756
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A bioecological systems review of ethical practice in educational and school psychology

&

REFERENCES

  • American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. APA.
  • Andronikidis, K. (2023). Meaningful and ethical use of data in schools. In Data4Learning Webinar Series. Brussels, Belgium: European Schoolnet.
  • Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (FAccT ’21) (pp. 610–623). March 3–10, 2021 Virtual Event, Canada. New York, NY, USA, ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
  • Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Routledge.
  • Bhaskar, R., & Danermark, B. (2006). Metatheory, interdisciplinarity and disability research: A critical realist perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 8(4), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410600914329
  • Booker, R. (2021). A psychological perspective of agency and structure within critical realist theory: A specific application to the construct of self-efficacy. Journal of Critical Realism, 20(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2021.1958281
  • Bourke, R., & Dharan, V. (2015). Assessment practices of educational psychologists in Aotearoa/New Zealand: From diagnostic to dialogic ways of working. Educational Psychology in Practice, 31(4), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2015.1070709
  • Bowles, T., Scull, J., Hattie, J., Clinton, J., Larkins, G., Cicconi, V., Kumar, D., & Arnup, J. L. (2016). Conducting psychological assessments in schools: Adapting for converging skills and expanding knowledge. Issues in Educational Research, 26(1), 10–28.
  • British Psychological Society. (2018). Code of ethics and conduct. BPS.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1988). Interacting systems in human development. Research paradigms: Present and future. In N. Bolger, A. Caspi, G. Downey, & M. Moorehouse (Eds.), Persons in context: Developmental processes (pp. 25–49). Cambridge University Press.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In M. Gauvain & M. Cole (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 37–43). New York, NY: Freeman.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (2001). The bioecological theory of human development. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 6963–6970). Elsevier.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development 5th (pp. 993–1028). John Wiley.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (Vol. 1, pp. 793–828). Wiley.
  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior, and Human Decision Process, 97(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
  • Burns, M. K., Warmbold-Brann, K., Zaslofsky, A. F., & Burns, M. (2015). Ecological systems theory in school psychology review. School Psychology Review, 44(3), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-15-0092.1
  • Childress-Beatty, L. (2023). Opportunity and challenge: The ethical implications of generative artificial intelligence for psychologists. [Webinar], American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/members/content/generative-artificial-intelligence-series
  • Christensen, J. (2016). A critical reflection of bronfenbrenner´s development ecology model. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 69(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/16.69.22
  • Cunliffe, A. L. (2009). The philosopher leader: On relationalism, ethics and reflexivity–A critical perspective to teaching leadership. Management Learning, 40(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507608099315
  • Dailor, A. N., & Jacob, S. (2011). Ethically challenging situations reported by school psychologists: Implications for training. Psychology in the Schools, 48(6), 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20574
  • Demers, J. A., & Sullivan, A. L. (2016). Confronting the ubiquity of electronic communication and social media: Ethical and legal considerations for psychoeducational practice. Psychology in the Schools, 53(5), 517–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21920
  • Diamond, E. L., & Whalen, A. (2019). Ethics and social media: Professional considerations for the school psychologist. Contemporary School Psychology, 23(4), 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-017-0170-x
  • Dombrowski, S. C., & Gischlar, K. L. (2014). Ethical and empirical consideration in the identification of learning disabilities. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 30(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2013.869786
  • Edwards, L. M., & Sullivan, A. L. (2014). School psychology in rural contexts: Ethical, professional, and legal issues. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 30(3), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2014.924455
  • Elder-Vass, D. (2019). Realism, values and critique. Journal of Critical Realism, 18(3), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2019.1614744
  • European Commission. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators. Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Fisher, C. B. (2023). Decoding the Ethics Code (5th ed.). Sage publications.
  • Fulford, K. W. M. (2008). Values-based practice: A new partner to evidence-based practice and a first for psychiatry? Mens Sana Monographs, 6(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1229.40565
  • Gajewski, A. (2017). Conceptualizing professional ethics in inclusive education. International Perspectives in Inclusive Education, 9, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620170000009001
  • Goforth, A. N., Yosai, E. R., Brown, J. A., & Shindorf, Z. R. (2017). A multi-method inquiry of the practice and context of rural school psychology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-016-0110-1
  • Guiney, M. S., Harris, A., Zusho, A., & Cancelli, A. (2014). School psychologists’ sense of self-efficacy for consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 24(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2014.870486
  • Hailes, H. P., Ceccolini, C. J., Gutowski, E., & Liang, B. (2021). Ethical guidelines for social justice in psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 52(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000291
  • Hardy, J., Bham, M., & Hobbs, C. (2020). Leadership for educational psychologists: Principles and practicalities. Wiley.
  • Harrison, A. G. (2022). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, learning disorders, and other incentivized diagnoses — a special issue for psychologists. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(3), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-022-09460-2
  • Harris, B., Sullivan, A. L., Oades-Sese, G. V., & Sotelo-Dynega, M. (2015). Culturally and linguistically responsive practices in psychoeducational reports for English Language Learners. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 31(2), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2014.1002144
  • Hedgecoe, A. H. (2004). Critical bioethics: Beyond the social sciences critique of applied ethics. Bioethics, 18(2), 120–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00385.x
  • Helton, G., & Ray, B. (2009). Administrative pressures to practice unethically: Research and suggested strategies. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 11(2), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1891/1559-4343.11.2.112
  • Johnson, J. L., Bahr, M. W., & Navarro, V. L. (2019). School psychology and cultural competence: Room to grow? Educational Policy, 33(7), 951–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817741542
  • Kapoulitsas, M., & Corcoran, T. (2017). School psychologists and ethical challenges. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 34(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2016.21
  • Kerssens, N., & van Dijck, J. (2022). Governed by Edtech? Valuing pedagogical autonomy in a platform society. Harvard Educational Review, 92(2), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-92.2.284
  • Khoo, E. J., & Lantos, J. D. (2020). Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Acta Paediatrica, 109(7), 1323–1325. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15307
  • King, C. K., & Rings, J. A. (2022). Adolescent sexting: Ethical and legal implications for psychologists. Ethics & Behavior, 32(96), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2021.1983818
  • Kinsella, W., & Senior, J. (2008). Developing inclusive schools: A systemic approach. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(5–6), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802377698
  • Koller, S. H., Raffaelli, M., & Araujo de Morais, N. (2020). From theory to methodology: Using ecological engagement to study development in context. Child Developmental Perspectives, 14(3), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12378
  • Kubiszyn, T., Mire, S., Dutt, S., Papathopoulos, K., & Backsheider Burridge, A. (2012). Significant differences in pediatric psychotropic side effects: Implications for school performance. School Psychology Quarterly, 27(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027419
  • Landers, R. N., & Behrend, T. S. (2023). Auditing the AI auditors: A framework for evaluating fairness and bias in high stakes AI predictive models. American Psychologist, 78(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000972
  • Lasser, J., McGarry Klose, L., & Robillard, R. (2013). Context-sensitive ethics in school psychology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340993
  • Lockwood, A. B., Mcclure, J., Sealander, K., & Baker, C. N. (2017). Measuring school psychology trainee self-efficacy. Psychology in the Schools, 54(6), 655–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22016
  • Louvar Reeves, M. A., & Brock, S. E. (2018). School behavioral threat assessment and management. Contemporary School Psychology, 22(2), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-017-0158-6
  • Mahoney, E. B., & Morris, R. J. (2012). Practicing school psychology while impaired: Ethical, professional, and legal issues. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28(4), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2012.722180
  • Maki, K. E., Kranzler, J. H., & Wheeler, J. M. (2022). Ethical dilemmas in school psychology: Which dilemmas are most prevalent today and how well prepared are school psychologists to face them? School Psychology Review, 53(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2022.2125338
  • Mayworm, A. S., & Sharkey, J. D. (2014). Ethical considerations in a three-tiered approach to school discipline policy and practice. Psychology in the Schools, 5(7), 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21782
  • Mendes, S. A., Nascimento, I. M. G., Abreu-Lima, I. M. P., & Almeida, L. S. (2016). A study of the ethical dilemmas experienced by school psychologists in Portugal. Ethics & Behavior, 26(5), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2015.1029047
  • Midgen, T. (2015). Un)ethical learnership: What can educational psychology services learn? Educational & Child Psychology, 32(4), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2015.32.4.81
  • Midgen, T., & Theodoratou, T. (2020). Ethical selfhood and team awareness: The role of reflexivity in leadership. In J. Hardy, M. Bham, & C. Hobbs (Eds.), Leadership for educational psychologists: Principles and practicalities (pp. 35–49). Wiley.
  • National Association of School Psychologists (NASP). (2020). The professional standards of the National Association of School psychologists. NASP.
  • National Institute of Clinical Excellence. (2021). Shared Decision Making. http://www.nice.org.uk/about/what-we-do/our-programmes/nice-guidance/nice-guidelines/shared-decision-making
  • Navarro, J. L., Stephens, C., Rodrigues, B. C., Walker, I. A., Cook, O., O’Toole, L., Haynes, N., & Tudge, J. R. H. (2022). Bored of the rings: Methodological and analytic approaches to operationalising Bronfenbrenner’s PPCT model in research practice. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 14(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12459
  • O’Mahoney, J., & Vincent, S. (2014). Critical realism as an empirical project: A beginner’s Guide. In P. K. Edwards, J. O’Mahoney, & S. Vincent (Eds.), Studying organizations using critical realism: A practical guide (pp. 1–20). Oxford University Press.
  • Osbeck, L. M. (2019). Values in psychological sciences: Re-imaging epistemic priorities at a new frontier. Cambridge University Press.
  • Osborn, A. (2012). Juggling personal life and professionalism: Ethical implications for rural school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 49(9), 876–882. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21642
  • Perfect, M. M., & Morris, R. J. (2011). Delivering school-based mental health services by school psychologists: Education, training, and ethical issues. Psychology in the Schools, 48(10), 1049–1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20612
  • Pham, A. V. (2014). Navigating social networking and social media in school psychology: Ethical and professional considerations in training programs. Psychology in the Schools, 51(7), 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21774
  • Pilgrim, D. (2020). Critical realism for psychologists. Routledge.
  • Prendeville, P., & Kinsella, W. (2022). Ethics, values, and values based practice in educational psychology. Cambridge Journal of Education, 52(6), 735–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2022.2047893
  • Rahimzadeh, V., Bartlett, G., Longo, C., & Iles, J. (2020). Interactive role-playing and health-related quality of life assessment in children with neurocognitive sequaelae: A global neuroethics research approach. In D. Stein & I. Singh (Eds.), Global Mental Health and neuroethics (pp. 165–187). Academic Press.
  • Roberts, H. J., Floress, M. T., & Ellis, C. R. (2009). Training school psychologists in psychopharmacology consultation. Psychology in the Schools, 46(9), 827–835. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20423
  • Rouf, K. (2015). Position paper: Universal psychology under threat? A reflection on how systems changes are impacting on communities, services and applied psychology. Educational and Child Psychology, 32(1), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2015.32.1.92
  • Sadeh, S., & Sullivan, A. L. (2017). Ethical and legal landmines: Causal inference in special education decisions. Psychology in the Schools, 54, 1134–1147. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22046
  • Sayer, A. (2011). Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge University Press.
  • Schank, J. A., Helbok, C. M., Haldeman, D. C., & Gallardon, M. E. (2010). Challenges and benefits of ethical small-community practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 41(6), 502–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021689
  • Schilling, E. J., Randolph, M., & Boan-Lenzo, C. (2018). Job burnout in school psychology: How big is the problem? Contemporary School Psychology, 22(3), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-017-0138-x
  • Sewell, A., & Hulusi, H. (2016). Preventing radicalisation to extreme positions in children and young people. What does the literature tell us and should educational psychology respond? Educational Psychology in Practice, 32(4), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2016.1189885
  • Shahidullah, J. D. (2014). Medication-related practice roles: An ethical and legal primer for school psychologists. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-014-0013-y
  • Shapiro, J. P., & Stefkovich, J. A. (2022). Ethical leadership and decision making in education- applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas–5th Edn. Routledge.
  • Stein, R., & Sharkey, J. (2015). Your hands are (not) tied: School-based ethics when parents revoke special education consent. Psychology in the Schools, 52(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21814
  • Timmons, A. C., Duong, J. B., Simo Fiallo, N., Lee, T., Vo, H. P. Q., Ahle, M. W., Comer, J. S., Brewer, L. C., Frazier, S. L., & Chaspari, T. (2023). A call to action on assessing and mitigating bias in artificial intelligence applications for mental health. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 18(5), 1062–1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221134490
  • Tong, P., & An, I. S. (2024). Review of studies applying Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory in international and intercultural education research. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1233925
  • Tong, P., & An, I. S. (2024). Review of studies applying Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory in international and intercultural education research. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1233925
  • Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C. … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
  • Tudge, J. R. H., Mokrova, I., Hatfield, B. E., & Karnik, R. B. (2009). Uses and misuses of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1(4), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00026.x
  • United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. Treaty no. 27531 (Vol. 1577). United Nations Treaty Series.
  • Vincent-Lancrin, S., & van der Vlies, R. (2020). Trustworthy artificial intelligence in education: Promises and challenges. OECD Education Working Papers No. 218. OCED.
  • Watling Neal, J., & Neal, Z. P. (2013). Nested or networked? Future directions for ecological systems theory. Social Development, 22(4), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12018
  • Winston, M. D. (2007). Ethical leadership and ethical decision making: A meta-analysis of research related to ethics education. Library & Information Science Research, 29(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.04.002
  • Woody, R. H. (2011). Science in mental health training and practice, with special reference to school psychology. Ethics & Behavior, 21(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2011.537571
  • World Economic Forum. (2023). http://www.weforum.org/focus/fourth-industrial-revolution
  • Xia, M., Li, X., & Tudge, J. H. (2020). Operationalizing Urie Bronfenbrenner’s process-person-context-time model. Human Development, 64(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1159/000507958