Achieving sustainability at the individual and community levels through development assistance

References

• Aga, D. A., Noorderhaven, N., & Vallejo, B. (2018). Project beneficiary participation and behavioural intentions promoting project sustainability: The mediating role of psychological ownership. Development Policy Review, 36(5), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, M. S., Talib, A., & Bt, N. (2016). Analysis of community empowerment on projects sustainability: Moderating role of sense of community. Social Indicators Research, 129(3), 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0781-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, C., Malekpour, S., & Mintrom, M. (2023). Cross‐scale, cross‐level and multi‐actor governance of transformations toward the sustainable development goals: A review of common challenges and solutions. Sustainable Development, 31(3), 1250–1267. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2019). Community-driven development: A field perspective on possibilities and limitations. Development Policy Centre Discussion Paper #82. Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcand, J. L., & Wagner, N. (2016). Does community-driven development improve inclusiveness in peasant organizations?–Evidence from Senegal. World Development, 78, 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank. (2012). The Saemaul Undong movement in the Republic of Korea: Sharing knowledge on community-driven development.
   Google Scholar
• Aslipour, H., & Zargar, M. R. (2022). Developing grounded theory systematic approach for public policy researches. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221090357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6, Pt.1), 359. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AusAid, A. (2000). Promoting practical sustainability ( ROOM DOCUMENT NO.8).
   Google Scholar
• Babaei, H., Ahmad, N., & Gill, S. S. (2012). Bonding, bridging and linking social capital and empowerment among squatter settlements in Tehran, Iran. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(1), 119–126.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, R., & Inkpen, A. C. (2011). Understanding institutional-based trust building processes in inter-organizational relationships. Organization Studies, 32(2), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610397477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bantilan, M. C. S., & Padmaja, R. (2008). Empowerment through social capital build-up: Gender dimensions in technology uptake. Experimental Agriculture, 44(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479707005947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayliss, K., & Van Waeyenberge, E. (2018). Unpacking the public private partnership revival. The Journal of Development Studies, 54(4), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2017.1303671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, A., & Staples, L. H. (2004). Empowerment: The point of view of consumers. Families in Society, 85(2), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boström, M. (2012). A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 8(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908080
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. H., Peterson, N. D., Arora, P., & Caldwell, K. (2016). Five approaches to social sustainability and an integrated way forward. Sustainability, 8(9), 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, A., Collins, A., Heaven Taylor, B., Pan, D., Visman, E., Norris, J., Gill, J. C., Rees, J., Pelling, M., Tufet Bayona, M., Cassidy, S., & Murray, V. (2020). New partnerships for co-delivery of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11(5), 680–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00293-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buntaine, M. T., Daniels, B., & Devlin, C. (2018). Can information outreach increase participation in community-driven development? A field experiment near Bwindi National Park, Uganda. World Development, 106, 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, K. (2018). Radical decentralization: Does community-driven development work? Annual Review of Economics, 10(1), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053339
   Google Scholar
• Casey, K., Glennerster, R., & Miguel, E. (2012). Reshaping institutions: Evidence on aid impacts using a preanalysis plan. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(4), 1755–1812. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qje027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. (2009). Going to scale with community‐led total sanitation: Reflections on experience, issues and ways forward. IDS Practice Papers, 2009(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0225.2009.00001_2.x
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J., To, H. P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-2118-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (1995). Between positivism and postmodernism: Implications for methods. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 17(2), 43–72.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2017). Special invited paper: Continuities, contradictions, and critical inquiry in grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917719350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2021). The genesis, grounds, and growth of constructivist grounded theory. In J. M. Morse, B. J. Bowers, K. Charmaz, A. E. Clarke, J. Corbin, C. J. Porr, & P. N. Stern (Eds.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation revisited (pp. 153–187). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., Gassier, M., & Myint, N. (2023). Leveraging social cohesion for development outcomes. Policy Research Working Papers No. 10417. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi, S., Janus, H., Klingebiel, S., Li, X., Mello e Souza, A. D., Sidiropoulos, E., & Wehrmann, D., Chaturvedi, S., Janus, H., Klingebiel, S., Li, X., Mello e Souza, A. D., Sidiropoulos, E., Wehrmann, D. (2021). The Palgrave handbook of development cooperation for achieving the 2030 agenda: Contested collaboration. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57938-8
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, R. L. (2003). Social sustainability, sustainable development and housing development. In R. Forrest & J. Lee (Eds.), Housing and social change: East-west perspectives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, G., Jin, T., Jeong, Y., & Lee, S. K. (2020). Evolution of partnerships for sustainable development: The case of P4G. Sustainability, 12(16), 6485. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Medicine, 7, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, C. R., Neal, J. W., & Neal, Z. P. (2014). Transforming individual civic engagement into community collective efficacy: The role of bonding social capital. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54(3), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9675-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee for International Development Cooperation. (2011). 새마을운동 ODA 사업 기본계획 [Saemaul Undong ODA Project Basic Plan].
   Google Scholar
• Committee for International Development Cooperation. (2016). 새마을운동의 국제적 확산방안(안) [Global Method for expanding Saemaul Undong].
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cuesta, J., Madrigal, L., & Pecorari, N. (2022). Social sustainability, poverty, and income. Policy Research Working Paper 10085. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthill, M. (2010). Strengthening the ‘social’in sustainable development: Developing a conceptual framework for social sustainability in a rapid urban growth region in Australia. Sustainable Development, 18(6), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, A., & Sparkes, J. (2011). The ‘agency’ of sustainable community development. Community Development Journal, 46(4), 476–492. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsq013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Souza, A., & Begeer, H. (2020). Co-creative leadership and self-organization: Inclusive leadership of development action. In Handbook of communication for development and social change (pp. 257–268). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2014-3_126
   Google Scholar
• DeCelles, K. A., DeRue, D. S., Margolis, J. D., & Ceranic, T. L. (2012). Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 681–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19(5), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Heyer, M., & Johnson, D. (2020). Exploring the complexity of partnerships in development policy and practice: Upstairs and downstairs. Development Policy Review, 38(S1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12485
   Google Scholar
• Department for International Development. (2008). Working Paper Series: Capacity Building ( DFID research strategy 2008-2013).
   Google Scholar
• Dewalt, K. M., & DeWalt, B. R. (2002). Participant observation. Walnut creek. Rowman Altamira
   Google Scholar
• Dongier, P., Van Domelen, J., Ostrom, E., Ryan, A., Wakeman, W., Bebbington, A., & Polski, M. (2003). Community driven development. In Poverty reduction strategy paper sourcebook (pp. 301–331). World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, C. (2011). The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.494930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterly, W. (2006). The white man’s burden: Why the west’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. (1999). NGO performance–what breeds success? New evidence from South Asia. World Development, 27(2), 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00125-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/258191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezemenari, K., Kebede, E., & Lahiri, S. (2008). The fiscal impact of foreign aid in Rwanda: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Policy Research Working Paper No. 4541. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2010). Participatory governance. Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance, 24, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Flint, A., & Natrup, C. M. Z. (2014). Ownership and participation: Toward a development paradigm based on beneficiary-led aid. Journal of Developing Societies, 30(3), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X14536972
   Google Scholar
• Flint, A., & Natrup, C. M. Z. (2019). Aid and development by design: Local solutions to local problems. Development in Practice, 29(2), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2018.1543388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florini, A., & Pauli, M. (2018). Collaborative governance for the sustainable development goals. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 5(3), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonchingong, C. C., & Fonjong, L. N. (2002). The concept of self-reliance in community development initiatives in the Cameroon grassfields. GeoJournal, 57(1–2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026042718043
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429269400-8
   Google Scholar
• Fu, Y., & Ma, W. (2020). Sustainable urban community development: A case study from the perspective of self-governance and public participation. Sustainability, 12(2), 617. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuglsang, L., & Jagd, S. (2015). Making sense of institutional trust in organizations: Bridging institutional context and trust. Organization, 22(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413496577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaye, M., & Diallo, F. (1997). Community participation in the management of the urban environment in Rufisque (Senegal). Environment and Urbanization, 9(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789700900110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittel, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (2005). The grounded theory perspective III: Theoretical coding. Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson, J., & Wood, G. (2009). Urban regeneration and impact assessment for social sustainability. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27(4), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.3152/146155109X480358
   Google Scholar
• Grootaert, C. (2003). On the relationship between empowerment, social capital and community driven development (World Bank Working paper 33074). World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, J., & Kitano, N. (2018). Perspectives on the Global partnership for effective development cooperation. In J. Gu & N. Kitano (Eds.), Emerging economies and the changing dynamics of development cooperation (pp. 145–166). Institute of Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, P., & Hertting, N. (2017). Understanding participatory governance: An analysis of participants’ motives for participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(5), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015626298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. (2005). Social capital. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Han, D. (2012). The successful cases of the Korea’s Saemaul Undong (New community movement). KDI School of Public Policy and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (2015). Collective action. RFF Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, P., & Lind, J. (2005). Dependency and humanitarian relief: A critical analysis (HPG Report 19). Humanitarian Policy Group, Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hord, S. M. (1992). Facilitative leadership: The imperative for change. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, J., & Lee, S. W. (2019). A case study on the evaluation of international agricultural cooperation project in Africa: A way to break away from ‘No money, no action’. Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association, 31(4), 203–217.
   Google Scholar
• Im, S. (2017). Agricultural and rural development measures through Saemaul Undong approach in Myanmar. Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture, 29(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2017.29.2.120
   Google Scholar
• Ingelaere, B., & Verpoorten, M. (2020). Trust in the aftermath of genocide: Insights from Rwandan life histories. Journal of Peace Research, 57(4), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319899136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, J. (2020). A study on social network of community-driven development ODA Project Pilot village: Thanatpin in Myanmar. Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association, 32(5), 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Jean, N. (2014, October 30). Kagame, South Korean president discuss bilateral ties. The New Times. http://en.umuseke.rw/kagame-south-korean-president-discuss-bilateral-ties.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, M. (2016). A study of success and failure in community development in Asia. Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association, 28(4), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Joo, N. Y. (2015). The impact of empowerment on the perceived ODA effectiveness [ Doctoral dissertation, Kyungpook National University]. Kyungpook National University Library.
   Google Scholar
• Kagame, P. (2015, September 26). Home-grown solutions are Rwanda’s driving force. PaulKagame. https://www.paulkagame.com/home-grown-solutions-are-rwanda-s-driving-force/
   Google Scholar
• Kaler, A., & Parkins, J. R. (2015). Food, donors, and dependency syndrome (s) in South Sudan. Sociology of Development, 1(3), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1525/sod.2015.1.3.400
   Google Scholar
• Karanda, C., & Toledano, N. (2018). Foreign aid versus support to social entrepreneurs: Reviewing the way of fighting poverty in Zimbabwe. Development Southern Africa, 35(4), 480–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2018.1482198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karl, M. (1995). Women and empowerment: Participation and decision making. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. (2018). A study on factors affected to the sustainability of Korea's development assistance projects: Case study on projects implemented in Nepal. Journal of International Area Studies, 27(1), 59–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. G. (2013). 새마을 운동 ODA 현황과 전망 [The status of Saemaul Undong ODA and its outlook]. Journal of International Development Cooperation, 2013(4), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.34225/jidc.2013.4.141
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. G. (2016). Social capital and effectiveness of integrated rural development project in developing country: A case study about Official DevelopmEnt Assistance (ODA) of Myanmar. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, 43(1), 86–111.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. W., Sohn, H. S., & Lee, J. (2020). Evaluating participation: Empirical analysis of recipient and beneficiary engagement with IFAD international development projects. Sustainability, 12(14), 5862. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsbergen, S., Koch, D. J., Plaisier, C., & Schulpen, L. (2022). Long-lasting, but not transformative. An ex-post sustainability study of development interventions of private development initiatives. European Journal of Development Research, 34(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00346-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsbergen, S., Schulpen, L., & Ruben, R. (2017). Understanding the sustainability of private development initiatives: What kind of difference do they make? Forum for Development Studies, 44(2), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2017.1307270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, H. J., Yamagata, T., Kim, E., & Kondoh, H. (Eds.). (2022). International development cooperation of Japan and South Korea: New strategies for an uncertain world. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4601-0
   Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, P. (2008). A sense of ownership in community development: Understanding the potential for participation in community planning efforts. Community Development, 39(2), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330809489730
   Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, P. R., & McCool, S. F. (2005). Exploring the concept of “ownership” in natural resource planning. Society and Natural Resources, 18(3), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920590908141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, G. L. (2008). An inquiry into the theoretical basis of sustainability: Ten propositions. In J. Dillard, V. Dujon, & M. C. King (Eds.), Understanding the social dimension of sustainability (pp. 61–98). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• LeCompte, M. D. (2000). Analyzing qualitative data. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. (2017). Sustainability in international aid programs; identification of working concepts of sustainability and its contributing factors. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 5(7), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v5i1.2055
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2010). The governance of Saemaul Undong in Korea and Mongolia – A governance approach of ODA and Saemaul Undong. Journal of Saemaul Undong & Community Development, 6, 143–168.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Shim, S. (2020). A case study on villagers’ participation and project achievement in rural development - Focusing on Saemaul Undong project in Myanmar. Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 26(3), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.7851/Ksrp.2020.26.3.079
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. (2016). A theoretical implication of the Global Saemaul Undong development. Chungbuk Development Review, 27(1), 69–90.
   Google Scholar
• Leigland, J. (2018). Public-private partnerships in developing countries: The emerging evidence-based critique. The World Bank Research Observer, 33(1), 103–134. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkx008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentz, E., Barrett, C. B., & Hoddinott, J. (2005). Food aid and dependency: Implications for emergency food security assessments. IFPRI Discussion Paper No. 12-2. International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, H. S. (2013). 새마을운동 세계화를 위한 시범사업 현황과 개선방향 [The status and future direction for improvement of Saemaul Undong globalization]. Saemaul Globalization Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, H. S., No, E. J. & Kwon, R. M. (2014). 경상북도 새마을 시범마을 조성사업의 효과적 추진방안 -아프리카 시범마을 중심으로- [Effective ways to implement Gyeongsangbuk-do Saemaul Pilot Village Project – focused on pilot villages in Africa-]. Kyungwoon University Saemaul Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Littig, B., & Griessler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1/2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2005.007375
   Google Scholar
• Lupova-Henry, E., & Dotti, N. F. (2019). Governance of sustainable innovation: Moving beyond the hierarchy-market-network trichotomy? A systematic literature review using the ‘who-how-what’framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahama, V. A., & Badu-Nyarko, S. K. (2014). Community participation in water delivery services and sustainability in the Savelugu/Nanton Municipality, Ghana. African Educational Research Journal, 2(2), 54–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mahirwe, A. (2016). (The) role of Saemaul Undong on empowerment and its effects in rural community development in Rwanda [ Master’s thesis]. Yonsei University. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14186301&outLink=K
   Google Scholar
• Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2004). Community-based and-driven development: A critical review. The World Bank Research Observer, 19(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkh012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2012). Localizing development: Does participation work? (A World Bank Policy Research Report). World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maton, K. I. (2008). Empowering community settings: Agents of individual development, community betterment, and positive social change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9148-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: Towards some definitions. Hawke Research Institute Working Paper Series No 27. Hawke Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.2307/259290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNabb, D. E. (2017). Research methods in public administration and nonprofit management. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J., Farrell, K. N., & Spangenberg, J. (2005). Developing a framework for sustainability governance in the European Union. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1–2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2005.007371
   Google Scholar
• Mikami, S. (2022). Effect of participation and alignment on the sustainability of development aid output: Evidence from a field experiment in Uganda. Studies in Comparative International Development, 57(4), 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-022-09374-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2006). Trust, institutions, agency: Towards a neoinstitutional theory of trust. In R. Bachmann & A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of trust research (pp. 355–376). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2001). Situating grounded theory within qualitative inquiry. In S. R. Schreiber & P. N. Stern (Eds.), Using grounded theory in nursing (pp. 1–15). Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M., & Clark, L. (2019). The nuances of grounded theory sampling and the pivotal role of theoretical sampling. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 145–166). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Moucheraud, C., Sarma, H., Ha, T. T. T., Ahmed, T., Epstein, A., Glenn, J., Hanh, H. H., Huong, T. T. T., Luies, S. K., Moitry, A. N., Nhung, D. P., Payán, D. D., Rahman, M., Tariqujjaman, M., Thuy, T. T., Tuan, T., Bossert, T. J., & Kruk, M. E. (2020). Can complex programs be sustained? A mixed methods sustainability evaluation of a national infant and young child feeding program in Bangladesh and Vietnam. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09438-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyo, D. (2009). Dead aid: Why aid is not working and how there is a better way for Africa. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, D., Chambers, R., Shah, M. K., & Petesch, P. (2000). Voices of the poor: Crying out for change. Oxford University Press for the World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-1952-1602-4
   Google Scholar
• Nikkhah, H. A., & Redzuan, M. (2009). Participation as a medium of empowerment in community development. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 170–176.
   Google Scholar
• Noori, H. (2022). Social capital and structural disadvantages: A case of community‐driven development program in Afghanistan. Asian Social Work & Policy Review, 16(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., & Bingham, L. B. (Eds.). (2009). The collaborative public manager: New ideas for the twenty-first century. Georgetown University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book13036
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2020). Development assistance committee members and civil society. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2021). Applying evaluation criteria thoughtfully. OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Osmani, S. R. (2008). Participatory governance: An overview of issues and evidence. In Participatory governance and the millennium development goals (pp. 1–45). United Nations Department for Economic and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, S. M., Esteve, M., & Lee, S. K. (2018). Assessing qualitative studies in public administration research. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 593–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American political science association, 1997. The American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxfam. (2011). Whose aid is it anyway? Politicizing aid in conflicts and crises ( Oxfam Briefing Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Panda, B., & Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686217701467
   Google Scholar
• Park, H. (2013). Empowerment: A bottom-up approach to fight World poverty. OUGHTOPIA, 28(2), 5–35.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. (2019). Re-inventing Africa’s development: Linking Africa to the Korean development model. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03946-2
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. (2022). The significance of Korea’s Saemaul Undong (new village movement) for Africa’s development. Review of Institution and Economics, 16(1), 77–129. https://doi.org/10.30885/RIE.2022.16.1.077
   Google Scholar
• Partridge, E. (2005, September 28–30). Social sustainability’: A useful theoretical framework? In The Australasian Political Science Association Annual Conference, Dunedin, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pelenc, J., Bazile, D., & Ceruti, C. (2015). Collective capability and collective agency for sustainability: A case study. Ecological Economics, 118, 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The Pprox Prospect, 4(13), 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community Robert Putnam. Simon & pprox.
   Google Scholar
• Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T., Golden Biddle, K., & Germann, K. (2006). Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 977–998. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22798178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, E. P. (2010, September 30). Is Saemaul Undong a model for developing countries today? [Paper presentation]. Anniversary of saemaul undong hosted by the Korea saemaul undong Center. International Symposium in Commemoration of the 40th, Anniversary of Saemaul Undong, Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, C., & Farrokhnia, F. (2016). Optimizing grounded theory for policy research: A knowledge-building approach to analyzing WTO e-commerce policies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 160940691562138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saemaul Foundation. (2017). Final Data Analysis Plan with Revised Tables. [Data set].
   Google Scholar
• Saemaul Foundation. (2018). 르완다 카모니군 새마을 시범마을 조성사업 최종결과보고서 [The Final Report of Saemaul Pilot Villages in Kamonyi].
   Google Scholar
• Saemaul Foundation. (2021). Annual Report 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Saemaul Foundation. (2022). Annual Report 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Saemaul Foundation. (n.d.). Saemaul Pilot Villages in Rwanda. https://www.saemaulgf.or.kr/pages/biz/page.html?mc=0725
   Google Scholar
• Saguin, K. (2018). Why the poor do not benefit from community-driven development: Lessons from participatory budgeting. World Development, 112, 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuck, R. (1997). Practical action research for change. IRI/Skylight Training and Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, H. (1999). Participatory governance for poverty reduction. Journal of International Development: The Journal of the Development Studies Association, 11(4), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199906)11:4<521:AID-JID599>3.0.CO;2-J
   Google Scholar
• Sebeelo, T. B. (2022). The utility of constructivist grounded theory in critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 160940692210900. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221090057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, J. (2007). Community governance and Saemaul Undong in Korea. Korean Association for Local Government Studies, 19(3), 93–112.
   Google Scholar
• So, J. G., & Kim, S. H. (2011). The way to apply Saemaul Undong into ODA projects (Report No. 2011-66). Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements
   Google Scholar
• Song, J., & Yim, S. (2015). Theoretical exploration of social sustainability for the qualitative development of cities. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 50(6), 677–694.
   Google Scholar
• Stockmann, R. (1997). The sustainability of development projects: An impact assessment of German vocational-training projects in Latin America. World Development, 25(11), 1767–1784. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00067-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, J. (2000). Foreign aid and rent-seeking. Journal of International Economics, 51(2), 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00014-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szreter, S., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33(4), 650–667. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Themelis, C., Sime, J. A., & Thornberg, R. (2022). Informed grounded theory: A symbiosis of philosophy, methodology, and art. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2115135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R. (2012). Informed grounded theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R., & Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In F. Cornish, A. Gillespie, T. Zittoun, & U. Flick (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative data analysis. Collaborative analysis of qualitative data (pp. 153–169). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thornberg, R., & Dunne, C. (2019). Literature review in grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 206–221). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Tiainen, H. (2016). Contemplating governance for social sustainability in mining in Greenland. Resources Policy, 49, 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (n.d.). Rwanda. https://www.transparency.org/country/RWA#
   Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S., & Aarts, N. (2010). How participation creates citizens: Participatory governance as performative practice. Ecology and Society, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03701-150426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. (2015a). Development of Knowledge Management Products for Saemaul Initiative towards Inclusive and Sustainable Rural Community Development in Rwanda.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. (2015b). Saemaul Initiative Towards Inclusive and Sustainable New Communities: Implementation Guidance.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2011). Promoting Livelihoods and Self-Reliance.
   Google Scholar
• Uphoff, N. T. (1992). Local institutions and participation for sustainable development( GATEKEEPER SERIES No. 31). Iied.
   Google Scholar
• Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Dixon, J. E. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum, 42(3), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Windt, P. (2020). Assessing the longer term impact of community-driven development programs: Evidence from a field experiment in the democratic Republic of Congo. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 9140. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.1.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernick, L. J., Kulick, A., & Woodford, M. R. (2014). How theater within a transformative organizing framework cultivates individual and collective empowerment among LGBTQQ youth. Journal of Community Psychology, 42(7), 838–853. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H., Menon, R., & Waddington, H. (2018). Community-driven development: Does it build social cohesion or infrastructure? A mixed-method evidence synthesis. Working Paper No. 30. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson-Maposa, S., & Fowler, A. (2009). Taking philanthropy to where communities are. Alliance, 14(3), 28–29.
   Google Scholar
• Wolsko, C., Marino, E., Doherty, T. J., Fisher, S., Green, A. S., Goodwin, B., Reese, R., & Wirth, A. (2016). Systems of access: A multidisciplinary strategy for assessing the social dimensions of sustainability. Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, 12(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2016.11908156
   Google Scholar
• Wong, S., & Guggenheim, S. (2018). Community-driven development: Myths and realities. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 8435. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcraft, S., Hackett, T., & Caistor-Arendar, L. (2011). Design for social sustainability: A framework for creating thriving new communities. Social Lilfe.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (1996). Participation Sourcebook.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53–111.
   Google Scholar