Endogenous EWSR1 Exists in Two Visual Modalities That Reflect Its Associations with Nucleic Acids and Concentration at Sites of Active Transcription

References

• Lee J, Nguyen PT, Shim HS, Hyeon SJ, Im H, Choi MH, Chung S, Kowall NW, Lee SB, Ryu H. EWSR1, a multifunctional protein, regulates cellular function and aging via genetic and epigenetic pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2019;1865:1938–1945. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.10.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz JC, Cech TR, Parker RR. Biochemical properties and biological functions of FET proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 2015;84:355–379. doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohno T, Ouchida M, Lee L, Gatalica Z, Rao VN, Reddy ES. The EWS gene, involved in Ewing family of tumors, malignant melanoma of soft parts and desmoplastic small round cell tumors, codes for an RNA binding protein with novel regulatory domains. Oncogene. 1994;9:3087–3097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakaryan RP, Gehring H. Identification and characterization of the nuclear localization/retention signal in the EWS proto-oncoprotein. J Mol Biol. 2006;363:27–38. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2006.08.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Blechingberg J, Fernandes AM, Li S, Fryland T, Børglum AD, Bolund L, Nielsen AL. EWS and FUS bind a subset of transcribed genes encoding proteins enriched in RNA regulatory functions. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:929. doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2125-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolotti A, Melot T, Acker J, Vigneron M, Delattre O, Tora L. EWS, but not EWS-FLI-1, is associated with both TFIID and RNA polymerase II: interactions between two members of the TET family, EWS and hTAFII68, and subunits of TFIID and RNA polymerase II complexes. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:1489–1497. doi:10.1128/MCB.18.3.1489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorthi A, Romero JC, Loranc E, Cao L, Lawrence LA, Goodale E, Iniguez AB, Bernard X, Masamsetti VP, Roston S, et al. EWS-FLI1 increases transcription to cause R-loops and block BRCA1 repair in Ewing sarcoma. Nature. 2018;555:387–391. doi:10.1038/nature25748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz JC, Ebmeier CC, Podell ER, Heimiller J, Taatjes DJ, Cech TR. FUS binds the CTD of RNA polymerase II and regulates its phosphorylation at Ser2. Genes Dev. 2012;26:2690–2695. doi:10.1101/gad.204602.112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Chansky HA, Hickstein DD. EWS.Fli-1 fusion protein interacts with hyperphosphorylated RNA polymerase II and interferes with serine-arginine protein-mediated RNA splicing. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:37612–37618. doi:10.1074/jbc.M005739200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoell JI, Larsson E, Runge S, Nusbaum JD, Duggimpudi S, Farazi TA, Hafner M, Borkhardt A, Sander C, Tuschl T. RNA targets of wild-type and mutant FET family proteins. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18:1428–1431. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogelj B, Easton LE, Bogu GK, Stanton LW, Rot G, Curk T, Zupan B, Sugimoto Y, Modic M, Haberman N, et al. Widespread binding of FUS along nascent RNA regulates alternative splicing in the brain. Sci Rep. 2012;2:603. doi:10.1038/srep00603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Schwartz JC, Cech TR. Nucleic acid-binding specificity of human FUS protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:7535–7543. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv679.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selig EE, Bhura R, White MR, Akula S, Hoffman RD, Tovar CN, Xu X, Booth RE, Libich DS. Biochemical and biophysical characterization of the nucleic acid binding properties of the RNA/DNA binding protein EWS. Biopolymers. 2023;114:e23536. doi:10.1002/bip.23536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan H, Jin M, Ghadiyaram A, Kaur P, Miller HE, Ta HM, Liu M, Fan Y, Mahn C, Gorthi A, et al. Cohesin SA1 and SA2 are RNA binding proteins that localize to RNA containing regions on DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:5639–5655. doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CN, Xu X, Holloway SP, Libich DS. The (1)H, (15)N and (13)C resonance assignments of the low-complexity domain from the oncogenic fusion protein EWS-FLI1. Biomol NMR Assign. 2022;16:67–73. doi:10.1007/s12104-021-10061-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgore HR, Young RA. Learning the chemical grammar of biomolecular condensates. Nat Chem Biol. 2022;18:1298–1306. doi:10.1038/s41589-022-01046-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSwiggen DT, Mir M, Darzacq X, Tjian R. Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences. Genes Dev. 2019;33:1619–1634. doi:10.1101/gad.331520.119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke KA, Janke AM, Rhine CL, Fawzi NL. Residue-by-residue view of in vitro FUS granules that bind the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell. 2015;60:231–241. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han TW, Kato M, Xie S, Wu LC, Mirzaei H, Pei J, Chen M, Xie Y, Allen J, Xiao G, et al. Cell-free formation of RNA granules: bound RNAs identify features and components of cellular assemblies. Cell. 2012;149:768–779. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato M, Han TW, Xie S, Shi K, Du X, Wu LC, Mirzaei H, Goldsmith EJ, Longgood J, Pei J, et al. Cell-free formation of RNA granules: low complexity sequence domains form dynamic fibers within hydrogels. Cell. 2012;149:753–767. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maharana S, Wang J, Papadopoulos DK, Richter D, Pozniakovsky A, Poser I, Bickle M, Rizk S, Guillén-Boixet J, Franzmann TM, et al. RNA buffers the phase separation behavior of prion-like RNA binding proteins. Science. 2018;360:918–921. doi:10.1126/science.aar7366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy AC, Tang WS, Jovic N, Janke AM, Seo DH, Perdikari TM, Mittal J, Fawzi NL. Molecular interactions contributing to FUS SYGQ LC-RGG phase separation and co-partitioning with RNA polymerase II heptads. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2021;28:923–935. doi:10.1038/s41594-021-00677-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimobayashi SF, Ronceray P, Sanders DW, Haataja MP, Brangwynne CP. Nucleation landscape of biomolecular condensates. Nature. 2021;599:503–506. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03905-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz JC, Wang X, Podell ER, Cech TR. RNA seeds higher-order assembly of FUS protein. Cell Rep. 2013;5:918–925. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmeyer M, Neelsen KJ, Teloni F, Pozdnyakova I, Pellegrino S, Grøfte M, Rask M-BD, Streicher W, Jungmichel S, Nielsen ML, et al. Liquid demixing of intrinsically disordered proteins is seeded by poly(ADP-ribose). Nat Commun. 2015;6:8088. doi:10.1038/ncomms9088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel A, Lee HO, Jawerth L, Maharana S, Jahnel M, Hein MY, Stoynov S, Mahamid J, Saha S, Franzmann TM, et al. A liquid-to-solid phase transition of the ALS protein FUS accelerated by disease mutation. Cell. 2015;162:1066–1077. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin Y, Berry J, Pannucci N, Haataja MP, Toettcher JE, Brangwynne CP. Spatiotemporal control of intracellular phase transitions using light-activated optoDroplets. Cell. 2017;168:159–171.e14. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giard DJ, Aaronson SA, Todaro GJ, Arnstein P, Kersey JH, Dosik H, Parks WP. In vitro cultivation of human tumors: establishment of cell lines derived from a series of solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1973;51:1417–1423. doi:10.1093/jnci/51.5.1417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Ramírez A, Rodríguez-Perales S, Meléndez B, Martínez-Delgado B, Urioste M, Cigudosa JC, Benítez J. Characterization of the A673 cell line (Ewing tumor) by molecular cytogenetic techniques. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2003;141:138–142. doi:10.1016/s0165-4608(02)00670-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whang-Peng J, Triche TJ, Knutsen T, Miser J, Kao-Shan S, Tsai S, Israel MA. Cytogenetic characterization of selected small round cell tumors of childhood. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1986;21:185–208. doi:10.1016/0165-4608(86)90001-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally JG. Quantitative FRAP in analysis of molecular binding dynamics in vivo. Methods Cell Biol. 2008;85:329–351. doi:10.1016/S0091-679X(08)85014-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavreva DA, McNally JG. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) methods for visualizing protein dynamics in living mammalian cell nuclei. Methods Enzymol. 2004;375:443–455. doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(03)75027-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson NL, Burghardt TP, Axelrod D. Measuring surface dynamics of biomolecules by total internal reflection fluorescence with photobleaching recovery or correlation spectroscopy. Biophys J. 1981;33:435–454. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84905-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahama K, Kino K, Arai S, Kurokawa R, Oyoshi T. Identification of Ewing’s sarcoma protein as a G-quadruplex DNA- and RNA-binding protein. FEBS J. 2011;278:988–998. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08020.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad K, Henikoff S. The histone variant H3.3 marks active chromatin by replication-independent nucleosome assembly. Mol Cell. 2002;9:1191–1200. doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00542-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin C, Felsenfeld G. Nucleosome stability mediated by histone variants H3.3 and H2A.Z. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1519–1529. doi:10.1101/gad.1547707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho WK, Spille JH, Hecht M, Lee C, Li C, Grube V, Cisse II. Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates. Science. 2018;361:412–415. doi:10.1126/science.aar4199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabari BR, Dall’Agnese A, Boija A, Klein IA, Coffey EL, Shrinivas K, Abraham BJ, Hannett NM, Zamudio AV, Manteiga JC, et al. Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control. Science. 2018;361:eaar3958. doi:10.1126/science.aar3958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamudio AV, Dall’Agnese A, Henninger JE, Manteiga JC, Afeyan LK, Hannett NM, Coffey EL, Li CH, Oksuz O, Sabari BR, et al. Mediator condensates localize signaling factors to key cell identity genes. Mol Cell. 2019;76:753–766.e6. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.08.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaron JS, Taylor AB, Chew TL. Image co-localization—co-occurrence versus correlation. J Cell Sci. 2018;131(3):jcs211847. doi:10.1242/jcs.211847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn KW, Kamocka MM, McDonald JH. A practical guide to evaluating colocalization in biological microscopy. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2011;300:C723–C742. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00462.2010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinchuk V, Grossenbacher-Zinchuk O. Quantitative colocalization analysis of fluorescence microscopy images. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2014;62:4.19.1–4.19.14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costes SV, Daelemans D, Cho EH, Dobbin Z, Pavlakis G, Lockett S. Automatic and quantitative measurement of protein-protein colocalization in live cells. Biophys J. 2004;86:3993–4003. doi:10.1529/biophysj.103.038422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen KM, Churchman LS. The code and beyond: transcription regulation by the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18:263–273. doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrocola AS, Kim SH, Trinh AT, Rodenkirch LA, Tibbetts RS. The RNA-binding protein fused in sarcoma (FUS) functions downstream of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:24731–24741. doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.497974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nogami M, Sano O, Adachi-Tominari K, Hayakawa-Yano Y, Furukawa T, Iwata H, Ogi K, Okano H, Yano M. DNA damage stress-induced translocation of mutant FUS proteins into cytosolic granules and screening for translocation inhibitors. Front Mol Neurosci. 2022;15:953365. doi:10.3389/fnmol.2022.953365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rulten SL, Rotheray A, Green RL, Grundy GJ, Moore DAQ, Gómez-Herreros F, Hafezparast M, Caldecott KW. PARP-1 dependent recruitment of the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-associated protein FUS/TLS to sites of oxidative DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:307–314. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baradaran-Heravi Y, Van Broeckhoven C, van der Zee J. Stress granule mediated protein aggregation and underlying gene defects in the FTD-ALS spectrum. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;134:104639. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison AF, Shorter J. RNA-binding proteins with prion-like domains in health and disease. Biochem J. 2017;474:1417–1438. doi:10.1042/BCJ20160499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie IR, Neumann M. FET proteins in frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Res. 2012;1462:40–43. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoads SN, Monahan ZT, Yee DS, Shewmaker FP. The role of post-translational modifications on prion-like aggregation and liquid-phase separation of FUS. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(3):886. doi:10.3390/ijms19030886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montagnoli A, Valsasina B, Croci V, Menichincheri M, Rainoldi S, Marchesi V, Tibolla M, Tenca P, Brotherton D, Albanese C, et al. A Cdc7 kinase inhibitor restricts initiation of DNA replication and has antitumor activity. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4:357–365. doi:10.1038/nchembio.90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores G, Everett JH, Boguslawski EA, Oswald BM, Madaj ZB, Beddows I, Dikalov S, Adams M, Klumpp-Thomas CA, Kitchen-Goosen SM, et al. CDK9 blockade exploits context-dependent transcriptional changes to improve activity and limit toxicity of mithramycin for Ewing sarcoma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2020;19:1183–1196. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdilek BA, Thompson VF, Ahmed NS, White CI, Batey RT, Schwartz JC. Intrinsically disordered RGG/RG domains mediate degenerate specificity in RNA binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:7984–7996. doi:10.1093/nar/gkx460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Tjian R. Visualizing transcription factor dynamics in living cells. J Cell Biol. 2018;217:1181–1191. doi:10.1083/jcb.201710038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahlich S, Quero L, Roschitzki B, Leemann-Zakaryan RP, Gehring H. Analysis of Ewing sarcoma (EWS)-binding proteins: interaction with hnRNP M, U, and RNA-helicases p68/72 within protein-RNA complexes. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:4455–4465. doi:10.1021/pr900235t.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuhara T, Xing YH, Bauer NC, Lee L, Dong R, Yadav T, Soberman RJ, Rivera MN, Zou L. Condensates induced by transcription inhibition localize active chromatin to nucleoli. Mol Cell. 2022;82:2738–2753.e6. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.05.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Cruz S, Cleveland DW. Understanding the role of TDP-43 and FUS/TLS in ALS and beyond. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011;21:904–919. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2011.05.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie IR, Rademakers R, Neumann M. TDP-43 and FUS in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:995–1007. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70195-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski TJ, Jr, Bosco DA, Leclerc AL, Tamrazian E, Vanderburg CR, Russ C, Davis A, Gilchrist J, Kasarskis EJ, Munsat T, et al. Mutations in the FUS/TLS gene on chromosome 16 cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science. 2009;323:1205–1208. doi:10.1126/science.1166066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance C, Rogelj B, Hortobágyi T, De Vos KJ, Nishimura AL, Sreedharan J, Hu X, Smith B, Ruddy D, Wright P, et al. Mutations in FUS, an RNA processing protein, cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 6. Science. 2009;323:1208–1211. doi:10.1126/science.1165942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brohl AS, Solomon DA, Chang W, Wang J, Song Y, Sindiri S, Patidar R, Hurd L, Chen L, Shern JF, et al. The genomic landscape of the Ewing sarcoma family of tumors reveals recurrent STAG2 mutation. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004475. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crompton BD, Stewart C, Taylor-Weiner A, Alexe G, Kurek KC, Calicchio ML, Kiezun A, Carter SL, Shukla SA, Mehta SS, et al. The genomic landscape of pediatric Ewing sarcoma. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:1326–1341. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirode F, Surdez D, Ma X, Parker M, Le Deley MC, Bahrami A, Zhang Z, Lapouble E, Grossetête-Lalami S, Rusch M, et al. Genomic landscape of Ewing sarcoma defines an aggressive subtype with co-association of STAG2 and TP53 mutations. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:1342–1353. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa R, Niikura Y, Becker A, Houghton PJ, Kitagawa K. EWSR1 maintains centromere identity. Cell Rep. 2023;42:112568. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosella ML, Tereshchenko M, Pritišanac I, Chong PA, Toretsky JA, Lee HO, Forman-Kay JD. O-linked-N-acetylglucosaminylation of the RNA-binding protein EWS N-terminal low complexity region reduces phase separation and enhances condensate dynamics. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143:11520–11534. doi:10.1021/jacs.1c04194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embree LJ, Azuma M, Hickstein DD. Ewing sarcoma fusion protein EWSR1/FLI1 interacts with EWSR1 leading to mitotic defects in zebrafish embryos and human cell lines. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4363–4371. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spahn L, Siligan C, Bachmaier R, Schmid JA, Aryee DN, Kovar H. Homotypic and heterotypic interactions of EWS, FLI1 and their oncogenic fusion protein. Oncogene. 2003;22:6819–6829. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chari Raj, Yeo NC, Chavez A, Church GM. sgRNA Scorer 2.0: A Species-Independent Model To Predict CRISPR/Cas9 Activity. ACS Synth Biol. 2017;6:902–904. doi:10.1021/acssynbio.6b00343. 28146356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaner NC, Lambert GG, Chammas A, Ni Y, Cranfill PJ, Baird MA, Sell BR, Allen JR, Day RN, Israelsson M, et al. A bright monomeric green fluorescent protein derived from Branchiostoma lanceolatum. Nat Methods. 2013;10:407–409. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Lee SR, Li LH, Park HJ, Park JH, Lee KY, Kim MK, Shin BA, Choi SY. High cleavage efficiency of a 2A peptide derived from porcine teschovirus-1 in human cell lines, zebrafish and mice. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18556. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grohar PJ, Kim S, Rangel Rivera GO, Sen N, Haddock S, Harlow ML, Maloney NK, Zhu J, O’Neill M, Jones TL, et al. Functional genomic screening reveals splicing of the EWS-FLI1 fusion transcript as a vulnerability in Ewing sarcoma. Cell Rep. 2016;14:598–610. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neckles C, Boer RE, Aboreden N, Cross AM, Walker RL, Kim BH, Kim S, Schneekloth JS, Jr., Caplen NJ. HNRNPH1-dependent splicing of a fusion oncogene reveals a targetable RNA G-quadruplex interaction. RNA. 2019;25:1731–1750. doi:10.1261/rna.072454.119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo T, Brownmiller T, Hall K, Jones TL, Choudhari S, Grammatikakis I, Ludwig KR, Caplen NJ. HNRNPH1 destabilizes the G-quadruplex structures formed by G-rich RNA sequences that regulate the alternative splicing of an oncogenic fusion transcript. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:6474–6496. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phair RD, Misteli T. High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus. Nature. 2000;404:604–609. doi:10.1038/35007077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giakoumakis NN, Rapsomaniki MA, Lygerou Z. Analysis of protein kinetics using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1563:243–267. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6810-7_16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar