Out of REACH: environmental hazards of cosmetic preservatives

References

• [ANSES] French Agency for Food Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety. 2020. Substance evaluation conclusion as required by REACH article 48 and evaluation report for triclocarban EC No 202-924-1 CAS No 101-20-2.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2012. Commission Regulation (EU) No 848/2012 of 19 September 2012 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards phenylmercury compounds. OJ L 253, 2092012; p. 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2018. Checklists for applicants submitting dossiers on cosmetic ingredients to be evaluated by the SCCS.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2019. Fitness check of the most relevant chemicals legislation (excluding REACH), as well as related aspects of legislation applied to downstream industries.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2020. Chemicals strategy for sustainability towards a toxic-free environment.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2022. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/707 of 19 December 2022 amending Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 as regards hazard classes and criteria for the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures. OJ L 93, 3132023; p. 7–39.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2023. SCCS Notes of guidance for the testing of cosmetic ingredients and their safety evaluation - 12th revision.
   Google Scholar
• [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2014. Decision on substanceevaluation pursuant to article 46(1) of regulation (EC) 1907/2006 For Triclosan, CAS No 3380-34-5 fEC No 222-182-2).
   Google Scholar
• [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2016a. Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency Case A-018-2014.
   Google Scholar
• [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2016b. Decision on Substance Evaluation Pursuant to Article 46(1) of Regulation (EC) 1907/2006 for Climbazole, CAS No 38083-17-9 (EC No 253-775-4).
   Google Scholar
• [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2016c. Decision on Substance Evaluation pursuant to Article 46(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 for methyl 4-hydroxybenzate CAS no 99-76-3 (EC No 202-785-7).
   Google Scholar
• [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2018. Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency Case A-009-2016.
   Google Scholar
• [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2019. Decision on Substance EvluationPursuant to Article 46(1) of Regulation 1907/2006 for Climbazole CAS No 38083-17-9 (EC No 253-775-4).
   Google Scholar
• [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2020. Inclusion of substances of very high concern in the Candidate List for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV Doc: d (2020)4578-DC.
   Google Scholar
• [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2021a. Inclusion of substances of very high concern in the Candidate List for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV Doc: d (2021)4569-DC.
   Google Scholar
• [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2021b. Report on the Operation of REACH and CLP 2021.
   Google Scholar
• [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2023a. Background document for glutaral. Document developed in the context of ECHA’s eleventh recommendation for the inclusion of substances in Annex XIV.
   Google Scholar
• [ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2023b. Triclosan. [updated 06/09/2023; accessed 19 June 2023]. https://echa.europa.eu/brief-profile/-/briefprofile/100.020.167.
   Google Scholar
• [EPCEU] European Parliament, Council of the European Union. 2006. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. OJ L 396, 30122006; p. 1–849.
   Google Scholar
• [EPCEU] European Parliament, Council of the European Union. 2008. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. OJ L 353, 31122008; p. 1–1355.
   Google Scholar
• [EPCEU] European Parliament, Council of the European Union. 2009. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. OJ L 342, 22122009, p. 59–209.
   Google Scholar
• [EPCEU] European Parliament, Council of the European Union. 2017. Regulation (EU) 2017/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on mercury, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1102/2008. OJ L 137, 2452017, p. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Carey DE, McNamara PJ. 2014. The impact of triclosan on the spread of antibiotic resistance in the environment. Front Microbiol. 5:780. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousins IT, Ng CA, Wang Z, Scheringer M. 2019. Why is high persistence alone a major cause of concern? Environ Sci Process Impacts. 21(5):781–792. doi: 10.1039/c8em00515j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hungarian National Institute of Chemical Safety. 2015. Substance evaluation report - disodium disulphite EC 231-673-0, CAS 7681-57-4.
   Google Scholar
• Istituto Superiore di Sanità. 2018. Justification Document for the Selection of a CoRAP Substance for Trimethyloctadecylammonium chloride.
   Google Scholar
• Istituto Superiore di Sanità. 2019. Justification for removing a substance from CoRAP prior to evaluation for Trimethyloctadecylammonium chloride.
   Google Scholar
• Li M, He Y, Sun J, Li J, Bai J, Zhang C. 2019. Chronic exposure to an environmentally relevant triclosan concentration induces persistent triclosan resistance but reversible antibiotic tolerance in Escherichia coli. Environ Sci Technol. 53(6):3277–3286. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Jin M, Nguyen SH, Mao L, Li J, Coin LJM, Yuan Z, Guo J. 2018. Non-antibiotic antimicrobial triclosan induces multiple antibiotic resistance through genetic mutation. Environ Int. 118:257–265. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak-Lange M, Niedziałkowska K, Lisowska K. 2022. Cosmetic preservatives: hazardous micropollutants in need of greater attention? Int J Mol Sci. 23(22):14495. doi: 10.3390/ijms232214495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pütz KW, Namazkar S, Plassmann M, Benskin JP. 2022. Are cosmetics a significant source of PFAS in Europe? Product inventories, chemical characterization and emission estimates. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 24(10):1697–1707. doi: 10.1039/d2em00123c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero JL, Grande Burgos MJ, Pérez-Pulido R, Gálvez A, Lucas R. 2017. Resistance to antibiotics, biocides, preservatives and metals in bacteria isolated from seafoods: co-selection of strains resistant or tolerant to different classes of compounds [original research]. Front Microbiol. 8:1650. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudén C, Hansson SO. 2010. Registration, Evaluation, and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH) is but the first step-how far will it take us? Six further steps to improve the European chemicals legislation. Environ Health Perspect. 118(1):6–10. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale F, Sousa CA, Sousa H, Santos L, Simões M. 2022. Parabens as emerging contaminants: environmental persistence, current practices and treatment processes. J Cleaner Prod. 347:131244. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar