Linking Green Innovation to Firm Success: Cost Leadership’s Mediating Role in Vietnam

References

• Adner, R., and D. Levinthal. 2001. Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation. Management Science 47 (5):611–28. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.5.611.10482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, V., J. Deffarges, B. Delteil, M. Francois, and K. Tara. 2022. Charting a path for Vietnam to achieve its net-zero goals. McKinsey & Company. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/charting-a-path-for-vietnam-to-achieve-its-net-zero-goals.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilera-Caracuel, J., and N. Ortiz-de-Mandojana. 2013. Green Innovation and financial performance: An institutional approach. Organization & Environment 26 (4):365–85. doi:10.1177/1086026613507931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amores-Salvadó, J., G. M. Castro, and J. E. Navas-López. 2014. Green corporate image: Moderating the connection between Environmental Product Innovation and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 83:356–65. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andries, P., and U. Stephan. 2019. Environmental innovation and firm performance: How firm size and motives matter. Sustainability 11 (13):3585. doi:10.3390/su11133585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragón-Correa, J. A. 1998. Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal 41 (5):556–67. doi:10.2307/256942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arenhardt, D. L., L. F. Battistella, and M. Z. Grohmann. 2016. The influence of the Green Innovation in the Search of Competitive Advantage of Enterprises of the electrical and electronic Brazilian sectors. International Journal of Innovation Management 20 (1):1650004. doi:10.1142/S1363919616500043.
   Google Scholar
• Atkin, T., A. Gilinsky, S. K. Newton, and H. Remaud. 2012. Environmental strategy: Does it lead to competitive advantage in the US wine industry? International Journal of Wine Business Research 24 (2):115–33. doi:10.1108/17511061211238911.
   Google Scholar
• Azzone, G., and G. Noci. 1998. Seeing ecology and “green” innovations as a source of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management 11 (2):94–111. doi:10.1108/09534819810212106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, W. E., and J. M. Sinkula. 2005. Environmental Marketing Strategy and firm performance: Effects on new product performance and market share. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 33 (4):461–75. doi:10.1177/0092070305276119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S. B., E. S. Iyer, and R. K. Kashyap. 2003. Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing 67 (2):106–22. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.106.18604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R., and R. Mashruwala. 2007. The moderating role of competition in the relationship between nonfinancial measures and future financial performance. Contemporary Accounting Research 24 (3):763–93. doi:10.1506/car.24.3.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, P. 2005. Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal 26 (3):197–218. doi:10.1002/smj.441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1):99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., S. Engel, D. Kammerer, and J. Sejas Nogareda. 2007. Explaining green innovation: Ten years after Porter’s win-win proposition: How to Study the Effects of Regulation on corporate environmental innovation? Politische Vierteljahresschrift 39:323–41.
   Google Scholar
• Berrone, P. 2009. Green keys to unlock competitive advantage: Turning pressure into possibility. IESE Insight 50–57. doi:10.15581/002.ART-1539.
   Google Scholar
• Calza, F., A. Parmentola, and I. Tutore. 2017. Types of green innovations: Ways of implementation in a non-green industry. Sustainability 9 (8):1301. doi:10.3390/su9081301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-H. 2011. The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: The mediation role of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (3):361–70. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0914-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, M. Q., A. T. Hoang, T. T. Truong, and X. P. Nguyen. 2020. Endless story about the alarming reality of plastic waste in Vietnam. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 1–9. doi:10.1080/15567036.2020.1802535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-S. 2008. The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image – Green Core Competence. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3):531–43. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9522-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-S., and C.-H. Chang. 2012. The determinants of green product development performance: Green Dynamic Capabilities, green Transformational Leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics 116 (1 August 26):107–19. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1452-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. H., S. Chen, and Y. Lan. 2016. Attaining a sustainable competitive advantage in the smart grid industry of China using suitable open innovation intermediaries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 62:1083–91. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-S., S.-B. Lai, and C.-T. Wen. 2006. The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (4):331–39. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., and L. Liu. 2018. Profiting from green innovation: The moderating effect of competitive strategy. Sustainability 11 (1):15. doi:10.3390/su11010015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou, T.-Y., H. K. Chan, F. Lettice, and S. H. Chung. 2011. The influence of greening the suppliers and Green Innovation on Environmental Performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics & Transportation Review 47 (6):822–36. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christmann, P. 2004. Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academy of Management Journal 47 (5):747–60. doi:10.2307/20159616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., and T. Arieli. 2011. Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling. Journal of Peace Research 48 (4):423–35. doi:10.1177/0022343311405698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaher, P. J., B. G. S. Hardie, and W. P. Putsis. 2001. Marketing-mix variables and the Diffusion of Successive Generations of a technological innovation. Journal of Marketing Research 38 (4):501–14. doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.4.501.18907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangelico, R. M. 2015. Green product innovation: Where we are and where we are going. Business Strategy and the Environment 25 (8):560–76. doi:10.1002/bse.1886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangelico, R. M., and D. Pujari. 2010. Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3):471–86. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danso, A., S. Adomako, J. Amankwah‐Amoah, S. Owusu‐Agyei, and R. Konadu. 2019. Environmental sustainability orientation, competitive strategy and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 28 (5):885–95. doi:10.1002/bse.2291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do, B., and N. Nguyen. 2020. The links between proactive environmental strategy, competitive advantages and firm performance: An empirical study in Vietnam. Sustainability 12 (12):4962. doi:10.3390/su12124962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dossi, A., and L. Patelli. 2010. You learn from what you measure: Financial and non-financial performance measures in multinational companies. Long Range Planning 43 (4):498–526. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2010.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duque‐Grisales, E., J. Aguilera‐Caracuel, J. Guerrero‐Villegas, and E. García‐Sánchez. 2020. Does green innovation affect the financial performance of Multilatinas? The moderating role of ISO 14001 and R&D investment. Business Strategy and the Environment 29 (8):3286–302. doi:10.1002/bse.2572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusek, G., Y. Yurova, and C. P. Ruppel. 2015. Using social media and targeted snowball sampling to survey a hard-to-reach population: A case study. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 10:279–99. doi:10.28945/2296.
   Google Scholar
• El-Kassar, A.-N., and S. K. Singh. 2019. Green Innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 144:483–98. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faugier, J., and M. Sargeant. 1997. Sampling hard to reach populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing 26 (4):790–97. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00371.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (3):382–88. doi:10.1177/002224378101800313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, E. R., S. D. Dmytriyev, and R. A. Phillips. 2021. Stakeholder theory and the Resource-Based View of the Firm. Journal of Management 47 (7):1757–70. doi:10.1177/0149206321993576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., D. Straub, and M.-C. Boudreau. 2000. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 4:4. doi:10.17705/1CAIS.00407.
   Google Scholar
• General Statistics Office. 2022. Socio-economic situation in the Fourth Quarter and 2022. In General Statistics Office of Vietnam. General Statistics Office of Vietnam. https://www.gso.gov.vn/en/data-and-statistics/2023/01/socio-economic-situation-in-the-fourth-quarter-and-2022/.
   Google Scholar
• Ghisetti, C., and K. Rennings. 2014. Environmental innovations and profitability: How does it pay to be green? An empirical analysis on the German Innovation Survey. Journal of Cleaner Production 75:106–17. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomezelj, D. O. 2016. A Systematic Review of Research on innovation in hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 28 (3):516–58. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-10-2014-0510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. A. 2011. Comment: On Respondent-Driven Sampling and snowball Sampling in hard-to-reach populations and snowball Sampling not in hard-to-reach populations. Sociological Methodology 41 (1):347–53. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01242.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory-Smith, D., D. Manika, and P. Demirel. 2017. Green Intentions under the blue flag: Exploring differences in EU Consumers’ willingness to pay more for environmentally-friendly products. Business Ethics: A European Review 26 (3):205–22. doi:10.1111/beer.12151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., F. Joe, L. M. Matthews, R. L. Matthews, and M. Sarstedt. 2017. PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis 1 (2):107. doi:10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle. 2019. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review 31 (1):2–24. doi:10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J.J. F., G. Tomas, M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2022. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. L. 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. The Academy of Management Review 20 (4):986–1014. doi:10.2307/258963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. L., and G. Ahuja. 1996. Does it pay to Be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 5 (1):30–37. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199603)5:1<30:AID-BSE38>3.0.CO;2-Q.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2014. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43 (1):115–35. doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., C. M. Ringle, and R. R. Sinkovics. 2009. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing 20:277–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernaus, T., M. Pejić Bach, V. Bosilj Vukšić, and T. Haldma. 2012. Influence of strategic approach to BPM on financial and Non‐financial performance. Baltic Journal of Management 7 (4):376–96. doi:10.1108/17465261211272148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjalager, A.-M. 2010. A Review of Innovation Research in tourism. Tourism Management 31 (1):1–12. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2009.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, L. C., and T. T. Bui. 2021. Market orientation, corporate social responsibility, and firm performance: The moderating role of relationship marketing orientation. Cogent Business & Management 8 (1):1–19. doi:10.1080/23311975.2021.1926212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, T. A., N. X. Chu, and T. V. Tran. 2017. The environmental pollution in Vietnam: Source, impact and remedies. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research 6 (2 February):249–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hoque, Z., and W. James. 2000. Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: Impact on organizational performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research 12 (1):1–17. doi:10.2308/jmar.2000.12.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Horbach, J., C. Rammer, and K. Rennings. 2012. Determinants of eco-innovations by Type of Environmental Impact — the Role of Regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics 78 (June):112–22. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J.-W., and Y.-H. Li. 2017. Green Innovation and performance: The view of organizational capability and social reciprocity. Journal of Business Ethics 145 (October):309–24. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2903-y.
   Google Scholar
• Ittner, C. D., and D. F. Larcker. 1998. Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. Journal of Accounting Research 36 (3):1–35. doi:10.2307/2491304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam-Sing Wong, S., and B. Bigliardi. 2012. The influence of green product competitiveness on the success of green product innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 15 (4):468–90. doi:10.1108/14601061211272385.
   Google Scholar
• Katila, R., and G. Ahuja. 2002. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal 45 (6):1183–94. doi:10.2307/3069433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanra, S., P. Kaur, R. P. Joseph, A. Malik, and A. Dhir. 2021. A resource‐based view of Green Innovation as a strategic firm resource: Present status and future directions. Business Strategy and the Environment 31 (4 December 31):1395–413. doi:10.1002/bse.2961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N. 2017. Common method bias: A full collinearity assessment method for PLS-SEM. Partial Least Squares Path Modeling August21:245–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., R. Sureka, W. M. Lim, S. Kumar Mangla, and N. Goyal. 2021. What do we know about business strategy and Environmental Research? Insights from business strategy and the environment. Business Strategy and the Environment 30 (8):3454–69. doi:10.1002/bse.2813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahens, L., E. Strady, T.-C. Kieu-Le, R. Dris, K. Boukerma, E. Rinnert, J. Gasperi, and B. Tassin. 2018. Macroplastic and microplastic contamination assessment of a Tropical River (Saigon River, Vietnam) transversed by a developing megacity. Environmental Pollution 236:661–71. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, J. B., B. L. Willis, E. A. Fiorenza, C. S. Couch, R. Howard, D. N. Rader, J. D. True, L. A. Kelly, A. Ahmad, J. Jompa, et al. 2018. Plastic Waste Associated with disease on Coral Reefs. Science 359(6374):460–62. doi:10.1126/science.aar3320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, Z. 2016. Temporal cognition, Environmental Innovation, and the Competitive Advantage of Enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production 135:1045–53. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P. B., and J. Gaskin. 2014. Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 57 (2):123–46. doi:10.1109/TPC.2014.2312452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., G. Hou, and B. Xin. 2017. Green process innovation and innovation benefit: The mediating effect of firm image. Sustainability 9 (10):1778. doi:10.3390/su9101778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., Q. Yin, Y. Pan, W. Cui, B. Xin, and Z. Rao. 2018. Green Product Innovation and firm performance: Assessing the moderating effect of novelty-centered and Efficiency-centered Business Model Design. Sustainability 10 (6):1843. doi:10.3390/su10061843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minh, N. 2023. Công Nghiệp Chế Biến - Chế Tạo Chuyển Dịch Tích Cực. Báo Đầu tư. https://baodautu.vn/cong-nghiep-che-bien---che-tao-chuyen-dich-tich-cuc-d181980.html.
   Google Scholar
• The Ministry of Planning & Investment of Vietnam. 2022. The white book of Vietnamese businesses. Ha Noi, HN: Statistical Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Najmi, M., J. Rigas, and I. Fan. 2005. A framework to review performance measurement systems. Business Process Management Journal 11 (2):109–22. doi:10.1108/14637150510591129.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. T., S. V. Nguyen, V.-H. Dau, A. T. Le, K. V. Nguyen, D. P. Nguyen, X.-T. Bui, and H. M. Bui. 2022. The nexus between greenhouse gases, economic growth, Energy and trade openness in Vietnam. Environmental Technology & Innovation 28:102912. doi:10.1016/j.eti.2022.102912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. 1978. An overview of psychological measurement. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Orsato, R. J. 2006. Competitive environmental strategies: When does it pay to be green? California Management Review 48 (2):127–43. doi:10.2307/41166341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher, M., and J. Gnoth. 2005. How to develop successful hospitality innovation. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 46 (2):205–22. doi:10.1177/0010880404271097.
   Google Scholar
• Patten, D. M. 2002. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note. Accounting, Organizations & Society 27 (8):763–73. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00028-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 1998. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining Superior performance: With a new introduction. New York: Free.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 2004. Competitive strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., and C. van Linde. 1995. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4):97–118. doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prajogo, D. I. 2016. The Strategic Fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance. International Journal of Production Economics 171:241–49. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman, S. U., S. Kraus, S. A. Shah, D. Khanin, and R. V. Mahto. 2021. Analyzing the relationship between Green Innovation and Environmental Performance in large manufacturing firms. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 163:120481. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhardt, F. L. 1998. Environmental product differentiation: Implications for corporate strategy. California Management Review 40 (4):43–73. doi:10.2307/41165964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennings, K., and C. Rammer. 2009. Increasing Energy and Resource Efficiency through innovation - an Explorative Analysis Using innovation Survey Data. ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research Discussion No 09-056. October 29. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1495761.
   Google Scholar
• Rusinko, C. 2007. Green Manufacturing: An Evaluation of Environmentally Sustainable Manufacturing Practices and their impact on competitive outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 54 (3):445–54. doi:10.1109/TEM.2007.900806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, M. V., and P. A. Fouts. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40 (3):534–59. doi:10.2307/257052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, G. R., H.-C. Lee, R. S.-H. Lim, and J. Fullerton. 2010. Recruiting hard-to-reach United States population sub-groups via adaptations of snowball sampling strategy. Nursing & Health Sciences 12 (3):369–74. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2010.00541.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellitto, M. A., C. G. Camfield, and S. Buzuku. 2020. Green Innovation and competitive advantages in a furniture industrial cluster: A survey and structural Model. Sustainable Production and Consumption 23 (July):94–104. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.04.007.
   Google Scholar
• Selvam, M., J. Gayathri, V. Vasanth, K. Lingaraja, and S. Marxiaoli. 2016. Determinants of firm performance: A subjective Model. International Journal of Social Science Studies 4 (7):90. doi:10.11114/ijsss.v4i7.1662.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., A. L. Pablo, and H. Vredenburg. 1999. Corporate environmental responsiveness strategies. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 35 (1):87–108. doi:10.1177/0021886399351008.
   Google Scholar
• Shrivastava, P. 1995. Environmental Technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 16 (S1):183–200. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S. K., M. Del Giudice, C. J. Chiappetta Jabbour, H. Latan, and A. S. Sohal. 2021. Stakeholder pressure, Green Innovation, and performance in small and Medium‐sized enterprises: The role of Green dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment 31 (1 September 30):500–14. doi:10.1002/bse.2906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skordoulis, M., G. Kyriakopoulos, S. Ntanos, S. Galatsidas, G. Arabatzis, M. Chalikias, and P. Kalantonis. 2022. The mediating role of firm strategy in the relationship between Green Entrepreneurship, Green Innovation, and competitive advantage: The case of medium and large-sized firms in Greece. Sustainability 14 (6):3286. doi:10.3390/su14063286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skordoulis, M., S. Ntanos, G. L. Kyriakopoulos, G. Arabatzis, S. Galatsidas, and M. Chalikias. 2020. Environmental innovation, Open innovation Dynamics and competitive advantage of medium and large-sized firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 6 4 (December):195. doi:10.3390/joitmc6040195.
   Google Scholar
• Škrinjar, R., V. Bosilj‐Vukšić, and M. Indihar‐Štemberger. 2008. The impact of business process orientation on financial and Non‐financial performance. Business Process Management Journal 14 (5):738–54. doi:10.1108/14637150810903084.
   Google Scholar
• Sodhi, M. S. 2015. Conceptualizing social responsibility in operations via stakeholder resource-based view. Production and Operations Management 24 (9):1375–89. doi:10.1111/poms.12393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, M., G. Walsh, D. Lerner, M. A. Fitza, and Q. Li. 2017. Green Innovation, managerial concern and firm performance: An empirical study. Business Strategy and the Environment 27 (1):39–51. doi:10.1002/bse.1981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toan, V. 2023. Roadmap to Realise Vietnam’s Commitments at COP26. Nhan Dan Newspaper. Nhan Dan Newspaper. Accessed December 18. https://special.nhandan.vn/lotrinhcop26_en/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Trần, T. V., T. H. Phan, A. T. Lê, and T. M. Trần. 2022. Evaluation of factors affecting the transition to a Circular Economy (CE) in Vietnam by structural equation modeling (SEM). Sustainability 14 (2):613. doi:10.3390/su14020613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M., and D. Nadler. 1986. Organizing for Innovation. California Management Review 28 (3):74–92. doi:10.2307/41165203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USAID. 2022. Climate change country profile: Vietnam. US Agency for International Development US Agency for International Developmentx https://www.usaid.gov/climate/country-profiles/vietnam#:~:text=Vietnam%20is%20one%20of%20the,long%2C%20densely%20populated%2C%20coast.
   Google Scholar
• Walley, N., and B. Whitehead. 1994. It’s not easy being green. Reader in Business and the Environment 36 (81):4.
   Google Scholar
• Watters, J. K., and P. Biernacki. 1989. Targeted sampling: Options for the study of hidden populations. Social Problems 36 (4):416–30. doi:10.2307/800824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, J. C., L. M. Amoroso, and P. E. Howard. 2000. Research methodology: Method and Representation in Internet-Based Survey ToolsŠ Mobility, community, and cultural identity in Survey 2000. Social Science Computer Review 18 (2):179–95. doi:10.1177/089443930001800207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. J., J. W. Emerson, D. C. Esty, A. de Sherbinin, Z. A. Wendling. 2022. 2022 environmental performance index. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. epi.yale.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C. W. Y., K. Lai, K.-C. Shang, C.-S. Lu, and T. K. P. Leung. 2012. Green Operations and the moderating role of environmental management capability of suppliers on manufacturing firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics 140 (1):283–94. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.08.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2016. Enterprise Survey 2015. Viet Nam - Enterprise Survey 2015. the World Bank - the Microdata Library. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/2664.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Group. 2022. Key highlights: Country climate and development report for Vietnam. world bank. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/vietnam/brief/key-highlights-country-climate-and-development-report-for-vietnam.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, M., F. Boadu, and Y. Xie. 2019. The penetration of green innovation on firm performance: Effects of absorptive capacity and managerial environmental concern. Sustainability 11 (9):2455. doi:10.3390/su11092455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, B., and X. Cao. 2022. Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability. Technology in Society 68:101868. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zameer, H., Y. Wang, H. Yasmeen, and S. Mubarak. 2020. Green Innovation as a Mediator in the Impact of Business Analytics and environmental orientation on Green competitive advantage. Management Decision 60 (2):488–507. doi:10.1108/MD-01-2020-0065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., Z. Rong, and Q. Ji. 2019. Green Innovation and firm performance: Evidence from listed companies in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 144:48–55. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., F. Xu, and X. Wang. 2020. How green transformational leadership affects green creativity: Creative process engagement as intermediary bond and green Innovation Strategy as boundary Spanner. Sustainability 12 (9):3841. doi:10.3390/su12093841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zott, C., and R. Amit. 2007. The fit between product market strategy and business Model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 29 (1 August 22):1–26. doi:10.1002/smj.642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar