128
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Parliamentary standards under attack: an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the Westminster Parliament

References

  • Allington, N. F. B., & Peele, G. (2010). Moats, duck houses and bath plugs: Members of parliament, the expenses scandal and the use of web sites. Parliamentary Affairs, 63(3), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsq010
  • Beatty, A. (2019). Emotional worlds. Beyond an anthropology of emotion. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bevir, M. (2013). Theory of governance. University of California Press.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago Press.
  • Chang, W. Y., & Glynos, J. (2011). Ideology and politics in the popular press: The case of the 2009 UK MPs’ expenses scandal. In L. Dahlberg, & S. Phelan (Eds.), Discourse theory and critical media politics (pp. 106–127). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Crewe, E. (2021). The anthropology of parliaments. Entanglements in democratic politics. Routledge.
  • Crewe, E., & Walker, A. (2019). An extraordinary scandal. The Westminster expenses crisis and why it still matters. Haus Publishing.
  • Durrant, T., & Haddon, C. (2022). Reinforcing ethical standards in government. Institute of Government. Retrieved 17 March 2023. https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2022-03/apo-nid317011.pdf.
  • Elias, N. (1987). Involvement and detachment. Basil Blackwell.
  • Elias, N. (1994). The civilizing process. Blackwell Publishing.
  • Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact (Fred Bradley and Thaddeus J. Trenn, Thaddeus J. Trenn and Robert K. Merton “Foreword” by Thomas S. Kuhn, Eds & Trans.). Chicago University Press. (Original work published 1935).
  • Geddes, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2018). Towards an interpretive parliamentary studies. In J. Brichzin, D. Krichewsky, L. Ringel, & J. Schank (Eds.), Soziologie der Parlamente, Politische Soziologie (pp. 87–107). Springer VS.
  • Girard, R. (1986). The scapegoat. John Hopkins University Press.
  • Hansard Society. (2022). Compendium of legislative standards for delegating powers in primary legislation. Retrieved 17 March 2023. https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/publications/reports/compendium-of-legislative-standards-for-delegating-powers-in-primary.
  • Holland, A. A. C. (2016). Forbearance. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000083
  • House of Commons. (2023). Matter referred on 21 April 2022 (conduct of Rt Hon Boris Johnson): Final Report. Fifth Report of Session 2022-23. Committee of Privileges, 15th June 2023, HC 564.
  • Kelso, A. (2009). Parliament on its knees: MPs’ expenses and the crisis of transparency at Westminster. The Political Quarterly, 80(3), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.02005.x
  • Little, G., & Stopforth, D. (2013). The legislative origins of the MPs’ expenses scandal. The Modern Law Review, 76(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12003
  • Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. (2005). Anthropology and development: Understanding contemporary social change. Zed.
  • Rai, S. (2014). Political performance: A framework for analysing democratic politics. Political Studies, 65(5), 1179–1197.
  • Russell, M. (2011). “Never allow a crisis to go to waste”: The Wright Committee reforms to strengthen the House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs, 64(4), 585–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsr026
  • White, H. (2022). Held in contempt. What’s wrong with the House of Commons? Manchester University Press.