205
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A study on behavioral intentions of artificial intelligence learning platform: comparing the perspectives of teachers and students

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Received 06 Jul 2023, Accepted 11 Apr 2024, Published online: 24 Apr 2024

References

  • Ab Rahman, R., Ahmad, S., & Hashim, U. R. (2018). The effectiveness of gamification technique for higher education students engagement in polytechnic Muadzam Shah Pahang, Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0123-0
  • Adukaite, A., van Zyl, I., Er, S., & Cantoni, L. (2017). Teacher perceptions on the use of digital gamified learning in tourism education: The case of South African secondary schools. Computers & Education, 111, 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.008
  • Agyei, C., & Razi, Ö. (2022). The effect of extended UTAUT model on EFLs’ adaptation to flipped classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 1865–1882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10657-2
  • Alghazi, S. S., Kamsin, A., Almaiah, M. A., Wong, S. Y., & Shuib, L. (2021). For sustainable application of mobile learning: An extended UTAUT model to examine the effect of technical factors on the usage of mobile devices as a learning tool. Sustainability, 13(4), https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041856
  • An, X., Chai, C. S., Li, Y. S., Zhou, Y., Shen, X., Zheng, C. P., & Chen, M. Y. (2023). Modeling English teachers’ behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence in middle schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5187–5208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11286-z
  • Andersen, I. G. (2018). Pygmalion in instruction? Tracking, teacher reward structures, and educational inequality. Social Psychology of Education, 21(5), 1021–1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9452-z
  • Arpaci, I., Durdu, P. O., & Mutlu, A. (2019). The role of self-efficacy and perceived enjoyment in predicting computer engineering students’ continuous use intention of scratch. International Journal of E-Adoption, 11(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEA.2019070101
  • Aung, Z. H., Sanium, S., Songsaksuppachok, C., Kusakunniran, W., Precharattana, M., Chuechote, S., Pongsanon, K., & Ritthipravat, P. (2022). Designing a novel teaching platform for AI: A case study in a Thai school context. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 1714–1729. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12706
  • Balkaya, S., & Akkucuk, U. (2021). Adoption and use of learning management systems in education: The role of playfulness and self-management. Sustainability, 13(3), 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031127
  • Bazelais, P., Binner, G., & Doleck, T. (2022). Examining the key drivers of student acceptance of online labs. Interactive Learning Environments, 16, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2121729
  • Cabellos, B., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2024). The moderating role of school facilitating conditions and attitudes towards ICT on teachers’ ICT use and emphasis on developing students’ digital skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 150, 107994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107994
  • Casal-Otero, L., Catala, A., Fernandez-Morante, C., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B., & Barro, S. (2023). AI literacy in K-12: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Stem Education, 10(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7
  • Chai, C. S., Chiu, T. K. F., Wang, X., Jiang, F., & Lin, X.-F. (2023). Modeling Chinese secondary school students’ behavioral intentions to learn artificial intelligence with the theory of planned behavior and self-determination theory. Sustainability, 15(1), 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010605
  • Chang, C. C., Liang, C. Y., Yan, C. F., & Tseng, J. S. (2013). The impact of college students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on continuance intention to use English mobile learning systems. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0011-7
  • Chen, S.-Y., Su, Y.-S., Ku, Y.-Y., Lai, C.-F., & Hsiao, K.-L. (2022). Exploring the factors of students’ intention to participate in AI software development. Library Hi Tech, https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-12-2021-0480
  • Chorfi, A., Hedjazi, D., Aouag, S., & Boubiche, D. (2022). Problem-based collaborative learning groupware to improve computer programming skills. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(1), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1795263
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Daumiller, M., Fasching, M. S., Steuer, G., Dresel, M., & Dickhäuser, O. (2022). From teachers’ personal achievement goals to students’ perceptions of classroom goal structures: Via student-oriented goals and specific instructional practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103617
  • Deci, E. L., Egharri, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x
  • Delialioglu, O., & Alioon, Y. (2016). The effect of students’ subject discipline on their m-learning application preferences. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1957–1966. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1070273
  • Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75–88.
  • Estriegana, R., Medina-Merodio, J. A., & Barchino, R. (2019). Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers & Education, 135, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.010
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  • Fuller, F., & Brown, O. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In K. Ryan (Ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  • Fung, W. K., & Chung, K. K. H. (2022). Overexcitabilities and creative potential in the kindergarten context: The mediating role of children’s playfulness. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101197
  • George, K., Anastasios, M. T., Dimitrios, M., & Christos, C. (2023). The mobile augmented reality acceptance model for teachers and future teachers. Education and Information Technologies, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12116-6
  • Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, 201–225.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Han, X. (2022). Influences of online practice community on instructors’ blended teaching behaviors: Analysis based on an extended UTAUT model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7084272
  • Harmandaoglu Baz, E., & Cephe, P. T. (2022). English student teachers’ behavioral intention to use information and communication technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 10809–10841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10957-1
  • Hitron, T., Orlev, Y., Wald, I., Shamir, A., Erel, H., & Zuckerman, O. (2019). Can children understand machine learning concepts? The effect of uncovering black boxes. [Chi 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems]. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Glasgow, Scotland.
  • Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Lu, C. H., Cheng, C. L., Lee, Y. C., & Lin, C. L. (2009). Playfulness-based design in educational games: A perspective on an evolutionary contest game. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820701483615
  • Hsu, T.-C., & Hwang, G.-J. (2023). Interaction of visual interface and academic levels with young students’ anxiety, playfulness, and enjoyment in programming for robot control. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22(1), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00821-3
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Hu, S. L., Laxman, K., & Lee, K. (2020). Exploring factors affecting academics’ adoption of emerging mobile technologies-an extended UTAUT perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4615–4635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10171-x
  • Hu, Y., Chen, C. H., & Su, C. Y. (2021). Exploring the effectiveness and moderators of block-based visual programming on student learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(8), 1467–1493.
  • Hu, Y., Su, C. Y., & Fu, A. N. (2022). Factors influencing younger adolescents’ intention to use game-based programming learning: A multigroup analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8203–8233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10973-1
  • Huang, R., Liu, D., Own, C. M., Zhang, J. B., Li, Y. Y., Chen, L. J., Hu, X., Fan, L., G. J., H., Yao, Y. J., Dai, Z. L., Wang, J. X., Chen, H. Y., Wei, Y. A., & Zhang, X. Y. (2022). International report of supportive environment on artificial intelligence courses in K-12. Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University.
  • Huang, Y. M. (2020). Students’ continuance intention toward programming games: Hedonic and utilitarian aspects. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(4), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1647665
  • Kaliisa, R., Palmer, E., & Miller, J. (2019). Mobile learning in higher education: A comparative analysis of developed and developing country contexts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 546–561.
  • Kandemir, M. A., Franklin, T., Perkmen, S., & Yildiz, Y. (2022). Developing a mobile learning acceptance scale for mathematics. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(2), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00216-3
  • Kolil, V. K., & Achuthan, K. (2023). Longitudinal study of teacher acceptance of mobile virtual labs. Education and Information Technologies, 28, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11499-2
  • Kong, S. C., & Wang, Y. Q. (2021). The influence of parental support and perceived usefulness on students’ learning motivation and flow experience in visual programming: Investigation from a parent perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1749–1770. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13071
  • Li, B., Sun, J. M., & Oubibi, M. (2022). The acceptance behavior of blended learning in secondary vocational school students: Based on the modified UTAUT model. Sustainability, 14(23), 15897. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315897
  • Li, Y., & Zhao, M. (2021). A study on the influencing factors of continued intention to use MOOCs: UTAUT model and CCC moderating effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 528259. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.528259
  • Moodley, K., Callaghan, P., Fraser, W. J., & Graham, M. A. (2020). Factors enhancing mobile technology acceptance: A case study of 15 teachers in a Pretoria secondary school. South African Journal of Education, 40(Supplement 2), 1791. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v40ns2a1791
  • Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
  • Nami, F., & Vaezi, S. (2018). How ready are our students for technology-enhanced learning? Students at a university of technology respond. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 510–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9181-5
  • Negra, A., M’Sallem, W., & Mzoughi, M. N. (2021). Investigating educators’ intention to adopt m-learning: A comparative study between Arab business schools. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 17(3), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTHI.2021070105
  • Ng, D. T. K., Lee, M., Tan, R. J. Y., Hu, X., Downie, J. S., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). A review of AI teaching and learning from 2000 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 28), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11491-w
  • Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill, Inc.
  • Ong, A. K. S., Prasetyo, Y. T., Robas, K. P. E., Persada, S. F., Nadlifatin, R., Matillano, J. S. A., Macababbad, D. C. B., Pabustan, J. R., & Taningco, K. A. C. (2023). Determination of factors influencing the behavioral intention to play “mobile legends: Bang-bang” during the COVID-19 pandemic: Integrating UTAUT2 and system usability scale for a sustainable E-sport business. Sustainability, 15(4), 3170. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043170
  • Orhan-Ozen, S., & Sumer, M. (2023). Factors affecting undergraduate students’ acceptance and use of live instructions for learning. Interactive Learning Environments, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2190355
  • Padilla-Melendez, A., Rosa del Aguila-Obra, A., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers & Education, 63, 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014
  • Parhamnia, F. (2022). Investigating mobile acceptance in academic library services based on Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model (UTAUT-2). The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(5), 102570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102570
  • Poondej, C., Koul, R., & Sujivorakul, C. (2010). Disciplinary differences in personal attributes: A review of the literature. [Selected topics in education and educational technology]. 9th WSEAS International Conference on Education and Educational Technology, Iwate Prefectural Univ, Iwate, JAPAN.
  • Prasad, P. W. C., Maag, A., Redestowicz, M., & Hoe, L. S. (2018). Unfamiliar technology: Reaction of international students to blended learning. Computers & Education, 122, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.016
  • Riady, Y., Alqahtany, T. M., Habibi, A., Sofyan, S., & Albelbisi, N. A. (2022). Factors affecting teachers’ social media use during COVID-19. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2115658
  • Saheb, T., & Saheb, T. (2023). Topical review of artificial intelligence national policies: A mixed method analysis. Technology in Society, 74, 102316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102316
  • Schiff, D. (2022). Education for AI, not AI for education: The role of education and ethics in national AI policy strategies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 527–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00270-2
  • Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
  • Sing, C. C., Teo, T., Huang, F., Chiu, T. K. F., & Xing Wei, W. (2022). Secondary school students’ intentions to learn AI: Testing moderation effects of readiness, social good and optimism. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 765–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10111-1
  • Songkram, N., Chootongchai, S., Osuwan, H., Chuppunnarat, Y., & Songkram, N. (2023). Students’ adoption towards behavioral intention of digital learning platform. Education and Information Technologies, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11637-4
  • Soon, H. T., & Kadir, S. (2017). The drivers for cloud-based virtual learning environment. Internet Research, 27(4), 942–973. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-08-2016-0256
  • Su, J. H., Guo, K., Chen, X. Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teaching artificial intelligence in K-12 classrooms: A scoping review. Interactive Learning Environments, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2212706
  • Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  • Szumski, G., & Karwowski, M. (2019). Exploring the Pygmalion effect: The role of teacher expectations, academic self-concept, and class context in students’ math achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101787
  • Tan, T. X., Yi, Z. Y., Camras, L. A., Cheng, K., Li, Z. J., Sun, Y., & Chen, N. L. (2021). The effect of academic performance, individualistic and collectivistic orientation on Chinese youth’s adjustment. Social Psychology of Education, 24(5), 1209–1229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09650-x
  • Tedre, M., Toivonen, T., Kahila, J., Vartiainen, H., Valtonen, T., Jormanainen, I., & Pears, A. (2021). Teaching machine learning in K–12 classroom: Pedagogical and technological trajectories for artificial intelligence education. IEEE Access, 9, 110558–110572. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3097962
  • Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A multi-group analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.641674
  • Terzis, V., Moridis, C. N., Economides, A. A., & Mendez, G. R. (2013). Computer based assessment acceptance: A cross-cultural study in Greece and Mexico. Educational Technology & Society, 16(3), 411–424.
  • Tewari, A., Singh, R., Mathur, S., & Pande, S. (2023). A modified UTAUT framework to predict students’ intention to adopt online learning: Moderating role of openness to change. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 40(2), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-04-2022-0093
  • Ukut, I. I. T., & Krairit, D. (2019). Justifying students’ performance: A comparative study of both ICT students’ and instructors’ perspective. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2018-0028
  • UNESCO. (2022). K-12 AI curricula: A mapping of government-endorsed AI curricula. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo
  • VanDerSchaaf, H. P., Daim, T. U., & Basoglu, N. A. (2023). Factors influencing student information technology adoption. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(2), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3053966
  • Velander, J., Taiye, M. A., Otero, N., & Milrad, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in K-12 Education: Eliciting and reflecting on Swedish teachers’ understanding of AI and its implications for teaching & learning. Education and Information Technologies, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11990-4
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • von Wangenheim, C. G., Hauck, J. C. R., Pacheco, F. S., & Bueno, M. F. B. (2021). Visual tools for teaching machine learning in K-12: A ten-year systematic mapping. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5733–5778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10570-8
  • Wang, C. S., Jeng, Y. L., & Huang, Y. M. (2017). What influences teachers to continue using cloud services? The role of facilitating conditions and social influence. The Electronic Library, 35(3), 520–533. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-02-2016-0046
  • Wang, F. M., King, R. B., Chai, C. S., & Zhou, Y. (2023). University students’ intentions to learn artificial intelligence: The roles of supportive environments and expectancy-value beliefs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00417-2
  • Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x
  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Springer US.
  • Wijaya, T. T., Cao, Y., Weinhandl, R., Yusron, E., & Lavicza, Z. (2022). Applying the UTAUT model to understand factors affecting micro-lecture usage by mathematics teachers in china. Mathematics, 10(7), 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10071008
  • Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 443–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2014-0088
  • Wong, K. T., Teo, T., & Russo, S. (2013). Interactive whiteboard acceptance: Applicability of the UTAUT model to student teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0001-9
  • Yang, W. (2022). Artificial Intelligence education for young children: Why, what, and how in curriculum design and implementation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100061
  • Yue, M., Jong, M. S.-Y., & Dai, Y. (2022). Pedagogical design of K-12 artificial intelligence education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14(23), 15620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315620
  • Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education-where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27.
  • Zhao, Y., He, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2019). Study on teachers’ acceptance of educational games and technology acceptance path model: Factor and path analysis based on 509 survey data. Journal of Distance Education, 37(6), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2019.06.011
  • Zhong, H.-X., Chang, J.-H., Lai, C.-F., Chen, P.-W., Ku, S.-H., & Chen, S.-Y. (2024). Information undergraduate and non-information undergraduate on an artificial intelligence learning platform: An artificial intelligence assessment model using PLS-SEM analysis. Education and Information Technologies, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11961-9
  • Zhong, H. X., Lai, C. F., Huang, Y. C., Wu, P. H., & Chang, J. H. (2021). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence learning platforms on interest in and attitudes toward learning.
  • Zou, C. Y., Li, P., & Jin, L. (2022). Integrating smartphones in EFL classrooms: Students’ satisfaction and perceived learning performance. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12667–12688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11103-7

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.