A meta-analysis of eight factors influencing MOOC-based learning outcomes across the world

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almatrafi, O., & Johri, A. (2018). Systematic review of discussion forums in massive open online courses (MOOCs). IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(3), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2859304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arpaci, I., Al-Emran, M., & Al-Sharafi, M. A. (2020). The impact of knowledge management practices on the acceptance of massive open online courses (MOOCs) by engineering students: A cross-cultural comparison. Telematics and Informatics, 54, 101468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386.
   Google Scholar
• Bote-Lorenzo, M. L., & Gómez-Sánchez, E. (2017). Predicting the decrease of engagement indicators in a MOOC. Proceedings of the seventh International learning analytics & knowledge conference (pp. 143–147). https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027387.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, R. I., Hung, Y. H., & Lin, C. F. (2015). Survey of learning experiences and influence of learning style preferences on user intentions regarding MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 528–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2013). Exploring the relationship between students’ self-regulated learning ability and their ePortfolio achievement. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M. H., Cheon, J., & Lim, S. (2021). Preservice teachers’ motivation profiles, self-regulation, and affective outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 42(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1869528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchinelli, A., Veas, E., Pardo, A., Pammer-Schindler, V., Fessl, A., Barreiros, C., & Lindstädt, S. (2018, March 7–9). Finding traces of self-regulated learning in activity streams. International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. ACM. LAK’18, Sydney, NSW, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170381.
   Google Scholar
• Diseth, A., Mathisen, F. K. S., & Samdal, O. (2020). A comparison of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among lower and upper secondary school students. Educational Psychology, 40(8), 961–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1778640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Z., Wang, F., & Wang, S. (2021). Reviewer experience vs. expertise: Which matters more for good course reviews in online learning?. Sustainability, 13(21), 12230. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Z., Wang, F., Wang, S., & Xiao, X. (2022). Enhancing learner participation in online discussion forums in massive open online courses: The role of mandatory participation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 819640. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, A. (2022). Massive open online course adoption amongst newly graduated health care providers. Advances in Health Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10113-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eom, S. B., Josephwen, H., & Ashill, N. (2010). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation*. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.x
   Google Scholar
• Fan, Y. Z., Jovanovic, J., Saint, J., Jiang, Y. H., Wang, Q., & Gasevic, D. (2022). Revealing the regulation of learning strategies of MOOC retakers: A learning analytic study. Computers & Education, 178, 104404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, J., Tang, L., Yang, J., & Peng, M. (2019). Social interaction in MOOCs: The mediating effects of immersive experience and psychological needs satisfaction. Telematics and Informatics, 39, 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fen, Y., & Sabaruddin, N. (2009). An extended model of theory of planned behaviour in predicting exercise intention. International Business Research, 1(4), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v1n4p108
   Google Scholar
• Fidalgo-Blanco, A., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., & Garcia-Penalvo, F. J. (2016). From massive access to cooperation: Lessons learned and proven results of a hybrid xMOOC/cMOOC pedagogical approach to MOOCs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0024-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galikyan, I., Admiraal, W., & Kester, L. (2021). Mooc discussion forums: The interplay of the cognitive and the social. Computers & Education, 165, 104133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the first ACM conference on learning@scale conference-L@S’14 (2014) (pp. 41–50). https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Decks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners’ contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, M.N., Hossain, M.Y., Bao, Y.K., Kumar, N., & Hoque, M.R. (2022). A proposed model to design MOOCs through the lens of addressing graduate skill gap. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-04-2021-0070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, R. S., Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Conijn, R., & Kester, L. (2020). Supporting learners’ self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 146, 103771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS). Computers & Education, 122, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, F., & Kwak, D. (2013). Online learning across ethnicity and age: A study on learning interaction participation, perception, and learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 61, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S., Memon, B., & Memon, M. A. (2019). Meta-analysis: A critical appraisal of the methodology, benefits and drawbacks. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 80(11), 636–641. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2019.80.11.636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Jung, E., Yoon, M., Chang, Y., Park, S., Kim, D., & Demir, F. (2021). Exploring the structural relationships between course design factors, learner commitment, self-directed learning, and intentions for further learning in a self-paced MOOC. Computers & Education, 166, 104171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., & Kumar, N. (2020). A study of learner’s satisfaction from MOOCs through a mediation model. Procedia Computer Science, 173, 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.06.041.
   Google Scholar
• Li, K. (2019). MOOC learners’ demographics, self-regulated learning strategy, perceived learning and satisfaction: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 132, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Johnson, J., Aarhus, W., & Shah, D. (2022). Key factors in MOOC pedagogy based on NLP sentiment analysis of learner reviews: What makes a hit. Computers & Education, 176, 104354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, N., Li, Y. M., Guo, J. H., Laurillard, D., & Yang, M. (2022). A learning model for improving in-service teachers’ course completion in MOOCs. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2025405
   Google Scholar
• Meet, R. K., Kala, D., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2022). Exploring factors affecting the adoption of MOOC in Generation Z using extended UTAUT2 model. Education and Information Technologies, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11052-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moule, P., Pontin, D., Gilchrist, M., & Ingram, R. (2003). Critical appraisal framework. Retrieved February 8, 2021, from http://learntech.uwe.ac.uk/da/Default.aspx?pageid=1445
   Google Scholar
• Niu, L. G. (2019). Decision-making determinants of students participating in MOOCs: Merging the theory of planned behavior and self-regulated learning model. Computers & Education, 134, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, S. R., & Holt, D. M. (2009). Examining student satisfaction with wholly online learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00294.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petronzi, D., & Hadi, M. (2016). Exploring the factors associated with MOOC engagement, retention and the wider benefits for learners. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 19 (2), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2016-0011
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
   Google Scholar
• Seaton, D., Bergner, Y., Chuang, I., Mitros, P., & Pritchard, D. (2013). Who does what in a massive open online course? Communications of the ACM, 57, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/2500876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. (2020a, August 17). By the numbers: MOOCs during the pandemic — class central. The Report by Class Central. https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-pandemic/
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D. (2020b, November 30). By the numbers: MOOCs in 2020 — class central. The Report by Class Central. https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2020/
   Google Scholar
• Shen, D., Cho, M. H., Tsai, C. L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrader, S., Wu, M., Owens, D., & Ana, K. S. (2016). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): participant activity, demographics and satisfaction. Online Learning, 20(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i2.596
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, L. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour and the impact of past behaviour. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 10(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v10i1.930
   Google Scholar
• Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9660-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208
   Google Scholar
• Tao, D., Fu, P., Wang, Y. H., Zhang, T. R., & Qu, X. D. (2019). Key characteristics in designing massive open online courses (MOOCs) for user acceptance: An application of the extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 30, 882–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1695214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., Guo, L., He, L., & Wu, Y. J. (2019). Effects of social-interactive engagement on the dropout ratio in online learning: Insights from MOOC. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(6), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1549595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Wen, M., & Rosé, C. P. (2016). Towards triggering higher-order thinking behaviors in MOOCs. Proceedings of the sixth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge-LAK’16 (pp. 398–407). https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883964.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Yang, D., Wen, M., Koedinger, K., & Rosé, C. P. (2015). Investigating how student analytics & knowledge-LAK’16. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on educational data mining (pp. 226–233). http://www.educationaldatamining.org/EDM2015/proceedings/full226-233.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A. F., & Cui, Y. (2018). Learning communities in the crowd: Characteristics of content related interactions and social relationships in MOOC discussion forums. Computers & Education, 122, 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Z. (2020). Visualizing co-citations of technology acceptance models in education. Journal of Information Technology Research, 13(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.4018/JITR.2020010106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Z. (2021). A literature review on MOOCs integrated with learning analytics. Journal of Information Technology Research, 14(2), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.4018/JITR.2021040104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., & Yu, X. (2019). An extended technology acceptance model of a mobile learning technology. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(3), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, W. T., Hu, X., Pan, Z. L., Li, C. L., Cai, Y., & Liu, M. (2021). Exploring the relationship between social presence and learners’ prestige in MOOC discussion forums using automated content analysis and social network analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar