Donor Responses to Out-group Beneficiary Profiles in Direct Mail Fundraising: A Canadian Case Study

References

• Adena, M., & Huck, S. (2019). Giving once, giving twice: A two-period field experiment on intertemporal crowding in charitable giving. Journal of Public Economics, 172, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. D., & Smith, G. E. (1997). The effect of direct mail framing strategies and segmentation variables on university fundraising performance. Journal of Direct Marketing, 11(1), 30–43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094996897707308
   Google Scholar
• Braxton, T. C. 2015. Successful fundraising by child welfare agencies: An explanatory model of organizational practices and individual donor motivations. [Doctoral]. The Catholic University of America.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. M. 2019. Toward a triadic understanding of charitable giving: How donors, beneficiaries, fundraisers, and social contexts influence donation decisions. [PhD Thesis]. The University of Queensland. https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2019.357.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. M., Louis, W. R., & Masser, B. M. (2018). Identifying (Our) donors: Toward a social psychological understanding of charity selection in Australia. Psychology & Marketing, 35(12), 980–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, C. M., Masser, B. M., & Louis, W. R. (2020, April). Identity motives in charitable giving: explanations for charity preferences from a global donor survey. Psychology & Marketing, 27(9), mar.21362. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, C. L., Cameron Wild, T., Schopflocher, D. P., Laing, L., & Veugelers, P. (2012). Racial discrimination experienced by aboriginal university students in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 57(10), 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371205701006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damgaard, M. T., & Gravert, C. (2017). Now or never! The effect of deadlines on charitable giving: Evidence from two natural field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66, 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DellaVigna, S., List, J. A., & Malmendier, U. (2012). Testing for Altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dens, N., De Pelsmacker, P., & De Meulenaer, S. (2017). Who do we help? How Schwartz values influence responses to different frames in charity appeals. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 11(4), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.33423/jmdc.v11i4.1506
   Google Scholar
• Donkers, B., van Diepen, M., & Franses, P. H. (2017). Do charities get more when they ask more often? Evidence from a unique field experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durango-Cohen, E. J., Torres, R. L., & Durango-Cohen, P. L. (2013). Donor segmentation: When summary statistics don’t tell the whole story. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(3), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. T., & List, J. A. (2014). Toward an understanding of why suggestions work in charitable fundraising: Theory and evidence from a natural field experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 114, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmett, B. 2016. “Charities, sustainable funding and smart growth.” Discussion Paper. Toronto, ON: Imagine Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, D., Aquino, K., & McFerran, B. (2009). Overcoming beneficiary race as an impediment to charitable donations: Social . Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208325415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaiter, J. M. (2016). Charities, Stop Stereotyping People of Color as Needy. The Chronicle of Philanthropy, July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, E., Connor, U. M., Nagelhout, E., & Steinberg, R. (2011). Persuasion in fundraising letters: An interdisciplinary study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009339216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassell, H. J. G., & Visalvanich, N. (2015). Call to (in)action: The effects of racial priming on grassroots mobilization. Political Behavior, 37(4), 911–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9297-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck, S., & Rasul, I. (2011). Matched fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5–6), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlan, D., & List, J. A. (2007). Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. The American Economic Review, 97(5), 1774–1793. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.5.1774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, H., & Hardy, E. (2019). Using behavioural insights to encourage charitable donations among repeat donors: Impact and innovation unit case study. Privy Council Office. http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/201/301/weekly_acquisitions_list-ef/2019/19-51/publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2019/bcp-pco/CP22-184-2019-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kistruck, G. M., Qureshi, I., & Beamish, P. W. (2013). Geographic and product diversification in charitable organizations. Journal of Management, 39(2), 496–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311398135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2005). The ‘identified victim’ effect: An identified group, or just a single individual? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(3), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, T., Ritov, I., Rubaltelli, E., & Liberman, N. (2018). How far is the suffering? The role of psychological distance and victims’ identifiability in donation decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(5), 458–466. https://journal.sjdm.org/18/18717a/jdm18717a.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, C. E., Lange, A., List, J. A., Price, M. K., & Rupp, N. G. (2006). Toward an understanding of the economics of charity: Evidence from a field experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 747–782. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapointe, S., Perroni, C., Scharf, K., & Tukiainen, J. (2018). Does market size matter for charities? Journal of Public Economics, 168, 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasby, D., & Barr, C. (2013). Talking about charities 2013: Canadians’ opinions on charities and issues affecting charities. The Muttart Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lasby, D., & Barr, C. W. 2018. 30 years of giving in Canada: The giving behaviour of Canadians: Who gives, how, and why? The Giving Behaviour Project. Ottawa, ON: Rideau Hall Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, M., & Thompson, K. (2004). Identity, place, and bystander intervention: Social categories and helping after natural disasters. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(3), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.144.3.229-245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, J. A., & Price, M. K. (2009). The role of social connections in charitable fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 69(2), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, D. P. (2016). Recognition and cross-cultural communications as motivators for charitable giving: A field experiment. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764015576408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesch, D., Osili, U., Ackerman, J., Bergdoll, J., Williams-Pulfer, K., Pactor, A., & Thayer, A. 2019. Women give 2019: Gender and giving across communities of color. Women Give. Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, G. E. (2017). Fiscal leanness and fiscal responsiveness: Exploring the normative limits of strategic nonprofit financial management. Administration & Society, 49(9), 1272–1296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715581035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musick, M. A., Wilson, J., & Bynum, W. B., Jr. (2000). Race and formal volunteering: The differential effects of class and religion. Social Forces, 78(4), 1539–1570. https://doi.org/10.2307/3006184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Loughlin Banks, J., & Raciti, M. M. (2014). Perceived and evidenced credibility-based trust and financial donors’ loyalty to charities: A relationship marketing perspective. E-Journal of Social & Behavioural Research in Business, 5(1), 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ritov, I., & Kogut, T. (2017). Altruistic behavior in cohesive social groups: The role of target identifiability. PLOS ONE, 12(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rondeau, D., & List, J. A. (2008). Matching and challenge gifts to charity: Evidence from laboratory and natural field experiments. Experimental Economics, 11(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-007-9190-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooney, P. M., Mesch, D. J., Chin, W., & Steinberg, K. S. (2005). The effects of race, gender, and survey methodologies on giving in the US. Economics Letters, 86(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2004.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Senate Special Committee on the Charitable Sector. (2019). Catalyst for change: A roadmap to a stronger charitable sector. Senate Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Shaker, G. G., & Nathan, S. K. (2017). Understanding higher education fundraisers in the United States. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 22(4), e1604. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. A., Feng, S., & Krishnan, T. V. (2015). To retain? To upgrade? The effects of direct mail on regular donation behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay-Boire, J., & Prakash, A. (2019). Biased altruism: Islamophobia and donor support for global humanitarian organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turcotte, M. 2015. Charitable Giving by Individuals. 89-652-X2015008. Spotlight on Canadians: Results from the General Social Survey. Statistics Canada. https://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.item?id=89-652-x2015008-eng⊕pdf&app=Library.
   Google Scholar
• Van Diepen, M., Donkers, B., & Franses, P. H. (2009). Dynamic and competitive effects of direct mailings: A charitable giving application. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(1), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.1.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaert, G. A., & Van den Poel, D. (2011). Improving campaign success rate by tailoring donation requests along the donor lifecycle. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winterich, K. P., Zhang, Y., & Mittal, V. (2012). How political identity and charity positioning increase donations: Insights from moral foundations theory. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyman, K. (2011). Fund development planning. In G. Mallabone (Ed.), Excellence in fundraising in Canada (pp. 13–40). Civil Sector Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yörük, B. K. (2012a). Do fundraisers select charitable donors based on gender and race? Evidence from survey data. Journal of Population Economics, 25(1), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-011-0385-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yörük, B. K. (2012b). Do charitable solicitations matter? A comparative analysis of fundraising methods. Fiscal Studies, 33(4), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2012.00169.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar