The C-PIECE Framework: Documenting Group Engineering Practices Elicited by Design Challenge Exhibits

References

• Adams, R., & Atman, C. J. (1999). Cognitive processes in iterative design behavior. Frontiers in Education [Conference Proceedings]. 29th Annual Conference, Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education, San Juan, PR, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1999.839114
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R. S., Turns, J., & Atman, C. J. (2003). Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design Studies, 24(3), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00056-X
   Google Scholar
• Allen, S., Gutwill, J., Perry, D., Garibay, C., Ellenbogen, K., Heimlich, J., Reich, C., & Klein, C. (2007). Research in museums: Coping with complexity. In J. H. Falk, L. D. Dierking, & S. Foutz (Eds.), In Principle, in Practice. AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (complete edition). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atman, C. J., Turns, J., Cardella, M. E., & Adams, R. S. (2003). The design processes of engineering educators: Thick descriptions and potential implications. In N. Cross & E. Edmonds (Eds.), Expertise in design: Proceedings of the design thinking research symposium 6. Creativity and Cognition Press, University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Axton, T. R., Doverspike, D., Park, S. R., & Barrett, G. V. (1997). A model of the information-processing and cognitive ability requirements for mechanical troubleshooting. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 1(3), 245–266.
   Google Scholar
• Barriault, C., & Pearson, D. (2010). Assessing exhibits for learning in science centres: A practical tool. Visitor Studies, 13(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645571003618824
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, B., Calabrese Barton, A., & Garibay, C. (2018). Broadening Perspectives on Broadening Participation in STEM: Critical Perspectives on the Role of Science Engagement. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, B., Gutwill, J. P., Petrich, M., & Wilkinson, K. (2015). Learning through STEM-rich tinkering: Findings from a jointly negotiated research project taken up in practice. Science Education, 99(1), 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardella, M., Svarovsky, G., Dorie, B. L., Tranby, Z., & Cleave, S. V. (2013). Gender research on adult-child discussions within informal engineering environments (gradient): Early findings. [Conference proceedings]. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Childress, V. W., & Rhodes, C. (2008). Engineering outcomes for grades 9 - 12. The Technology Teacher, 67(7), 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• CMC (Corporate Member Council). (2008). K-12 STEM Guidelines for All Americans. K-12 Engineering/Engineering Technology Guidelines Meeting. ASEE. https://aseecmsduq.blob.core.windows.net/aseecmsdev/asee/media/content/member%20resources/pdfs/cmc-k12-stem-guidelines-for-all-americans.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028002004
   Google Scholar
• Crismond, D., & Adams, R. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. M., & Hester, K. (2007). Engineering is elementary: An engineering and technology curriculum for children [Paper presentation]. American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Dorie, B. L., Cardella, M. E., & Svarovsky, G. (2014). Capturing the design behaviors of young children working with a parent. [Paper Presentation]. Proceedings of the 121st American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Ehsan, H., Leeker, J. R., Cardella, M. E., & Svarowsky, G. N. (2018, July). Examining children’s engineering practices during an engineering activity in a designed learning setting: A focus on troubleshooting (Fundamental). [Paper presentation]. 2018 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). The Museum Experience Revisited. Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., Moussouri, T., & Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitors’ agendas on museum learning. Curator: The Museum Journal, 41(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1998.tb00822.x
   Google Scholar
• Garibay, C., & Teasdale, R. (2019). Equity and evaluation in informal STEM education. New Directions for Evaluation, 2019(161), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20352
   Google Scholar
• Goel, V. (1989). Design within information-processing theory: The design problem space. AI Magazine, 10(1), 19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabinger, S., Aplin, C., & Ponnappa-Brenner, G. (2007). Instructional design for sociocultural learning environments. Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 10(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, J. (1994). Learning to learn in informal science settings. Research in Science Education, 24(1), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356336
   Google Scholar
• Heimlich, J., Wasserman, D., & Hayde, D. (2014). Human plus: Real lives + real engineering summative evaluation. Center for Research and Evaluation, COSI. https://resources.informalscience.org/sites/default/files/2014-06-25_Human_Plus_Summative_Report_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Herrán, C., Randol, S., Shagott, T., Benne, M., Ramos-Montañez, S., & Surbaugh, N. (2021). Exhibit Features and Visitor Groups’ Engineering Design Practices. Oregon Museum of Science and Industry. https://engineerourtomorrow.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Exhibit-Features-6-17.21.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Educational Sciences. (2013). Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development. https://ies.ed.gov/pdf/CommonGuidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jideani, V., & Jideani, A. (2012). Alignment of assessment objectives with instructional objectives using revised bloom’s taxonomy—The case for food science and technology education. Journal of Food Science Education, 11(3), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4329.2012.00141.x
   Google Scholar
• Kirkhart, K., & Hopson, R. (2010, June 13–16). Strengthening evaluation through cultural relevance and cultural competence. [Invited workshop]. American Evaluation Association Centers for Disease Control Summer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lussenhop, A., Auster, R., & Lindgren-Streicher, A. (2015). Facilitation research for engineering design. Museum of Science Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering. Education Research (J-PEER), 4(1), Article 2.
   Google Scholar
• Museum of Science Boston. (2009). Engineering is elementary engineering design process. http://www.mos.org/eie/engineering_design.php
   Google Scholar
• Museum of Science Boston. (2012). Design challenges observation instrument. https://informalscience.org/sites/default/files/MOS_DC_observation_instrument.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, M. (2012). Student learning. In R. Churchill, P. Ferguson, S. Godinho, N. Johnson, & A. Keddie (Eds.), Teaching making a difference (Vol. 2, pp. 74–88). Wiley Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12190
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oregon Museum of Science and Industry. (2016). Culturally responsive research framework. https://external-wiki.terc.edu/download/attachments/50462840/CRR_Framework_REVEAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, C. A., & Burke, L. (2017). Design squad global summative evaluation report. Concord Evaluation Group. https://www.informalscience.org/sites/default/files/DSG%20Summative%20Evaluation_122117.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Randol, S., Benne, M., Herrán, C., Ramos-Montañez, S., & Shagott, T. (2021). Exploring patterns of collaborative practices at interactive engineering challenge exhibits. Oregon Museum of Science and Industry. https://engineerourtomorrow.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Exploring-patterns-of-family-engineering-learning-behavior-at-design-challenge-exhibits-6-7-2021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Randol, S. M., Herrán, C., Ramos-Montanez, S., Shagott, T., & Benne, M. R. (2021, July), Engineering awareness at design challenge exhibits (fundamental) [Paper presentation]. 2021 American Society of Engineering Education Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37052
   Google Scholar
• Shagott, T., Benne, M., Herrán, C., Randol, S., Ramos-Montañez, S., Surbaugh, N. (2021). The study of collaborative practices at interactive engineering challenge exhibits—background and methods (The C-PIECE Study). Oregon Museum of Science and Industry. https://engineerourtomorrow.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Anchor-paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Strimel, G., Huffman, T., Grubbs, M., Gurganus, J., Sabarre, A., & Bartholomew, S. (2020). Framework for P-12 engineering learning: A defined and cohesive educational foundation for P-12 engineering. American Society for Engineering Education. https://p12framework.asee.org/
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. (2014, April). Design challenges at a science center: Are children engineering? [Paper presentation]. 2014 American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA. http://www.jennifertw.com/CV/papers/Wang%20-%202014%20-%20Design%20Challenges%20at%20a%20Science%20Center.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Werner-Avidon, M., Newton, L., Randol, S., Smith, B., & Walker, G. (2013). Ingenuity in action: Connecting tinkering to engineering design processes. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 3(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1077
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, J., Spencer, K., & Hammer, D. (2014). Examining young students’ problem scoping in engineering design. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1082
   Google Scholar