198
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

Humanizing geoscience education research through participant-driven visual representation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 15-23 | Received 02 Mar 2022, Accepted 17 Mar 2023, Published online: 03 Apr 2023

References

  • Agogino, A. (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. APS April Meeting Abstracts, K6–001.
  • Allen, R. E. S., & Wiles, J. L. (2016). A rose by any other name: Participants choosing research pseudonyms. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1133746
  • American Geosciences Institute (AGI). (2014). The challenges of comparing data on minorities in the geosciences (No. 83; Geoscience Currents). https://www.americangeosciences.org/sites/default/files/currents/Currents-83-MinorityDegreesAwarded.pdf
  • Anzaldúa, G., Cantú, N., & Hurtado, A. (2012). Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza (4th ed.). Aunt Lute Books.
  • Bernard, R. E., & Cooperdock, E. H. G. (2018). No progress on diversity in 40 years. Nature Geoscience, 11(5), 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0116-6
  • Bird, S. R. (2021). Seeing isn’t always believing gender, academic STEM, and women scientists’ perceptions of career opportunities. Gender & Society, 35(3), 422–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211008814
  • Boyd, E. A., & Lazar, K. B. (2022). “It’s not just a picture”: The effects of an international two-week field experience on student geoscience involvement and persistence. Journal of Geoscience Education, 70(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2022.2036045
  • Boyd, E., Lazar, K. B., Voigt, M. (2022). Customizable icons for participant representation in research. Department of Engineering and Science Education. https://www.clemson.edu/cecas/departments/ese/research/custom-icons.html
  • Burt, M., Barnes, R. T., Schanz, S., Clinton, S. M., & Fischer, E. V. (2023). Mentorship builds inclusivity and belonging in the geosciences. Eos, 104, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EO230020
  • Bush, P., & Mattox, S. (2020). Decadal review: How gender and race of geoscientists are portrayed in physical geology textbooks. Journal of Geoscience Education, 68(1), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1621715
  • Carabajal, I. G., Marshall, A. M., & Atchison, C. L. (2017). A synthesis of instructional strategies in geoscience education literature that address barriers to inclusion for students with disabilities. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.5408/16-211.1
  • Carolan, M. S. (2008). The bright- and blind-spots of science: Why objective knowledge is not enough to resolve environmental controversies. Critical Sociology, 34(5), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920508093365
  • Cech, E. A. (2013). The veiling of queerness: Depoliticization and the experiences of LGBT engineers [Paper presentation]. ASEE Annual Conference and Expositions.
  • Chesky, N., & Goldstein, R. (2018). Packaging girls for STEM or STEM for girls? A critique on the perceived crisis of increasing female representation in STEM education. Critical Education, 9(16), 6. https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v9i16.186415
  • d’Alessio, M. A., Lundquist, L. L., Schwartz, J. J., Pedone, V., Pavia, J., & Fleck, J. (2019). Social presence enhances student performance in an online geology course but depends on instructor facilitation. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(3), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1580179
  • Darling, R. A., & Smith, M. S. (2007). First-generation college students: First-year challenges. In Academic advising: New insights for teaching and learning in the first year. National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.
  • Dobie, T. E., & MacArthur, K. (2021). Student perspectives on group exams as a rehumanizing mechanism in college calculus. In D. Kollosche (Ed.), Exploring new ways to connect: Proceedings of the eleventh international mathematics education and society conference (Vol. 2, p. 423). Tredition.
  • Fanid, Y., Shepherd, L. J., Slavich, E., Waters, D., Stone, M., Abel, R., & Johnston, E. L. (2019). Gender and cultural bias in student ­evaluations: Why representation matters, 14(2), e0209749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209749
  • Farrugia, L. (2019). WASP (write a scientific paper): The ongoing process of ethical decision-making in qualitative research: Ethical principles and their application to the research process. Early Human Development, 133, 48–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.03.011
  • Gates, A. E., McNeal, K., Riggs, E., Sullivan, S., & Dalbotten, D. (2019). New developments in diversity and inclusiveness in geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(4), 285–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1671713
  • Gonzalez-Franco, M., & Peck, T. C. (2018). Avatar embodiment. Towards a standardized questionnaire. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 74.
  • Grinyer, A. (2002). The anonymity of research participants: Assumptions, ethics and practicalities. Social Research Update. https://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU36.html
  • Gutiérrez, R. (2009). Framing equity: Helping students “play the game” and “change the game. Teaching for Excellence and Equity in Mathematics, 1(1), 4–8.
  • Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0037
  • Gutiérrez, R. (2018a). Introduction: The need to rehumanize mathematics. In Rehumanizing mathematics for Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Gutiérrez, R. (2018b). Why we need to rehumanize mathematics. April.
  • Gutiérrez, R. (2022). PCMI 2022 workshop on rehumanizing mathematics. Park City Mathematics Institute | Institute for Advanced Study. https://www.ias.edu/pcmi/pcmi-2022-workshop-rehumanizing-mathematics
  • Haque, O. S., & Waytz, A. (2012). Dehumanization in medicine. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 7(2), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611429706
  • Harrison, C. (2003). Visual social semiotics: Understanding how still images make meaning. Technical Communication, 50(1), 46–60.
  • Hernandez, P. R., Bloodhart, B., Adams, A. S., Barnes, R. T., Burt, M., Clinton, S. M., Du, W., Godfrey, E., Henderson, H., Pollack, I. B., & Fischer, E. V. (2018). Role modeling is a viable retention strategy for undergraduate women in the geosciences. Geosphere, 14(6), 2585–2593. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01659.1
  • Hinnant, A., Len-Ríos, M. E., & Young, R. (2013). Journalistic use of exemplars to humanize health news. Journalism Studies, 14(4), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.721633
  • Hoisch, T. D., & Bowie, J. I. (2010). Assessing factors that influence the recruitment of majors from introductory geology classes at Northern Arizona University. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(3), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3544297
  • Hughes, B. E. (2018). Coming out in STEM: Factors affecting retention of sexual minority STEM students. Science Advances, 4(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao6373
  • Huntoon, J., Peach, C., & Hopkins, J. (2005). Report of the Second Geoscience Education Working Group.
  • Jessup, N. A., Wolfe, J. A., & Kalinec-Craig, C. (2021). Rehumanizing mathematics education and building community for online learning. In Online learning in mathematics education (pp. 95–113). Springer.
  • Kersey, E., & Voigt, M. (2020). Finding community and overcoming barriers: Experiences of queer and transgender postsecondary students in mathematics and other STEM fields. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(4), 733–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00356-5
  • King, L., MacKenzie, L., Tadaki, M., Cannon, S., McFarlane, K., Reid, D., & Koppes, M. (2018). Diversity in geoscience: Participation, behaviour, and the division of scientific labour at a Canadian geoscience conference. FACETS, 3(1), 415–440. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0111
  • Kingsbury, C. G., Sibert, E. C., Killingback, Z., & Atchison, C. L. (2020). “Nothing about us without us:” The perspectives of autistic geoscientists on inclusive instructional practices in geoscience education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 68(4), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2020.1768017
  • Kocur, M., Henze, N., Schwind, V. (2019). Utilizing the proteus effect to improve interactions using full-body avatars in virtual reality. https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2019-ws-584
  • Kress, N. (2019). Developing a framework for equitable mathematics instruction. Mathematics teacher education partnership conference, 75.
  • Kuntz, A. M. (2010). Representing representation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(4), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.492769
  • Kurianski, K. M., Marzocchi, A. S., & Soto, R. C. (2022). Tools for humanizing mathematics classes in a virtual world (and beyond). International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(3), 698–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1985178
  • Lancaster, C. M. (2022). Who gets to be the player character? A visual content analysis of representation in video game design programs. 2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity).
  • Lee, D. (2012). Where are disabled girls in virtual space? Representation of disability and gender in Google Images. Critical Disability Discourses/Discours Critiques Dans Le Champ Du Handicap, 4(0), 1–30. https://cdd.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/cdd/article/view/34900
  • Leyva, L. A., McNeill, R. T., & Duran, A. (2022). A queer of color challenge to neutrality in undergraduate STEM Pedagogy as a White, Cisheteropatriarchal Space. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 28(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2022036586
  • Louis, V. N., & King, N. S. (2022). Emancipating STEM education through abolitionist teaching: A research-practice partnership to support virtual microteaching experiences. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(2), 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.2012957
  • Makhortykh, M., Urman, A., & Ulloa, R. (2021). Detecting race and gender bias in visual representation of AI on Web search engines. In L. Boratto, S. Faralli, M. Marras, & G. Stilo (Eds.), Advances in bias and fairness in information retrieval (pp. 36–50). Springer International Publishing.
  • Mattheis, A., Murphy, M., & Marin-Spiotta, E. (2019). Examining intersectionality and inclusivity in geosciences education research: A synthesis of the literature 2008–2018. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(4), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1656522
  • Mattox, S., Bridenstine, M., Burns, B., Torresen, E., Koning, A., Meek, S. P., Ritchie, M., Schafer, N., Shepard, L., Slater, A., Waters, T., & Wigent, A. (2008). How gender and race of geologists are portrayed in physical geology textbooks. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56(2), 156–159. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-56.2.156
  • McCall, C. (2020). Unique and uniquely different experiences of civil engineering students with disabilities: A ground theory exploration of professional identity formation. Engineering and Science Education Seminar, Clemson University.
  • McGee, E. O. (2016). Devalued Black and Latino racial identities. A By-product of STEM College Culture? American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1626–1662. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216676572
  • Mendick, H. (2005). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing good at maths. Gender and Education, 17(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954025042000301465
  • Mendick, H. (2006). Masculinities in mathematics. Open University Press.
  • Morales, H., & DiNapoli, J. (2018). Latinx bilingual students’ perseverance on a mathematical task: A rehumanizing perspective. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 7(3), 226–250. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2018.3274
  • Nasir, N. S. (2011). Racialized identities: Race and Achievement among African american Youth, 215.
  • National Science Foundation. (2020). NSF includes: Special Report to the Nation II. Report, July.
  • Núñez, A.-M., Rivera, J., & Hallmark, T. (2019). Applying an Intersectionality Lens to Expand Equity in the Geosciences, Journal of Geoscience Education, 68(2), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1675131
  • Pickering, L., & Kara, H. (2017). Presenting and representing others: Towards an ethics of engagement. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1287875
  • Polyakov, S. (2019). The redefining women icon collection. https://blog.thenounproject.com/the-redefining-women-icon-collection-e18e1c4229c7
  • Poole, A. (2021). Towards a multimodal method for identifying and interpreting funds of identity derived from avatars. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 45(5), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2021.2011195
  • Raab, T., & Frodeman, R. (2002). What is it like to be a geologist? A phenomenology of geology and its epistemological implications. Philosophy & Geography, 5(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903770120116840
  • Reinholz, D. L., & Ridgway, S. W. (2021). Access needs: Centering students and disrupting ableist norms in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(3), es8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-01-0017
  • Robbins, E. (2018). Proposal preparation. https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/era_forum/forum5_presentation.pdf
  • Russell, A. C., & Diaz, N. D. (2013). Photography in social work research: Using visual image to humanize findings. Qualitative Social Work, 12(4), 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325011431859
  • Schummer, J., & Spector, T. I. (2007). Popular images versus self-images of science.
  • Sexton, J. M., O’Connell, S., Banning, J. H., & Most, D. E. (2014). Characteristics and culture of geoscience departments as interpreted from their website photographs. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014009751
  • Shah, N. (2019). “Asians are good at math” is not a compliment: STEM success as a threat to personhood. Harvard Educational Review, 89(4), 661–686. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-89.4.661
  • Shah, N. (2021). Asians are good at math? Why dressing up racism as a compliment just doesn’t add up. https://theconversation.com/asians-are-good-at-math-why-dressing-up-racism-as-a-compliment-just-doesnt-add-up-128731
  • Simic-Muller, K. (2022). Noticing and wondering to rehumanize mathematics classrooms. PRIMUS, Just-Accepted, 1, 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2022.2073624
  • Solomon, Y. (2007). Not belonging? What makes a functional learner identity in undergraduate mathematics? Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070601099473
  • Stewart, A. J., Malley, J. E., & Herzog, K. A. (2016). Increasing the representation of women faculty in STEM departments: What makes a difference? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 22(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2016014785
  • Swauger, M. (2011). Afterword: The ethics of risk, power, and representation. Qualitative Sociology, 34(3), 497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-011-9201-5
  • Tutu, D. (n.d.). Desmond Tutu. Oxford Reference.
  • Unsay, J. D. (2020). LGBTQ + in STEM: Visibility and beyond. Chemistry (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany), 26(40), 8670–8675. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202002474
  • Wilson, R. E., & Kittleson, J. (2013). Science as a classed and gendered endeavor: Persistence of two white female first-generation college students within an undergraduate science context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 802–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21087
  • Yeh, C., Ellis, M., & Mahmood, D. (2020). From the margin to the center: A framework for rehumanizing mathematics education for students with dis/abilities. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58, 100758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100758
  • Yusoff, K. (2018). Geology, race, and matter. In A billion black anthropocenes or none. University of Minnesota Press. https://manifold.umn.edu/read/untitled-5f0c83c1-5748-4091-8d8e-72bebca5b94b/section/6243cd2f-68f4-40dc-97a1-a5c84460c09b

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.