Online peer feedback patterns of success and failure in argumentative essay writing

References

• Aghaee, N., & Hansson, H. (2013). Peer portal: Quality enhancement in thesis writing using self-managed peer review on a mass scale. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, K. H., & Hou, H. T. (2015). Exploring students’ behavioural patterns during online peer assessment from the affective, cognitive, and metacognitive perspectives: A progressive sequential analysis. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.822416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coté, R. A. (2014). Peer feedback in anonymous peer review in an EFL writing class in Spain. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 9, 67–87. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.144
   Google Scholar
• Devon, J., Paterson, J. H., Moffat, D. C., & McCrae, J. (2015). Evaluation of student engagement With peer feedback based On student-generated MCQs. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 11(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.11120/ITAL.2012.11010027
   Google Scholar
• Dominguez, C., Cruz, G., Maia, A., Pedrosa, D., & Grams, G. (2012). Online peer assessment: An exploratory case study in a higher education civil engineering course. 2012 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, ICL 2012, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL.2012.6402220.
   Google Scholar
• Donia, M. B. L., Mach, M., O’Neill, T. A., & Brutus, S. (2021). Student satisfaction with use of an online peer feedback system. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(0), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1912286
   Google Scholar
• Du, X., Zhang, M., Shelton, B. E., & Hung, J. L. (2019). Learning anytime, anywhere: A spatio-temporal analysis for online learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1633546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekahitanond, V. (2013). Promoting university students’ critical thinking skills through peer feedback activity in an online discussion forum. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 59(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.11575/AJER.V59I2.55617
   Google Scholar
• Er, E., Dimitriadis, Y., & Gašević, D. (2020). Collaborative peer feedback and learning analytics: Theory-oriented design for supporting class-wide interventions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1764490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2019). A scaffolding tool to assist learners in argumentative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(1–2), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1660685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Y., & Xu, J. (2020). Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, R. P., & Graham, S. (2019). Argumentative writing: Theory, assessment, and instruction. Reading and Writing, 32(6), 1345–1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11145-019-09950-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619
   Google Scholar
• Foo, S. Y. (2021). Analysing peer feedback in asynchronous online discussions: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4553–4572. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-021-10477-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(Issue 1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsia, L. H., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). Effects of different online peer-feedback approaches on students’ performance skills, motivation and self-efficacy in a dance course. Computers & Education, 96, 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 344–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifi, S., & Noroozi, O. (2021). Supporting argumentative essay writing through an online supported peer-review script. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(5), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1961097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2020). Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2021). Peer feedback or peer feedforward? Enhancing students’ argumentative peer learning processes and outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 768–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, E. Z. F., & Lin, S. S. J. (2007). Relationship between peer feedback, cognitive and metacognitive strategies and achievement in networked peer assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 1122–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00702.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, N. F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: Students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701292548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science, 40(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2017). Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417707615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misiejuk, K., Wasson, B., & Egelandsdal, K. (2021). Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback. Computers in Human Behavior, 117, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M., Babayi, M., Ashrafi, H., & Biemans, H. J. (2022). Gender differences in students’ argumentative essay writing, peer review performance and uptake in online learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2034887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2016). Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., & Hatami, J. (2019). The effects of online peer feedback and epistemic beliefs on students’ argumentation-based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(5), 548–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1431143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., Bayat, A., van Ginkel, S., Biemans, H. J., & Mulder, M. (2020). Students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: Does gender matter? Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1543200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novakovich, J. (2016). Fostering critical thinking and reflection through blog-mediated peer feedback. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. J. (2016). The nature of feedback: How peer feedback features affect students’ implementation rate and quality of revisions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(8), 1098–1120. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000103
   Google Scholar
• Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 38(3), 444–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinholz, D. L. (2018). Three approaches to focusing peer feedback. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2018.120210.
   Google Scholar
• Ruegg, R. (2015). Differences in the uptake of peer and teacher feedback. RELC Journal, 46(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214562799
   Google Scholar
• Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., Van Der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2006). Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10459-006-9039-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, M. (2019). The effects of class size and instructional technology on student learning performance. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, L., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System, 91, 102247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2007). The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science, 37(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11251-007-9047-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsemach, E., & Zohar, A. (2021). The intersection of gender and culture in argumentative writing. International Journal of Science Education, 43(6), 969–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1894499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Taiwan college students’ self-efficacy and motivation of learning in online peer assessment environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valero Haro, A., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2020). Argumentation competence: Students’ argumentation knowledge, behavior and attitude and their relationships with domain-specific knowledge acquisition. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2020.1734995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valero Haro, A., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J., & Mulder, M. (2019). The effects of an online learning environment with worked examples and peer feedback on students’ argumentative essay writing and domain-specific knowledge acquisition in the field of biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 53(4), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1472132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Pol, J., van den Berg, B. A. M., Admiraal, W. F., & Simons, P. R. J. (2008). The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1804–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R. J. (2017). Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider. Educational Research Review, 20, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zundert, M. J., Sluijsmans, D. M., Könings, K. D., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2012). The differential effects of task complexity on domain-specific and peer assessment skills. Educational Psychology, 32(1), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.626122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. L., & Wu, P. Y. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1589–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingate, U. (2012). ‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2016). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement With feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020a). The effects of providing and receiving peer feedback on writing performance and learning of secondary school students. American Educational Research Journal, https://doi.org/10.3102//0002831220945266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020b). When peers agree, do students listen? The central role of feedback quality and feedback frequency in determining uptake of feedback. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 101897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2021). From plans to actions: A process model for why feedback features influence feedback implementation. Instructional Science, 49(3), 365–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11251-021-09546-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2015). Effective feedback Design using free technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(3), 408–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115571929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Song, W., Shen, S., & Huang, R. (2014). The effects of blog-mediated peer feedback on learners’ motivation, collaboration, and course satisfaction in a second language writing course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6), 670–685. doi:10.14742/ajet.860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar