Embedding planning support systems in spatial planning practice: the role of drift in implementing the Spatial Development Framework methodology

References

• Boerboom, L., M. Gibert, M. Spaliviero, and G. Spaliviero. 2017. “The Spatial Development Framework for Implementation of National Urban Policy.” Rwanda Journal 1 (1S): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S.-C., S. Li, and C.-Y. Li. 2011. “Recent Related Research in Technology Acceptance Model: A Literature Review.” Australian Journal of Business and Management Research 1 (9): 124–127.
   Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C. 1996. “The Platform Organization: Recombining Strategies, Structures, and Surprises.” Organization Science 7 (2): 103–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C. 1997. “De Profundis? Deconstructing the Concept of Strategic Alignment.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 9 (1): 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C. 2002. The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C., B. Kristin, A. Cordella, B. Dahlbom, A. Failla, O. Hanseth, K. A. Simon. 2000. From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C., and G. F. Lanzara. 1994. “Formative Contexts and Information Technology: Understanding the Dynamics of Innovation in Organizations.” Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 4 (2): 61–86.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Local Government Forum. 2018. The Local Government System in Rwanda. Retrieved June 12, 2019, from http://www.clgf.org.uk/rwanda.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw. 1989. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of two Theoretical Models.” Management Science 35 (8): 982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., and V. Venkatesh. 2000. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Science 46 (2): 186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbanna, A. R. 2008. “Strategic Systems Implementation: Diffusion Through Drift.” Journal of Information Technology 23 (2): 89–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertman, S. 2002. “Participatory Planning and GIS: A PSS to Bridge the gap.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29 (February 2002): 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Geertman, S. 2006. “Potentials for Planning Support: A Planning-Conceptual Approach.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33 (6): 863–880.
   Google Scholar
• Geertman, S. 2013. “Planning Support: From Systems to Science.” Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers: urban design and planning, Vol. 166, (pp. 50–59).
   Google Scholar
• Geertman, S. 2017. “PSS: Beyond the Implementation gap.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 104: 70–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertman, S., and J. Stillwell. 2004. “Planning Support Systems: An Inventory of Current Practice.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 28 (4): 291–310.
   Google Scholar
• Geertman, S., and J. Stillwell. 2009. “Planning Support Systems: Content, Issues and Trends.” In Planning Support Systems Best Practice and New Methods, Vol. 95, edited by S. Geertman, and J. Stillwell, 1–26. Utrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Geertman, S., and J. Stillwell. 2020a. In Handbook of Planning Support Science, edited by S. Geertman, and J. Stillwell. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Geertman, S., and J. Stillwell. 2020b. “Planning Support Science: Developments and Challenges.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 0 (0): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Geertman, S., F. Toppen, and J. Stillwell. 2013. Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development, (Vol. 195), edited by S. Geertman, F. Toppen, and J. Stillwell. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Goodspeed, R. 2016. “Sketching and Learning: A Planning Support System Field Study.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 43 (3): 444–463.
   Google Scholar
• Goodspeed, R., and C. Hackel. 2019. “Lessons for Developing a Planning Support System Infrastructure: The Case of Southern California’s Scenario Planning Model.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 46 (4): 777–796.
   Google Scholar
• Holmström, J., and F. Stalder. 2001. “Drifting Technologies and Multi-Purpose Networks: The Case of the Swedish Cashcard.” Information and Organization 11 (3): 187–206.
   Google Scholar
• McEvoy, S., F. H. M. van de Ven, A. G. Santander, and J. H. Slinger. 2019. “The Influence of Context on the use and Added Value of Planning Support Systems in Workshops: An Exploratory Case Study of Climate Adaptation Planning in Guayaquil, Ecuador.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 77 (November 2018): 101353.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Infrastructure. National Urbanization Policy. 2015. Kigali, Government of Rwanda.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Natural Resources. 2017. Rwanda National Land Use Planning Guidelines. Kigali: Republic of Rwanda.
   Google Scholar
• Mutuku, B., L. Boerboom, and A. M. Madureira. 2019. “The Role of Planning Support Systems in National Policy Transfer and Policy Translation in Secondary Cities.” International Planning Studies 24 (0): 293–307.
   Google Scholar
• Nandhakumar, J., M. Rossi, and J. Talvinen. 2003. “Planning for ‘drift'?: Implementation Process of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems.” In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. (p. 10). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W., and D. Hofman. 1997. “An Improvisational Model for Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies.” Sloan Management Review 38 (2): 11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Oyeku, D. A. 2020. Embedding Planning Support Systems (PSS) in the Spatial Planning Process: The Case of the Spatial Development Framework (SDF) Methods in Rwanda [Master’s Thesis, University of Twente]. http://purl.utwente.nl/essays/85183.
   Google Scholar
• Pelzer, P. 2017. “Usefulness of Planning Support Systems: A Conceptual Framework and an Empirical Illustration.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 104: 84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelzer, P., and S. Geertman. 2014. “Planning Support Systems and Interdisciplinary Learning.” Planning Theory & Practice 15 (4): 527–542.
   Google Scholar
• Pelzer, P., S. Geertman, and R. van der Heijden. 2016. “A Comparison of the Perceived Added Value of PSS Applications in Group Settings.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 56: 25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelzer, P., S. Geertman, R. van der Heijden, and E. Rouwette. 2014. “The Added Value of Planning Support Systems: A Practitioner’s Perspective.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 48: 16–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, C., A. Bakelmun, S. N. Lieske, S. Glackin, G. Thomson, H. Shearer, H. Dia, and P. Newman. 2018. “Planning Support Systems for Smart Cities.” City, Culture and Society 12: 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of Rwanda. 2018. Governance and Decentralization Sector Strategic Plan (2018/19-2023/24). Kigali: Rwanda.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 1962. “New Product Adoption and Diffusion.” Journal of Consumer Research 2: 290–304.
   Google Scholar
• Rolland, K. H. 2000. “Challenging the Installed Base: Deploying a Large-Scale IS in a Global Organization.” ECIS 2000 proceedings (p. 192).
   Google Scholar
• Russo, P., R. Lanzilotti, M. F. Costabile, and C. Pettit. 2018a. “Towards Satisfying Practitioners in Using Planning Support Systems.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 67: 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, P., R. Lanzilotti, M. Francesca Costabile, and C. James Pettit. 2018b. “Adoption and use of Software in Land use Planning Practice: A Multiple-Country Study.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 34 (1): 57–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaliviero, M., L. Boerboom, M. Gibert, G. Spaliviero, and M. Bajaj. 2019. “The Spatial Development Framework to Facilitate Urban Management in Countries with Weak Planning Systems.” International Planning Studies 24 (0): 235–254.
   Google Scholar
• te Brömmelstroet, M. 2010. Making Planning Support Systems Matter: Improving the use of Planning Support Systems for Integrated Land use and Transport Strategy-Making. University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• te Brömmelstroet, M. 2013. “Performance of Planning Support Systems.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 41: 299–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• te Brömmelstroet, M. 2017. “PSS are More User-Friendly, but are They Also Increasingly Useful?” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 104: 96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Baalen, P., and P. van Fenema. 2005. “Strategies for Dealing with Drift During Implementation of ERP Systems.” Research in Management. Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Vonk, G. 2006. Improving Planning Support: The use of Planning Support Systems for Spatial Planning. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Vonk, G., and S. Geertman. 2008. “Improving the Adoption and use of Planning Support Systems in Practice.” Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 1: 153–173.
   Google Scholar
• Vonk, G., S. Geertman, and P. Schot. 2005. “Bottlenecks Blocking Widespread Usage of Planning Support Systems.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 37: 909–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonk, G., S. Geertman, and P. Schot. 2007a. “A SWOT Analysis of Planning Support Systems.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 39 (7): 1699–1714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonk, G., S. Geertman, and P. Schot. 2007b. “New Technologies Stuck in Old Hierarchies: The Diffusion of Geo-Information Technologies in Dutch Public Organizations.” Public Administration Review 67 (4): 745–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonk, G., and A. Ligtenberg. 2009. “Socio-Technical PSS Development to Improve Functionality and Usability-Sketch Planning Using a Maptable.” Landscape and Urban Planning 94 (3-4): 166–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar