Randomness and probability: exploring student teachers’ conceptions

References

• Alexander, R. (1984). Innovation and continuity in the initial teacher education curriculum. In R. Alexander, M. Craft, & J. Lynch (Eds.), Change in teacher education: Context and provision since Robbins (pp. 103–160). Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, L., & Wallace, S. (2012). Qualitative research in education. Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Aven, T. (2020). Three influential risk foundation papers from the 80s and 90s: Are they still state-of-the-art? Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 193, 106680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batanero, C., Arteaga, P., Serrano, L., & Ruiz, B. (2014). Prospective primary school teachers’ perception of randomness. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 345–366). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Batanero, C., Chernoff, E. J., Engel, J., Lee, H. S., & Sánchez, E. (2016). Research on teaching and learning probability. ICME 13 Topical Surveys. Springer International. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319316246
   Google Scholar
• Batanero, C., & Serrano, L. (1999). The meaning of randomness for secondary school students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.2307/749774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batanero, C. (2015). Understanding randomness: Challenges for research and teaching. In K. Krainer, and N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 34–49). Charles University and ERME, Prague, Czech Republic. http://erme.site/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/CERME9_Proceedings_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baturo, A., Cooper, T., Doyle, K., & Grant, E. (2007). Using three levels in design of effective teacher-education tasks: The case of promoting conflicts with intuitive understandings in probability. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4–6), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9042-z
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, D. (1993). The development of the mathematical concept of randomness: Educational implications (Dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Borasi, R., Fonzi, J., Smith, C. F., & Rose, B. J. (1999). Beginning the process of rethinking mathematics instruction: A professional development program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009986606120
   Google Scholar
• Borovcnik, M., & Kapadia, R. (2014a). A historical and philosophical perspective on probability. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 7–34). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Borovcnik, M., & Kapadia, R. (2014b). From puzzles and paradoxes to concepts in probability. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting PLURAL PERSPECTIVES (pp. 35–73). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, P., & Nunes, T. (2012). Children’s understanding of probability: A literature review. Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, T. (2009). Statistical knowledge for teaching: Exploring it in the classroom. For the Learning of Mathematics, 29(3), 18–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25594561
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, T. (2006). A framework for examining teacher knowledge as used in action while teaching statistics. In A. Rossman, and B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Teaching Statistics (Vol. 6). International Association for Statistical Education and International Statistical Institute, Salvador, Brazil. http://iase-web.org/Conference_Proceedings.php?p=ICOTS_7_2006
   Google Scholar
• Burn, K., & Mutton, T. (2015). A review of ‘research-informed clinical practice’ in initial teacher education. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1020104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V., Cirillo, M., Kramer, S. L., & Hiebert, J. (2019). Posing significant research questions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.2.0114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calude, C. S., & Longo, G. (2016). Classical, quantum and biological randomness as relative unpredictability. Natural Computing, 15(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11047-015-9533-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernoff, E. J., & Sriraman, B. (Eds.). (2014). Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, K. (2014). The most common misconception about probability? In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. ix–xiii). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, A., & Nilsson, P. (2017). Introducing a symbolic interactionist approach on teaching mathematics: The case of revoicing as an interactional strategy in the teaching of probability. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9313-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichler, A., & Vogel, M. (2012). Basic modelling of uncertainty: Young students’ mental models. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(7), 841–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0451-9
   Google Scholar
• Eichler, A., & Vogel, M. (2014). Three approaches for modelling situations with randomness. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 75–99). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eichler, A. (2008). Statistics teaching in German secondary high schools. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, and A. Rossman (Eds.), Joint ICMI/IASE Study: Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics. Challenges for teaching and teacher education. Proceedings of the ICMI Study 18 and 2008 IASE Round Table Conference. Mexico, ICMI and IASE. https://iase-web.org/Conference_Proceedings.php?p=2008_Joint_ICMI-IASE_Study
   Google Scholar
• Elbehary, S. G. A. (2020). Discussing the conditional probability from a cognitive psychological perspective. American Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 491–501. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-8-7-7
   Google Scholar
• Elicer, R., & Carrasco, E. (2017). Conditional probability as a decision-making tool: A didactic sequence. In T. Dooley & G. Gueudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME10, February 1-5, 2017) (pp. 748–755). Dublin, Ireland: DCU Institute of Education and ERME. http://erme.site/wp-content/uploads/archives/CERME10_Proceedings_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, V., & Childs, A. (2019). Innovation in teacher education: Collective creativity in the development of a teacher education internship. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada, A., & Batanero, C. (2019). Prospective primary school teachers’ attitudes towards probability and its teaching. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5941
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, D., Sbeglia, G. C., Nehm, R. H., & Harms, U. (2019). How strongly does statistical reasoning influence knowledge and acceptance of evolution? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(9), 1183–1206. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, D., Tröbst, S., Harms, U., & Nehm, R. (2017). University students’ conceptual knowledge of randomness and probability in the contexts of evolution and mathematics. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-07-0230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E., & Gazit, A. (1984). Does the teaching of probability improve probabilistic intuitions? - An exploratory research study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380436
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1991). Factors affecting probabilistic judgements in children and adolescents. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(6), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312714
   Google Scholar
• Foster, C., Francome, T., Hewitt, D., & Shore, C. (2021). Principles for the design of a fully-resourced, coherent, research-informed school mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(5), 621–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2021.1902569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frigg, R. (2004). In what sense is the Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy a measure for chaotic behaviour? -Bridging the gap between dynamical systems theory and communication theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55(3), 411–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/55.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, B. (2001). Understanding probabilistic thinking: The legacy of Ephraim Fischbein. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45(1/3), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013801623755
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, T. L., Daniels, D., Austerweil, J. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2018). Subjective randomness as statistical inference. Cognitive Psychology, 103, 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth, R. E. (2013). Characterizing key developmental understandings and pedagogically powerful ideas within a statistical knowledge for teaching framework. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(2), 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2013.770718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, U., & Warren, P. A. (2009). Perceptions of randomness: Why three heads are better than four. Psychological Review, 116(2), 454–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, P. K. J., Klein, W. M. P., Killam, B., Lehman, T., Massett, H., & Freedman, A. N. (2012). Representing randomness in the communication of individualized cancer risk estimates: Effects on cancer risk perceptions, worry, and subjective uncertainty about risk. Patient Education and Counseling, 86(1), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannigan, A., Gill, O., & Leavy, A. M. (2013). An investigation of prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ conceptual knowledge of and attitudes towards statistics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(6), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9246-3
   Google Scholar
• Hourigan, M., & Leavy, A. M. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ understanding of probabilistic fairness: Analysis of decisions around task design. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(7), 997–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1648891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, J. (2021). Patterns in mathematics classroom interaction: A conversation analytic approach. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., & Mooney, E. S. (2007). Research in probability: Responding to classroom realities. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 909–956). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Slovic, S. P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J. J., Fisher, D. G., & Rogness, N. T. (2009). Lexical ambiguity in statistics: What do students know about the words association, average, confidence, random and spread? Journal of Statistics Education, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2009.11889535
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kazak, S., & Pratt, D. (2020). Developing the role of modelling in the teaching and learning of probability. Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1802328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konold, C., Lohmeier, J., Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. (1991). Novice views on randomness. In R. G. Underhill (Ed.) Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North American Chapter. Vol. 1 (pp. 167–173). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Konold, C., Madden, S., Pollatsek, A., Pfannkuch, M., Wild, C., Ziedins, I., Finzer, W., Horton, N. J., & Kazak, S. (2011). Conceptual challenges in coordinating theoretical and data-centered estimates of probability. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1–2), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2011.538299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konold, C., Pollatsek, A., Well, A., Lohmeier, J., & Lipson, A. (1993). Inconsistencies in students’ reasoning about probability. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(5), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.2307/749150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvatinsky, T., & Even, R. (2002). Framework for teacher knowledge and understanding about probability. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Developing a statistically literate society. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS 6), 1–6. Cape Town, South Africa: International Association for Statistical Education and International Statistical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Thompson, P. (2007). Teachers’ understandings of probability. Cognition and Instruction, 25(2–3), 113–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701301117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J., & Spence, M. (1999). Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: The importance of knowing-to act in the moment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1), 135–161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003622804002
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Menter, I., Elliot, D., Hulme, M., Lewin, J., & Lowden, K. (2011). A guide to practitioner research in education. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Molnar, A. (2018). Language and lexical ambiguity in the probability register. In C. Batanero & E. J. Chernoff (Eds.), Teaching and learning stochastics: Advances in probability education research (pp. 23–37). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, D. J., Newell, B. R., & Schulze, C. (2016). Learning and choosing in an uncertain world: An investigation of the explore-exploit dilemma in static and dynamic environments. Cognitive Psychology, 85, 43–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1951). The origin of the idea of chance in children. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, D. (2014). Lost in the shuffle: Technology, history, and the idea of musical randomness. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 31(3), 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2013.870347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, D., & Kazak, S. (2018). Research on uncertainty. In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar, & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp. 193–227). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, D., & Noss, R. (2002). The microevolution of mathematical knowledge: The case of randomness. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 453–488. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1104_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, D. (1998). The co-ordination of meanings for randomness. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(3), 2–11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40248272
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, D. (2000). Making sense of the total of two dice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 602–625. https://doi.org/10.2307/749889
   Google Scholar
• Prediger, S. (2008). Do you want me to do it with probability or with my normal thinking? Horizontal and vertical views on the formation of stochastic conceptions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(3), 126–154. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/223
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Savard, A. (2014). Developing probabilistic thinking: What about people’s conceptions? In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 283–298). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010). How we think. A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbring, H. (1991). The theoretical nature of probability in the classroom. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encounters: Probability in education (pp. 135–167). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stohl, H. (2005). Probability in teacher education and development. In G. A. Jones, (Ed.), Exploring probability in school (pp. 345–366), Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24530-8_15.
   Google Scholar
• Szollosi, A., Liang, G., Konstantinidis, E., Donkin, C., & Newell, B. R. (2019). Simultaneous underweighting and overestimation of rare events: Unpacking a paradox. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 148(12), 2207–2217. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabach, M. (2011). The dual role of researcher and teacher: A case study. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(2), 32–34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41319564
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031322
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90(4), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A., Jones, K., & Pratt, D. (2013). Key ideas in teaching mathematics: Research-based guidance for ages 9-19. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J., & Callingham, R. (2013). Likelihood and sample size: The understandings of students and their teachers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 660–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. (2001). Profiling teachers’ competence and confidence to teach particular mathematics topics: The case of chance and data. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(4), 305–337. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013383110860
   Google Scholar