The Role of Religion in the Mental Health of Single Adults: A Mixed-Method Investigation

References

• Abbott, D. M., & Franks, A. S. (2021). Coping with COVID-19: An examination of the role of (non)religiousness/(non)spirituality. Journal of Religion and Health, 60(4), 2395–2410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01284-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Raiya, H., & Pargament, K. I. (2015). Religious coping among diverse religions: Commonalities and divergences. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamczyk, K. (2021). Current and future paths in research on singlehood. In R. J. Coplan, J. C. Bowker, & L. J. Nelson (Eds.), The handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 163–177). Wiley Blackwell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adamczyk, K., Mrozowicz-Wrońska, M., & Janowicz, K. (2021). Singlehood from the subjective perspective of single individuals: Results from the interview-based research. The 32th International Congress of Psychology, Prague. 18-23 July, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Adamczyk, K., & Trepanowski, R. (2022). Religion and mental health of single adults [ Data set]. Open Science Repository (OSF). https://osf.io/vb6kz/
   Google Scholar
• Adamczyk, K., & Trepanowski, R. (2023). Singlehood in Europe: Rates and factors associated with happiness. V&R unipress | Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737015325
   Google Scholar
• Ano, G. G., & Vasconcelles, E. B. (2005). Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boss, P. (1977). A clarification of the concept of psychological father presence in families experiencing ambiguity of boundary. Journal of Marriage & Family, 39(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.2307/351070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boss, P. (2002). Family stress management: A contextual approach. Thousand Oaks:
   Google Scholar
• Boss, P., Greenberg, J., & Pearce McCall, D. (1990). Measurement of boundary ambiguity in families ( Station Bulletin (593–1990)). University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Bożewicz, M. (2019). Preferowane i realizowane modele życia rodzinnego. Komunikat z badań [preferred and implemented family life models. A research communication]. CBOS.
   Google Scholar
• Bożewicz, M. (2022). Zmiany religijności Polaków po pandemii. Komunikat z badań [changes in religiosity of poles after the pandemic. A research communication]. CBOS.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, S. R., Coulson, G. L., Spjut, K., Dickerson, W., Beck, A. R., Dougal, K., Debenham, C., & Jones, D. (2015). The influence of religion on the partner selection strategies of emerging adults. Journal of Family Issues, 36(2), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13491748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. E., van Mulukom, V., Charles, S. J., & Farias, M. (2021). Do you need religion to enjoy the benefits of church services? Social bonding, morality and quality of life among religious and secular congregations. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. S., Olson, C. D., & Buckmiller, N. (2007). Family boundary ambiguity: A 30-year review of theory, research, and measurement. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 56(2), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00453.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Schilo, L., & Grimm, K. J. (2018). Using residualized change versus difference scores for longitudinal research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(1), 32–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517718387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. N., May, R. W., & Fincham, F. D. (2019). Stress spillover and crossover in couple relationships: Integrating religious beliefs and prayer. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 11(2), 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, T., & Farquhar, L. K. (2014). Correlates of social anxiety, religion, and Facebook. Journal of Media & Religion, 13(4), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2014.971566
   Google Scholar
• Dziak, J. J., Dierker, L. C., & Abar, B. (2020). The interpretation of statistical power after the data have been gathered. Current Psychology, 39(3), 870–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0018-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2014). I say a little prayer for you: Praying for partner increases commitment in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(5), 587–593. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallegos, M. L., & Segrin, C. (2019). Exploring the mediating role of loneliness in the relationship between spirituality and health: Implications for the Latino health paradox. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 11(3), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garssen, B., Visser, A., & Pool, G. (2021). Does spirituality or religion positively affect mental health? meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 31(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1729570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girme, Y. U., Park, Y., & MacDonald, G. (2022). Coping or thriving? reviewing intrapersonal, interpersonal, and societal factors associated with well-being in singlehood from a within-group perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(5), 1097–1120. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221136119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girme, Y. U., Sibley, C. G., Hadden, B. W., Schmitt, M. T., & Hunger, J. M. (2022). Unsupported and stigmatized? The association between relationship status and well-being is mediated by social support and social discrimination. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211030102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granqvist, P., & Hagekull, B. (2000). Religiosity, adult attachment, and why “singles” are more religious. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327582IJPR1002_04
   Google Scholar
• Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2004). Analysing qualitative data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative methods for health research (pp. 173–200). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• GUS. (2019). Wyznania religijne w Polsce 2015-2018 [ Religious denominations in Poland 2015-2018]. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/inne-opracowania/wyznania-religijne/wyznania-religijne-w-polsce-20192021,5,3.html
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, M. G., Davis, J. M., & Crowson, C. S. (2022). Post hoc power calculations: An inappropriate method for interpreting the findings of a research study. The Journal of Rheumatology, 49(8), 867–870. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.211115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himawan, K. K. (2020a). Menikah adalah ibadah: Peran agama dalam mengkonstruksi pengalaman melajang di Indonesia [Marriage is worship: The role of religion in constructing the single experience in Indonesia]. Jurnal Studi Pemuda, 9(2), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.22146/studipemudaugm.56548
   Google Scholar
• Himawan, K. K. (2020b). Singleness, sex, and spirituality: How religion affects the experience of being single in Indonesia. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 23(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1767555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himawan, K. K. (2020c). The single’s struggle: Discovering involuntary singleness in Indonesia through gender and religious perspectives. The Family Journal (TFJ): Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 28(4), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480720950419
   Google Scholar
• Himawan, K. K., Bambling, M., & Edirippulige, S. (2018a). Singleness, religiosity, and the implications for counselors: The Indonesian case. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(2), 485–497. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i2.1530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himawan, K. K., Bambling, M., & Edirippulige, S. (2018b). What does it mean to be single in Indonesia? Religiosity, social stigma, and marital status among never-married Indonesian adults. SAGE Open, 8(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018803132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. B. (2018). The ambiguous loss of singlehood: Conceptualizing and treating singlehood ambiguous loss among never-married adults. Contemporary Family Therapy, 40(2), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-018-9455-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janicka, I. L., & Szymczak, W. (2019). Can close romantic relationships last? The commitment of partners in married and cohabitant couples. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 7(3), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2019.86129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarosz, M. (2011). Skala Religijnego Radzenia Sobie—Wersja skrócona (Brief RCOPE). In M. Jarosz (Ed.), Psychologiczny pomiar religijności [Psychological dimension of religion] (pp. 293–316). Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL.
   Google Scholar
• Karaś, D., Cieciuch, J., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2014). The Polish adaptation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF). Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisbu-Sakarya, Y., MacKinnon, D. P., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). A monte carlo comparison study of the power of the analysis of covariance, simple difference, and residual change scores in testing two-wave data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412450574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranz, D., Niepel, C., Botes, E., & Greiff, S. (2020). Religiosity predicts unreasonable coping with COVID-19. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000395
   Google Scholar
• Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., & Lowe, B. (2009). An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: The PHQ–4. Psychosomatics, 50(6), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psy.50.6.613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krok, D. (2015). Religiousness, spirituality, and coping with stress among late adolescents: A meaning-making perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 45(1), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.10.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 33267. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33267
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. G. (1994). Single heterosexual women through the life cycle. In M. P. Mirkin (Ed.), Women in context: Toward a feminist reconstruction of psychotherapy (pp. 170–187). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lianda, T., Ch, R., & Himawan, K. K. (2022). A source of hope whilst in waiting: The contributions of religiosity to the psychological well-being of involuntarily single women. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 37(2), 244–267. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v37i2.5029
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, G., & Park, Y. (2022). Associations of attachment avoidance and anxiety with life satisfaction, satisfaction with singlehood, and desire for a romantic partner. Personal Relationships, 29(1), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, A. M. (2010). Religion in families, 1999-2009: A relational spirituality framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(4), 805–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00732.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, K. A. (2015). An exploration of boundary ambiguity among never-married single women. a dissertation presented to the graduate. Faculty of Saint Louis University.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2007). Generalization in qualitatively oriented research. Forum Qualitative Research, 8(3), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Niehuis, S., Adamczyk, K., Trepanowski, R., Celejewska, A., Ganclerz, M., Frydrysiak, A., Reifman, A., & Willis‐Grossmann, E. (2021). Development of the Polish‐Language relationship disillusionment scale and its validation. Personal Relationships, 28(4), 1017–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyes, J., Booth, A., Moore, G., Flemming, K., Tunçalp, Ö., & Shakibazadeh, E. (2019). Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: Clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods. BMJ Global Health, 4(1), e000893. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000893
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noyes, J., Booth, A., Moore, G., Flemming, K., Tunçalp, Ö., & Shakibazadeh, E. (2019). Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods. BMJ Global Health, 4(1), e000893. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000893
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pargament, K. I., Ensing, D. S., Falgout, K., Olsen, H., Reilly, B., Haitsma, K., & Warren, R. (1990). God help me: I. Religious coping efforts as predictors of the outcomes to significant negative life events. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(6), 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00938065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pargament, K., Feuille, M., & Burdzy, D. (2011). The brief RCOPE: Current psychometric status of a short measure of religious coping. Religions, 2(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel2010051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pargament, K. I., Kennell, J., Hathaway, W., Grevengoed, N., Newman, J., & Jones, W. (1988). Religion and the problem-solving process: Three styles of coping. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 27(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pargament, K. I., Smith, B. W., Koenig, H. G., & Perez, L. (1998). Patterns of positive and negative religious coping with major life stressors. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(4), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pargament, K. I., Tarakeshwar, N., Ellison, C. G., & Wulff, K. M. (2001). Religious coping among the religious: The relationships between religious coping and well-being in a national sample of Presbyterian clergy, elders, and members. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(3), 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8294.00073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. L. (2005). Religion as a meaning-making framework in coping with life stress. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 707–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00428.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. L., Holt, C. L., Le, D., Christie, J., & Williams, B. (2018). Positive and negative religious coping styles as prospective predictors of well-being in African Americans. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(4), 318–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rel0000124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Puchalska-Wasyl, M. M., & Zarzycka, B. (2020). Prayer and internal dialogical activity: How do they predict well-being? Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 12(4), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A quting. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/. [ computer software]
   Google Scholar
• Rendle, K. A., Abramson, C. M., Garrett, S. B., Halley, M. C., & Dohan, D. (2019). Beyond exploratory: A tailored framework for designing and assessing qualitative health research. British Medical Journal Open, 9(8), e030123. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J., Wetherell, M., & Taylor, S. (2007). Choice and chance: Negotiating agency in narratives of singleness. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 55(2), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00708.x
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosmarin, D. H., Pirutinsky, S., Carp, S., Appel, M., & Kor, A. (2017). Religious coping across a spectrum of religious involvement among Jews. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(Suppl 1), S96–S104. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000114
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serdar, C. C., Cihan, M., Yücel, D., & Serdar, M. A. (2021). Sample size, power and effect size revisited: Simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochemia Medica, 31(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2021.010502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, E. A., & Ganong, L. (2007). Living in the gray: Women’s experiences of missing the marital transition. Journal of Marriage & Family, 69(3), 831–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00408.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonič, B., & Rijavec Klobučar, N. R. (2017). Experiencing positive religious coping in the process of divorce: A qualitative study. Journal of Religion and Health, 56(5), 1644–1654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0230-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Słysz, A., & Soroko, E. (2012). “A scientific journey”. On experiencing qualitative research. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 13(1–2), 36–44.
   Google Scholar
• Staudinger, U. M., & Bluck, S. (2001). A view on midlife development from life-span theory. In M. E. Lachman (Ed.), Handbook of midlife development (pp. 3–39). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tarakeshwar, N., Stanton, J., & Pargament, K. I. (2003). Religion: An overlooked dimension in cross-cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(4), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022103034004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay, L., Li, M., Myers, D., & Diener, E. (2014). Religiosity and subjective well-being: An international perspective. In C. Kim-Prieto (Ed.), Religion and spirituality across cultures (pp. 163–175). Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Wadsworth, T. (2016). Marriage and subjective well-being: How and why context matters. Social Indicators Research, 126(3), 1025–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0930-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarzycka, B., Puchalska-Wasyl, M., & Łysiak, M. (2021). Deconversion processes and quality of life among Polish adolescents: The mediating role of social support. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 32(3), 196–213. Advanced publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2021.1946266
   Google Scholar
• Zarzycka, B., Rybarski, R., & Sliwak, J. (2017). The relationship of religious comfort and struggle with anxiety and satisfaction with life in roman catholic Polish men: The moderating effect of sexual orientation. Journal of Religion and Health, 56(6), 2162–2179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0388-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarzycka, B., Tychmanowicz, A., & Krok, D. (2020). Religious struggle and psychological well-being: The mediating role of religious support and meaning making. Religions, 11(3), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11030149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Piotrowski, J., & Sawicki, A. (2021). Religiosity, spirituality, national narcissism, and prejudice toward refugees and sexual minorities in Poland. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. Advanced publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar