Reading in the Classroom and Beyond: Learning from Early Career English Teachers

References

• Arendt, H. (1954) 1976. Between Past and Future. New York, NY: The Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum: English. Accessed January 2024. https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au/teacher-resources/understand-this-learning-area/english.
   Google Scholar
• Ayers, W. 1993. To Teach: The Journey of a Teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belsey, C. 1980. Critical Practice. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D., and J. Sefton-Green. 1994. Cultural Studies Goes to School: Reading and Teaching Popular Media. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum Corporation. 1994. A Statement on English for Australian Schools. Carlton, VIC: Curriculum Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Docker, J. 1984. In a Critical Condition: Reading Australian Literature. Ringwood, VIC: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Doecke, B. 2019. “Rewriting the History of Subject English Through the Lens of ‘Literary Sociability’.” Changing English 26 (4): 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2019.1649116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doecke, B., and D. McClenaghan. 2011. Confronting Practice: Classroom Investigations into Language and Learning. Putney, NSW: Phoenix Education.
   Google Scholar
• Doecke, B., and P. Mead. 2018. “English and the Knowledge Question.” Pedagogy Culture & Society 26 (2): 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2017.1380691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doecke, B., and P. Mead. 2023a. “Crossing Institutional Boundaries, Negotiating a Professional Identity As an English Teacher.” In Literary Knowing and the Making of English Teachers: The Role of Literature in Shaping English Teachers’ Professional Knowledge and Identities, by L. McLean-Davies, B. Doecke, P. Mead, W. Sawyer and L. Yates, 197–211. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doecke, B., and P. Mead. 2023b. “Literary Sociability: Making Meaning in English Classrooms.” In Literary Knowing and the Making of English Teachers: The Role of Literature in Shaping English Teachers’ Professional Knowledge and Identities, by L. McLean-Davies, B. Doecke, P. Mead, W. Sawyer and L. Yates, 131–143. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duck, P. 2018. “Making Sense of Close Reading.” Changing English 25 (1): 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2017.1400375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, P. 2019. “‘An Invested Interest in Language’: Literary Practice in Secondary Classrooms.” Changing English 26 (2): 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2019.1584849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagleton, T. (1985) 1986. “The Subject of Literature.” Cultural Critique 2:95–104. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354202.
   Google Scholar
• Esson, L., F. D. Davison, M. Franklin, G. Ashton, B. Birtles, D. Birtles, N. Bartlett, et al. 1943. Australian Writers Speak: Literature and Life in Australia. Sydney and London: Angus & Robertson.
   Google Scholar
• Felski, R. 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frow, J. 1995. Cultural Studies & Cultural Value. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, P. 1987. “Post Reader-Response: The Deconstructive Critique.” In Readers, Texts, Teachers, edited by B. Corcoran and E. Evans, 234–250. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, P. 1989. Writing, Schooling, and Deconstruction: From Voice to Text in the Classroom. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hourd, M. (1949) 1968. The Education of the Poetic Spirit: A Study of Children’s Expression in the English Lesson. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• McLean-Davies, L., B. Doecke, P. Mead, W. Sawyer, and L. Yates. 2023. Literary Knowing and the Making of English Teachers: The Role of Literature in Shaping English Teachers’ Professional Knowledge and Identities. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, P., and B. Doecke. 2020. Pedagogy. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.1032.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, P., B. Doecke, and L. McLean Davies. 2020. “Contingencies of Meaning Making: English Teaching and Literary Sociability.” Australian Literary Studies 35 (2). https://doi.org/10.20314/als.00225a9681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meek, M. (1988) 2009. How Texts Teach What Readers Learn. Woodchester Stroud, Gloucestershire: Thimble Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moi, T. 2017. Revolution of the Ordinary: Literary Studies After Wittgenstein, Austin, and Cavell. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, W. 1992. A Post-Structuralist English Classroom: The Example of Ned Kelly. Carlton: Victorian Association for the Teaching of English.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, W. 1997. Critical Literacy in the Classroom: The Art of the Possible. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, V. (1954) 1980. The Legend of the Nineties. Carlton, VIC: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, A. 1992. “Individualism in English: From Personal Growth to Discursive Construction.” English Education 24 (2): 131–146.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. 1978. The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of a Literary Work. London and Amsterdam: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, M. 2020. “‘It Was a Pleasure to Read with Them’: Reflecting on Jane Eyre As a Class Reader.” Changing English 27 (4): 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2020.1807312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 57 (2): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teese, R. 2011. “The New Curriculum for English in Australia and Student Achievement Under the Old Curriculum: Understanding Inequality and Addressing it.” In Creating an Australian Curriculum for English: National Agendas, Local Contexts, edited by B. Doecke, G. Parr, and W. Sawyer, 5–20. Putney, NSW: Phoenix Education.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. 1987. Understanding Teenagers’ Reading: Reading Processes and the Teaching of Literature. Norwood, SA: Australian Association for the Teaching of English.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. 2004. “Uncritical Reading.” In Polemic: Critical or Uncritical, edited by J. Gallup, 13–38. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1958) 2001. “Culture Is Ordinary.” In The Raymond Williams Reader, edited by J. Higgins, 10–24. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953) 2001. Philosophical Investigations. The German Text with a Revised Translation. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Laden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L., L. McLean Davies, L. Buzacott, B. Doecke, P. Mead, and W. Sawyer. 2019. “School English, Literature and the Knowledge-Base Question.” The Curriculum Journal 30 (1): 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1543603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. 2008. Bringing Knowledge Back In: From Social Constructivism to Social Realism in the Sociology of Education. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., D. Lambert, C. Roberts, and M. Roberts. 2014. Knowledge and the Future School: Curriculum and Social Justice. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Zabka, T. 2016. “Literary Studies: A Preparation for Tertiary Education (And Life Beyond).” Changing English 23 (3): 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2016.1203618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar