Paying to pollute? The calculation of environmental indicators in crematorium burden sharing schemes

References

• Ballestero, A. (2014). What is in a percentage? Calculation as the poetic translation of human rights. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 21(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.21.1.27
   Google Scholar
• Beer, D. (2015). Productive measures: Culture and measurement in the context of everyday neoliberalism. Big Data & Society, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715578951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, D. (2016). Metric power. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bernholf, R. (2012). Mercury toxicity and treatment: A review of the literature. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2012, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/460508
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• Brighenti, A. (2018). The social life of measures: conceptualizing measure–value environments. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276416689028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAMEO. (2021). Rules of the CAMEO burden sharing scheme. http://www.cameoonline.org.uk/scheme-rules/
   Google Scholar
• Colic-Peisker, V., & Flitney, A. (2017). The age of post-rationality: Limits of economic reasoning in the 21st century. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• The Control of Mercury (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations. (2019). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2019/96/contents/made
   Google Scholar
• The Control of Mercury (Enforcement) Regulations. (2017). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2017/1200/contents/made
   Google Scholar
• Day, S., Lury, C., & Wakeford, N. (2014). Number ecologies: Numbers and numbering practices. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(2), 123–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.923011
   Google Scholar
• Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs. (2004). Mercury emissions from crematoria – second consultation. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/pollution/ppc/old-consultations/crematoria-two/consultation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs. (2012). Statutory guidance for crematoria. https://www.cremation.org.uk/content/files/PG5-2%2812%29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs. (2017). A consultation on the proposed control of mercury (enforcement) regulations 2017. https://consult.defra.gov.uk/environmental-quality/control-ofmercuryenforcementregulations2017/supporting_documents/20171016%20Draft%20UK%20Mercury%20Regulations%2 0Consultati on%20Document.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (2002). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. (2017). Foucault and geometrics. In P. Bonditti, D. Bigo, & F. Gros (Eds.), Foucault and the modern international: Silences and legacies for the study of world politics (pp. 295–311). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. (2019). Speaking against number: Heidegger, language and the politics of calculation. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Environment Act. (2021). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2021/30/contents/enacted
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. (2015). Narrating numbers. In R. Rottenburg, S. E. Merry, S. J. Park, & J. Mugler (Eds.), The world of indicators: The making of governmental knowledge through quantification (pp. 56–75). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W., & Stevens, M. (2008). A sociology of quantification. European Journal of Sociology, 49(3), 401–436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975609000150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foden, M., Head, E., Katz-Gerro, T., & Martens, L. (2022). Environment or economy? Food concerns and sustainable food transitions in the UK. Sociology, 56(3), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385211043679
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2013). Lectures on the will to know. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrys, J. (2016). Practicing, materialising and contesting environmental data. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716673391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, R. (2014). Social barriers to biophilia: Merging structural and ideational explanations for environmental degradation. The Social Science Journal, 51(4), 681–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, R. (2015). Environmental sociology and the Frankfurt school 1: Reason and capital. Environmental Sociology, 1(3), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2015.1054022
   Google Scholar
• Guyer, J. (2014). Percentages and perchance: Archaic forms in the twenty-first century. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.920268
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (2003). Plato’s Sophist. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government UK. (2018). A green future: Our 25 year plan to improve the environment. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/25-year-environment-plan
   Google Scholar
• HM Government UK. (2019). The clean air strategy 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/clean-air-strategy-2019
   Google Scholar
• Hoeyer, K. (2009). Tradable body parts? How bone and recycled prosthetic devices acquire a price without forming a ‘Market’. BioSocieties, 4(2–3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855209990159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeyer, K. (2013). Exchanging human bodily material: Rethinking bodies and markets. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, L. (2020). Sociologies of personal relationships and the challenge of climate change. Sociology, 54(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519882599
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, S., & Sørensen, K. H. (2022). Numeric work: The efforts of calculation actors to make numbers count in climate and energy policy. Science & Public Policy, 50(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoll, L. (2019). Sustainable markets and the State: Taxation, cap-and-trade, pay-for-success, and nudging. Historical Social Research, 44(1), 231–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunertova, D. (2018). The ethics of burden sharing: When Canada talks about fairness, but actually counts benefits. Les ateliers de l’éthique, 13(3), 4–30. https://doi.org/10.7202/1061216ar
   Google Scholar
• Lansing, D. M. (2010). Carbon’s calculatory spaces: The emergence of carbon offsets in Costa Rica. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(4), 710–725. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansing, D. M. (2011). Realizing carbon’s value: Discourse and calculation in the production of carbon forestry offsets in Costa Rica. Antipode, 43(3), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00886.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansing, D. M. (2012). Performing carbon’s materiality: The production of carbon offsets and the framing of exchange. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippert, I. (2012). Carbon classified? Unpacking heterogeneous relations inscribed into corporate carbon emissions. Ephemera: Critical Dialogues on Organization, 12(1/2), 138–161.
   Google Scholar
• Lippert, I. (2016). Failing the market, failing deliberative democracy: How scaling up corporate carbon reporting proliferates information asymmetries. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716673390
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (2013). Das Kapital. Wordsworth Edition Limited.
   Google Scholar
• McElwee, P. (2017). The metrics of making ecosystem services. Environment and Society, 8(1), 96–124. https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2017.080105
   Google Scholar
• Newark and Sherwood District Council. (2018). Report of the CAMEO position for mercury abatement for mansfield & district crematorium for the period 2017. https://democracy.newark-sherwooddc.gov.uk/documents/s599/Item%204%20-%20CAMEO%20-%20Mercury%20Abatement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Olson, P. R. (2016). Knowing ‘Necro-Waste’. Social Epistemology, 30(3), 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2015.1015063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, T., & Shapiro-Garza, E. (2018). Embedding carbon markets: Complicating commodification of ecosystem services in Mexico’s forests. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1343657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., & Morgan, J. (2013). Short ‐term ethnography: Intense routes to knowing. Symbolic Interaction, 36(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polzer, T., Meyer, R. E., Höllerer, M. A., & Seiwald, J. (2016). Institutional hybridity in public sector reform: replacement, blending, or layering of administrative paradigms. In J. Gehman, M. Lounsbury, & R. Greenwood (Eds.), How institutions matter. Research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 69–99). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, D. (2020). The production of value in corpse disposal [ Doctoral dissertation]. University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Rottenburg, R., Merry, S. E., Park, S. J. & Mugler, J. (Eds.). (2015). The world of indicators: The making of governmental knowledge through quantification. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rumble, H. (2019). Ashes to ashes, rust to rust?: The recovery and recycling of orthopaedic implants post-cremation. In T. Kohn, M. Gibbs, B. Nansen, & L. van Ryn (Eds.), Residues of death (pp. 136–149). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rumble, H., Troyer, J., Walter, T., & Woodthorpe, K. (2014). Disposal or dispersal? Environmentalism and final treatment of the British dead. Mortality, 19(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2014.920315
   Google Scholar
• Verran, H. (2010). Number as an inventive frontier in knowing and working Australia’s water resources. Anthropological Theory, 10(1–2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499610365383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verran, H. (2013). Numbers performing nature in quantitative valuing. Nature Culture, 2, 23–37. https://doi.org/10.18910/75514
   Google Scholar