Enhancing comprehension of online informed consent: the impact of interactive elements and presentation formats

REFERENCES

• Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benegal, S. D., & Scruggs, L. A. (2018). Correcting misinformation about climate change: The impact of partisanship in an experimental setting. Climatic Change, 148(1–2), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2192-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Corneli, A., Namey, E., Mueller, M. P., Tharaldson, J., Sortijas, S., Grey, T., & Sugarman, J. (2017). Evidence-based strategies for shortening informed consent forms in clinical research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 12(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616682550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchley, C. R. (2008). Public opinion and trust in scientists: The role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers. Public Understanding of Science, 17(3), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan Kicken, E., Mackert, M., Guinn, T. D., Tollison, A. C., Breckinridge, B., & Pont, S. J. (2012). Health Literacy, self-efficacy, and patients’ assessment of medical disclosure and consent documentation. Health Communication, 27(6), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.618434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, B. D., McGorray, E. L., & Ewell, P. J. (2021). Some researchers wear yellow pants, but even fewer participants read consent forms: Exploring and improving consent form reading in human subjects research. Psychological Methods, 26(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/MET0000267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel, E. J., & Boyle, C. W. (2021). Assessment of length and readability of informed consent documents for COVID-19 vaccine trials. JAMA Network Open, 4(4), e2110843–e2110843. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMANETWORKOPEN.2021.10843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geier, C., Adams, R. B., Mitchell, K. M., & Holtz, B. E. (2021). Informed consent for Online Research—is anybody reading?: Assessing comprehension and Individual Differences in Readings of Digital consent forms. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 16(3), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211020160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanel, P. H. P., Vione, K. C., & Voracek, M. (2016). Do Student samples provide an accurate estimate of the General public? PLoS One, 11(12), e0168354. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0168354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman, M. R., & Lay, J. C. (2018). They see dead people (voting): Correcting misperceptions about voter fraud in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. Journal of Political Marketing, 18(1–2), 31–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2018.1478656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, I., Velozo, C. A., Li, C. Y., Romero, S., Gruber-Baldini, A. L., & Shulman, L. M. (2016). Assessment of the psychometrics of a PROMIS item bank: Self-efficacy for managing daily activities. Quality of Life Research, 25(9), 2221–2232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1270-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karegar, F., Gerber, N., Volkamer, M., & Fischer-Hübner, S. (2018). Helping john to make informed decisions on using social login. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 1165–1174. https://doi.org/10.1145/3167132.3167259
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, B., Tyson, A., & Funk, C. (2022). Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Other Groups Declines | Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2022/02/15/americans-trust-in-scientists-other-groups-declines/
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Fang, S. (2020). Decisions to choose genetically modified foods: How do people’s perceptions of science and scientists affect their choices? Journal of Science Communication, 19(2), A01. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.19020201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehdonvirta, V., Oksanen, A., Räsänen, P., & Blank, G. (2021). Social Media, web, and panel surveys: Using non-probability samples in Social and policy research. Policy & Internet, 13(1), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/POI3.238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindegren, D., Karegar, F., Kane, B., & Pettersson, J. S. (2019). An evaluation of three designs to engage users when providing their consent on smartphones. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(4), 398–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1697898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustria, M. L. A. (2007). Can interactivity make a difference? Effects of interactivity on the comprehension of and attitudes toward online health content. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/ASI.20557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N. (2008). Completion time and response order effects in web surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 914–934. https://doi.org/10.1093/POQ/NFN050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, M. D., Critchley, C. R., & Walshe, J. (2015). Attitudes to genetically modified food over time: How trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support. Public Understanding of Science, 24(5), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514542372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijhawan, L., Janodia, M., Muddukrishna, B., Bhat, K., Bairy, K., Udupa, N., & Musmade, P. (2013). Informed consent: Issues and challenges. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research, 4(3), 134. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-4040.116779
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Office for Human Research Protections. (2021). Revised Common Rule.
   Google Scholar
• Ogungbure, A. A. (2012). The Tuskegee Syphilis Study: Some ethical reflections. Thought and Practice, 3(2), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.4314/tp.v3i2
   Google Scholar
• Perrault, E. K., & Keating, D. M. (2018). Seeking ways to inform the uninformed: Improving the informed consent process in online social science research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617738846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrault, E. K., & McCullock, S. P. (2019). Concise consent forms appreciated—still not comprehended: Applying revised common rule guidelines in online studies. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619853453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, K. H. S. (2008). Informed consent: An ethical obligation or legal compulsion? Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery, 1(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2077.41159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Research, N. C. for the P. of H. S. of B. and B. (n.d.). The Belmont Report - Google books. Retrieved July 15, 2022, from https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Belmont_Report/cAqtFohwYhIC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=National+Commission+for+the+Protection+of+Human+Subjects+of+Biomedical+and+Behavioral+Research.+(1979).+The+Belmont+Report:+Ethical+principles+and+guidelines+for+the+prot
   Google Scholar
• Rowbotham, M. C., Astin, J., Greene, K., Cummings, S. R., & Preis, T. (2013). Interactive informed consent: Randomized comparison with paper consents. PLoS One, 8(3), e58603. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0058603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofyan, D., & Jayanti, F. G. (2019). The correlation between reading self-efficacy and reading comprehension. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33369/JEET.3.1.1-13
   Google Scholar
• Theiss, J. D., Hobbs, W. B., Giordano, P. J., & Brunson, O. M. (2014). Undergraduate consent form reading in relation to conscientiousness, procrastination, and the point-of-time effect. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: JERHRE, 9(3), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614540593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnhagen, C. K., Gushta, M., Daniels, J., Peters, T. C., Parmar, N., Law, D., Hirsch, R., Sadler Takach, B., & Johnson, T. (2005). How informed is online informed consent? Ethics & Behavior, 15(1), 37–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington, H. A. (2006). Medical apartheid: The dark history of medical experimentation on Black Americans from colonial times to the present. Doubleday Books.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J., Shaver, J., Stephenson, R., & Newman, P. A. (2016). Outness, stigma, and primary health care utilization among rural LGBT populations. PLoS One, 11(1), e0146139. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0146139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (2006). Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science–hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genetics, 9(3), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1159/000092659
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yogurtcu, K. (2013). The impact of self-efficacy perception on reading comprehension on academic achievement. Kadir Yoğurtçu/Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.075
   Google Scholar