Do urban renewal programs make suburbs safer? A fine-grained GIS and space syntax study of an urban renewal project in the city of Toulouse

References

• Alford, V. 1996. “Crime and Space in the Inner City.” Urban Design Studies 2 (1): 45–76.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, J. M., R. Andrews, and V. Jorda. 2019. “Do Neighbourhood Renewal Programs Reduce Crime Rates?” Journal of Urban Economics 110:51–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2019.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belmessous, H. 2011. Opération banlieues: comment l’Etat prépare la guerre urbaine dans les cités françaises. Paris: Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Berghauser, M. Y., and P. Haupt. 2009. “Space, Density and Urban Form”. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Bourret, J. 2019. “La « tranquillité sociale » : la prise en compte de ses enjeux dans les politiques de rénovation urbaine L’exemple de Toulouse”. PhD thesis, Jean Jaures University, 661.
   Google Scholar
• Brehny, M. 1997. “Urban Compaction: Feasible and Acceptable?” Cities 14 (4): 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00005-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccato, V. 2016. “Public Space and the Situational Conditions of Crime and Fear.” International Criminal Justice Review 26 (2): 69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Ceccato, V. 2020. “The Circumstances of Crime and Fear in Public Places.” In Crime and Fear in Public Places: Towards Safe, Inclusive and Sustainable Cities, edited by Vania Ceccato and Mahesh K. Nalla, 16–37. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• CGD (Gendarmerie Nationale Toulouse Mirail). 2019. “List of Crimes and Offenses.” Accessed September 15, 2021. https://crimes.politologue.com/gendarmerie-31-cgd-toulouse-mirail.uO9jKx8ujXfmNEnrNEEGfXjUSnYfSv0.
   Google Scholar
• Chareyron, S., F. Goffette-Nagot, and L. Letrouit. 2022. “Externalities from Urban Renewal: Evidence from a French Program.” Regional science and urban economics 95:103789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2022.103789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chataway, M., T. Hart, R. Coomber, and C. Bond. 2017. “The Geography of Crime Fear: A Pilot Study Exploring Event-Based Perceptions of Risk Using Mobile Technology.” Applied Geography 86:300–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornish, D., and R. V. Clarke. 2002. “Crime As a Rational Choice.” In Criminological Theories: Bridging the Past to the Future, edited by Cote Suzette, 291–297. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cozens, P. M. 2011. “Urban Planning and Environmental Criminology: Towards a New Perspective for Safer Cities.” Planning Practice & Research 26 (4): 481–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2011.582357.
   Google Scholar
• Csardi, G., and T. Nepusz. 2006. “The Igraph Software Package for Complex Network Research.” InterJournal Complex Systems 1695. https://igraph.org.
   Google Scholar
• DepthmapX Development Team. 2020. “DepthmapX (V.0.8.0)”. https://github.com/SpaceGroupUCL/depthmapX/.
   Google Scholar
• Desyllas, J., and E. Duxbury. 2001. “Axial Maps and Visibility Graph Analysis.” In 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, 21–13. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Doran, B. J., and M. B. Burgess. 2011. Putting Fear of Crime on the Map: Investigating Perceptions of Crime Using Geographic Information Systems. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Eck, J. E. 1994. “Drug markets and drug places: A case-control study of the spatial structure of illicit drug dealing.” PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
   Google Scholar
• Eck, J. E. 1995. “A General Model of the Geography of Illicit Retail Marketplaces.” Crime and Place 4:67–93.
   Google Scholar
• Férial, D., C. Noyé, S. Doucet, D. Le François, and F. Valegeas. 2010. Rénovation, Trajectoire et Territoires: Quels Effets Des Mobilités Sur Les Recompositions Résidentielles et Sociales Locales?. PUCA, IUP-LAB’URBA, Université Paris-Est-Créteil.
   Google Scholar
• Filosofi (Fichier localisé social et fiscal). 2015. “Données carroyées, revenus, pauvreté et niveau de vie” [Social and fiscal localized file : Gridded data, income, poverty and living standards]. Accessed February 6, 2022. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/4176290?sommaire=4176305.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B., and J. L. Nasar. 1995. “Fear Spots in Relation to Microlevel Physical Cues: Exploring the Overlooked.” The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 32 (2): 214–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. 1977. “A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness.” Sociometry 40 (1): 35–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. 2001. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Copenhagen: Arkitektens Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• German, S., G. Metternicht, S. Laffan, and S. Hawken. 2022. “Intelligent Spatial Technologies for Gender Inclusive Urban Environments in Today’s Smart Cities”. In Intelligent Environments Advanced Systems for a Healthy Planet, edited by P. Droege, 1–38. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://www.elsevier.com/books/intelligent-environments/droege/978-0-12-820247-0.
   Google Scholar
• Glas, I., G. Engbersen, and E. Snel. 2019. “The Street Level and Beyond: The Impact of Ethnic Diversity on Neighborhood Cohesion and Fear of Crime Among Dutch Natives and Nonnatives.” Journal of Urban Affairs 41 (6): 737–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1533379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godillon, S. 2012. “La rénovation urbaine comme occasion de réduire les inégalités face à la sécurité des déplacements. Une comparaison franco-allemande. Territoire en mouvement.” Revue de géographie et aménagement 13:163–176. https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.1639.
   Google Scholar
• Gosselin, C. 2015. Urban Renewal and the “Defensible Space” Model: The Growing Impact of Security. Paris: IAU-IDF Metro politics.Eu. Accessed November 15, 2022. https://metropolitics.org/IMG/pdf/met-gosselin-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Guyon, N. 2016. Etude des effets de la rénovation urbaine sur l’évolution du bâti et du peuplement dans les quartiers ciblés entre 2004 et 2013. Research Report, Singapore: Sciences Po and National university of Singapour, 131. Accessed January 16, 2023. https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03613519.
   Google Scholar
• Hacar, Ö., F. G. Öztürk, and S. Bilgi. 2020. “Evaluation of the Space Syntax Measures Affecting Pedestrian Density Through Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9 (10): 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9100589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawken, S., S. Z. Leao, O. Gudes, P. Izadpanahi, K. Viswanath, and C. Petit. 2020. “Safer Cities for Women: Global and Local Innovations with Open Data and Civic Technology.” In Open Cities: Open Data Collaborative Cities in the Information Era, edited by S. Hawken, H. Han, and C. Petit, 85–105. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6605-5_4.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 1988. “Against enclosure.” In Rehumanising Housing, edited by T. Markus and T. Wooley, 63–85. London: Butterworths &Co. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 1996. Space Is the Machine. Cambridge: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 2004. “Can Streets Be Made Safe?” Urban Design International 9 (1): 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000079.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., A. Penn, T. G. Julienne Hanson, and J. Xu. 1993. “Natural Movement: Or, Configuration and Attraction in Urban Pedestrian Movement.” Environment & Planning: B, Planning & Design 20 (1): 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., and J. Hanson. 1984. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., and S. Shu. 2000. “Crime and Urban Layout: The Need for Evidence.” Key Issues in Crime Prevention, Crime Reduction and Community Safety 224:6–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., and S. Iida. 2005. “Network Effects and Psychological Effects: A Theory of Urban Movement.” In International Symposium on Space Syntax, 553–564. Delft: TU Delft.
   Google Scholar
• INSEE (Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques). 2017. “National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies.” https://www.insee.fr/fr/information/4467366.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Jaillet-Roman, M.-C., and M. Zendjebil. 2006. “Le Mirail: un projet de « quasi-ville nouvelle » au destin de grand ensemble.” Histoire urbaine 3:85–98. https://doi.org/10.3917/rhu.017.0085.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobi, Á., and A. Podör. 2020. “GIS-Based Statistical Analysis of Detecting Fear of Crime with Digital Sketch Maps: A Hungarian Multicity Study.” International Journal of Geo-Information 9 (04): 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9040229.
   Google Scholar
• Kawachi, I., B. P. Kennedy, and R. G. Wilkinson. 1999. “Crime: Social Disorganization and Relative Deprivation.” Social Science & Medicine 48 (6): 719–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00400-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipfer, S. 2015. “Neocolonial Urbanism? La Rénovation Urbaine in Paris.” Antipode 48 (3). https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchen, T., and R. H. Schneider. 2007. Crime Prevention and the Built Environment. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203098813.
   Google Scholar
• Laouar, D., S. Mazouz, and J. Teller. 2019. “L’accessibilité spatiale comme indice de fragmentation urbaine dans les villes coloniales. Le cas de la ville d’Annaba”. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.31539.
   Google Scholar
• Lê, S., J. Josse, and F. Husson. 2008. “FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis.” Journal of Statistical Software 25 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévy-Vroelant, C. 2007. “Urban Renewal in France.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 20 (2): 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610701502222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAvay, H., and G. Verdugo. 2021. “Income Inequality and Segregation in the Paris Metro Area (1990–2015).” In Urban Socio-Economic Segregation and Income Inequality, edited by M. Van Ham, T. Tammaru, R. Ubarevičienė, and H. Janssen, 329–345. Cham Switzerland: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64569-4.
   Google Scholar
• McCord, E. S., and J. H. Ratcliffe. 2007. “A Micro-Spatial Analysis of the Demographic and Criminogenic Environment of Drug Markets in Philadelphia.” The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 40 (1): 43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, O. 1972. Defensible Space, Crime Prevention Through Urban Design. New York: The Macmillan company.
   Google Scholar
• Pánek, J. 2018. “Emotional Maps: Participatory Crowdsourcing of Citizens Perceptions of Their Urban Environment.” Cartographic Perspectives 91:19–27. https://doi.org/10.14714/CP91.1419.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, A., B. Hillier, D. Banister, and J. Xu. 1998. “Configurational Modelling of Urban Movement Network.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25:59–84. https://doi.org/10.1068/b250059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, K. E., and M. Pearl. 2001. “Multilevel Analyses of Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Context and Health Outcomes: A Critical Review.” Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 55 (2): 111–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QGIS Development Team 2018. “QGIS Geographic Information System.” Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing”. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ratti, C. 2004. “Urban Texture and Space Syntax: Some Inconsistencies.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31 (4): 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengert, G., J. Ratcliffe, and S. Chakravorty. 2005. Policing Illegal Drug Markets: Geographic Approaches to Crime Reduction. NY: Criminal Justice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P., and H. Sykes. 1999. Urban Regeneration: a Handbook. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roncek, D. W. 1975. “Density and Crime: A Methodological Critique.” The American Behavioral Scientist 18 (6): 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427501800608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuman, T. 1987. “Participation, Empowerment, and Urbanism: Design and Politics in the Revitalization of French Social Housing.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 4 (4): 349–359. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43028863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarkhanyan, L. 2015. “Urban Design and Drug Crime: Uncovering the Spatial Logic of Drug Crime in Relation to the Urban Street Network and Land use Mosaic in London.” London: UCL.
   Google Scholar
• Terrin, J.-J. 2008. “A Few Factors in Understanding French Town Planning.” Spatial Research and Planning 66 (2): 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03183126.
   Google Scholar
• Tuppen, J., and P. Mingret. 1986. “Suburban Malaise in French Cities: The Quest for a Solution.” The Town Planning Review 57 (2): 187–201. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.57.2.x1u475528024r546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A. 2004. Depthmap 4: A Researcher’s Handbook. London: Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, University College London. Accessed September 30, 2022. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/2651.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A., M. Doxa, D. O’Sullivan, and A. Penn. 2001. “From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space.” Environment & Planning: B, Planning & Design 28 (1): 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Nes, A., and C. Yamu. 2022. Introduction to Space Syntax in Urban Studies. Delft: Springer. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/50404.
   Google Scholar
• Watt, P., and P. Smets. 2017. Social Housing and Urban Renewal: A Cross-National Perspective. UK: Emerald Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S. 2013. Planning for Sustainability: Creating Livable, Equitable and Ecological Communities. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203134559.
   Google Scholar