89
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Evaluation Studies

Outside Museum Walls: The Impact of Community Facilitators in an Outdoor Social Science Exhibition

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Received 13 Feb 2023, Accepted 23 Jan 2024, Published online: 12 Feb 2024

References

  • Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
  • Adler, N., & Stewart, J. (2007). The MacArthur scale of subjective social status. MacArthur Research Network on SES & Health.
  • American Association of Museums (Ed.). (1992). Excellence and equity: Education and the public dimension of museums. American Association of Museums.
  • Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241
  • Barriault, C., & Pearson, D. (2010). Assessing exhibits for learning in science centers: A practical tool. Visitor Studies, 13(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645571003618824
  • Blader, S. L., Shirako, A., & Chen, Y. R. (2016). Looking out from the top: Differential effects of status and power on perspective taking. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(6), 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216636628
  • Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255–342). Elsevier.
  • Burgoon, J. K. (2015). Expectancy violations theory. In Berger, C. R., Roloff, M. E., Wilson, S. R., Dillard, J. P., Caughlin, J., Solomon, D. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic102
  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2015). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Ravenio books.
  • Cancian, F. M. (1992). Feminist science: Methodologies that challenge inequality. Gender & Society, 6(4), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124392006004006
  • Cardiel, C. L. B., Pattison, S. A., Benne, M., & Johnson, M. (2016). Science on the move: A design-based research study of informal STEM learning in public spaces. Visitor Studies, 19(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2016.1144027
  • Carello, J., & Butler, L. D. (2015). Practicing what we teach: Trauma-informed educational practice. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 35(3), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2015.1030059
  • Chien, H.-Y., & Atwell Seate, A. (2017). When talking differences makes us closer: Communicative dynamics of group salience in intergroup contact. Communication Studies, 68(4), 455–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2017.1361458
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd Ed.) Academic Press.
  • COVES (2019). Understanding our visitors: Multi-institutional museum study (July 2018-June 2019). Collaboration for Ongoing Visitor Experience Studies.
  • Dawson, E. (2014). “Not designed for us”: How science museums and science centers socially exclude low-income, minority ethnic Groups. Science Education, 98(6), 981–1008. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21133
  • Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205284282
  • Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: Metacognition, motivation, and self-regulation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 297–323) Kluwer.
  • Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001
  • Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277
  • Eschert, S., & Simon, B. (2019). Respect and political disagreement: Can intergroup respect reduce the biased evaluation of outgroup arguments? PloS One, 14(3), e0211556. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211556
  • Exploratorium (2022). Sound commons: A living innovation zone in UN plaza. Retrieved on May 2, 2022 from https://www.exploratorium.edu/publicspaces/projects/un-plaza.
  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. (1992). The museum experience. Whalesback Books.
  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. AltaMira Press.
  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
  • Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1068–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x
  • Garibay Group. (2021). Middle Ground summative evaluation [Summative Evaluation]. https://www.informalscience.org/street-smarts-experiments-urban-social-science.
  • Garibay, C., & Teasdale, R. M. (2019). Equity and evaluation in informal STEM education. New Directions for Evaluation, 2019(161), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20352
  • Gutwill, J. P., & Allen, S. (2010). Facilitating family group inquiry at science museum exhibits. Science Education, 94(4), 710–742. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20387
  • Gutwill, J. P., Chien, H.-Y., Hammonds, L., & Dixon, R. (2020a, October 21). Creating middle ground: Transforming urban outdoor spaces with social science exhibits and facilitation about biases. [Conference presentation] [Paper presentation]. Association of Science-Technology Centers. Virtual location.
  • Gutwill, J. P., Chien, H.-Y., Hammonds, L., & Dixon, R. (2020b, November 12). Creating Middle Ground: Transforming Urban Outdoor Spaces with Social Science Exhibits and Facilitation about Biases [Paper presentation]. Virtual Presentation to Urban Alchemy, San Francisco, CA.
  • Gutwill, J. P., Chien, H.-Y., Hammonds, L., & Dixon, R. (2020c, November 20). Making Middle Ground: Transforming Urban Outdoor Spaces with Social Science Exhibits and Facilitation [Paper presentation]. Virtual Presentation to the School of Education at the University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
  • Gutwill, J. P., Chien, H.-Y., Lani, S., Winterheld, H., Miller, L., & Garibay, C. (2022). Creating Middle Ground: Transforming outdoor informal learning landscapes. Curator: The Museum Journal, 65(4), 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12493
  • Gutwill, J. P., Lani, S., & Chien, H.-Y. (2023). Transforming learning landscapes: A radical model for informal science learning. In J. Diamond & S. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Amplifying informal science learning (pp. 3–17). Routledge.
  • Hall, B., Tandon, R., & Tremblay, C. (2015). Strengthening community university research partnerships: Global perspectives. University of Victoria & PRIA.
  • Harwood, J., & Joyce, N. (2012). Intergroup contact and communication. In H. Giles (Ed.), The handbook of intergroup communication (pp. 167–180). Routledge.
  • Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664
  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The Four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
  • Horowitz, C. R., Robinson, M., & Seifer, S. (2009). Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: Are researchers prepared? Circulation, 119(19), 2633–2642. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.729863
  • Kim, B., Heo, J., Chun, S., & Lee, Y. (2011). Construction and initial validation of the leisure facilitator scale. Leisure/Loisir, 35(4), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2011.648402
  • Kisiel, J. (2006). An examination of field trip strategies and their implementation within a natural history museum. Science Education, 90(3), 434–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20117
  • Kisiel, J. (2021). The challenge of identifying impacts of an on-the-floor presenter program [Paper presentation]. Visitor Studies Association, Virtual Conference.
  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion & adaptation. Oxford University Press.
  • Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Gilford Press.
  • Lindemann-Matthies, P., & Kamer, T. (2006). The influence of an interactive educational approach on visitors’ learning in a Swiss zoo. Science Education, 90(2), 296–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20127
  • Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
  • Lussenhop, A., Auster, R., & Lindgren-Streicher, A. (2015). Facilitation research for engineering design education (FREDE). Museum of Science.
  • Macaulay, A. C., Jagosh, J., Pluye, P., Bush, P. L., & Salsberg, J. (2013). Quantitative methods in participatory research. Nouvelles Pratiques Sociales, 25(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.7202/1020827ar
  • Machado Corral, S., Monteiro, P. H. N., Pisani, K., & Barriault, C. L. (2021). Facilitators improve the learning experience of visitors to a science centre. Frontiers in Education, 6, 516. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.675124
  • Mackie, D. M., Smith, E. R., & Ray, D. G. (2008). Intergroup emotions and intergroup relations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1866–1880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00130.x
  • McManimon, S. K., Causey, L., King, Z., Ronning, E. C., & Bequette, M. B. (2020). On the need for expanded guidance in navigating ethical learning research at science museums. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(5), 651–671. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21613
  • Meluch, W. (2015). Science of sharing experiments & exhibits summative evaluation report. http://www.informalscience.org/sites/default/files/2015-11-24_SoS_Summative_ Report_Fin_12Nov2015.pdf
  • Minkler, M. (2005). Community-based research partnerships: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 82(2 Suppl 2), ii3–i12. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jti034
  • Mony, P. R. S., & Heimlich, J. E. (2008). Talking to visitors about conservation: Exploring message communication through docent–visitor Interactions at zoos. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645570802355513
  • Nee, J. (2021). Participatory action research in Teotitlán del Valle Zapotec language revitalization [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of California. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/26v6d2k7
  • Pattison, S., Randol, S., Benne, M., Rubin, A., Gontan, I., Andanen, E., Bromley, C., Ramos-Montañez, S., & Dierking, L. (2017). A design-based research study of staff-facilitated family learning at interactive math exhibits. Visitor Studies, 20(2), 138–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2017.1404348
  • Pattison, S. A., Rubin, A., Benne, M., Gontan, I., Andanen, E., Shagott, T., Francisco, M., Ramos-Montañez, S., Bromley, C., & Dierking, L. D. (2018). The Impact of facilitation by museum educators on family learning at interactive math exhibits: A quasi-experimental study. Visitor Studies, 21(1), 4–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2018.1503879
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504
  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
  • Price, C. A., Makdisi, L., Hutchison, G., Lancaster, D., & Keels, M. (2022). Exploring trauma responsive educational practices in a museum. Journal of Museum Education, 47(1), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2021.1988274
  • Raymore, L. A. (2002). Facilitators to leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2002.11949959
  • Ryoo, J. J., & Shea, M. (2015). Value mapping: An activity for surfacing power dynamics and diverse perspectives in research-practice collaborations. Exploratorium. https://rpp.wtgrantfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Value-Mapping_Nov2015.pdf
  • San Francisco Planning Department (2017). San Francisco neighborhoods: Socio-economic Profiles. American Community Survey 2010–2014. Office of the Mayor.
  • San Francisco Department of Emergency Management (2021). Tenderloin emergency initiative: Strategic plan and operations guide. https://sf.gov/sites/default/files/2022-01/Tenderloin%20Emergency%20Initiative%20Strategic%20Plan%20and%20Operation_12.27.21.pdf
  • Serrell, B. (1998). Paying attention: Visitors and museum exhibitions. American Association of Museums.
  • Serrell, B. (2010). Paying more attention to paying attention. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education. http://caise.insci.org/news/96/51/Paying-More-Attention-to-Paying-Attention/d,resources-page-item-detail
  • SF City Planning (2017). Civic Center initiative. SF Civic Center. https://sfciviccenter.org/civic-center-initiative/
  • Simon, B., Eschert, S., Schaefer, C. D., Reininger, K. M., Zitzmann, S., & Smith, H. J. (2019). Disapproved, but tolerated: The role of respect in outgroup tolerance. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(3), 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218787810
  • Stephan, W. G., & Finlay, K. (1999). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55(4), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00144
  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x
  • Strand, K., Marullo, S., Cutforth, N., Stoecker, R., & Donohue, P. (2003). Community-based research and higher education: Principles and practices. Jossey-Bass.
  • Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Harwood, J., Voci, A., & Kenworthy, J. (2006). Intergroup contact and grandparent-grandchild communication: The effects of self-disclosure on implicit and explicit biases against older people. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(3), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206064642
  • Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.369
  • Urban Alchemy (n.d.). Urban Alchemy: Transforming the energy in traumatized urban spaces. https://urban-alchemy.us/
  • UrbanAlchemyUA. (2022, September 19). Urban Alchemy: Director of training, Loving Louie. https://medium.com/@social_89466/urban-alchemy-director-of-training-loving-louie-a790d76ed68a
  • Verbeke, M., Pattison, S., & Merson, M. (2018). Visitor interest and the dynamics of interpreter-visitor conversations in national park. Visitor Studies Association. https://www.informalscience.org/sites/default/files/iSWOOP_VSA_2018_Monae%20Verbeke.pdf
  • Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E., Garlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D., Rhodes, S., Samuel-Hodge, C., Maty, S., Lux, L., Webb, L., Sutton, S. F., Swinson, T., Jackman, A., & Whitener, L. (2004). Community-based participatory research: Assessing the evidence. In AHRQ evidence report summaries. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.