A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tutor- and Computer-Delivered Inferential Comprehension Interventions for Middle School Students with Reading Difficulties

References

• Ahmed, Y., Francis, D. J., York, M., Fletcher, J. M., Barnes, M., & Kulesz, P. (2016). Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Otaiba, S., Kim, Y. S., Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., & Wagner, R. K. (2014). Long-term effects of first-grade multitier intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(3), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2014.906692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balfanz, R., DePaoli, J. L., Bridgeland, J. M., Atwell, M., Ingram, E. S., & Byrnes, V.(2017). Grad nation: Building a grad nation. Progress and Challenge in Ending the High School Dropout Epidemic.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. A., Ahmed, Y., Barth, A., & Francis, D. J. (2015). The relation of knowledge-text integration processes and reading comprehension in seventh to twelfth grade students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(4), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1022650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, A. E., Barnes, M., Francis, D., Vaughn, S., & York, M. (2015). Inferential processing among adequate and struggling adolescent comprehenders and relations to reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 587–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9540-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, A. E., & Elleman, A. (2017). Evaluating the impact of a multistrategy inference intervention for middle-grade struggling readers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_LSHSS-16-0041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battig, W. F. (1979). The flexibility of human memory. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. Craik, (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory, (pp. 23–44). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baye, A., Inns, A., Lake, C., & Slavin, R. E. (2019). A synthesis of quantitative research on reading programs for secondary students. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(2), 133–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgonovi, F. (2016). Video gaming and gender differences in digital and printed reading performance among 15-year-olds students in 26 countries. Journal of Adolescence, 48(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.01.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borgonovi, F. (2022). Is the literacy achievement of teenage boys poorer than that of teenage girls, or do estimates of gender gaps depend on the test? A comparison of PISA and PIAAC. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(2), 239. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasseur-Hock, I. F., Hock, M. F., Kieffer, M. J., Biancarosa, G., & Deshler, D. D. (2011). Adolescent struggling readers in urban schools: Results of a latent class analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 438–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(5), 1118–1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, A. C., Godbole, N., & Marsh, E. J. (2013). Explanation feedback is better than correct answer feedback for promoting transfer of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirino, P. T., Romain, M. A., Barth, A. E., Tolar, T. D., Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2013). Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers. Reading and Writing, 26(7), 1059–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9406-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens, N. H., & Barnes, M. A. (2018). Connect-IT reading comprehension assessment (CIRCA). The University of Texas at Austin: Authors. Connect-IT.
   Google Scholar
• Clemens, N. H., Oslund, E., Kwok, O. M., Fogarty, M., Simmons, D., & Davis, J. L. (2019). Skill moderators of the effects of a reading comprehension intervention. Exceptional Children, 85(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918787339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens, N. H., Simmons, D., Simmons, L. E., Wang, H., & Kwok, O. M. (2017). The prevalence of reading fluency and vocabulary difficulties among adolescents struggling with reading comprehension. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(8), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916662120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, V., Taylor, T., Bajpayee, S., Davison, M. L., Carlson, S. E., & Seipel, B. (2020). Inferential comprehension differences between narrative and expository texts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 33(9), 2223–2248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10044-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, D. L., Miller, A. C., Elleman, A. M., & Steacy, L. M. (2014). Have we forsaken reading theory in the name of “quick fix” interventions for children with reading disability? Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.836200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, L. E., & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. (2010). Reading comprehension of scientific text: A domain-specific test of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 687–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Enos, M., York, M. J., Francis, D. J., Barnes, M. A., Kulesz, P. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Carter, S. (2015). Text processing differences in adolescent adequate and poor comprehenders reading accessible and challenging narrative and informational text. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(4), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edyburn, D. (2011). Harnessing the potential of technology to support the academic success of diverse students. New Directions for Higher Education, 154(2011), 37–44.https://doi.org/10.1002/he.432
   Google Scholar
• Elbro, C., & Buch-Iversen, I. (2013). Activation of background knowledge for inference making: Effects on reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.774005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbro, C., Oakhill, J., Megherbi, H., & Seigneuric, A. (2017). Aspects of pronominal resolution as markers of reading comprehension: The role of antecedent variability. Reading and Writing, 30(4), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9702-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elleman, A. M. (2017). Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less skilled readers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 761–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elleman, A. M., Steacy, L. M., Gilbert, J. K., Cho, E., Miller, A. C., Coyne-Green, A., Pritchard, P., Fields, R. S., Schaeffer, S., & Compton, D. L. (2022). Exploring the role of knowledge in predicting reading and listening comprehension in fifth grade students. Learning and Individual Differences, 98, 102182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., Petscher, Y., Lefsky, E. B., & Toste, J. R. (2010). Reading first in Florida: Five years of improvement. Journal of Literacy Research, 42(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960903583202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2019). On the importance of moderator analysis in intervention research: An introduction to the special issue. Exceptional Children, 85(2), 126–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918811924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour, A. F., Fuchs, D., & Wehby, J. H. (2019). Are students with disabilities accessing the curriculum? A meta-analysis of the reading achievement gap between students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 85(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918795830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C. S. (2016). Inference instruction for struggling readers: A synthesis of intervention research. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9295-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hock, M. F., Brasseur, I. F., Deshler, D. D., Catts, H. W., Marquis, J. G., Mark, C. A., & Stribling, J. W. (2009). What is the reading component skill profile of adolescent struggling readers in urban schools? Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/25474660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. A., Phillips, G., Reed, P., & Paterson, K. (2013). Brief exposure to a self-paced computer-based reading programme and how it impacts reading ability and behaviour problems. Public Library of Science ONE, 8(11), e77867. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077867
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self‐competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, T., Meyer, J., Wigfield, A., & Möller, J. (2022). Which student and instructional variables are most strongly related to academic motivation in K-12 education? A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 148(1–2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(3), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430802132279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Lynch, J. S., Van Den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., White, M. J., & Kremer, K. E. (2005). Developing successful readers: Building early comprehension skills through television viewing and listening. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-005-0030-6
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. S. G. (2020). Hierarchical and dynamic relations of language and cognitive skills to reading comprehension: Testing the direct and indirect effects model of reading (DIER). Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 667–. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemons, C. J., Fuchs, D., Gilbert, J. K., & Fuchs, L. S. (2014). Evidence-based practices in a changing world: Reconsidering the counterfactual in education research. Educational Researcher, 43(5), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14539189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenth, R., & Lenth, M. R.(2018). Package ‘lsmeans’. American Statistician, 34(4), 216–221.
   Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., & Kieffer, M. J. (2010). Exploring sources of reading comprehension difficulties among language minority learners and their classmates in early adolescence. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 596–632. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209355469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, M. W., Frijters, J. C., Steinbach, K. A., De Palma, M., Lacerenza, L., Wolf, M., Sevcik, R. A., & Morris, R. D. (2022). Interpreting comprehension outcomes after multiple-component reading intervention for children and adolescents with reading disabilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 100, 102224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mar, R. A., Li, J., Nguyen, A. T., & Ta, C. P. (2021). Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Lincoln, A., Barnes, M. A., & Clemens, N. H. (2021). Differential effectiveness of an inferential reading comprehension intervention for struggling middle school readers in relation to mind wandering, anxiety, mindset, and English learner status. Annals of Dyslexia, 71(2), 322–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00209-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, B. R., Salas-Wright, C. P., & Vaughn, M. G. (2015). High school dropouts in emerging adulthood: Substance use, mental health problems, and crime. Community Mental Health Journal, 51(3), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-014-9760-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, S., & Hill, D. S. (1984). An analysis of the effects of two procedures for increasing disabled readers’ inferencing skills. The Journal of Educational Research, 77(4), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1984.10885527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 297–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51009-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeish, D., Stapleton, L. M., & Silverman, R. D. (2017). On the unnecessary ubiquity of hierarchical linear modeling. Psychological Methods, 22(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. J., Wijekumar, K., & Lei, P. (2018). Comparative signaling generated for expository texts by 4th–8th graders: Variations by text structure strategy instruction, comprehension skill, and signal word. Reading and Writing, 31(9), 1937–1968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9871-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrazek, M. D., Phillips, D. T., Franklin, M. S., Broadway, J. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). Young and restless: Validation of the mind-wandering questionnaire (MWQ) reveals disruptive impact of mind-wandering for youth. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 560. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, M. A., Barnes, M. A., & Barron, R. W. (2010). The role of illustrations in children’s inferential comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, M., Swank, P., Taylor, H., Landry, S., & Barnes, M. A. (2013). Effect of preschool working memory, language, and narrative abilities on inferential comprehension at school-age in children with spina bifida myelomeningocele and typically developing children. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617712001579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986031004437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Assessing mediation in communication research (pp. 13–54). The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Sterba, S. K. (2019). Aptitude-by-treatment interactions in research on educational interventions. Exceptional Children, 85(2), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918802803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N.(2010). Blocked versus interleaved practice with multiple representations in an intelligent tutoring system for fractions. Proceedings of the Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 10th International Conference, ITS 2010, Pittsburgh, PA, USA June 14-18(Vol. 10, pp. 413–422). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scammacca, N. K., Roberts, G. J., Cho, E., Williams, K. J., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S. R., & Carroll, M. (2016). A century of progress: Reading interventions for students in grades 4–12, 1914–2014. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 756–800. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316652942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, M., & Cain, K. (2015). The relations between lower and higher-level comprehension skills and their role in prediction of early reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, M., Wagner, R. K., & Petscher, Y. (2019). The reading comprehension and vocabulary knowledge of children with poor reading comprehension despite adequate decoding: Evidence from a regression-based matching approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, E., Stevens, E. A., Scammacca, N. K., Capin, P., Stewart, A. A., & Austin, C. R. (2017). The impact of tier 1 reading instruction on reading outcomes for students in grades 4–12: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 30(8), 1639–1665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9743-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2012). TOWRE-2: Test of word reading efficiency-2. Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Department of Education Reading Assessment. (2019). Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
   Google Scholar
• Van den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39(2–3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Capin, P., Scammacca, N., Roberts, G., Cirino, P., & Fletcher, J. M. (2020). The critical role of word reading as a predictor of response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(6), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419891412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Grills, A. E., Capin, P., Roberts, G., Fall, A.-M., & Daniel, J. (2022). Examining the effects of integrating anxiety management instruction within a reading intervention for upper elementary students with reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(5), 408–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194211053225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Swanson, E., & Sargent, K. (2019). Examining the role of pre-instruction academic performance within a text-based approach to improving student content knowledge and understanding. Exceptional Children, 85(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918783187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., & Fletcher, J. M. (2011). Efficacy of a reading intervention for middle school students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 78(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291107800105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2009). (WIAT-III) Wechsler individual achievement test. (3rd ed.). Pearson Clinical Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A conceptual framework for studying the sources of variation in program effects. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(3), 778–808. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). What works clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook. version 5.0
   Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences. (2016). WWC Intervention Report: Read 180. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/…/wwc_read180_112916.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wijekumar, K. K., Meyer, B. J., & Lei, P. (2017). Web-based text structure strategy instruction improves seventh graders’ content area reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B. J., Lei, P. W., Lin, Y. C., Johnson, L. A., Spielvogel, J. A., Shurmatz, K. M., Ray, M., & Cook, M. (2014). Multisite randomized controlled trial examining intelligent tutoring of structure strategy for fifth-grade readers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(4), 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2013.853333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., Wijekumar, K., Ramirez, G., Hu, X., & Irey, R. (2019). The effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on K‐12 students’ reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3119–3137. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar