(Re)defining “Professional” in Technical & Professional Communication

References

• Baniya, S., & Potts, L. (2022). Experts, knowledge making, and disaster across Twitter. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. Boston, MA, United States, 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, J. (2011). Glorified grammarian or versatile value adder? What internship reports reveal about the professionalization of technical communication. Technical Communication, 58(4), 307–327.
   Google Scholar
• Carliner, S. (2012). The three approaches to professionalization in technical communication. Technical Communication, 59(1), 49–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, Y. (2012). Discussions about the technical communication profession: Perspectives from the blogosphere. Technical Communication, 59(1), 8–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppola, N. W. (2010). The technical communication body of knowledge initiative: An academic-practitioner partnership. Technical Communication, 57(1), 11–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppola, N. W. (2011). Professionalization of technical communication: Zeitgeist for our age introduction to this special issue (Part 1). Technical Communication, 58(4), 277–284.
   Google Scholar
• Coppola, N. W. (2012). Professionalization of technical communication: Zeitgeist for our age introduction to this special issue (Part 2). Technical Communication, 59(1), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber, B. (2002). Professional identities: What is professional about professional communication? Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 16(3), 306–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/105065190201600303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, T., & Bemer, A. (2016). Reconsidering power and legitimacy in technical communication: A case for enlarging the definition of technical communicator. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(3), 311–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616639484
   Google Scholar
• Hubrig, A. (2020a). Negotiating crip comfort: Dispatches from my (involuntarily) subversive wardrobe. The Journal of Multimodal Rhetorics, 3(2), 140–153. http://journalofmultimodalrhetorics.com/3-2-issue-hubrig
   Google Scholar
• Hull, B., Shelton, C. D., & Mckoy, T. (2020b). Dressed but not tryin’ to impress: Black women deconstructing ‘professional’ dress. The Journal of Multimodal Rhetorics, 3(2), 7–20. http://journalofmultimodalrhetorics.com/3-2-hull-shelton-mckoy
   Google Scholar
• Itchuaqiyaq, C. U., Edenfield, A. C., & Grant-Davie, K. (2021). Sex work and professional risk communication: Keeping safe on the streets. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 36(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519211044190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, N. N., & Williams, M. F. (2020). The just use of imagination: A call to action. The association for teachers of technical writing. https://attw.org/blog/the-just-use-of-imagination-a-call-to-action/
   Google Scholar
• Kimball, M. A. (2017). The golden age of technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 47(3), 330–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616641927
   Google Scholar
• Kynell-Hunt, T., & Savage, G. J. (Eds.). (2003). Power and legitimacy in technical communication (Vol. 1). Baywood Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Kynell-Hunt, T., & Savage, G. J. (Eds.). (2004). Power and legitimacy in technical communication (Vol. 2). Baywood Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, E. A. (2011). The first wave (1953–1961) of the professionalization movement in technical communication. Technical Communication, 58(4), 285–306.
   Google Scholar
• Manthey, K. (2020c). Dress practices as embodied multimodal rhetoric. The Journal of Multimodal Rhetorics, 3(2), 4–6. http://journalofmultimodalrhetorics.com/3-2-issue-editor
   Google Scholar
• Melonçon, L., & Schreiber, J. (2022). Introduction: Promoting a sustainable collective identity for technical and professional communication. In J. Schreiber & L. Melonçon (Eds.), Assembling critical components: A framework for sustaining technical and professional communication (pp. 3–16). The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/TPC-B.2022.1381
   Google Scholar
• Rosselot-Merritt, J. (2020). Fertile grounds: What interviews of working professionals can tell us about perceptions of technical communication and the viability of technical communication as a field. Technical Communication Online, 67(1). https://www.stc.org/techcomm/2020/03/05/fertile-grounds-what-interviews-of-working-professionals-can-tell-us-about-perceptions-of-technical-communication-and-the-viability-of-technical-communication-as-a-field/
   Google Scholar
• Royster, J. J. (2000). Traces of a stream: Literacy and social change among African American women. University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Royster, J. J., & Kirsch, G. E. (2010). Feminist rhetorical practices: In search of excellence. College Composition and Communication, 61(4), 640–672. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc201011333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, G. J. (1999). The process and prospects for professionalizing technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 29(4), 355–381. https://doi.org/10.2190/7GFX-A5PC-5P7R-9LHX
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, C. (2020). Shifting out of neutral: Centering difference, bias, and social justice in a business writing course. Technical Communication Quarterly, 29(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1640287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, C. D., & Warren-Riley, S. (2023). Historicizing power and legitimacy after the social justice turn: Resisting narcissistic tendencies. Technical Communication Quarterly, 32(4), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2022.2141898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulshyan, R., & Burney, J. (2021, February 11). Stop telling women they have imposter syndrome. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/02/stop-telling-women-they-have-imposter-syndrome
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R., Moore, K. R., & Jones, N. N. (2019). Technical communication after the social justice turn: Building coalitions for action. Routledge.
   Google Scholar