Cultivating creativity improves middle school students’ computational thinking skills

References

• Anwar, M. N., Aness, M., Khizar, A., Naseer, M. (2012). Relationship of creative thinking with the academic achievements of secondary school students. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(3), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Aronshtam, L., Shrot, T., & Shmallo, R. (2021). Can we do better? A classification of algorithm run-time-complexity improvement using the SOLO taxonomy. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 5851–5872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10532-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschauer, W., Haim, K., & Weber, C. (2021). A contribution to scientific creativity: A validation study measuring divergent problem solving ability. Creativity Research Journal, 34(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1968656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylor, A. L. (2001). A U-shaped model for the development of intuition by level of expertise. New Ideas in Psychology, 19(3), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-118X(01)00005-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Creativity in classrooms. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 587–606). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.029
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (structure of the observed learning outcome). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohan, H., & Bohan, S. (1993). Extending the regular curriculum through creative problem solving. The Arithmetic Teacher, 41(2), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.41.2.0083
   Google Scholar
• Boom, K. D., Bower, M., Arguel, A., Siemon, J., & Scholkmann, A. (2018). Relationship between computational thinking and a measure of intelligence as a general problem-solving ability. Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 18, 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197091.3197104
   Google Scholar
• Carlucci, L. (2013). On the necessity of U-shaped learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(1), 56–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/TOPS.12002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance tests of creative thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, X., Tang, Y.-Y., Tang, R., & Posner, M. I. (2014). Improving creativity performance by short-term meditation. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 10(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-10-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durak, H. Y., & Saritepeci, M. (2018). Analysis of the relation between computational thinking skills and various variables with the structural equation model. Computers and Education, 116, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginat, D., & Menashe, E. (2015). SOLO taxonomy for assessing novices’ algorithmic design. SIGCSE 2015 – Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 452–457. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677311
   Google Scholar
• Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenaga, M., Eguíluz, A., Garaizar, P., & Gibaja, J. (2021). How do students develop computational thinking? Assessing early programmers in a maze-based online game. Computer Science Education, 31(2), 259–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1903248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, E., & Milgram, R. M. (2010). Creative thinking ability: Domain generality and specificity. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.503535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel-Fishelson, R., & Hershkovitz, A. (2022). Studying interrelations of computational thinking and creativity: A scoping review (2011–2020). Computers & Education, 176, 104353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel-Fishelson, R., Hershkovitz, A., Eguíluz, A., Garaizar, P., & Guenaga, M. (2021). The associations between computational thinking and creativity: The role of personal characteristics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(8), 1415–1447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120940954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, L. A., Witt, E. A., Games, A. I., Fitzgerald, H. E., Von Eye, A., & Zhao, Y. (2012). Information technology use and creativity: Findings from the children and technology project. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, F., & Divitini, M. (2020). Affinity for technology and teenagers’ learning intentions. ICER 2020 – Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372782.3406269
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., & Proctor, C. (2021). A revaluation of computational thinking in K–12 education: Moving toward computational literacies. Educational Researcher, 51(2), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211057904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2011). Proven reliability and validity of the Torrance tests of creative thinking (TTCT). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(4), 314–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2017). The Torrance tests of creative thinking – Figural or verbal: Which one should we use? Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 4(2), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0015
   Google Scholar
• Kong, S. (2019). Components and methods of evaluating computational thinking for fostering creative problem-solvers in senior primary school education. In S. Kong & H. Abelson (Eds.), Computational thinking education (pp. 119–142). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6528-7_8
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M.-C., & Lu, H.-F. (2002). A study on the creative problem-solving process in computer programming. Proceeding of the International Conference on Engineering Education. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/057e/f657236382b17b7b3e9865178709def3296b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, B., & Venckuté, M. (2020). Creativity – A transversal skill for lifelong learning. An overview of existing concepts and practices: Literature review report (P. Kampylis & R. Cachia, Eds.). EUR 30405 EN, Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/557196
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, M. E. (1998). What is problem solving? Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325160315576361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcneil, N. M. (2007). U-shaped development in math: 7-year-olds outperform 9-year-olds on equivalence problems. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 687. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mevarech, Z. R. (1997). The U-curve process that trainee teachers experience in integrating computers into the curriculum. In D. Passey & B. Samways (Eds.), Information Technology (pp. 46–51). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35081-3_5
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). PISA 2022 creative thinking framework (third draft).
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rios, J. A., Ling, G., Pugh, R., Becker, D., & Bacall, A. (2020). Identifying critical 21st-century skills for workplace success: A content analysis of job advertisements. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19890600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, Y.-H., & Kim, J.-H. (2016). Analyzing the effects of coding education through pair programming for the computational thinking and creativity of elementary school students. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(46), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i46/107837
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, C. E., Kleibeuker, S. W., de Dreu, C. K. W., & Crone, E. A. (2014). Training creative cognition: Adolescence as a flexible period for improving creativity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(October), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00827
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang, X., Yin, Y., Lin, Q., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2020). Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 148, 103798. doi:doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1965). Scientific views of creativity and factors affecting its growth. Daedalus, 94(3), 663–681. https://doi.org/10.2307/20026936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Whalley, J., & Ogier, H. (2020). Paperclips, circles, and six-legged spiders. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Australasian Computing Education Conference (pp. 11–20).
   Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2010). Computational thinking: What and why? The Link Magazine, Carnegie Mellon University. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020.
   Google Scholar