Do Attractive People Get a Better Deal? An Experimental Study

References

• Aksoy, B., C. C. Eckel, and R. K. Wilson. 2018. “Can i Rely on You?” Games 9 (4): 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/g9040081
   Google Scholar
• Andreoni, J., and R. Petrie. 2008. “Beauty, Gender and Stereotypes: Evidence from Laboratory Experiments.” Journal of Economic Psychology 29 (1): 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, R., H. S. Ahn, and S. Leider. 2018. “Can Trustworthiness in a Supply Chain Be Signaled?” Management Science 64 (9): 3974–3994. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berggren, N., H. Jordahl, and P. Poutvaara. 2010. “The Looks of a Winner: Beauty and Electoral Success.” Journal of Public Economics 94 (1–2): 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berscheid, E., and E. Walster. 1974. “Physical Attractiveness.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 7 (1): 157–215.
   Google Scholar
• Bester, H., and W. Güth. 1998. “Is Altruism Evolutionarily Stable?” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 34 (2): 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(97)00060-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buell, R. W., T. Kim, and C. J. Tsay. 2017. “Creating Reciprocal Value through Operational Transparency.” Management Science 63 (6): 1673–1695. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cachon, G. P. 2003. “Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts.” Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science 11: 227–339.
   Google Scholar
• Cachon, G. P., and M. A. Lariviere. 2005. “Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations.” Management Science 51 (1): 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliskan-Demirag, O., Y. F. Chen, and J. Li. 2010. “Channel Coordination under Fairness Concerns and Nonlinear Demand.” European Journal of Operational Research 207 (3): 1321–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness, G., and E. Haruvy. 2002. “Altruism, Equity, and Reciprocity in a Gift-Exchange Experiment: An Encompassing Approach.” Games and Economic Behavior 40 (2): 203–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-8256(02)00006-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K. Y., J. Wang, and Y. Lang. 2022. “Coping with Digital Extortion: An Experimental Study of Benefit Appeals and Normative Appeals.” Management Science 68 (7): 5269–5286. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, R. K., and R. D. Babcock. 2002. “The Relative Importance of Facial Attractiveness and Gender in Hong Kong Selection Decisions.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 13 (1): 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190110092857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croson, R., K. Schultz, E. Siemsen, and M. L. Yeo. 2013. “Behavioral Operations: The State of the Field.” Journal of Operations Management 31 (1–2): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, T. H., J. S. Raju, and Z. J. Zhang. 2007. “Fairness and Channel Coordination.” Management Science 53 (8): 1303–1314. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion, K., E. Berscheid, and E. Walster. 1972. “What is Beautiful is Good.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24 (3): 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckel, C. C., and R. Petrie. 2011. “Face Value.” American Economic Review 101 (4): 1497–1513. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.4.1497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenbruch, A. B., R. L. Grillot, D. Maestripieri, and J. R. Roney. 2016. “Evidence of Partner Choice Heuristics in a One-Shot Bargaining Game.” Evolution and Human Behavior 37 (6): 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esslinger, J., S. Eckerd, L. Kaufmann, and C. Carter. 2019. “Who Cares? Supplier Reactions to Buyer Claims after Psychological Contract over‐Fulfillments.” Journal of Supply Chain Management 55 (4): 98–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauville, G., M. Luo, A. C. Muller Queiroz, J. N. Bailenson, and J. Hancock. 2021. “Zoom Exhaustion & Fatigue Scale.” Computers in Human Behavior Reports 4: 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100119
   Google Scholar
• Forbes Insight. 2009. “Business Meetings: The Case for Face-to-Face.” https://www.forbes.com/forbesinsights/Business_Meetings_FaceToFace/.
   Google Scholar
• Fruhen, L. S., C. D. Watkins, and B. C. Jones. 2015. “Perceptions of Facial Dominance, Trustworthiness and Attractiveness Predict Managerial Pay Awards in Experimental Tasks.” The Leadership Quarterly 26 (6): 1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gino, F., and G. Pisano. 2008. “Toward a Theory of Behavioral Operations.” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 10 (4): 676–691. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1070.0205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield, E., and S. Sprecher. 1986. Mirror, Mirror: The Importance of Looks in Everyday Life. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyes, A., and J. A. List. 2016. “Supply and Demand for Discrimination: Strategic Revelation of Own Characteristics in a Trust Game.” American Economic Review 106 (5): 319–323. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, J., B. Fan, S. Dai, and Q. Ma. 2017. “Beauty Premium: Event-Related Potentials Evidence of How Physical Attractiveness Matters in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending.” Neuroscience Letters 640: 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.01.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L. 2021. “Bumble Closes to Give 'Burnt-Out’ Staff a Week’s Break.” https://www.bbc.com/news/business-57562230
   Google Scholar
• Kanwisher, N., J. McDermott, and M. M. Chun. 1997. “The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception.” The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 17 (11): 4302–4311. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04302.1997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katok, E., T. Olsen, and V. Pavlov. 2014. “Wholesale Pricing under Mild and Privately Known Concerns for Fairness.” Production and Operations Management 23 (2): 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01388.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer, M., S. Minner, and L. N. Van Wassenhove. 2010. “Do Random Errors Explain Newsvendor Behavior?” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 12 (4): 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1100.0294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, Y., J. Su, and K. Y. Chen. 2023. Strategic Disposal or Strategic Inventory? Theory and Experiments. SUNY Oneonta, working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Laustsen, L. 2014. Decomposing the Relationship between Candidates’ Facial Appearance and Electoral Success. Political Behavior 36 (4): 777–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9253-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S., Y. W. Seo, and E. Siemsen. 2018. Running Behavioral Operations Experiments Using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Production and Operations Management 27 (5): 973–989. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leider, S., and W. S. Lovejoy. 2016. Bargaining in Supply Chains. Management Science 62 (10): 3039–3058. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, D. K. 1998. Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments. Review of Economic Dynamics 1 (3): 593–622. https://doi.org/10.1006/redy.1998.0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loch, C. H., K. Sengupta, and M. G. Ahmad. 2013. The Microevolution of Routines: How Problem Solving and Social Preferences Interact. Organization Science 24 (1): 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loch, C. H., and Y. Wu. 2008. Social Preferences and Supply Chain Performance: An Experimental Study. Management Science 54 (11): 1835–1849. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonati, S., B. F. Quiroga, C. Zehnder, and J. Antonakis. 2018. On Doing Relevant and Rigorous Experiments: Review and Recommendations. Journal of Operations Management 64 (1): 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2018.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Ma, D. S., J. Correll, and B. Wittenbrink. 2015. The Chicago Face Database: A Free Stimulus Set of Faces and Norming Data. Behavior Research Methods 47 (4): 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey, R. D., and T. R. Palfrey. 1995. Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games. Games and Economic Behavior 10 (1): 6–38. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Craven, K. M., and N. Kanwisher. 2000. Mental Imagery of Faces and Places Activates Corresponding Stimulus-Specific Brain Regions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 (6): 1013–1023. https://doi.org/10.1162/08989290051137549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özer, Ö., Y. Zheng, and Y. Ren. 2014. Trust, Trustworthiness, and Information Sharing in Supply Chains Bridging China and the United States. Management Science 60 (10): 2435–2460. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raihani, N. J., and S. Smith. 2015. Competitive Helping in Online Giving. Current Biology: CB 25 (9): 1183–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffle, B. J., and Z. E. Shtudiner. 2014. Are Good-Looking People More Employable? Management Science 61 (8): 1760–1776. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorsch, T., C. M. Wallenburg, and A. Wieland. 2017. The Human Factor in SCM: Introducing a Meta-Theory of Behavioral Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 47 (4): 238–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-10-2015-0268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solnick, S. J. 2001. Gender Differences in the Ultimatum Game. Economic Inquiry 39 (2): 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2001.tb00060.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solnick, S. J., and M. E. Schweitzer. 1999. The Influence of Physical Attractiveness and Gender on Ultimatum Game Decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 79 (3): 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starostyuk, L., K. Y. Chen, and E. L. Prater. 2023. Do Looks Matter in Supply Chain Contracting? An Experimental Study. Business Economics 58 (1): 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-023-00301-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart, J. E. 1980. Defendant’s Attractiveness as a Factor in the Outcome of Criminal Trials: An Observational Study 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 10 (4): 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00715.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, X. 2008. Bounded Rationality in Newsvendor Models. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 10 (4): 566–589. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1070.0200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A. 2012. The Social Perception of Faces. In S.T. Fiske, C.N. Macrae (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Cognition, 96–114. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Todorov, A. 2017. Face Value: The Irresistible Influence of First Impressions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., C. Y. Olivola, R. Dotsch, and P. Mende-Siedlecki. 2015. Social Attributions from Faces: Determinants, Consequences, Accuracy, and Functional Significance. Annual Review of Psychology 66 (1): 519–545. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science (New York, NY) 211 (4481): 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
   Google Scholar
• Urda, J., and C. H. Loch. 2013. Social Preferences and Emotions as Regulators of Behavior in Processes. Journal of Operations Management 31 (1–2): 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van't Wout, M., and A. G. Sanfey. 2008. Friend or Foe: The Effect of Implicit Trustworthiness Judgments in Social Decision-Making. Cognition 108 (3): 796–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, P. T., D. J. Bickford, and G. K. Leong. 1996. Configurations of Manufacturing Strategy, Business Strategy, Environment and Structure. Journal of Management 22 (4): 597–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. K., and C. C. Eckel. 2006. Judging a Book by Its Cover: Beauty and Expectations in the Trust Game. Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. D., K. Y. Chen, and Y. Lang. 2023. Learning under the Inventory Problem of Economic Order Quantity: A Behavioral Study. International Journal of Inventory Research. (Forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., and J. A. Niederhoff. 2014. Fairness in Selling to the Newsvendor. Production and Operations Management 23 (11): 2002–2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar