Revisiting façade design and its contribution to the urban experience in the 21st century

References

• Abdelmonem, M. G. 2022. “Fear in Disguise: Defensive Architecture and façade Permeability in Shaping the Urban Experience of Belfast’s Public Spaces.” ARQ: Architectural Research Quarterly 26 (2): 130–152. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135522000392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. 2013. “Values in Planning and Design: A Process Perspective on Ethics in Forming the Built Environment.” In Ethics, Design and Planning of the Built Environment, edited by C. Basta and S. Moroni, 3–22. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Appleyard, B., and D. Appleyard. 2021. Livable Streets 2.0. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Araabi, H. F., H. Hickman, and K. McClymont. 2022. “Introduction: Planning in the Name of Beauty.” Planning Theory & Practice 23 (4): 602–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2022.2113613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. 2017. “Can We Extend Design Governance to the Big Urban Design Decisions?” Journal of Urban Design 22 (1): 37–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.1274537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, J., and B. W. Blaesser. 2017. Reinventing Development Regulations. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, S., and H. Nagendra. 2020. “The Street As Workspace: Assessing Street vendors’ Rights to Trees in Hyderabad, India.” Landscape and Urban Planning 199:103818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berleant, A. 2005. Aesthetics and Environment, Theme and Variations. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bhan, G. 2009. ““This Is No Longer the City I Once knew”. Evictions, the Urban Poor and the Right to the City in Millennial Delhi.” Environment & Urbanization 21 (1): 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247809103009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddulph, M. 2022. “Beauty Back in Place: The Place of Aesthetics and Beauty in Urban Design Thinking and Practice.” Planning Theory & Practice 23 (4): 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2022.2113613.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broudehoux, A. M. 2001. “Image Making, City Marketing, and the Aesthetization of Social Inequality in Rio de Janeiro.” In Consuming Tradition, Manufacturing Heritage. Global Norms and Urban Forms in the Age of Tourism, edited by N. AlSayyad, 273–297. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calvillo Cortés, A. B., and L. E. Falcón Morales. 2016. “Emotions and the Urban Lighting Environment: A Cross-Cultural Comparison.” SAGE Open 6 (1): 2158244016629708. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016629708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campo Baeza, A. 2016. Varia Architectonica. Madrid: Mairea Libros.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. 2009. “Design Coding and the Creative, Market and Regulatory Tyrannies of Practice.” Urban Studies 46 (12): 2643–2667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009344226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., S. Marshall, and Q. Stevens. 2006. “Design Codes: Their Use and Potential.” Progress in Planning 65:209–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2006.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clammer, J. 2019. Cultural Rights and Justice. Sustainable Development, the Arts and the Body. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Colomb, C. 2007. “Unpacking New labour’s ‘Urban Renaissance’ Agenda: Towards a Socially Sustainable Reurbanization of British Cities?” Planning, Practice & Research 22 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701455249.
   Google Scholar
• Cuff, D. 2023. Architectures of Spatial Justice. Arnhem: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, H. 2006. The Culture of Building. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Degen, M. M. 2008. Sensing Cities. Regenerating Public Life in Barcelona and Manchester. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Degen, M. M., and G. Rose. 2012. “The Sensory Experiencing of Urban Design: The Role of Walking and Perceptual Memory.” Urban Studies 49 (15): 3271–3287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012440463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degen, M., G. Rose, and B. Basdas. 2010. “Bodies and Everyday Practices in Designed Urban Environments.” Science Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Science and Technology Studies 23 (2): 60–76. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55253.
   Google Scholar
• Di Carlo, G. 2005. “Architecture’s Public.” In Architecture and Participation, edited by P. B. Jones, D. Petrescu, and J. Till, 3–18. Oxon: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K. 2008. Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elbaz, A., and N. Alfasi. 2024. “What About Beauty in Planning Theory and Practice?” Journal of Planning Literature 39 (1): 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122231187574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elinoff, E. 2016. “A House Is More Than a House: Aesthetic Politics in a Northeastern Thai Railway Settlement.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 22 (3): 610–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. 2002. “The New Urbanism: Critiques and Rebuttals.” Journal of Urban Design 7 (3): 261–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357480022000039330.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., and O. Clemente. 2013. Measuring Urban Design. Metrics for Livable Places. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fabbri, K., and J. Gaspari. 2021. “A Replicable Methodology to Evaluate Passive Façade Performance with SMA During the Architectural Design Process: A Case Study Application.” Energies 14 (19): 6231. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, K. A. 1984. “Exorcising the Ghost of Physical Determinism.” Environment and Behavior 16 (4): 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916584164001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garde, A. 2020. “New Urbanism: Past, Present, and Future.” Urban Planning 5 (4): 453–463. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. 2011. Life Between Buildings. Using Public Space. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, J., L. J. Kaefer, and S. Reigstad. 2006. “Close Encounters with Buildings.” Urban Design International 11:29–47. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000162.
   Google Scholar
• Glazer, N., and M. Lilla. 2016. “Introduction.” In The Public Face of Architecture. Civil Culture and Public Spaces, edited by N. Glazer and M. Lilla, ix–xvi. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2005. “Modernity - an Incomplete Project.” In Contemporary Sociological Thought. Themes and Theories, edited by S. P. Hier, 163–174. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, A., and C. Julian. 2015. A Community Right to Beauty. London: ResPublicTrust.
   Google Scholar
• Hashemi, M. 2019. “Embedded Enclaves: Cultural Mimicry and Urban Social Exclusion in Iran.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 43 (5): 914–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemani, S., A. K. Das, and A. Chowdhury. 2016. “Influence of Urban Forms on Social Sustainability: A Case of Guwahati, Assam.” Urban Design International 22 (2): 168–194. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-016-0012-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, J. B., and E. C. Anderson. 2020. “The Impact of Urban façade Quality on Affective Feelings.” Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research 14 (2): 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/arch-07-2019-0181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie, R. 2007. “The Interrelationships Between Building Regulations and architects’ Practices.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34 (5): 925–943. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie, R., and E. Street. 2009. “Regulating Design: The Practices of Architecture, Governance and Control.” Urban Studies 46 (12): 2507–2518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009346068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie, R., and E. Street. 2011. Architectural Design and Regulation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, R. 2000. “The Urban Picturesque: An Aesthetic Experience of Urban Pedestrian Places.” Journal of Urban Design 5 (2): 145–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/713683961.
   Google Scholar
• Jabareen, Y., and O. Zilberman. 2017. “Sidestepping Physical Determinism in Planning: The Role of Compactness, Design, and Social Perceptions in Shaping Sense of Community.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 37 (1): 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16636940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. B. 1993. Great Streets. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Julier, G. 2005. “Urban Designscapes and the Production of Aesthetic Consent.” Urban Studies 42 (5/6): 869–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500107474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimnia, E., and T. Haas. 2020. “Appropriation of Public Space: A Dialectical Approach in Designing Publicness.” In Companion to Public Space, edited by V. Mehta and D. Palazzo, 35–45. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klaufus, C. 2006. “Globalization in Residential Architecture in Cuenca, Ecuador: Social and Cultural Diversification of Architects and Their Clients.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24 (1): 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1068/d0103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaufus, C. 2012. Urban Residence: Housing and Social Transformations in Globalizing Ecuador. Amsterdam: Berghahn Books and CEDLA.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, P. L. 2011. Cities and Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Korman, R. 2022. The Architecture of the Facade. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, J., and W. Moleski. 2010. Functionalism Revisited. Architectural Theory and Practice and the Behavioral Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, S. 2022. “Urban Experience As Aesthetic Compromise.” In Imperfectionist Aesthetics in Art and Everyday Life, edited by P. Cheyne, 363–374. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1960. The Image of the City. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1972. What Time Is This Place? Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Z. 2023. “Deep Exploration of Street View Features for Identifying Urban Vitality: A Case Study of Qingdao City.” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 123:103476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matusiak, B. S. 2013. “Glare from a Translucent façade, Evaluation with an Experimental Method.” Solar Energy 97:230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, V. 2007. “Lively Streets. Determining Environmental Characteristics to Support Social Behavior.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 27 (2): 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X07307947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, V. 2009. “Look Closely and You Will See, Listen Carefully and You Will Hear: Urban Design and the Social Interaction on Streets.” Journal of Urban Design 14 (1): 29–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802452658.
   Google Scholar
• Miró Quesada Garland, L. 1994. Introducción a la teoría del diseño arquitectónico. Lima: Editorial Realizaciones Graficas Especializadas EIRL.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. 1998. “Making a City: Urbanity, Vitality and Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 3 (1): 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, F. 2010. “Els paisatges del transumer. L’ordre visual del consum en trànsit.” Enrahonar An International Journal of Theoretical and Practical Reason 45:107–121. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/enrahonar.223.
   Google Scholar
• Netto, V. M. 2017. The Social Fabric of Cities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Netto, V. M., J. C. Vargas, and R. T. de Saboya. 2019. “The Social Effects of Architecture. Built Form and Social Sustainability.” In Urban Social Sustainability. Theory, Policy and Practice, edited by M. R. Shirazi and R. Keivani, 125–148. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D., S. Carrasco, and K. Dovey. 2020. “Incremental Housing: Harnessing Informality at Villa Verde.” Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research 14 (3): 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1108/arch-10-2019-0237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallasmaa, J. 2006. Los ojos de la piel: la arquitectura y los sentidos. Barcelona: Editorial GG.
   Google Scholar
• Pallasmaa, J. 2022. Diseminaciones. Semillas para el pensamiento arquitectónico. Barcelona: Editorial GG.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. H., J. H. Kim, Y. M. Choi, and H. L. Seo. 2013. “Design Elements to Improve Pleasantness, Vitality, Safety, and Complexity of the Pedestrian Environment: Evidence from a Korean Neighbourhood Walkability Case Study.” International Journal of Urban Sciences 17 (1): 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2013.776283.
   Google Scholar
• Parolek, D. G., K. Parolek, and P. C. Crawford. 2008. Form Based Codes: A Guide for Planners, Urban Designers, Municipalities, and Developers. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, J. 2016. “The London Spikes Controversy: Homelessness, Urban Securitisation and the Question of ‘Hostile architecture’.” International Journal for Crime, Justice & Social Democracy 5 (1): 67–81. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i1.286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pow, C. P. 2009. “Neoliberalism and the Aestheticization of New Middle‐Class Landscapes.” Antipode 41 (2): 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00677.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto, A., and M. Oldenhave. 2021. “What Makes a façade Beautiful? Architects’ Perspectives on the Main Aspects That Inform Aesthetic Preferences in façade Design.” Journal of Facade Design and Engineering 9 (2): 21–46. https://doi.org/10.7480/jfde.2021.2.5540.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, A. D. 1994. “Local Architectural Language and Contextualism.” In Design Review: Challenging Urban Aesthetic Control, edited by B. C. Scheer and W. F. E. Preiser, 165–174. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Rezafar, A. 2023. “The Effect of Politics on the Formation of Urban Aesthetics, the Case of Iran.” Cities 132:104095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezafar, A., and S. S. Turk. 2023. “Path Dependency in Aesthetic Control Management within Turkish Planning History.” Planning Perspectives 38 (3): 643–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2022.2116350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, W. 2014. “Steps Toward Validity in Active Living Research: Research Design That Limits Accusations of Physical Determinism.” Health & Place 26:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.11.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, R. 2020. “Hostile Design and the Materiality of Surveillance.” In Relating to Things. Design, Technology and the Artificial, edited by H. Wiltse, 135–150. London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, J., and S. Lang. 2017. “Repurposing the High Line: Aesthetic Experience and Contradiction in West Chelsea.” City, Culture & Society 9:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2015.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Scruton, R. 1979. The Aesthetics of Architecture. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sklair, L. 2017. The Icon Project: Architecture, Cities, and Capitalist Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. F. 2005. Architecture in a Climate of Change. A Guide to Sustainable Design. Burlington: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Southworth, M., and E. Ben-Joseph. 2003. Streets and the Shaping of Towns and Cities. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spector, T. 2021. Architecture and the Public Good. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 2000. “New Urbanism and the Culture of Criticism.” Urban Geography 21 (4): 318–341. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.21.4.318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 2002. “The Social Goals of New Urbanism.” Housing Policy Debate 13 (1): 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2002.9521438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 2012. City Rules. How Regulations Affect Urban Form. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trovato, G. 2004. “La fachada como lugar en la arquitectura contemporánea.” PhDdiss, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Unwin, J. 2019. “Lighting for Reassurance.” In Urban Lighting for People. Evidence-Based Lighting Design for the Built Environment, edited by N. Davoudian, 56–74. London: RIBA Publising.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Task Force. 2003. Towards an Urban Renaissance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Venturi, R., D. Scott-Brown, and S. Izenour. 1972. Learning from Las Vegas: The Forgotten Symbolism of Architectural Form. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, B., P. Sullivan, and G. Palermo. 2000. Ethics and the Practice of Architecture. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V. 2014. “African urban fantasies: dreams or nightmares?” Environment & Urbanization 26 (1): 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247813513705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitfield, T. W. A. 2005. “Aesthetics as Pre-Linguistic Knowledge: A Psychological Perspective.” Design Issues 21 (1): 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1162/0747936053103002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, E. 2001. “Architecture.” In The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, edited by D. Lopes and B. Gaut, 519–530. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, E. 2002. “Art, Architecture and Their Public.” The Journal of Architecture 7 (4): 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360236032000040901.
   Google Scholar
• Zumelzu, A., and M. Barrientos-Trinanes. 2019. “Analysis of the Effects of Urban Form on Neighborhood Vitality: Five Cases in Valdivia, Southern Chile.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 34 (3): 897–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09694-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar