431
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Curriculum and Instruction

Drawing attention to attitudes toward scientists: Changes in 10- to 13-year-old students as a result of a GeoCamp experience in New Zealand

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 24-36 | Received 01 May 2022, Accepted 21 Jun 2023, Published online: 09 Aug 2023

References

  • Akaygun, S., & Jones, L. L. (2014). Words or pictures: A comparison of written and pictorial explanations of physical and chemical equilibria. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 783–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.828361
  • Anderson, D., Thomas, G. P., & Ellenbogen, K. M. (2003). Learning science from experiences in informal contexts: The next generation of research. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 4(1), Foreword.
  • Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). “Science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending Bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922–948. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227
  • Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2011). Using tourism free-choice learning experiences to promote environmentally sustainable behaviour: The role of post-visit ‘action resources’. Environmental Education Research, 17(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.530645
  • Chambers, D. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-a-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670213
  • Cheng, M. M. W. (2021). Affordances of visual representations and sense-making of science. The New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 26, 60–68. https://doi.org/10.26686/nzaroe.v26.6889
  • D’Angelo, C. M., Touchman, S., Clark, D. B. (2009). Constructivism. http://www.eduction.com/reference/article/constructivism/
  • Dierking, L. D., Falk, J. H., Rennie, L., Anderson, D., & Ellenbogen, K. (2003). Policy statement of the “Informal Science Education” ad hoc committee. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10066
  • Falk, J. H. (2004). The director’s cut: Toward an improved understanding of learning from museums. Science Education, 88(S1), S83–S96. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20014
  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1997). School field trips: Assessing their long-term impact. Curator: The Museum Journal, 40(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1997.tb01304.x
  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums. Alta Mira Press.
  • Farland, D. L., McComas, W. F. (2007). The enhanced (e-dast): A more valid, efficient, reliable and complete method of identifying students’ perceptions of scientists. Paper Presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST. April 15–18.
  • Farland-Smith, D. (2012). Development and field test of the modified Draw-a-Scientist test and the Draw-a-Scientist rubric. School Science and Mathematics, 112(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00124.x
  • Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the Draw-a-Scientist Test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb15762.x
  • GNS Science. (2020). GNSScience. https://www.cri.nz/
  • Jarrett, O. S., & Burnley, P. (2010). Lessons on the role of fun/playfulness from a geology undergraduate summer research program. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3534844
  • Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking, fast and slow. Penguin.
  • Kitts, K. (2009). The paradox of middle and high school students’ attitudes towards science versus their attitudes about science as a career. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(2), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3544253
  • Krause, K.-L., Bochner, S., & Duchesne, S. (2003). Educational psychology. Nelson Australia.
  • Leung, J. S. C., & Cheng, M. M. W. (2023). Prioritizing emotion objects in making sense of student learning of socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(2), 357–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21801
  • McPhail, G. J. (2020). Twenty-first Century learning and the case for more knowledge about knowledge. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 55(2), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-020-00172-2
  • Mead, M., & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high school students. Science (New York, N.Y.), 126(3270), 384–390. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.126.3270.384
  • Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children’s gender-science stereotypes: A meta-analysis of five decades of US Draw-a-Scientist studies. Child Development, 89(6), 1943–1955. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13039
  • Milne, R. L. (2015). The EOTC milieu as a setting for teaching and learning experiences for five-year-old students in technology education [PhD thesis]. University of Waikato.
  • Ministry of Education. (2011). Education outside the classroom: Schools’ use of EOTC Guidelines. 1–16. http://www.ero.govt.nz
  • Ministry of Education (2016). EOTC guidelines: Bringing the curriculum alive, New Zealand. https://eotc.tki.org.nz/EOTC-home/EOTC-Guidelines
  • Moreland, J., McGee, C., Jones, A. T., Milne, R. L., Donaghy, A., & Miller, T. (2005). Research into effectiveness of programmes for curriculum-based Learning Experiences Outside the Classroom. Centre for Science and Technology Education Research and Wilf Malcolm Institute of Educational Research.
  • Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/international-results.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. (2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. National Academy of Sciences.
  • Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691773384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  • Nugent, G., Toland, M. D., Levy, R., Kunz, G., Harwood, D., Green, D., & Kitts, K. (2012). The impact of an inquiry-based geoscience field course on pre-service teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(5), 503–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-928-2
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
  • Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (Eds.) (2014). International handbook of emotions in education. Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
  • Rennie, L. J., & Johnston, D. J. (2004). The nature of learning and its implications for research on learning from museums. Science Education, 88(S1), S4–S16. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20017
  • Semmens, K., Fosbenner, L., Maxfield, H., Carr, R., Ramage, J., O’Leary, J., Larouche, C., Hayward, J., & Henderson, M. (2021). Teaching Earth systems connections to middle school students in an informal learning environment with Science on a Sphere®, personal relevance and arts-based activities. Journal of Geoscience Education, 69(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2020.1829396
  • Tofield, S., Coll, R. K., Vyle, B., & Bolstad, R. (2003). Zoos as a source of free choice learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21(1), 67–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140308342
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the cultural development of the child. In R. Ven der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 57–72). Blackwell.
  • Yaden, D. B. (2003). Parent-child storybook reading as a complex adaptive system: Or “An igloo is a house for bears. In A. Van Kleeck, S. A. Stahl & E. B. Bauer (Eds.), On reading books to children: Parents and teachers (pp. 336–362). Erlbaum.