Political parties and parliamentary oversight committee seats: sharing and trading the costs

References

• Andeweg, R. B. (1997). Role specialisation or role switching? Dutch MPs between electorate and executive. In T. Saalfeld, & W. C. Müller (Eds.), Members of parliament in Western Europe: Roles and behaviour (pp. 110–128). Frank Cass and Company Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, H., Debus, M., & Dumont, P. (2011). Who gets what in coalition governments? Predictors of portfolio allocation in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 50(4), 441–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailer, S. (2011). People’s voice or information pool? The role of, and reasons for, parliamentary questions in the Swiss parliament. Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.595123
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, T., Müller, W. C., Strøm, K., & Blomgren, M. (2003). Democratic delegation and accountability: Cross-national patterns. In K. Strøm, W. C. Müller, & T. Bergman (Eds.), Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies (pp. 109–221). Oxford University press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, T., & Strøm, K. (2011). The madisonian turn. Political parties and parliamentary democracy in nordic Europe (Torbjörn Bergman and Kaare Strøm, Eds.). The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (1993). Legislative Leviathan. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (2005). Setting the agenda: Responsible party government in the US house of representatives. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damgaard, E. (1994). Parliamentary questions and control in Denmark. In M. Wiberg (Ed.), Parliamentary control in the Nordic countries: Forms of questioning and behavioural trends (pp. 44–76). The Finnish Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Damgaard, E. (2000). Parliament and government. In P. Esaiasson, & K. Heidar (Eds.), Beyond westminister and Congress: The Nordic experience (pp. 265–281). The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, P., & Heidar, K. (2000). Beyond westminister and Congress: The Nordic experience. The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, J. D. (1999). Electoral accountability and the control of politicians: Selecting good types versus sanctioning poor performance. In A. Przeworski, S. C. Stokes, & B. Manin (Eds.), Democracy, accountability, and representation (pp. 55–98). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, J. M., Saalfeld, T., & Schwemmer, C. (2022). The politics of select committee assignments in the British house of commons. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 47(2), 329–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frech, E., & Sieberer, U. (2023). Coordination committees and legislative agenda-setting power in 31 European parliaments. Historical Social Research, 48(3), 189–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C. (2010). Bringing parties into parliament: The development of parliamentary activities in Western Europe. Party Politics, 16(3), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809341057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagevi, M. (2000). Nordic light on committee assignments. In P. Esaiasson, & K. Heidar (Eds.), Beyond westminister and Congress: The Nordic experience (pp. 237–261). The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. E. (2010). Committee assignment politics in the danish folketing. Scandinavian Political Studies, 33(4), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2010.00256.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. E. (2019). Distributing chairs and seats in committees: A parliamentary perspective. Parliamentary Affairs, 72(1), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsy008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidar, K. (1997). Roles, structures and behaviour: Norwegian parliamentarians in the nineties. In T. Saalfeld, & W. C. Müller (Eds.), Members of parliament in Western Europe: Roles and behaviour (pp. 91–110). Frank Cass and Company Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Heidar, K. (2000). Parliamentary party groups. In P. Esaiasson, & K. Heidar (Eds.), Beyond westminister and Congress: The Nordic experience (pp. 183–209). The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, T. K. (2000). Party cohesion. In P. Esaiasson, & K. Heidar (Eds.), Beyond westminister and Congress: The Nordic experience (pp. 210–237). The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kiewiet, D. R., & McCubbins, M. (1991). The logic of delegation. Congressional parties and the appropriations process. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korff, G. (2018). The parliamentary public accounts committees in the Nordic Countries and regions. In R. Stapenhurst, & B. Larson (Eds.), Beyond westminister: A global perspective on public governance and accounts (pp. 40–58). The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Krehbiel, K. (1991). Are congressional committees composed of preference outliers? American Political Science Review, 84(1), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupia, A. (2003). Delegation and Its perils. In T. Strøm, K. Müller, & W. Bergman (Eds.), Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies (pp. 33–55). Oxford University press.
   Google Scholar
• Maor, M. (1999). Electoral competition and the oversight game: A transaction cost approach and the Norwegian experience. European Journal of Political Research, 28, 165–179.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. (2011). Parliamentary questions, the behaviour of legislators, and the function of legislatures an introduction. Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2011.595120
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. (2018). Committees. In S. Martin, T. Saalfeld, & K. Strøm (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of legislative studies (pp. 352–371). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattson, I., & Strøm, K. (1995). Parliamentary committees. In H. Döring (Ed.), Parliaments and majority rule in Western Europe (pp. 249–307). Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, D. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCubbins, M. D., & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, W. C. (2000). Political parties in parliamentary democracies: Making delegation and accountability work. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 309–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, W. C., & Sieberer, U. (2014). Procedure and rules in legislatures. In S. Martin, T. Saalfeld, & K. W. Strøm (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of legislative studies (pp. 311–332). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, W. C., & Strøm, K. (2004). Servants or oligarchs? Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning, 45(2), 421–458. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-291X-2004-02-15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, P. (2019). Post-legislative scrutiny in the UK parliament: Adding value. Journal of Legislative Studies, 25(3), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2019.1633778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patzelt, W. J. (1997). German MPs and their roles. In T. Saalfeld, & W. C. Müller (Eds.), Members of parliament in Western Europe: Roles and behaviour (pp. 55–79). Frank Cass and Company Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. H. (2010). How intra-party power relations affect the coalition behaviour of political parties. Party Politics, 16(6), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809345855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. H. (2012). What do parties want? Policy versus office. West European Politics, 35(4), 896–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.682350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelizzo, R., & Stapenhurst, F. (2008). Public accounts committees. In R. Staphenhurst, R. Pelizzo, D. Olson, & L. Trapp (Eds.), Legislative oversight and budgeting. A world perspective (pp. 117–128). The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, B. E. (1994). Questiontime in the Norwegian storting - theoretical and empirical considerations. In M. Wiberg (Ed.), Parliamentary control in the Nordic Countries: Forms of questioning and behavioural trends (pp. 247–275). The Finnish Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, B. E. (2011). Why minority governments? Executive-legislative relations in the Nordic Countries. In T. Persson, & M. Wiberg (Eds.), Parliamentary government in the Nordic countries at a crossroads (pp. 41–63). Santérus Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raunio, T. (2021). Commitees in the Finnish eduskunta. Cross-party cooperation and legislative scrutiny behind closed doors. In S. T. Siefken & H. Rommetvedt (Eds.), Parliamentary committees in the policy process (pp. 79–97). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetvedt, H. (2021). Chapter 13: Norwegian parliamentary committees: Split and sidelined in the policy process. In S. T. Siefken, & H. Rommetvedt (Eds.), Parliamentary committees in the policy process. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, T. (2000). Members of parliament and governments in Western Europe: Agency relations and problems of oversight. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 353–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play - actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sieberer, U. (2006). Party unity in parliamentary democracies: A comparative analysis. Journal of Legislative Studies, 12(2), 150–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330600739413
   Google Scholar
• Sieberer, U. (2011). The institutional power of western European parliaments: A multidimensional analysis. West European Politics, 34(4), 731–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.572389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siefken, S., & Rommetvedt, H. (2021). Parliamentary Committees in the Policy Process. eds. Sven Siefken and Hilmar Rommetvedt. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, K. (1990a). A behavioral theory of competitive political parties. American Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 565–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, K. (1990b). Minority government and majority rule. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, K. (2000). Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 261–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. (2014). Evidence taking under the microscope: How has oral evidence affected the scrutiny of legislation in house of commons committees? British Politics, 9(4), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2014.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. (2018). Understanding third parties at Westminster: The SNP in the 2015 parliament. Politics, 38(4), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395717740585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L., & Pearson, M. (2023). Enter parliament but never become part of it’: How have the greens in the United Kingdom approached opposition? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 25(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481211069791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players - How political institutions work. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, R. K. (1986). The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy, 6(4), 371–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00004219
   Google Scholar
• West, H. (2018). “MP firefighting: When do MPs hold government accountable?” Aarhus University, Politicas ph.d. serie.
   Google Scholar
• West, H. (2020). MP firefighting and the partisan logic. Scandinavian Political Studies, 43(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, H. (2021). MP firefighting and the institutional logic. Journal of Legislative Studies, 27(3), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2020.1818927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, H. (2023). Parliamentary committees and Ex-post oversight: Institutional options and design. Parliamentary Affairs, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsad015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiberg, M. (1994). Parliamentary control in the Nordic countries. Forms of questioning and behavioural trends (Matti Wiberg, Ed.). The Finnish Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Winzen, T. (2013). European integration and national parliamentary oversight institutions. European Union Politics, 14(2), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116512467088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar