A framework connecting vision and depiction

References

• Aach, H. (1970). On the use and phenomena of fluorescent pigments in paintings. Leonardo, 3(2), 135–138. https://doi.org/10.2307/1572077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnesscott.edu Describing Art. Retrieved July, 2023, from https://www.agnesscott.edu/center-for-writing-and-speaking/handouts/describing-art.html
   Google Scholar
• Alberti, L. B. (1435). On painting. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkin, A. (2022). Peirce’s theory of signs. In E. N. Zalta, & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2022). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/peirce-semiotics/
   Google Scholar
• Balas, B. A., Nakano, L. B., & Rosenholtz, R. B. (2009). A summary-statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual crowding. Journal of Vision, 9(12), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.12.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, P. (2003). Bright earth: Art and the invention of color. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A., & Jaeger, G. J.2022). Uncertainty: A catalyst for creativity, learning and development. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. (2008). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. Penguin Book.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. (2008). Ways of seeing. Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Berns, R. S. (2016). Color science and the visual arts: A guide for conservatiors, curators, and the curious. The Getty Conservation Institute. https://search.worldcat.org/title/927140853
   Google Scholar
• Bol, M. (2013). Seeing through the paint. The dissemination of technical terminology between three Métiers: Pictura translucida, enameling and glass painting. In A. Speer (Ed.), Zwischen Kunsthandwerk und Kunst: Die, Schedula diversarum artium’ (pp. 145–162). DE GRUYTER. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110334821.145.
   Google Scholar
• Bol, M., & Lehman, A.-S. (2009). Towards a material iconography of translucent motifs in early Netherlandish painting. In Papers Presented at the seventeenth symposium for the study of underdrawing and technology in painting held in Leuven, 22–24 October 2009, 215–225.
   Google Scholar
• Carbon, C.-C., & Pastukhov, A. (2018). Reliable top-left light convention starts with early renaissance: An extensive approach comprising 10k artworks. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casati, R. (2008). The copycat solution to the shadow correspondence problem. Perception, 37(4), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, P. (2005). The artist as neuroscientist. Nature, 434(7031), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1038/434301a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. C., & Kentridge, R. W. (2015). The perception of gloss: A review. Vision Research, 109(PB), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2014.10.026
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen, M. A., Dennett, D. C., & Kanwisher, N. (2016). What is the bandwidth of perceptual experience? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(5), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couprie, L. D. (1983). Iconclass: An iconographic classification system. Art Libraries Journal, 8(2), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0307472200003436
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. Minton Balch and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Di Cicco, F., Wijntjes, M. W., & Pont, S. C. (2019). Understanding gloss perception through the lens of art: Combining perception, image analysis, and painting recipes of 17th century painted grapes. Journal of Vision, 19(3), 7–7. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.3.7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Piles, R. (1743). The principles of painting. J. Orborn.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (2002). Elliott W. Eisner’s John Dewey lecture. Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Elgammal, A., Liu, B., Kim, D., Elhoseiny, M., & Mazzone, M. (2018). The shape of art history in the eyes of the machine. 32nd AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, AAAI 2018, 2183–2191.
   Google Scholar
• Enns, J. T., & MacDonald, S. C. (2013). The role of clarity and blur in guiding visual attention in photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(2), 568–578. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, R. W., Jakel, F., & Maloney, L. T. (2011). Visual perception of thick transparent materials. Psychological Science, 22(6), 812–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611408734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2011). Metamers of the ventral stream. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1195–1201. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, R. E. (1920). Vision and design. Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Getty. (2023). The J. Paul Getty museum. Elements of art. Retrieved July, 2023, from https://www.getty.edu/education/teachers/building_lessons/formal_analysis.html
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Glazer, Y. (2020). Visual culture and critical pedagogy: From theory to practice. Critical Studies in Education, 61(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1292298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. H. (1960). Art and illusion—A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. Phaidon Press Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. H. (1964). Light, form and texture in the XVth century painting. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts, 112(5099), 826–849.
   Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. H. (1995a). Shadows: The depiction of cast shadows in Western art. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. H. (1995b). The story of art (16th ed. rev., expanded, and redesigned). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of Art. Hackett Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Granito, C., Tehrani, J. J., Kendal, J. R., & Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2022). Does group contact shape styles of pictorial representation? A case study of Australian rock art. Human Nature, 33(3), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-022-09430-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, J., & Werner, S. (2004). Why cast shadows are expendable: Insensitivity of human observers and the inherent ambiguity of cast shadows in pictorial art. Perception, 33(11), 1369–1383. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julesz, B. (1981). Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature, 290(5802), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1038/290091a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy Center. (2023). Formal visual analysis: The elements & principles of composition. Retrieved July, 2023, from https://www.kennedy-center.org/education/resources-for-educators/classroom-resources/articles-and-how-tos/articles/educators/visual-arts/formal-visual-analysis-the-elements-and-principles-of-compositoin/
   Google Scholar
• Koenderink, J. (2015). Perceptual organistation in visual art. In J. Wagemans (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of perceptual organization (pp. 886–916). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014). Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. European Conference on Computer Vision, 740–755.
   Google Scholar
• Mamassian, P. (2004). Impossible shadows and the shadow correspondence problem. Perception, 33(11), 1279–1290. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlow, P. J., Kim, J., & Anderson, B. L. (2012). The perception and misperception of specular surface reflectance. Current Biology, 22(20), 1909–1913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metelli, F. (1970). An algebraic development of the theory of perceptual transparency. Ergonomics, 13(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137008931118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metelli, F. (1974). The perception of transparency. Scientific American, 230(4), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0474-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani, F., & Fraternali, P. (2021). A dataset and a convolutional model for iconography classification in paintings. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 14(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458885
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M. G. (2011). Iconography and iconology as a visual method and approach. The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, 1, 283–297. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268278.n15
   Google Scholar
• Munsterberg, M. (2009). Writing about art. https://writingaboutart.org
   Google Scholar
• Oliva, A., Torralba, A., & Schyns, P. G. (2006). Hybrid images. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 25(3), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1145/1141911.1141919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panofsky, E. (1955). Iconography and iconology: An introduction to the study of renaissance art. In Meaning in the Visual Arts, 26–55.
   Google Scholar
• Panofsky, E. (2020). Perspective as symbolic form. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pont, S. C., Wijntjes, M. W. A., Oomes, A. H. J., van Doorn, A., van Nierop, O., de Ridder, H., & Koenderink, J. J. (2011). Cast shadows in wide perspective. Perception, 40(8), 938–948. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1979). Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception, 8(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1068/p080125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayim, B., & Cavanagh, P. (2011). The art of transparency. I-Perception, 2(7), 679–696. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0459aap
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smarthistory.org Introduction: Close looking and approaches to art. Kilroy-Ewbank, L. Retrieved July, 2023, from https://smarthistory.org/reframing-art-history/introduction-close-looking-approaches/
   Google Scholar
• Sontag, S. (1966). Against interpretation. Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Strezoski, G., & Worring, M. (2018). Omniart: A large-scale artistic benchmark. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications, 14(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3273022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., & Perona, P. (1998). Where is the sun? Nature Neuroscience, 1(3), 183–184. https://doi.org/10.1038/630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Doorn, A. J., Koenderink, J. J., Leyssen, M. H. R., & Wagemans, J. (2012). Interaction of depth probes and style of depiction. I-Perception, 3(8), 528–540. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zuijlen, M. J. P., Lin, H., Bala, K., Pont, S. C., & Wijntjes, M. W. A. (2021). Materials in paintings (MIP): An interdisciplinary dataset for perception, art history, and computer vision. PLoS One, 16(8), e0255109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallach, H., & O’Connell, D. N. (1952). The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45(4), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056880
   Google Scholar
• Ware, C. (1993). The foundations of experimental semiotics: A theory of sensory and conventional representation. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 4(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvlc.1993.1006
   Google Scholar
• Ware, C. (2019). Information visualization: Perception for design. Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Wijntjes, M. W. A. (2020). Shadows, highlights and faces: The contribution of a “human in the loop” to digital art history. Art and Perception, https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-bja10022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijntjes, M. W. A., & de Ridder, H. (2014). Shading and shadowing on Canaletto’s Piazza San Marco. IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging, 901415–901416.
   Google Scholar
• Willats, J. (1997). Art and representation: New principles in the analysis of pictures. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wölfflin, H. (1915). Principles of art history. Courier Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wollheim, R. (1998). On pictorial representation. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 56(3), 217. https://doi.org/10.2307/432361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollheim, R., & Eldridge, R. T. (2015). Art and its objects: With six supplementary essays (2nd ed., Cambridge Philosophy Classics edition). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Nefs, H. T., Redi, J., & Heynderickx, I. (2014). The aesthetic appeal of depth of field in photographs.
   Google Scholar