Towards clinically meaningful subtyping of youth with violent behavior: application of latent profile analysis to a risk-strengths based risk assessment model*

References

• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 16(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Dowden, C. (2006). Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment: A meta-analytic investigation. International Journal of Offender Therapy Comparative Criminology, 50(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X05282556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes-Lee, A. R., & Campbell, C. A. (2020). Protective factors for reducing juvenile reoffending: An examination of incremental and differential predictive validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(11), 1390–1408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820952115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, L. R., & El-Khouri, B. (1987). EXACON: A Fortran 77 program for the exact analysis of single cells in a contingency table. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47(1), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164487471024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2016). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2006). Manual for the structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY). Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, E. F. J. M., & Van Heerde, W. K. (2004). Handleiding FPJ-lijst: forensisch profiel justitiële jeugd [Manual FPJ List: juvenile forensic profile]. Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. A., Miller, W., Papp, J., Barnes, A. R., Onifade, E., & Anderson, V. R. (2019). Assessing intervention needs of juvenile probationers: An application of latent profile analysis to a risk–need–responsivity assessment model. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818796869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caudill, J. W. (2010). Back on the swagger: Institutional release and recidivism timing among gang affiliates. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204009339872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs, K., Frick, P. J., Ryals, J. S., Lingonblad, A., & Villio, M. J. (2014). A comparison of empirically based and structured professional judgment estimation of risk using the structured assessment of violence risk in youth. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 12(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204013480368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. L., & Muthén, B. (2009). Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis. https://www.statmodel.com/download/relatinglca.pdf
   Google Scholar
• D’Amato, C., Campbell, C. A., Papp, J., & Miller, W. (2021). Profile analysis and risk assessment: Identifying distinct patterns of risks and needs. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 19(4), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/15412040211012467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., Geers, M. C. K., Stapel, M., Hilterman, E. L. B., & de Vogel, V. (2014). SAPROF- Youth version. Structured assessment of protective factors for violence risk - youth version. Richtlijnen voor de beoordeling van beschermende factoren voor gewelddadig gedrag bij jeugd. Van der Hoeven Kliniek.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., Geers, M. C. K., Stapel, M., Hilterman, E. L. B., & de Vogel, V. (2015). SAPROF - Youth version. Structured assessment of protective factors for violence risk - youth version. Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk in juveniles. Van Der Hoeven Kliniek.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., Veldhuizen, A., Vullings, K., Helmers, N., & van Hoof, L. (2022). Risk and protective factors for juvenile violent offending. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P. (1986). Age and crime. Crime and Justice-a Review of Research, 7, 189–250. https://doi.org/10.1086/449114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P. W., & Jones, P. R. (1999). Differentiating delinquent youths for program planning and evaluation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26(4), 403–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854899026004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, J., & Bijleveld, C. C. (2004). Juvenile sexual delinquents: Contrasting child abusers with peer abusers. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 14(4), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.591
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hillege, S. L., Brand, E. F. J. M., Mulder, E. A., Vermeiren, R. R. J. M., & van Domburgh, L. (2017). Serious juvenile offenders: Classification into subgroups based on static and dynamic charateristics. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 11(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-017-0201-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hilterman, E. L., Bongers, I., Nicholls, T. L., & van Nieuwenhuizen, C. (2016). Identifying gender specific risk/need areas for male and female juvenile offenders: Factor analyses with the structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY). Law and Human Behavior, 40(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilterman, E. L. B., Vermunt, J. K., Nicholls, T. L., Bongers, I. L., & van Nieuwenhuizen, C. (2019). Profiles of SAVRY risk and protective factors within male and female juvenile offenders: A latent class and latent transition analysis. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 18(4), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2019.1580803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeve, M., Colins, O. F., Mulder, E. A., Loeber, R., Stams, G. J. J. M., & Vermeiren, R. R. J. M. (2015). Trauma and mental health problems in adolescent males: Differences between childhood-onset and adolescent-onset offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814558505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleeven, A. T. H., de Vries Robbé, M., Mulder, E. A., & Popma, A. (2023). The validity of violence risk assessment in young adults: A comparative study of juvenile and adult risk assessment tools. Emerging Adulthood, 11(6), 1409–1422. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968231184278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleeven, A. T. H., de Vries Robbé, M., Mulder, E. A., & Popma, A. (2022). Risk assessment in juvenile and young adult offenders: Predictive validity of the SAVRY and SAPROF-YV. Assessment, 29(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120959740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, L. L., Day, A., Klettke, B., Daffern, M., & Chu, C. M. (2020). The predictive validity of youth violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review. Psychology Crime & Law, 26(8), 776–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1734200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotelnikova, K., Lefebvre, C., Campbell, M. A., Canales, D., & Stewart, C. (2022). Intersection of personality profiles and criminogenic risk-needs in justice-involved youth. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 21(3), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2021.1972061
   Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. (2011). Why the risk and needs principles are relevant to correctional programs (even to employment programs). Criminology & Public Policy, 10(4), 973–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00759.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., & Taxman, F. S. (2020). Using latent class analysis to identify the complex needs of youth on probation. Children and Youth Services Review, 115, 105087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D. D., Chu, C. M., Xu, X. X., Zeng, G., & Ruby, K. (2019). Risk and protective factors for probation success among youth offenders in Singapore. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 17(2), 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204018778887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims and Offenders, 4(2), 124–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880802612573
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Y., Mendell, N., & Rubin, D. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodewijks, H., Doreleijers, T., de Ruiter, C., & de Wit-Grouls, H. (2006). Structured assessment of violence risk in youth: Handleiding voor de gestructureerde risicotaxatie van gewelddadig gedrag bij jongeren. Rentray.
   Google Scholar
• Loeber, R., Slot, N. W., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2016). A cumulative developmental model of risk and promotive factors. In R. Loeber, N. W. Slot, P. H. van der Laan, & M. Hoeve (Eds.), Tomorrow's criminals (pp. 151–180). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Romero, L., Maneiro, L., Cutrin, O., Gomez-Fraguela, J. A., Villar, P., Luengo, M. A., Sobral, J., & Romero, E. (2019). Identifying risk profiles for antisocial behavior in a Spanish sample of young offenders. International Journmal Offender Therapy Comparative Criminology, 63(10), 1896–1913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19842032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lösel, F., & Farrington, D. P. (2012). Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development of youth violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(2 Suppl 1), S8–S23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2016). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs? Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705281747
   Google Scholar
• Maltz, M. D. (1984). Recidivism. Academic Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Maneiro, L., Argudo, A., & Gómez-Fraguela, X. A. (2022). Risk profiles in a Spanish sample of juvenile offenders: Implications for risk assessment and management. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2055757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, E., Brand, E., Bullens, R., & van Marle, H. (2010a). A classification of risk factors in serious juvenile offenders and the relation between patterns of risk factors and recidivism. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 20(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, E., Brand, E., Bullens, R., & van Marle, H. (2010b). Profiling serious juvenile offenders in juvenile institutions: Change in risk factors in their population. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2010.499554
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, E., Vermunt, J., Brand, E., Bullens, R., & van Marle, H. (2012). Recidivism in subgroups of serious juvenile offenders: Different profiles, different risks? Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 22(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Fagan, J., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., Chassin, L., Brame, R., Schubert, C. A., Hecker, T., & Losoya, S. H. (2004). Theory and research on desistance from antisocial activity among serious adolescent offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2(3), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204004265864
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nylund, K. L., Asparoutiov, T., & Muthen, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling-A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberski, D. (2016). Mixture models: Latent profile and latent class analysis. In J. Robertson, & M. Kaptein (Eds.), Modern statistical methods for HCI (pp. 275–287). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C., & Wormith, J. S. (2009). Risk assessment with young offenders. A meta-analysis of three assessment measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(4), 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809331457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onifade, E., Davidson, W., Livsey, S., Turke, G., Horton, C., Malinowski, J., Atkinson, D., & Wimberly, D. (2008). Risk assessment: Identifying patterns of risk in young offenders with the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(2), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxnam, P., & Vess, J. (2006). A personality-based typology of adolescent sexual offenders using the Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35(1), 36–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxnam, P., & Vess, J. (2008). A typology of adolescent sexual offenders: Millon adolescent clinical inventory profiles, developmental factors, and offence characteristics. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 19(2), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940701694452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkan, T. (2016). Reoffending among serious juvenile offenders: A developmental perspective. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995). Violent recidicism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 737–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.63.5.737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24(5), 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005575113507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salekin, R. T., Lee, Z., Schrum Dillard, C. L., & Kubak, F. A. (2010). Child psychopathy and protective factors: IQ and motivation to change. Psychology, Public Policy, and law, 16(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sameroff, A. J. (2000). Dialectical processes in developmental psychopathology. In A. J. Sameroff & M. Lewis (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychopathology (pp. 23–40). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, D. (1982). Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression-model. Biometrika, 69(1), 239–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/69.1.239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, C. S. (2007). Risk assessment for juvenile justice: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 31(5), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9071-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, C. S., Macy, R. J., Day, S. H., & Fraser, M. W. (2008). Classifying offenders. An application of latent class analysis to needs assessment in juvenile justice. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204007313383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souverein, F., Oostermeijer, S., Johns, D., Ross, S., van Domburgh, L., Popma, A., & Mulder, E. (2023). Small-scale, community-embedded youth justice facilities: Lessons from Dutch reforms and recommendations for cross-jurisdictional implementation. The Prison Journal, 103(5), 679–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855231200638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dam, C., de Bruyn, E. E. J., & Janssens, J. M. A. M. (2007). Personality, delinquency, and criminal recidivism. Adolescence, 42(168), 763–777.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Kordelaar, W. (2002). Beslissingsondersteuning onderzoek geestesvermogens in het strafrecht voorvolwassenen [Decision support research mental capacity in criminal justice for adults]. Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Viljoen, S., Viljoen, J. L., Nicholls, T. L., & De Vries Robbé, M. (2017). The role of protective factors in forensic risk assessments. In R. Roesch, & A. N. Cook (Eds.), Handbook of forensic mental health services (pp. 199–235). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S. C., Bishop, A. S., Nurius, P. S., & Logan-Greene, P. (2016). The heterogeneity of treatment needs for justice-involved girls. A yypology using latent class analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815615162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijters, G., Verweij, S., Tollenaar, N., & Hill, J. (2019). Recidive onder justitiabelen: Verslag over de periode 2006-2018 [Recidivism among offenders in the Netherlands: Report covering the period 2006-2018]. https://www.wodc.nl/binaries/Cahier%202019-10_Volledige%20tekst_tcm28-396007.pdf
   Google Scholar