On making one’s way through chess

References

• Adamson, G. (2007). Thinking through craft. Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Araújo, D., & Davids, K. (2011). What is actually acquired during skill acquisition? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18, 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, C., Chemero, T., & Hall, J. (2019). What the jeweller’s hand tells the jewellers brain: Tool use, creativity and embodied cognition. Philosophy & Technology, 32(2), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0292-0
   Google Scholar
• Bergson, H. (1911). Creative evolution. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bilalic, M., McLeod, P., & Gobet, F. (2007). Does chess need intelligence? A study with young chess players. Intelligence, 35(5), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binet, A. (1984). Psychologie des grands calculateurs et joueurs d’échecs. Hachette (Original work published 1894).
   Google Scholar
• Cage, J. (2011). Silence: lectures and writings by John Cage (50th anniversary ed.). Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland, A. A. (1907). The psychology of chess and of learning to play it. The American Journal of Psychology, 18(3), 269–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412592
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A. P. (2015). Canonical affordances and creative agency. In V. P. Glâveanu, A. Gillespie, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Rethinking creativity: Contributions from social and cultural psychology (cultural dynamics of social representation) (pp. 45–57). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Groot, A. (1978). Thought and choice in chess (2nd ed.). De Gruyter (Original work published 1965).
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1989). Qu’est-ce qu’un dispositif? In F. Ewald (Ed.), Michel Foucault philosophe (pp. 185–195). Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (1993). Memoirs of the blind: The self-portrait and other ruins. P. -A. Brault and M. Nass (trans.). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (2005). Art as experience. Perigee (Original work published 1934).
   Google Scholar
• Dormer, P. (1994). The art of the maker. Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Fajen, B. (2007). Affordance-based control of visually guided action. Ecological Psychology, 19(4), 383–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407410701557877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H., & de Groot, A. (1981). Otto Selz: His contribution to psychology. Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. J. (1988). Exploratory behaviour in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 39(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.39.020188.000245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception. Mifflin and Company (Original work published 1979).
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (2020). Notes on affordances Part V: The affordances of the environment. In E. Reed & R. Jones (Eds.), Reasons for realism: The selected essays of James J. Gibson (pp. 408–410). Routledge (Original work published 1972).
   Google Scholar
• Glâveanu, V. P. (2014). Theorising context in psychology: The case of creativity. Theory & Psychology, 24(3), 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354314529851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobet, F. (2019). Psychology of chess. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gobet, F., & Charness, N. (2018). Expertise in chess. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt, & A. M. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 597–615). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2012). The foundations of ecological psychology. In S. Clayton (Ed.), The oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 11–40). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2013). Wayfinding, navigation, and environmental cognition from a naturalist’s stance. In D. Waller & L. Nadel (Eds.), Handbook of spatial cognition (pp. 265–294). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hofsten, C. V., & Lee, D. (1985). Dialogue on perception and action. In W. Warren & R. Shaw (Eds.), Persistence and change: Proceedings of the first international conference on event perception (pp. 231–242). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Holding, D. H. (1992). Theories of chess skill. Psychological Research, 54(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01359218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2017). Anthropology and/as education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kugler, P. N., & Turvey, M. T. (1987). Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masschelein, J. (2010). E-ducating the gaze: The idea of a poor pedagogy. Ethics and Education, 5(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449641003590621
   Google Scholar
• Montero, B., & Evans, C. (2011). Intuitions without concepts lose the game: Mindedness in the art of chess. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9192-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Noë, A. (2015). Strange tools: Art and human nature. Hill & Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, T., Bril, B., & Rein, R. (2010). How do stone knappers predict and control the outcome of flaking? Implications for understanding early stone tool technology. Journal of Human Evolution, 59(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, E. (1996a). Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, E. (1996b). The necessity of experience. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld, E. (2022). Change-ability for a world in flux. Adaptive Behavior, 30(6), 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123221133869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsperson. Penguin (Allen Lane).
   Google Scholar
• Trasmundi, S. B., Baggs, E., Toro, J., & Steffensen, S. V. (2023). Expertise in non-well-defined task domains: The case of reading. Social Epistemology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2266690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, L., & Rietveld, E. (2021). Situated anticipation. Synthese, 198(1), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02013-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, L., & Withagen, R. (2014). The horizontal worldview: A Wittgensteinian attitude towards scientific psychology. Theory & Psychology, 24(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354313517415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, L., & Withagen, R. (2016). Temporalizing agency: Moving beyond on- and offline cognition. Theory & Psychology, 26(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315596080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1966). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press (Original work published 1944).
   Google Scholar
• Warren, W. (2006). The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological Review, 113(2), 358–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withagen, R., & van der Kamp, J. (2018). An ecological approach to creativity in making. New Ideas in Psychology, 49, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, C. T., Araújo, D., & Davids, K. (2023). On a corresponsive sport science. Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01981-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, C. T., & Davids, K. (2022). Thinking through making and doing: Sport science as an art of inquiry. Sport, Education and Society, 28(5), 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2022.2054792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, C. T., & Davids, K. (2023). Sport scientists in-becoming: From fulfilling one’s potential to finding our way along. Sport, Education and Society, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2022.2163231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar