Volunteer commitment and longevity in community-based conservation in Aotearoa New Zealand

References

• Akin H, Shaw B, Stepenuck KF, Goers E. (2013). Factors associated with ongoing commitment to a volunteer stream-monitoring program. Journal of Extension. 51(3):25. doi:10.34068/joe.51.03.25.
   Google Scholar
• Alender B. 2016. Understanding volunteer motivations to participate in citizen science projects: a deeper look at water quality monitoring. Journal of Science Communication. 15(3):A04. doi:10.22323/2.15030204.
   Google Scholar
• Asah ST, Blahna D. 2013. Practical implications of understanding the influence of motivations on commitment to voluntary urban conservation stewardship. Conservation Biology. 27(4):866–875. doi:10.1111/cobi.12058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes F. 2004. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology. 18(3):621–630. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonney R, Cooper CB, Dickinson JL, Kelling S, Phillips T, Rosenberg KV, Shirk J. 2009. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience. 59(11):977–984. doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen D. 2024. Sector burnout in conservation volunteering? [accessed March 2024].https://www.volunteeringnz.org.nz/views/conservation-volunteering-sector-burnout/.
   Google Scholar
• Bramston P, Pretty G, Zammit C. (2011). Assessing environmental stewardship motivation. Environment and Behavior. 43(6), 776–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruyere B, Rappe S. 2007. Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 50(4):503–516. doi:10.1080/09640560701402034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushway L, Dickinson J, Stedman R, Wagenet L, Weinstein D. 2011. Benefits, motivations, and barriers related to environmental volunteerism for older adults: developing a research agenda. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 72(3):189–206. doi:10.2190/AG.72.3.b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase SK, Levine A. 2018. Citizen science: exploring the potential of natural resource monitoring programs to influence environmental attitudes and behaviors. Conservation Letters. 11(2):e12382. doi:10.1111/conl.12382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen PW, Chen LK, Huang HK, & Loh CH. (2022). Productive aging by environmental volunteerism: a systematic review. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 98:104563 doi:10.1016/j.archger.2021.104563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clary EG, Ridge RD, Stukas AA, Snyder M, Copeland J, Haugen J, Miene P. 1998. Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 74(6):1516–1530. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denscombe M. 2014. The good research guide: for small-scale research projects. 5th ed. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Conservation. 2020. He Māhere Rautaki Whakakore Konihi, Predator Free 2050, 5-year action plan: 2020 - 2025. Department of Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Conservation. 2021. Predator free 2050 5-year progress report. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Conservation Te Papa Atawhai.
   Google Scholar
• Ding C, Schuett MA. 2020. Predicting the commitment of volunteers’ environmental stewardship: does generativity play a role? Sustainability. 12(17):6802. doi:10.3390/su12176802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domroese MC, Johnson EA. 2017. Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the great pollinator project. Biological Conservation. 208:40–47. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley N, Higgins-Zogib L, Mansourian S. 2009. The links between protected areas, faiths, and sacred natural sites. Conservation Biology. 23(3):568–577. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01201.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunkley RA. 2019. Monitoring ecological change in UK woodlands and rivers: an exploration of the relational geographies of citizen science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 44(1):16–31. doi:10.1111/tran.12258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Defence Society. 2024. The government’s war on nature goes nuclear. [accessed March 2024]. https://eds.org.nz/resources/documents/media-releases/2024/fast-track-bill/?from=featured.
   Google Scholar
• Forgie V, Horsley P, Johnston J. 2001. Facilitating community-based conservation initiatives. Wellington, NZ: Department of Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Frensley T, Crall A, Stern M, Jordan R, Gray S, Prysby MD, Newman G, Hmelo-Silver C, Mellor D, Huang J. 2017. Bridging the benefits of online and community supported citizen science: a case study on motivation and retention with conservation-oriented volunteers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice. 2(1):4–14. doi:10.5334/cstp.84.
   Google Scholar
• Ganzevoort W, van den Born RJG. 2020. Understanding citizens’ action for nature: the profile, motivations and experiences of Dutch nature volunteers. Journal for Nature Conservation. 55:125824. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geoghegan H, Dyke A, Pateman R, West S, Everett G. 2016. Understanding motivations for citizen science. Final report on behalf of UKEOF. University of Reading, Stockholm Environment Institute (University of York) and University of the West of England.
   Google Scholar
• Gooch M. 2003. A sense of place: eological identity as a driver for catchment volunteering.
   Google Scholar
• Gratzer K, Brodschneider R. 2021. How and why beekeepers participate in the INSIGNIA citizen science honey bee environmental monitoring project. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(28):37995–38006 doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13379-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiney MS, Oberhauser KS. 2009. Conservation volunteers’ connection to nature. Ecopsychology. 1(4):187–197. doi:10.1089/eco.2009.0030.
   Google Scholar
• Gulliver RE, Fielding KS, Louis WR. 2022. An investigation of factors influencing environmental volunteering leadership and participation behaviors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 52(2):397–420. doi:10.1111/conl.12382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimann A, Medvecky F. (2022). Attitudes and motivations of New Zealand conservation volunteers. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 46(1):1–13. doi:10.20417/nzjecol.46.18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins O, Shackleton CM. 2015. The benefits from and barriers to participation in civic environmental organisations in South Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation. 24(8):2031–2046. doi:10.1007/s10531-015-0924-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughey KF, Kerr GN, Cullen R. 2016. Public perceptions of New Zealand’s environment: 2016. Christchurch: EOS Ecology.
   Google Scholar
• Hughey KF, Kerr GN, Cullen R. 2019. Public perceptions of New Zealand’s environment: 2019. Christchurch: EOS Ecology.
   Google Scholar
• Hvenegaard GT, Perkins R. 2019. Motivations, commitment, and turnover of bluebird trail managers. Human Dimensions of Wildlife. 24(3):250–266. doi:10.1080/10871209.2019.1598521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ipsos. 2016. Full report: survey of New Zealanders. report prepared for the department of conservation. Auckland: Ipsos.
   Google Scholar
• Krasny ME, Crestol SR, Tidball KG, Stedman RC. 2014. New York city's oyster gardeners: memories and meanings as motivations for volunteer environmental stewardship. Landscape and Urban Planning. 132:16–25. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson LR, Cooper CB, Futch S, Singh D, Shipley NJ, Dale K, LeBaron GS. Takekawa JY. 2020. The diverse motivations of citizen scientists: does conservation emphasis grow as volunteer participation progresses? Biological Conservation. 242:108428. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laverie DA, McDonald RE. 2007. Volunteer dedication: understanding the role of identity importance on participation frequency. Journal of Macromarketing. 27(3):274–288. doi:10.1177/0276146707302837.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen SF, Ekelund F, Strange N, Schou JS. 2021. Motivations of volunteers in Danish grazing organizations. Sustainability. 13(15):8163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAteer B, Flannery W, Murtagh B. 2021. Linking the motivations and outcomes of volunteers to understand participation in marine community science. Marine Policy. 124:104375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Wetland Trust of New Zealand. Manawatu Estuary. https://www.wetlandtrust.org.nz/get-involved/ramsar-wetlands/manawatu-estuary/.
   Google Scholar
• New TR. 2010. Butterfly conservation in Australia: the importance of community participation. Journal of Insect Conservation. 14(3):305–311. doi:10.1007/s10841-009-9252-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton C, Becker K, Bell S. 2014. Learning and development opportunities as a tool for the retention of volunteers: a motivational perspective. Human Resource Management Journal. 24(4):514–530. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Murphy SA. 2009. The nature relatedness scale. Environment and Behavior. 41(5):715–740. doi:10.1177/0013916508318748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien L, Townsend M, Ebden M. 2010. ‘Doing something positive’: volunteers’ experiences of the well-being benefits derived from practical conservation activities in nature. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 21(4):525–545. doi:10.1007/s11266-010-9149-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohmer ML, Meadowcroft P, Freed K, Lewis E. 2009. Community gardening and community development: individual, social and community benefits of a community conservation program. Journal of Community Practice. 17(4):377–399. doi:10.1080/10705420903299961.
   Google Scholar
• Pagès M, Fischer A, van der Wal R. 2018. The dynamics of volunteer motivations for engaging in the management of invasive plants: insights from a mixed-methods study on Scottish seabird islands. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 61(5-6):904–923. doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1329139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillemer K, Wells NM, Meador RH, Schultz L, Henderson CR, Jr., Cope MT, Meeks S. 2017. Engaging older adults in environmental volunteerism: the retirees in service to the environment program. Gerontologist. 57(2):367–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope J. 2005. Volunteering in Victoria over 2004. Australian Journal on Volunteering. 10(2):29.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Mallén I, Newing H, Porter-Bolland L, Pritchard DJ, García-Frapolli E, Méndez-López ME, Reyes-García V. 2014. Cognisance, participation and protected areas in the Yucatan Peninsula. Environmental Conservation. 41(3):265–275. doi:10.1017/S0376892913000507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Mallen I, Schunko C, Corbera E, Roes M, Reyes-Garcia, V. (2015). Meanings, drivers, and motivations for community-based conservation in Latin America. Ecology and Society. 20(3):33. doi:10.5751/ES-07733-200333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan RL. 2005. Exploring the effects of environmental experience on attachment to urban natural areas. Environment and Behavior. 37(1):3–42. doi:10.1177/0013916504264147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan Kaplan R, Grese RE. 2001. Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programmes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 44(5):629–648. doi:10.1080/09640560120079948.
   Google Scholar
• Sarantakos S. 2013. Social research. 4th ed. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schild R. 2018. Fostering environmental citizenship: the motivations and outcomes of civic recreation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 61(5-6):924–949. doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1350144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirk JL, Ballard HL, Wilderman CC, Phillips T, Wiggins A, Jordan R, McCallie E, Minarchek M, Lewenstein BV, Krasny ME, Bonney R. 2012. Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society. 17(2):04705–170229. doi:10.5751/ES-04705-170229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simakole BM, Farrelly TA, Holland J. 2019. Provisions for community participation in heritage management: case of the Zambezi source national monument, Zambia. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 25(3):225–238. doi:10.1080/13527258.2018.1481135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMC (Science Media Centre). 2020. Predator free 2050 strategy–expert reaction. https://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/2020/03/09/predator-free-2050-strategy-expert-reaction/.
   Google Scholar
• Stats NZ. 2018. Non-profit institutions satellite account. https://www.stats.govt.nz/reports/non-profit-institutions-satellite-account-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Takase Y, Hadi AA, Furuya K. 2019. The relationship between volunteer motivations and variation in frequency of participation in conservation activities. Environmental Management. 63(1):32–45. doi:10.1007/s00267-018-1106-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas JL, Cullen M, O'Leary D, Wilson C, Fitzsimons JA. 2021. Characteristics and preferences of volunteers in a large national bird conservation program in Australia. Ecological Management & Restoration. 22(1):100–105. doi:10.1111/emr.12442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull JW, Johnston EL, Kajlich L, Clark GF. 2020. Quantifying local coastal stewardship reveals motivations, models and engagement strategies. Biological Conservation. 249:108714. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Berg HA, Dann SL, Dirkx JM. (2009). Motivations of adults for non-formal conservation education and volunteerism: implications for programming. Applied Environmental Education & Communication. 8(1), 6–17. doi:10.1080/15330150902847328.
   Google Scholar