Cross-Modal Impact of Recent Word Encountering Experience

References

• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J. (2013). Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 328. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2018). Parsimonious mixed models. (arXiv:1506.04967). arXiv
   Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., & Fayol, M. (2002). Frequency effects in the written and spoken production of homophonic picture names. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14(3), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440143000078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, D. E. (1967). Word-frequency effect and response bias. Psychological Review, 74(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. D., & Watson, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M. (2022). Word recognition II: Phonological coding in reading. In M. Snowling, C. Hulme, & K. Nation (Eds.), The Science of Reading: A Handbook (2 ed., pp. 79–101). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119705116.ch4
   Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2016). The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon project 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(3), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Q., Brysbaert, M., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE, 5(6), e10729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C.-M. (1981). Perception of Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Lin, T.-J., Ku, Y.-M., Zhang, J., & O’Connell, A. (2018). Reader, word, and character attributes contributing to Chinese children’s concept of word. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(3), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1414220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, F. K. (1999). Phonological recoding in Chinese logograph recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 876. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahan, D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2001). Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), 317–367. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Stainton, M. (1991). Phonological recoding in silent reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(4), 618. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.4.618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnenwerth-Nolan, S., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1981). Multiple code activation in word recognition: Evidence from rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7(3), 170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.7.3.170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drewnowski, A., & Healy, A. F. (1982). Phonetic factors in letter detection: A reevaluation. Memory & Cognition, 10(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W., Young, A. W., & Anderson, C. (1988). Modes of word recognition in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Brain and Language, 35(2), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X8890111-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrand, L., Meot, A., Spinelli, E., New, B., Pallier, C., Bonin, P., Dufau, S., Mathot, S., & Grainger, J. (2018). MEGALEX: A megastudy of visual and auditory word recognition. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1285–1307. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0943-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical Access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12(6), 627–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-53717380042-8
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, M. K., Rothkopf, E. Z., Lapan, R., & Lafferty, T. (1987). The word frequency effect in lexical decision: Finding a frequency-based component. Memory & Cognition, 15(1), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, R. A., Davis, M. H., Gaskell, M. G., & Rodd, J. M. (2018). Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(10), 1533–1561. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Diependaele, K., Spinelli, E., Ferrand, L., & Farioli, F. (2003). Masked repetition and phonological priming within and across modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), 1256–1269. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111(3), 662. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M., & Coltheart, M. (1986). Language processing in children and adults: An introduction. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hoosain, R. (1991). Cerebral lateralization of bilingual functions after handedness switch in childhood. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 152(2), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1991.9914672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., & Li, X. (2020). Early, but not overwhelming: The effect of prior context on segmenting overlapping ambiguous strings when reading Chinese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(9), 1382–1395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820926012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., Staub, A., & Li, X. (2021). Prior context influences lexical competition when segmenting Chinese overlapping ambiguous strings. Journal of Memory and Language, 118, 104218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2021.104218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word-processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(6), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.87.4.329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempley, S. T., & Morton, J. (1982). The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 73(4), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01826.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kligler, N., & Gabay, Y. A cross-modal investigation of statistical learning in developmental dyslexia. (2023). Scientific Studies of Reading, 27(4), 334–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2023.2166413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. V. (2022). Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R Package Version 1.7.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., Huang, L., Yao, P., & Hyönä, J. (2022). Universal and specific reading mechanisms across different writing systems. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(3), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00022-6
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 525–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Li, W., Lin, N., Li, X., & Pelli, D. G. (2013). Do Chinese readers follow the national standard rules for word segmentation during reading? PLoS ONE, 8(2), e55440. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Vermeylen, L., Wisniewski, D., & Brysbaert, M. (2020). The contribution of phonological information to visual word recognition: Evidence from Chinese phonetic radicals. Cortex, 133, 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Zhao, W., & Pollatsek, A. (2012). Dividing lines at the word boundary position helps reading in Chinese. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 929–934. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0270-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, G., Li, X., & Rayner, K. (2014). Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(3), 1046–1059. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D., & Perfetti, C. A. (1982). Coherence and connectedness in the development of discourse production. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 2(1–3), 113–140.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, W. B., Ackerman, P. T., & Dykman, R. A. (1997). Auditory and visual rhyme judgements reveal differences and similarities between normal and disabled adolescent readers. Dyslexia, 3(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/SICI1099-09091997063:2<63:AID-DYS49>3.0.CO;2-Q
   Google Scholar
• Mok, L. W. (2009). Word-superiority effect as a function of semantic transparency of Chinese bimorphemic compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(7–8), 1039–1081. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960902831195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, J. (1979). Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing change in the logogen model. In P. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language (pp. 259–268). Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, J. (1982). Disintegrating the lexicon: An information processing approach. In J. Mehler, E. Walker, & M. Garrett (Eds.), On Mental Representation (pp. 89–109). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Muneaux, M., & Ziegler, J. (2004). Locus of orthographic effects in spoken word recognition: Novel insights from the neighbour generation task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(5), 641–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., & Pallier, C. (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(4), 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1017/s014271640707035x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastizzo, M. J., & Carbone, R. F. (2007). Spoken word frequency counts based on 1.6 million words in American English. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 1025–1028. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattamadilok, C., Knierim, I., & Devlin, J. T. (2008). Orthographic influence on speech processing: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Brain Stimulation, 1(3), 321–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.224
   Google Scholar
• Pattamadilok, C., Knierim, I. N., Duncan, K. J. K., & Devlin, J. T. (2010). How does learning to read affect speech perception? Journal of Neuroscience, 30(25), 8435–8444. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5791-09.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattamadilok, C., Perre, L., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. C. (2009). On-line orthographic influences on spoken language in a semantic task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(1), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, K., Shewell, C., Coltheart, M., Sartori, G., & Job, R. (1987). Speak and spell: Dissociations and word-class effects. In M. Coltheart, G. Sartori, & R. Job (Eds.), The cognitive neuropsychology of language (pp. 273–294). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., Drieghe, D., Stockall, L., & de Almeida, R. G. (2010). The interpretation of ambiguous trimorphemic words in sentence context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(1), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(1), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.1.148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, Q., & Damian, M. F. (2017). Orthographic effects in spoken word recognition: Evidence from Chinese. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(3), 901–906. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1164-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rack, J. P. (1985). Orthographic and phonetic coding in developmental dyslexia. British Journal of Psychology, 76(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01956.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.0.0) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(2), 275. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027768
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodd, J. M., Cai, Z. G., Betts, H. N., Hanby, B., Hutchinson, C., & Adler, A. (2016). The impact of recent and long-term experience on access to word meanings: Evidence from large-scale internet-based experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 87, 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodd, J. M., Cutrin, B. L., Kirsch, H., Millar, A., & Davis, M. H. (2013). Long-term priming of the meanings of ambiguous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., & Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(5), 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-53717080091-3
   Google Scholar
• Schad, D. J., Vasishth, S., Hohenstein, S., & Kliegl, R. (2020). How to capitalize on a priori contrasts in linear (mixed) models: A tutorial. Journal of Memory and Language, 110, 104038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5(6), 546. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.6.546
   Google Scholar
• Shen, W., & Li, X. (2012). 中文阅读中词优效应的特异性. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57(35), 3414–3420. https://doi.org/10.1360/972012-666
   Google Scholar
• Tan, L. H., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Visual Chinese character recognition: Does phonological information mediate access to meaning? Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, M. D., & Burnham, D. K. (2006). Orthographic influences on phoneme deletion response times. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(11), 2010–2031. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500521828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Gollan, T. H. (2016). Linking recognition and production: Cross-modal transfer effects between picture naming and lexical decision during first and second language processing in bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura, P., Morais, J., Pattamadilok, C., & Kolinsky, R. (2004). The locus of the orthographic consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(1), 57–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, W., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2013). Word properties of a fixated region affect outgoing saccade length in Chinese reading. Vision Research, 80, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1(1), 59–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-02857090005-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Pollatsek, A., & Potter, M. C. (1999). The activation of phonology during silent Chinese word reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 838. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, G., Tian, H., Bai, X., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712605x70066
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yao, P., Alkhammash, R., & Li, X. (2021). Plausibility and syntactic reanalysis in processing novel noun-noun combinations during Chinese reading: Evidence from native and non-native speakers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(5), 390–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2021.2020796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zecker, S. G. (1991). The orthographic code: Developmental trends in reading-disabled and normally-achieving children. Annals of Dyslexia, 41(1), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648085
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zecker, S. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., Alderman, L., & Siqueland, L. (1986). Lateralization of lexical codes in auditory word recognition. Brain and Language, 29(2), 372–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X8690055-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., Li, T., Elliott, M. A., & Rueckl, J. G. (2018). Statistical and cooperative learning in reading: An artificial orthography learning study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(3), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1414219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999). Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 579–606. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(5–6), 525–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar