Going jingo: a classification of the wartime positions of Russia’s “systemic opposition” parties

References

• Alyukov, Maksim, Maria Kunilovskaya, and Andrei Semenov. 2022a. “Firehose of (Useless) Propaganda.” Riddle (Blog). July 10. Accessed February 17, 2024. https://ridl.io/firehose-of-useless-propaganda/?fbclid=IwAR3bfGlEMpz84nsYRsyaWdTLnXNoy1JHJ2yonxktRwQAXBOQNsaa1BM_Bg0.
   Google Scholar
• Alyukov, Maksim, Maria Kunilovskaya, and Andrei Semenov. 2022b. “Putin Fans or Kremlin Bots? War and Mobilisation Across Russian Social Media Platforms.” Re: Russia (Blog). July 11. Accessed February 17, 2024. https://re-russia.net/en/expertise/031/.
   Google Scholar
• Arriola, Leonardo R., Jed Devaro, and Anne Meng. 2021. “Democratic Subversion: Elite Cooptation and Opposition Fragmentation.” American Political Science Review 115 (4): 1358–1372. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollbaum, Jan Matti. 2017. “Curbing Protest Through Elite Co-Optation? Regional Protest Mobilization by the Russian Systemic Opposition During the ‘For Fair Elections’ Protests 2011–2012.” Journal of Eurasian Studies 8 (2): 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2017.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Dollbaum, Jan Matti. 2021. “Social Policy on Social Media: How Opposition Actors Used Twitter and VKontakte to Oppose the Russian Pension Reform.” Problems of Post-Communism 68 (6): 509–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2020.1800492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollbaum, Jan Matti, Morvan Lallouet, and Ben Noble. 2021. Navalny: Putin’s Nemesis, Russia’s Future?. London: Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Natasha M., and Erica Frantz. 2011. “State Institutions and the Survival of Dictatorships.” Journal of International Affairs 65 (1): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, Jennifer, and Ellen Lust-Okar. 2009. “Elections Under Authoritarianism.” Annual Review of Political Science 12 (1): 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060106.095434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1): 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel’man, Vladimir. 2005. “Political Opposition in Russia: A Dying Species?” Post-Soviet Affairs 21 (3): 226–246. https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.21.3.226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel’man, Vladimir. 2008. “Party Politics in Russia: From Competition to Hierarchy.” Europe-Asia Studies 60 (6): 913–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130802161165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel’man, Vladimir. 2015. “Political Opposition in Russia: A Troubled Transformation.” Europe-Asia Studies 67 (2): 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.1001577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigorii V. 2014. “Co-Optation in the Process of Dominant Party System Building: The Case of Russia.” East European Politics 30 (2): 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2014.899211.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Lei, Chris J. Vargo, Zixuan Pan, Weicong Ding, and Prakash Ishwar. 2016. “Big Social Data Analytics in Journalism and Mass Communication: Comparing Dictionary-Based Text Analysis and Unsupervised Topic Modeling.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 93 (2): 332–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016639231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guriev, Sergei, and Daniel Treisman. 2022. Spin Dictators: The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kavasoglu, Berker. 2022. “Opposition Party Organizational Features, Ideological Orientations, and Elite Co-optation in Electoral Autocracies.” Democratization 29 (4): 634–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1994552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korgunyuk, Yuri. 2011. “Populist Tactics and Populist Rhetoric in Political Parties of Post-Soviet Russia.” Sociedade e Cultura 13 (2): https://doi.org/10.5216/sec.v13i2.13427.
   Google Scholar
• Korgunyuk, Yuri. 2017. “Classification of Russian Parties.” Russian Politics 2 (3): 255–286. https://doi.org/10.1163/2451-8921-00203001.
   Google Scholar
• Laruelle, Marlene. 2014. “Alexei Navalny and Challenges in Reconciling ‘Nationalism’ and ‘Liberalism’.” Post-Soviet Affairs 30 (4): 276–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2013.872453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levada Center. 2023. “Auditoriya sotsial’nykh setei i messendzherov [The Audience of Social Networks and Instant Messengers].” April 18. Accessed February 17, 2024. https://www.levada.ru/2023/04/18/auditoriya-sotsialnyh-setej-i-messendzherov/.
   Google Scholar
• Levintova, Ekaterina. 2011. “Being the Opposition in Contemporary Russia: The Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF) Among Social-Democratic, Marxist–Leninist, and Nationalist–Socialist Discourses.” Party Politics 18 (5): 727–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810389637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2005. Structuring Conflict in the Arab World: Incumbents, Opponents, and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malesky, Edmund, and Paul Schuler. 2010. “Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament.” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 482–502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, Luke. 2002. The Communist Party in Post-Soviet Russia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, Luke. 2009. “Managing Opposition in a Hybrid Regime: Just Russia and Parastatal Opposition.” Slavic Review 68 (3): 504–527. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0037677900019707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onuch, Olga, and Henry E. Hale. 2022. The Zelensky Effect. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pertsev, Andrei. 2023. “Partii bol’she net. Pis’mo o tom, kak Putin vozrozhdaet GDR [There are No More Parties. A Newsletter About How Putin Revives the GDR].” March 3. Accessed February 17, 2024. https://us5.campaign-archive.com/?u=4ea5740c1fe71d71fea4212ee&id=430d8e8e9f&utm_source=Bear+Market+Brief&utm_campaign=a1e4724922-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2023_03_10_09_02&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-a1e4724922-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, Ora John. 2017. The Origins of Dominant Parties: Building Authoritarian Institutions in Post-Soviet Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, Ora John, and Graeme B. Robertson. 2015. “Legislatures, Cooptation, and Social Protest in Contemporary Authoritarian Regimes.” The Journal of Politics 77 (1): 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/678390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, Graeme B. 2009. “Managing Society: Protest, Civil Society, and Regime in Putin’s Russia.” Slavic Review 68 (3): 528–547. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0037677900019719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakwa, Richard. 2012. “Party and Power: Between Representation and Mobilisation in Contemporary Russia.” East European Politics 28 (3): 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2012.683784.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, Andreas, ed. 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: L. Rienner Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, Regina. 2022. “State Intervention and Russia’s Frozen Dominant Party System.” In Vol. 2.Routledge Handbook of Russian Politics and Society, edited by Graeme J. Gill. 127–137. 2nd ed. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Soest, Christian von, and Julia Grauvogel. 2017. “Identity, Procedures and Performance: How Authoritarian Regimes Legitimize Their Rule.” Contemporary Politics 23 (3): 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2017.1304319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, Philip J., Dexter C. Dunphy, Marshall S. Smith, and Daniel M. Ogilvie. 1966. The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, David. 2012. “Re-Conceptualising Russian Party Politics.” East European Politics 28 (3): 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2012.688815.
   Google Scholar