Acceptance of educational use of the Internet of Things (IoT) in the context of individual innovativeness and ICT competency of pre-service teachers

References

• Abed, S., Alyahya, N., Altameem, A. (2020). IoT in education: Its impacts and its future in Saudi universities and educational environments. In A. Luhach, J. Kosa, R. Poonia, X. Z. Gao, D. Singh (Eds.), First international conference on sustainable technologies for computational intelligence. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, 1045. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0029-9_5
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23010927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Abdullatif, A. M., Al-Dokhny, A. A., & Drwish, A. M. (2022). Critical factors influencing pre-service teachers’ use of the Internet of Things (IoT) in classrooms. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16, 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i04.27007.
   Google Scholar
• Aldahdouh, T. Z., Nokelainen, P., & Korhonen, V. (2018). Innovativeness of staff in higher education – Do implicit theories and goal orientations matter? International Journal of Higher Education, 7(2), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n2p43
   Google Scholar
• Aldahdouh, T. Z., Nokelainen, P., & Korhonen, V. (2020). Technology and social media usage in higher education: The influence of individual innovativeness. SAGE Open, 10(1), 2158244019899441. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almetere, E. S., Kelana, B. W. Y., & Mansor, N. N. A. (2020). Using UTAUT model to determine factors affecting Internet of Things acceptance in public universities. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(2), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i2/6915
   Google Scholar
• Amasha, M. A., Areed, M. F., Alkhalaf, S., Abougalala, R. A., Elatawy, S. M., & Khairy, D. (2020, February). The future of using Internet of Things (loTs) and context-aware technology in e-learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology (pp. 114–123).
   Google Scholar
• Baig, M. I., Shuib, L., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2019). Big data adoption: State of the art and research challenges. Information Processing & Management, 56(6), Article 102095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1985). Model of causality in social learning theory. In Cognition and psychotherapy (pp. 81–99). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baturay, M. H., Gökçearslan, S., & Sahin, S. (2017). Associations among teachers’ attitudes towards computer-assisted education and TPACK competencies. Informatics in Education, 16(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2017.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, J., & Reinders, M. J. (2011). Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future research. Journal of Business Research, 64(6), 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blahodyr, L., Kononenko, A., Kulynych, O., Ianytskyi, T., Sinelnikova, V., & Mykytenko, T. (2021). Digital competence in education at the present stage of development information society. International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security, 21(8), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.8.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user Information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15192
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2018). Integrated curriculum as an effective way to teach 21st century capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.30777/APJER.2018.1.1.03
   Google Scholar
• Farhan, M., Jabbar, S., Aslam, M., Hammoudeh, M., Ahmad, M., Khalid, S., Khan, M., & Han, K. (2018). IoT-based students interaction framework using attention-scoring assessment in eLearning. Future Generation Computer Systems, 79(3), 909–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.09.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felicia, A., Wong, W. K., Loh, W. N., & Juwono, F. H. (2021, July). Increasing role of IoT in education sector: A review of Internet of educational things (IoEdT). In 2021 International Conference on Green Energy, Computing and Sustainable Technology (GECOST) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, G., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regressing: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association of in Formation Systems, 4(7), 1–70. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407
   Google Scholar
• Gökçearslan, Ş, Coşkun, T. K., & Şahin, S. (2019). Adaptation of information and communication technology competency scale to Turkish for pre-service teachers. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(4), 1435–1444. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2828
   Google Scholar
• Gökçearslan, Ş, Karademir, T., & Korucu, A. T. (2017). Preservice teachers’ level of web pedagogical content knowledge: Assessment by individual innovativeness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(1), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0735633116642593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gökçearslan, Ş, & Saritepeci, M. (2021). Educational dimension of the internet of things. In H. Çakır & Ç. Uluyol (Eds.), Internet of Things from theory to practice (pp. 351–366). Nobel Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, J. (2015). The Internet of Things: Revolutionizing the retail industry. Accenture Strategy, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition. Pearson Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• He, J., Lo, D. C. T., Xie, Y., & Lartigue, J. (2016, October). Integrating Internet of Things (IoT) into STEM undergraduate education: Case study of a modern technology infused courseware for embedded system course. In 2016 IEEE frontiers in education conference (FIE) (pp. 1–9). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757458
   Google Scholar
• Hu, C. C., Yeh, H. C., & Chen, N. S. (2021). Teacher development in robot and IoT knowledge, skills, and attitudes with the use of the TPACK-based support-stimulate-seek approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2019058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00597.x
   Google Scholar
• Ionescu-Feleaga, L., Ionescu, BȘ, & Bunea, M. (2021). The IoT technologies acceptance in education by the students from the economic studies in Romania. The Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 23(57), 342–342. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2021/57/342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik, A. K., & Rahman, Z. (2014). Perspectives and dimensions of consumer innovativeness: A literature review and future agenda. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 26(3), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2014.893150
   Google Scholar
• Kılıçer, K., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2010). Individual innovativeness scale (IS): The study of adaptation to Turkish, validity and reliability. Hacettepe University Education Faculty Journal, 38(38), 150–164. https://hdl.handle.net/11421/14292
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed., pp. 3–427). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Y. H., Chen, S. Y., Lai, C. F., Chang, Y. C., & Su, Y. S. (2021). Study on enhancing AIoT computational thinking skills by plot image-based VR. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1580750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., Yao, J. E., & Yu, C. S. (2005). Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyapina, I., Sotnikova, E., Lebedeva, O., Makarova, T., & Skvortsova, N. (2019). Smart technologies: Perspectives of usage in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(3), 454–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2018-0257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaulay, J., Buckalew, L., & Chung, G. (2015). Internet of Things in logistics. DHL Trend Research, 1(1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mazman Akar, S. G. (2019). Does it matter being innovative: Teachers’ technology acceptance? Education and Information Technologies, 24(6), 3415–3432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09933-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, L., Ellis, K., & Kent, M. (2018). Internet of things (IoT): Education and technology (pp. 1–37). https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/IoTEducation_Formatted_Accessible.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meacham, S., Stefanidis, A., Gritt, L., & Phalp, K. T. (2018). Internet of Things for education: Facilitating personalised education from a university’s perspective. http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/32703/1/2%20BCS%20Inspire_Design%20an%20IoT%20Solution%20for%20Education_camera%20ready%20final%20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mershad, K., Damaj, A., & Hamieh, A. (2019). Using Internet of Things for automatic student assessment during laboratory experiments. In 2019 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISC246665.2019.9071654
   Google Scholar
• Moreira, F. T., Magalhães, A., Ramos, F., & Vairinhos, M. (2018). The power of the Internet of Things in education: An overview of current status and potential. In Ó Mealha, M. Divitini, & M. Rehm (Eds.), Citizen, territory and technologies: Smart learning contexts and practices. SLERD 2017. Smart innovation, systems and technologies (p. 80). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61322-2_6
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Park, E., Cho, Y., Han, J., & Kwon, S. J. (2017). Comprehensive approaches to user acceptance of Internet of Things in a smart home environment. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(6), 2342–2350. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2750765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parveen, F., & Sulaiman, A. (2008). Technology complexity, personal innovativeness and intention to use wireless Internet using mobile devices in Malaysia. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(5), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, R. B., Rahman, R. B., & Amirruddin, A. B. M. (2020). Users’ intention in developing Internet of Things in education context using the technology acceptance model: A case study. Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Pendidikan Teknikal | Journal of Social Sciences and Technical Education (JoSSTEd), 1(1), 98–104. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jossted/article/view/10689
   Google Scholar
• Rawlinson, K. (2014). Hp study reveals 70 percent of Internet of Things devices vulnerable to attack. HP Advisory.
   Google Scholar
• Rico-Bautista, D., Guerrero, C. D., Collazos, C. A., Maestre-Góngora, G., Hurtado-Alegría, J. A., Medina-Cárdenas, Y., & Swaminathan, J. (2021). Smart university: A vision of technology adoption. Revista Colombiana de Computación, 22(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.29375/25392115.4153
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations; A cross-cultural approach.
   Google Scholar
• Saritepeci, M., Yıldız Durak, H., & Durak, A. (2021). Hayat Boyu öğrenme bağlamında endüstri 4.0. In H. Yildiz Durak ve M. Saritepeci (Eds.) içinde Dijital Çağda Hayat Boyu Öğrenme (10. Bölüm). Pegem Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi, P., & Sarangi, S. R. (2017). Internet of Things: architectures, protocols, and applications. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2017, 9324035, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9324035
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, S. K., Al-Badi, A. H., Govindaluri, S. M., & Al-Kharusi, M. H. (2016). Predicting motivators of cloud computing adoption: A developing country perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siripongdee, K., Tuntiwongwanich, S., & Pimdee, P. (2021). Blended learning model with IoT-based by smartphone. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(11), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i11.22441
   Google Scholar
• Sitepu, R. B., Eliyana, A., Raza, A., & Rosalina, M. (2020). The readiness of educational competency in higher education in connecting the era of Industrial Revolution 4.0. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 76, p. 01045). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207601045
   Google Scholar
• Starkey, L. (2020). A review of research exploring teacher preparation for the digital age. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1625867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojanović, D., Bogdanović, Z., Petrović, L., Mitrović, S., & Labus, A. (2020). Empowering learning process in secondary education using pervasive technologies. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1806886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tianbo, Z. (2012, November). The Internet of Things promoting higher education revolution. In 2012 Fourth International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and Security (pp. 790–793). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MINES.2012.231.
   Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S., & Consuegra, E. (2018). A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher's ICT competencies. Computers & Education, 122, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Pynoo, B., van Braak, J., Fraeyman, N., & Erstad, O. (2017). Developing a validated instrument to measure preservice teachers’ ICT competencies: Meeting the demands of the 21st century. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trust, T. (2018). 2017 ISTE standards for educators: From teaching with technology to using technology to empower learners. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1398980
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2011). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002134/213475e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vaca-Cárdenas, L., & McHaney, R. (2017). Business teachers’ ICT skills and uses in an IoT classroom. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(4), 394–403. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v11i4.7168
   Google Scholar
• Vyalikova, G., Plekhanova, M., Pluzhnikova, J., & Savelyeva, S. (2019). General pedagogical ICT competency as a content-forming factor in the training of a new teacher. ARPHA Proceedings, 1, 775. https://doi.org/10.3897/ap.1.e0736
   Google Scholar
• Yi, M. Y., Fiedler, K. D., & Park, J. S. (2006). Understanding the role of individual innovativeness in the acceptance of IT-based innovations: Comparative analyses of models and measures. Decision Sciences, 37(3), 393–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00132.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz Durak, H. (2019). Examining the acceptance and use of online social networks by preservice teachers within the context of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9200-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz Durak, H. (2021a). Modeling of relations between K-12 teachers’ TPACK levels and their technology integration self-efficacy, technology literacy levels, attitudes toward technology and usage objectives of social networks. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1136–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619591
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz Durak, H. (2021b). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate teaching technologies into their classrooms: Examining the effects of teaching environments based on open-ended, hands-on and authentic tasks. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5365–5387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10511-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaerov, E., Letskovska, S., Seymenliyski, K., & Simionov, R. (2020, October). PV system monitoring by loT in smart university. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Telecommunications and Remote Sensing (pp. 44–49). https://doi.org/10.1145/3430116.3430124
   Google Scholar