Quality assurance dysfunctions

References

• Academic Quality Agency for New Zealand Universities (AQA), 2023, What We Do. Available at https://www.aqa.ac.nz/about-us/mission-terms-of-reference (accessed 2 April 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Academic Quality Agency for New Zealand Universities (AQA), 2024a, Policies and Procedures. Available at https://www.aqa.ac.nz/sites/all/files/AQA%20Policies%20January%202024.pdf (accessed 2 April 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Academic Quality Agency for New Zealand Universities (AQA), 2024b. Reports and Papers. Available at https://www.aqa.ac.nz/reports-and-papers (accessed 2 April 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Australian National Audit Office, 2021, Auditor-General Report No.34 2020–21 Implementation of ANAO and Parliamentary Committee Recommendations—Department of Defence, Commonwealth of Australia. Available at https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance-audit/implementation-anao-and-parliamentary-committee-recommendations-department-defence (accessed 2 April 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, M., 1999, ‘Quality-management systems and dramaturgical compliance’, Quality in Higher Education, 5(1), pp. 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., 1992, ‘Making audit acceptable: a collegial approach to quality assurance’, Higher Education Quarterly, 46(1), pp. 47–66.
   Google Scholar
• Beerkens, M., 2015, ‘Quality assurance in the political context: in the midst of different expectations and conflicting goals’, Quality in Higher Education, 21(3), pp. 231–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beerkens, M., 2018, ‘Evidence-based policy and higher education quality assurance: progress, pitfalls and promise’, European Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), pp. 272–87.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J., 2002, ‘The influence of the organizational structures of colleges and universities on college student learning’, Peabody Journal of Education, 77(3), pp. 40–59.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. & Milem, J., 2000, ‘Organizational behavior in higher education and student outcomes’, in Smart, J.C. (Ed.), 2000, Higher Education: Handbook of theory and research, volume 15, pp. 268–338 (New York, Agathon).
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R., 1988, How Colleges Work. The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership (Hoboken, NJ, Jossey-Bass).
   Google Scholar
• Blanco-Ramírez, G., 2013, ‘Studying quality beyond technical rationality: political and symbolic perspectives’, Quality in Higher Education, 19(2), pp. 126–14.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco-Ramírez, G. & Berger, J., 2014, ‘Rankings, accreditation, and the international quest for quality’, Quality Assurance in Education, 22(1), pp. 88–104.
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., Mittag, S. & Daniel, H., 2006, ‘Quality assurance in higher education: meta-evaluation of multi-stage evaluation procedures in Germany’, Higher Education, 52, pp. 687–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, M., 2023, What factors influence engagement with academic audit and implementation of audit recommendations?, doctoral thesis (Wellington, Victoria University of Wellington). Available at https://openaccess.wgtn.ac.nz/articles/thesis/What_factors_influence_engagement_with_academic_audit_and_implementation_of_audit_recommendations_/22337005/1 (accessed 1 April 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Botha, J., Favish, J. & Stephenson, S., 2008, ‘Institutional audits: a comparison of the experiences of three South African universities’, Quality in Higher Education, 14(1), pp. 29–53.
   Google Scholar
• Chong, S., Geare, A. & Willett, R., 2017, ‘Change in a New Zealand University 1985–2010: views of collegiality and managerialism’, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(6), pp. 926–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codd, J. & Sullivan, K., 1997, ‘Quality Assurance and Audit in New Zealand Universities: a review and case study’, New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 6, pp. 29–50.
   Google Scholar
• Controller and Auditor-General [New Zealand], 2014, Public Entities’ Progress in Implementing the Auditor-General’s Recommendations 2014. Available at https://oag.parliament.nz/2014/public-entities-progress (accessed 2 April 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Council on Higher Education [South Africa], 2021, Framework for Institutional Audits. Available at https://www.che.ac.za/ (accessed 2 April 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Dill, D., 2000, ‘Capacity building as an instrument of institutional reform: improving the quality of higher education through academic audits in the UK, New Zealand, Sweden, and Hong Kong’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 2(2), pp. 211–34.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, D., Quirin, J. & O’Bryan, D., 2003, ‘Auditor acceptance of dysfunctional audit behavior: an explanatory model using auditors’ personal characteristics’, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15(1), pp. 87–110.
   Google Scholar
• Donina, D. & Paleari, S., 2019, ‘New public management: global reform script or conceptual stretching? Analysis of university governance structures in the Napoleonic administrative tradition’, Higher Education, 78, pp. 193–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, J. & Westerheijden, D., 2014, ‘The Dutch way of new public management: a critical perspective on quality assurance in higher education’, Policy and Society, 33(3), pp. 189–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, European Students’ Union, European University Association, & European Association of Institutions in Higher Education, 2015, Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). Available at https://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf (accessed 2 April 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Harcleroad, F., 1976, Educational Auditing and Accountability (an occasional paper) (Washington DC, The Council on Postsecondary Education).
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., 2004–2024, Analytic Quality Glossary. Quality Research International. Available at http://www.qualityresearchinternational.com/glossary/ (accessed 2 April 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L., 2005, ‘A history and critique of quality evaluation in the UK’, Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 13(4), pp. 263–78.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. & Green, D., 1993, ‘Defining quality’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), pp. 9–34.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. & Stensaker, B., 2008, ‘Quality culture: understandings, boundaries and linkages’, European Journal of Education, 43(4), pp. 427–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. & Williams, J., 2010, ‘Fifteen years of Quality in Higher Education (Part Two)’. Quality in Higher Education, 16(2), pp. 81–113.
   Google Scholar
• Hoecht, A., 2006, ‘Quality assurance in UK higher education: issues of trust, control, professional autonomy and accountability’, Higher Education, 51(4), pp. 541–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, J. & Stensaker, B., 2022, ‘Performance governance and management in higher education revisited: international developments and perspectives’, Quality in Higher Education, 28(1), pp. 106–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulpiau, K. & Waeytens, V., 2003, ‘Improving the quality of education: what makes it actually work?’, in Prichard, C. & Trowler, P. (Eds.), 2003, Realizing Qualitative Research into Higher Education, pp. 145–69 (Farnham, UK, Ashgate Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., 1989, ‘Do you use the telephone too much? A review of performance indicators, evaluation and appraisal in British universities’, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 13(1), pp. 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. & Christensen, L., 2012, Educational Research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Kells, H., 1995, Self-Study Processes. A guide to self-evaluation in higher education, 4th edition (Washington, DC, American Council on Education and Oryx Press).
   Google Scholar
• Knights, D. & Willmott, H., 2007, Introducing Organizational Behaviour and Management, 3rd edition (Toronto, Thompson Learning).
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, B. & Harvey, L., 2010, ‘Initiative-based quality development and the role of distributed leadership’, in Nair, S, Webster, L. & Mertova, P. (Eds.), 2010, Leadership and Management of Quality in Higher Education, pp. 21–36 (Sebastopol, CA, Chandos).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. & McKenzie, J., 2011, ‘Evaluating doctoral supervision: tensions in eliciting students’ perspectives’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(1), pp. 69–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiber, T., Stensaker, B. & Harvey, L., 2015, ‘Impact evaluation of quality assurance in higher education: methodology and causal designs’, Quality in Higher Education, 21(3), pp. 288–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massy, W., 2010, ‘Education quality audit as applied in Hong Kong’, in Dill, D. & Beerkens, M. (Eds.), 2010, Public Policy for Academic Quality: Analyses of innovative policy instruments, pp. 203–25 (Dordrecht, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S., 1998, Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education (San Francisco, CA, Jossey Bass).
   Google Scholar
• Morin, D., 2008, ‘Auditors general’s universe revisited: an exploratory study of the influence they exert on public administration through their value for money audits’, Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(7), pp. 697–720.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, L., 2003, Quality and Power in Higher Education (Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Council [Hong Kong], 2023, Quality Audit-related Reports, University Grants Committee. Available at https://www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/qac/about/term/publications/report.html (accessed 15 April 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 1997, The Audit Society: Rituals of verification (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ramamoorti, S., Baskin, D. & Krull, G., 2017, ‘The Gresham’s law of measurement and audit quality indicators: implications for policy making and standard-setting’, Research in Accounting Regulation, 29(1), pp. 79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Raudla, R., Taro, K., Agu, C. & Douglas, J., 2015, ‘The impact of performance audit on public sector organizations: the case of Estonia’, Public Organization Review, 16(2), pp. 217–33.
   Google Scholar
• Reichborn-Kjennerud, K., 2013, ‘Political accountability and performance audit: the case of the Auditor General in Norway’, Public Administration, 91(3), pp. 680–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, M., Tavares, D. & Amaral, A., 2006, ‘Institutional consequences of quality assessment’, Quality in Higher Education, 12(2), pp. 145–59.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, M., 2013, ‘The effectiveness of external quality audits: a study of Australian universities, Quality in Higher Education, 19(3), pp. 358–75.
   Google Scholar
• Srikanthan, G. & Dalrymple, J., 2007, ‘A conceptual overview of a holistic model for quality in higher education’, International Journal of Educational Management, 21(3), pp. 173–93.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R., 1995, The Art of Case Study Research (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Svanström, T., 2016, ‘Time pressure, training activities and auditor behavior: evidence from small audit firms’, International Journal of Auditing, 5(8), pp. 42–51.
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee Board of Regents, 2022, Educational Quality Improvement: A handbook for the academic audit, undergraduate programs (accessed 28 February 2023; no longer available online).
   Google Scholar
• Triantafillou, P., 2015, ‘Doing things with numbers: the Danish National Audit Office and the governing of university teaching’, Policy and Society, 34(1), pp. 13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Universitetskanslersämbetet (UKÄ)/Swedish Higher Education Authority, 2023, Follow-up Report: The Swedish Higher Education Authority’s (UKÄ) Response to ENQA’s Recommendations (UKÄ, Stockholm). Available at https://www.uka.se/download/18.2fdd35e31862cdd23185e2/1675936487916/UK%C3%84%20follow-up%20report%20on%20ENQA%20recommendations.pdf (accessed 2 April 2024).
   Google Scholar
• Vettori, O., 2018, ‘Shared misunderstandings? Competing and conflicting meaning structures in quality assurance’, Quality in Higher Education, 24(2), pp. 85–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadesango, N., Chinamasa, T., Mhaka, C. & Wadesango V., 2017, ‘Challenges faced by management in implementing audit recommendations: a literature review’, Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 7(4), pp. 51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlén, S., 2004, ‘Does national quality monitoring make a difference?’, Quality in Higher Education, 10(2), pp. 139–47.
   Google Scholar
• Westerheijden, D., Hulpiau, V. & Waeytens, K., 2007, ‘From design and implementation to impact of quality assurance: an overview of some studies into what impacts improvements’, Tertiary Education and Management, 13(4), pp. 295–312.
   Google Scholar
• Westerheijden, D. & Maassen, P., 1998, ‘Following the follow-up: a sketch of evaluation use in European higher education’, in Scheele, J., Maassen, P. & Westerheijden, D. (Eds.), 1998, To be continued … Follow-up of Quality-Assurance in Higher Education (Amsterdam, Elsevier/De Tijdstroom).
   Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, D., 1995, ‘Efficient quality systems’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(1), pp. 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, D., 1998, ‘Quality assurance in higher education: the next 25 years’, Quality in Higher Education, 4(3), pp. 257–73.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, D., 2003, ‘Quality improvement through quality audit’, Quality in Higher Education, 9(2), pp. 133–39.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, D. & Stokes, T., 2010, ‘Australia: evaluation and quality in higher education’, Research in Comparative and International Education, 5(1), pp. 18–31.
   Google Scholar