprofessional education. Journal of Nursing Education, 58(8), 474–480. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20190719-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite, I., Martinho, C., Pereira, A., & Paiva, A. (2008). Icat: An affective game buddy based on anticipatory mechanisms (short paper). Proc. of 7th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 1229–1232.
   Google Scholar
• Miskam, M. A., Hamid, M. A. C., Yussof, H., Shamsuddin, S., Malik, N. A., & Basir, S. N. (2013). Study on social interaction between children with autism and humanoid robot NAO. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 393, 573–578. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.393.573
   Google Scholar
• Moro, C., Lin, S., Nejat, G., & Mihailidis, A. (2019). Social robots and seniors: A comparative study on the influence of dynamic social features on human–robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0488-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson, S. (2015). Peeking behind the locked door: A survey of escape room facilities. White Paper available at http://scottnicholson.com/pubs/erfacwhite.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, S. (2018). Want to see the escape room? Get some tips from a creator. Retrieved at February 2019 from: https://www.redbull.com/in-en/interview-with-dr-scott-nicholson
   Google Scholar
• Nijholt, A. (2019). Stand-up comedy and humor by robots. Proceedings Sixteenth International Symposium on Social Communication, 1, 228–234.
   Google Scholar
• Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, R., Lo, H., & Neustaedter, C. (2017). Collaboration, awareness, and communication in real-life escape rooms. In O. Mival & M. B. Smyth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2017 conference on designing interactive systems (pp. 1353–1364). NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064767
   Google Scholar
• Park, E., & Kwon, S. J. (2016). I can teach them: The ability of robot instructors to cognitive disable children. Journal of Psychological & Educational Research, 24(1), 101–114.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G. M. (2011). Team players and teamwork: New strategies for developing successful collaboration. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., Li, D., Jussila, I., & Wang, J. (2020). An empirical examination of the emergence of collective psychological ownership in work team contexts. Journal of Management & Organization, 26(5), 657–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pino, O., Palestra, G., Trevino, R., & De Carolis, B. (2020). The humanoid robot NAO as trainer in a memory program for elderly people with mild cognitive impairment. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00533-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portugal, D., Alvito, P., Christodoulou, E., Samaras, G., & Dias, J. (2019). A study on the deployment of a service robot in an elderly care center. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(2), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0492-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950596
   Google Scholar
• Rosin, F., Forget, P., Lamouri, S., & Pellerin, R. (2020). Impacts of industry 4.0 technologies on lean principles. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1644–1661. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1672902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCRAP. (2016). About SCRAP. https://realescapegame. com/about/
   Google Scholar
• Sen, C., Ay, Z. S., & Kiray, S. A. (2018). STEM skills in the 21st century education. In M. Shelley & S. A. Kirav (Eds), Research highlights in STEM education (pp. 81–101). ISRES Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Shukla, J., Cristiano, J., Oliver, J., & Puig, D. (2019). Robot assisted interventions for individuals with intellectual disabilities: Impact on users and caregivers. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(4), 631–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00527-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spira, L. (2017). Three years of room escapes: The growth of the US market. Room Escape Artist. https://roomescapeartist.com/2017/07/30/three-yearsof-room-escapes-the-growth-of-the-us-market/
   Google Scholar
• Spira, L. (2018). Escape Room Industry Growth Study. Room Escape Artist. https://roomescapeartist.com/2018/07/28/2018-escape-room-industry/
   Google Scholar
• Stock-Homburg, R., Hannig, M., & Lilienthal, L. (2020, November). Conversational flow in human-robot interactions at the workplace: Comparing humanoid and android robots. In A. R. Wagner, D. Feil-Seifer, K. S. Haring, S. Rossi, T. Williams, H. He, & S. S. Ge (Eds.), International conference on social robotics (pp. 578–589). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Syamimi, S., Hanafiah, Y., Ismailb, L. I., Mohamedc, S., Hanapiahc, F. A., & Zaharid, N. I. (2012). Humanoid robot NAO interacting with autistic children of moderately impaired intelligence to augment communication skills. Procedia Engineering, 41, 1533–1538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.346
   Google Scholar
• Tahir, Y., Dauwels, J., Thalmann, D., & Thalmann, N. M. (2018). A user study of a humanoid robot as a social mediator for two-person conversations. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00523-0
   Google Scholar
• Talalai, S. O. (2018). A case study of the integration of robotics to support the educational and therapeutic goals of students with low-iIncidence disabilities. New Jersey City University.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, A. L., Tung, V. W. S., & Cheng, T. O. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of the potential use of educational robotics in management education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1780269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathy, M. (2018). Building quality teamwork to achieve excellence in business organizations. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 5(3), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, H. W., & Yeh, H. T. (2013). Team members’ perceptions of online teamwork learning experiences and building teamwork trust: A qualitative study. Computers & Education, 63, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Berghe, R., Verhagen, J., Oudgenoeg-Paz, O., Van der Ven, S., & & Leseman, P. (2019). Social robots for language learning: A review. Review of Educational Research, 89(2), 259–295. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318821286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Elzen, L. (2019). Improving the motivation of students using educational escape room. Bachelor thesis. University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel, R. J., Lexis, M. A., & de Witte, L. P. (2019). ZORA robot based interventions to achieve therapeutic and educational goals in children with severe physical disabilities. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(2), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00578-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, E. T., Torta, E., & Cuijpers, R. H. (2013). Effects of eye contact and iconic gestures on message retention in human-robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(4), 491–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0214-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar