The student as a prosumer of educational audio–visual resources: a higher education hybrid learning experience

References

• Acosta Rodríguez, V. M., Moreno Santana, A. M., & Axpe Caballero, M. Á. (2017). La detección e intervención en habilidades narrativas en niños con trastorno específico del lenguaje en contextos educativos. Educación XX1, 20(2), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.19053
   Google Scholar
• Al-Nuaimi, M. N., & Al-Emran, M. (2021). Learning management systems and technology acceptance models: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5499–5533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10513-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Nuaimi, M. N., Al-Kabi, M. N., & Al-Emran, M. (2021). Digitizing learning during the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned from the most infected countries. In I. Arpaci, M. Al-Emran, M. A. Al-Sharafi, & G. Marques (Eds.), Emerging technologies during the Era of COVID-19 pandemic (pp. 291–303). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• AL-Nuaimi, M. N., Al Sawafi, O. S., Malik, S. I., Al-Emran, M., & Selim, Y. F. (2022). Evaluating the actual use of learning management systems during the covid-19 pandemic: An integrated theoretical model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2055577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Amo, D., Casany, M. J., & Alier, M. (2014). Approaches for quality in pedagogical and design fundamentals in MOOCS. Teoría de La Educación. Educación y Cultura En La Sociedad de La Información, 15(1), 70–89. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=201030471005
   Google Scholar
• Anuradha, V., & Rengaraj, M. (2017). Storytelling: Creating a positive attitude toward narration among engineering graduates. IUP Journal of English Studies, 12(1), 32–38. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=09733728&AN=122924573&h=NtA7iVP5TE6i14BsrOBDyJZhVI291HoIpSWJZShkj6QVRxbkILoXTGaZ8OjC2yNM6yBOPOoY516qDEnuBLdVog%3D%3D&crl=c.
   Google Scholar
• Bandulet, M., & Morasch, K. (2005). Would you like to be a prosumer? Information revelation, personalization and price discrimination in electronic markets. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 12(2), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571510500128038
   Google Scholar
• Bates, S. P., Galloway, R. K., McBride, K. L., Rebello, N. S., Engelhardt, P. V., & Singh, C. (2012). Student-generated content: Using PeerWise to enhance engagement and outcomes in introductory physics courses. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1413(1), 123–126. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3680009
   Google Scholar
• Bedggood, R. E., & Donovan, J. D. (2012). University performance evaluations: What are we really measuring? Studies in Higher Education, 37(7), 825–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.549221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belt, E. S., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2021). Video use in online and blended courses: A qualitative synthesis. Distance Education, 42(3), 410–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1954882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Avdiel, O. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students? The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 100722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozkurt, A., & Keefer, J. (2018). Participatory learning culture and community formation in connectivist MOOCs. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(6), 776–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1412988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701602748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho, M. M., Urquía, E., Pascual, D., & Rivero, M. J. (2016). Recursos multimedia para el aprendizaje de Contabilidad Financiera en los grados bilingües. Educación XXI, 19(1), 63–89. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.15578
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, L. O., Heller, S., & Pulse, L. (2020). Student-created video: An active learning approach in online environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1711777
   Google Scholar
• Collis, B., & Moonen, J. C. (2005). An on-going journey: Technology as a learning workbench. University of Twente. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/an-on-going-journey-technology-as-a-learning-workbench
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, J. (2020). Prosumerism in higher education—does It meet the disability test?. In M. Burgos (Ed.), Lecture notes in educational technology (pp. 105–121). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De George-Walker, L., & Keeffe, M. (2010). Self-determined blended learning: A case study of blended learning design. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(1), 1–13. https://acquire.cqu.edu.au/articles/journal_contribution/Self_determined_blended_learning_a_case_study_of_blended_learning_design_a_case_study_of_blended_learning_design/13404713/1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, L. E., & Frawley, J. K. (2018). A student-generated video careers project: Understanding the learning processes in and out of the classroom. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 10(4), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2018100103
   Google Scholar
• Engin, M. (2014). Extending the flipped classroom model: Developing second language writing skills through student-created digital videos. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(5), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotlv14i5.12829
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, K., & Falkner, N. J. G. (2012). Supporting and structuring “contributing student pedagogy” in computer science curricula. Computer Science Education, 22(4), 413–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2012.727713
   Google Scholar
• Fang, J. W., He, L. Y., Hwang, G. J., Zhu, X. W., Bian, C. N., & Fu, Q. K. (2022). A concept mapping-based self-regulated learning approach to promoting students’ learning achievement and self-regulation in STEM activities. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(4), 413–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2061013
   Google Scholar
• Fellenz, M. R. (2004). Using assessment to support higher level learning: The multiple choice item development assignment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 703–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000227245
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., Perényi, Á, & Birdthistle, N. (2021). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418801702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61–72. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ842688
   Google Scholar
• González Fernández, M. O., & Huerta Gaytán, P. (2019). Experiencia del aula invertida para promover estudiantes prosumidores del nivel superior. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(2), 245. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.2.23065
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, J., Bates, S. P., Casey, M. M., Galloway, K. W., Galloway, R. K., Kay, A. E., Kirsop, P., & McQueen, H. A. (2014). Student-generated content: Enhancing learning through sharing multiple-choice questions. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2180–2194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.916831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoban, G., Nielsen, W., & Shepherd, A. (2015). Student-generated digital media in science education: Learning, explaining and communicating content. Routledge. https://books.google.com/books?hl=es&lr=&id=MAcXCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=iRKB1OEcCd&sig=X31B4Rq_oazJdxajSCVNTNkdxYc
   Google Scholar
• Hoic-Bozic, N., Mornar, V., & Boticki, I. (2009). A blended learning approach to course design and implementation. IEEE Transactions on Education, 52(1), 19–30. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4544803/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning - its challenges and future. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 612–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Lin, G. Y., Wang, Y. S., & Lee, Y. N. (2022). Investigating factors affecting learning satisfaction and perceived learning in flipped classrooms: The mediating effect of interaction. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2018616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-García, R., López-Martín, C., & Arguedas-Sanz, R. (2020). “Collaborative learning communities for sustainable employment through visual tools”. Special issue online and ubiquitous training, mobile technology in education and sustainability. Sustainability, 12(6), 2569. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S. L., Matthews, K. E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R., & Swaim, K. (2017). A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R. S. (1999). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, S., & Anderson, A. R. (2014). Understanding the entrepreneurial learning process and its impact on students’ personal development: A European perspective. The International Journal of Management Education, 12(3), 500–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2014.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Navío-Marco, J., & Solórzano-García, M. (2021). Student’s social e-reputation (“karma”) as motivational factor in MOOC learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1579237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L. (2012). Five reasons I’m not flipping over the flipped classroom. Technology and Learning, https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0,5&lookup=0&q=Five+reasons+I%27m+not+flipping+over+the+flipped+classroom
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1969). Biología y conocimiento: Ensayo sobre las relaciones entre las regulaciones orgánicas y los procesos cognoscitivos (F. González, Trad.). Siglo Veintiuno de España Editores. (Original book published in 1967).
   Google Scholar
• Pool, J., Reitsma, G., & Van den Berg, D. (2017). Revised community of inquiry: Examining learning presence in a blended mode of delivery. Online Learning, 21(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.866
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & McDougall, J. (2017). Digital media, culture and education: Theorising third space literacies. Springer. https://books.google.com/books?hl=es&lr=&id=uq_HDgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP3&ots=4HnQC8-DWG&sig=Zw_dNvPwpWf7xUtRjCfNPCYXvTw
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2021). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos-Serrano, M. (2007). Comunicación viral y creatividad. Revista Creatividad y Sociedad, 11, 202–226. www.marinaramos.net
   Google Scholar
• Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2021). An approach for scaffolding students peer-learning self-regulation strategy in the online component of blended learning. IEEE Access, 9, 30721–30738. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3059916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, J., Hanham, J., Vlachopoulos, P., & Meier, P. (2021). A systematic approach to designing, implementing, and evaluating learner-generated digital media (LGDM) assignments and its effect on self-regulation in tertiary science education. Research in Science Education, 51(6), 1501–1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09885-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, J., & Meier, P. (2018). Using the learner-generated digital media (LGDM) framework in tertiary science education: A pilot study. Education Sciences, 8(3), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, K., Dodson, S., Harandi, N. M., Roberson, N., Fels, S., & Roll, I. (2021). Active learning with online video: The impact of learning context on engagement. Computers & Education, 165, 104132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., Hayes, S., Uzuner Smith, S., Vickers, J., Bidjerano, T., Gozza-Cohen, M., Jian, S. B., Pickett, A. M., Wilde, J., & Tseng, C. H. (2013). Online learner self-regulation: Learning presence viewed through quantitative content- and social network analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 427–461. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solórzano-García, M., & Navío-Marco, J. (2019). Developing social entrepreneurs through distance education: The value of commitment and interactivity with the learning community. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 13(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2019.096466
   Google Scholar
• Toffler, A., & Alvin, T. (1980). The third wave (Bantam books, Vol. 484). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f16d/b4a85e2a9170a0fbef8d686ac22b2ec73550.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Triviño-Cabrera, L., Chaves-Guerrero, E. I., & Alejo-Lozano, L. (2021). The figure of the teacher-prosumer for the development of an innovative, sustainable, and committed education in times of COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(3), 1128. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilchenko, A., Cajander, A., & Daniels, M. (2020). Students as Prosumers: Learning from Peer-Produced Materials in a Computing Science Course. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2020-October.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker.
   Google Scholar
• Werder, C., & Otis, M. M. (2010). Engaging student voices in the study of teaching and learning. Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, F. Y. (2022). An online learning system supporting student-generated explanations for questions: Design, development, and pedagogical potential. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(5), 782–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1686398
   Google Scholar