Investigating the crash-box-structure’s ability to absorb energy

References

• Abdullah NAZ, Sani MSM, Salwani MS, et al. A review on crashworthiness studies of crash box structure. Thin-Walled Structures. 2020;153:106795. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.106795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe N, Vendrig R, Houtzager K. Improved design for frontal protection (No. 2001-06-0137). SAE Technical Paper. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Waller PF. Challenges in motor vehicle safety. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23(1):93–113. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140522.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koppel S, Charlton J, Fildes B, et al. How important is vehicle safety in the new vehicle purchase process? Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40(3):994–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.11.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlovic A, Fragassa C. General considerations on regulations and safety requirements for quadricycles. Int J Qual Res. 2015;9:657–674.
   Google Scholar
• Xu F, Zhang X, Zhang H. A review on functionally graded structures and materials for energy absorption. Eng Struct. 2018;171:309–325. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusof NSB, Sapuan SM, Sultan MTH, et al. Design and materials development of automotive crash box: a review. Ciênc e Tecnol Dos Mater. 2017;29(3):129–144. doi: 10.1016/j.ctmat.2017.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memane K, Mashalkar A, Kumar P. A review thin-wall-tube energy-absorbing structure: crash-box. J Phys Conf Ser. 2023;2426(1):012060. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2426/1/012060.
   Google Scholar
• Wesselmecking S, Kreins M, Dahmen M, et al. Material oriented crash-box design–combining structural and material design todoc_improve specific energy absorption. Materials & Design. 2022;213:110357. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Q, Zha Y, Dong B, et al. Structure design and multi objective optimization of CFRP/aluminum hybrid crash box. Polym Compos. 2020;41(10):4202–4220. doi: 10.1002/pc.25705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HC, Shin DK, Lee JJ, et al. Crashworthiness of aluminum/CFRP square hollow section beam under axial impact loading for crash box application. Compos Struct. 2014;112:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.01.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baratzadeh F, Tay YY, Patil S, et al. An experimental and numerical investigation into the dynamic crash testing of vehicle bumper fabricated using friction stir welding and gas metal arc welding. Int J Crashworthiness. 2014;19(4):371–384. doi: 10.1080/13588265.2014.904062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natarajan N, Joshi P, Tyagi RK. Design improvements of vehicle bumper for low speed impact. Mater Today Proc. 2021;38:456–465. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.212.
   Google Scholar
• Prabhaharan SA, Balaji G, Annamalai K, et al. Robust design assessment of automotive crash box structures through model order reduction. Int J Crashworthiness. 2023;28(2):256–269. doi: 10.1080/13588265.2022.2074937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel GM, Thambiratnam DP. Computer simulation and energy absorption of tapered thin-walled rectangular tubes. Thin Walled Struct. 2005;43(8):1225–1242. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2005.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirfendereski L, Salimi M, Ziaei-Rad S. Parametric study and numerical analysis of empty and foam-filled thin-walled tubes under static and dynamic loadings. Int J Mech Sci. 2008;50(6):1042–1057. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beik V, Fard M, Jazar RN. 2016). Crashworthiness of tapered beams in automotive application. In: Jazar R, Dai L, editors. Nonlinear approaches in engineering applications. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Koç M, Altan T. Prediction of forming limits and parameters in the tube hydroforming process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2002;42(1):123–138. doi: 10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00048-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross D, Ehlers W, Wriggers P, et al. 2016. Mechanics of materials-formulas and problems. Berlin: Springer. pp. 2–113.
   Google Scholar
• Kossakowski PG. Influence of initial porosity on strength properties of S235JR steel at low stress triaxiality. Arch Civil Eng. 2012;58(3):293–308. doi: 10.2478/v.10169-012-0017-9.
   Google Scholar
• Kossakowski PG. Simulation of ductile fracture of S235JR steel using computational cells with microstructurally-based length scales. J Theor Appl Mech. 2012;50(2):589–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minak G, Brugo T, Fragassa C, et al. Structural design and manufacturing of a cruiser class solar vehicle. J Vis Exp. 2019;143(143):e58525. doi: 10.3791/58525.
   Google Scholar
• Fragassa C, Pavlovic A, Minak G. On the structural behaviour of a CFRP safety cage in a solar powered electric vehicle. Compos Struct. 2020;252:112698. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minak G, Fragassa C, Vannucchi de Camargo F. A brief review on determinant aspects in energy efficient solar car design and manufacturing. In: Campana G, editor. Sustainable design and manufacturing 2017. SDM 2017. Smart innovation, systems and technologies. vol 68. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017. pp. 847–856.
   Google Scholar
• NACA 0024 airfoil. http://airfoiltools.com/airfoil/details?airfoil=naca0024-il.
   Google Scholar