Exploring the optimal learning moments in a university-level chemistry course

References

• Allen, J. F., Long, K. M., O'Mara, J., & Judd, B. B. (2008). Students’ predispositions and orientations toward communication and perceptions of instructor reciprocity and learning. Communication Education, 57(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520701670908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizoglu, N., Alkan, M., & Geban, Ö. (2006). Undergraduate pre-service teachers’ understandings and misconceptions of phase equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(6), 947–953. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandriet, A. R., Ward, R. M., & Bretz, S. L. (2013). Modeling meaningful learning in chemistry using structural equation modeling. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00043E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretz, S. L. (2001). Novak’s theory of education: Human constructivism and meaningful learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(8), 1107–1116. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed078p1107.6
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow the psychology of optimal experience. Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Applications of flow in human development and education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (2014). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), In flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 35–55). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Csikzentmihalyi, M., & Csikzentmihalyi, I. S. (1998). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egbert, J. (2004). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60(5), 549–586. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.60.5.549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, R., Jones, J. R., Stinglhamber, F., Shanock, L., & Randall, A. T. (2005). Flow experiences at work: For high need achievers alone? Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(7), 755–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y. M., & Ro, Y. K. (2008). Capturing flow in the business classroom. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(2), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00185.x
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2013). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hampden-Thompson, G., & Bennett, J. (2013). Science teaching and learning activities and students’ engagement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1325–1343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.608093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendolin, I. (2016). Exploring optimal learning moments at tutorial sessions, Physical Education Research Conference, 20-21 July 2016, Sacramento, California.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, P., Argyle, M., & Reeves, R. (2000). Individual differences in leisure satisfactions: An investigation of four theories of leisure motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(4), 763–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00137-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1039/B4RP90027H
   Google Scholar
• Inkinen, J., Klager, C., Juuti, K., Schneider, B., Salmela-Aro, K., Krajcik, J., & Lavonen, J. (2020). High school students’ situational engagement associated with scientific practices in designed science learning situations. Science Education, 104(4), 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkinen, J., Klager, C., Schneider, B., Juuti, K., Krajcik, J., Lavonen, J., & Salmelo-Aro, K. (2019). Science classroom activities and student situational engagement. International Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1549372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, M., & Koo, K. (2020). Emotional presence in building an online learning community among non-traditional graduate students. Online Learning, 24(2), 93–111. http://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2307
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn?Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Kahveci, M. (2015). Assessing high school students’ attitudes toward chemistry with a shortened semantic differential. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00186A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiili, K. (2005). Content creation challenges and flow experience in educational games: The IT-emperor case. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C. M., Park, S. W., Huynh, N., & Schuermann, R. T. (2015). University students’ motivation, engagement and performance in a large lecture-format general education course. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(2), 201–214. http://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.1070401
   Google Scholar
• Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., Boer, H. D., Kuijk, M. V., & Doolaard, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students’ academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 643–680. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdi, J. G. (2014). Student attitudes towards chemistry: An examination of choices and preferences. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(6), 351–356. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-6-3
   Google Scholar
• Malik, M. A. A., Mustapha, M. F., Sobri, N. M., Razak, N. F. A., Zaidi, M. N. M., Shukri, A. A., & Sham, M. A. Z. Z. (2021). Optimal reliability and validity of measurement model in confirmatory factor analysis: Different Likert point scale experiment. Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought, 11(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.37134/jcit.vol11.9.2021
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulford, D. M., & Robinson, W. R. (2002). An inventory for alternate conceptions among first-semester general chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(6), 739–744. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed079p739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan, C. B., Schneider, B., & Wolfe, R. (2005). Non-response and population representation in studies of adolescent time use. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 2(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.13085/eIJTUR.2.1.33-53
   Google Scholar
• Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed069p191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinarbasi, T., & Canpolat, N. (2003). Students’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(11), 1328–1332. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed080p1328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozo, R. M. D. (2001). Prospective teachers’ ideas about the relationships between concepts describing the composition of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 23(4), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006901300069084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quílez, J. (2019). A categorisation of the terminological sources of student difficulties when learning chemistry. Studies in Science Education, 55(2), 121–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1694792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. A., Rosenberg, J. M., & Beymer, P. N. (2018). A person-in-context approach to student engagement in science: Examining learning activities and choice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., Lavonen, J., Salmelo-Aro, K., Broda, M., Spicer, J., Bruner, J., Moeller, J., Linnansaari, J., Juuti, K., & Viljaranta, J. (2016). Investigating optimal learning moments in US and Finnish science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 400–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sendur, G. (2020). An examination of pre-service chemistry teachers’ meaningful understanding and learning difficulties about aromatic compounds using a systemic assessment questions diagram. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00080A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J., Csikzentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J., & Vandell, D. L. (2007). Engagement in after-school program activities: Quality of experience from the perspective of participants. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(7), 891–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9183-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(2), 2–20.
   Google Scholar
• Spagnoli, D., Wong, L., Maisey, S., & Clemons, T. D. (2017). Prepare, do, review: A model used to reduce the negative feelings towards laboratory classes in an introductory chemistry undergraduate unit. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00157B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer, J. J. (2005). Measuring student engagement in science classrooms: An investigation of the contextual factors and longitudinal outcomes [Thesis of doctor of philosophy]. Michigan State University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2001). Building the structural concepts of chemistry: Some considerations from educational research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2(2), 123–158. https://doi.org/10.1039/B1RP90014E
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S.. (2002). Alternative conceptions in chemistry: prevention, diagnosis and cure? (1st ed.). The Royal Society of Chemistry.
   Google Scholar
• Thai, N. T. T., Wever, B. D., & Valcke, M. (2020). Feedback: An important key in the online environment of a flipped classroom setting. Interactive Learning Environments, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1815218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomporowski, P. D., & Pesce, C. (2019). Exercise, sports, and performance arts benefit cognition via a common process. Psychological Bulletin, 145(9), 929–951. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadyaya, K., Cumsille, P., Avalos, B., Araneda, S., Lavonen, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2021). Patterns of situational engagement and task values in science lessons. The Journal of Educational Research, 114(4), 394–403. http://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1955651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woldeamanuel, M. M., Atagana, H., & Engida, T. (2014). What makes chemistry difficult? African Journal of Chemical Education, 4(2), 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Yousaf, H. Q., Rehman, S., Ahmed, M., & Munawar, S. (2022). Investigating students’ satisfaction in online learning: The role of students’ interaction and engagement in universities. Interactive Learning Environments, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2061009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar